with a loud, yes to say to the scandal, we are talking about the statement of the nato official styna jensen, who said that he actually spoke about ukraine's renunciation of part of its territories in exchange for joining the north atlantic alliance , as reported on the radio freedom in the press service of nato already said that it was a mistake and this gentleman should not have said that. and some say that it was his personal opinion and not the opinion of the entire alliance . how much do you think mr. st-anjensen could afford such a personal opinion? i want to remind everyone of the idea that his speech was somewhere in some peripheral city in norway, which i have never heard of, although i really like geography ot and it was published by one norwegian publication , well, far from the main ot and otse, and there is a reference to his words. actually, it is very good that he said such a thing because it is obvious that he heard such things being said about them somewhere. here he voiced them and ukraine immediately reacted to it, and considering that this is a middle-ranking employee , b

ukraine oleksiy danilov called the statement of the head of the staff of the nato secretary general styna jensenission the statement and adviser to the head of the office of the ukrainian president , mykhailo podolyak, to exchange the territory for the nato umbrella is strange, that is, to deliberately go to the defeat of democracy, the promotion of global the criminal, the conservation of the russian regime, the destruction of international law and the mandatory transfer of the war to another generation, because why should russia, without losing, voluntarily give up the provocation of hybrids of traditional behavior, it is obvious that if putin does not suffer anything and is defeated, the political regime in russia will not change, the war criminals will not be punished the war will definitely return with the increased appetites of russia continuing the conversation about the terms of the russian-ukrainian war here is another news and a quote the war does not end not until the end this year not until next spring, deputy prime minister and minister of reintegration of the temporarily occupied t

seemingly strange statement by the spokesman or head of the staff of the nato secretary general styna jensen that one of the decisions that can be made when ukraine joins nato is that ukraine will concede part of the territory of russia, the occupied part of the occupied part will be given to russia , of course the north atlantic alliance already said that this was a false statement, of course this stian jensen had no right to say such a thing at the panel discussion, and even more so to comment there would be some lands to give to whom, but today there were more interviews with former french president nicolas sarkozyk and he said that crimea is historically russian territory, its inhabitants consider themselves to be talking about its return to ukraine as an illusion do you assume that volodymyr, what is the west promoting the topic of ukraine's accession to nato in exchange for the already occupied territories, well, that is , when publications about this begin to actively appear in the western press, an absolutely logical question arises, are these not the test layers that they are trying