the building code section truly about the restrictions and what you do this is a free document to submittal no cost from the city as we go through that you'll see other things the deadline for the scope is 2015 for some reason the document is not 134i78d please let us you know in theory if you don't submittal that the department of building inspection will give a notice of violations and or sftv.org you, you want us to do a site inspection you can send a dvd again do worry about the address and things like that it will be available it on the website two location sftv.org back slash e extensive is part of the administration bulletin for the private schools again on the website we'll you work u walk you through the process we know that most engineers when it comes the evaluation use the template it is user friendly we don'ts o see those as harp the first section does this replace another report yes or no the scope document maybe filled out incorrectly we'll work you you about it you send it in a second time we'll document that we want the school name and address and the block and lock number

no further continuances beyond that any additional submittals briefing and it will have to be submitted tomorrow. >>

no further continuances beyond that any additional submittals briefing and it will have to be submitted tomorrow. >> if there's a solution we'll give them more time to preserve that meeting. >> okay. >> that's it. >> if there's a solution we'll give them more time to make themselves viable and okay mr. pacheco. >> we have a motion on the floor on to continue those matters until march 25th one week no additional briefings allowed for further negotiation between the parties on that motion to continue one week. >> commissioner fung commissioner vice president honda commissioner wilson thank you. the vote is 4 to zero those matters are continued until march 25th. >> okay. thank you before i call the next item i want to make sure that the appellant is in the room ms. mary so i'm calling item 8 melody versus the zoning administrator the property on hodge's alley protesting the rear yard variance to construct a third-story side addition on the first story and second-story floor that encroaches into the rear yard we'll start with ms. mar. >> i've been hired that i reuben, junius & rose so i fee

spring break no one will be here that's one less week to work on version. >> can we add when we submittal that the board had been month to month on april 14th. >> i'm sorry director lee. >> thank you commissioner president murase that's fine commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell for us to say a little bit more than there's will be an amendment to say the timing exactly so i think that is not he'll done i want to say in terms of what happened the superintendent alludes to now and the 14th alike lecturer what i've heard we had a lot of boos to construct and modify the plan it is less clear at least to me what amendments would make sense based on the feedback that was provided tonight we heard questions we can follow-up open the additional

spring break no one will be here that's one less week to work on version. >> can we add when we submittal that the board had been month to month on april 14th. >> i'm sorry director lee. >> thank you commissioner president murase that's fine commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell for us to say a little bit more than there's will be an amendment to say the timing exactly so i think that is not he'll done i want to say in terms of what happened the supe

sponsored with the san francisco park alliance i know i don't have a lot of time i'll safe the date the submittal is october 10th in sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us young kohlman park if it radiance i'll be working with the principle and we'll be hosting at the willie brown school thank you. >> thank you very much next item thank you all for coming out today and for 40 our public comment the next agenda we've completed item k l is special order of business public hearing and adaptation of the items i now call the public hearing to a tentative agreement to the united presence of the united states and canada local 38 unit union of allied workers and shop hands local 66 and national local one hundred four and 377 and the earth metal and glass workers local 17 and teamsters local 153 and local 776 and machinist the common craft may i have have month to month. >> mr. superintendant can i ask the director to please present and commend him on the color choices of his tie (laughter). >> thank you. superintendent board are the requested action the board of education of the s

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection. register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifyi purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving pars3 my name is john avalos, the chair, joined to my left by supervisor london breed and to my right vice chair cynthia cruz and also joined by lindo lafco commissioner. madam clerk. >> please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic quieses. any copies of documents to be included in the file should be submitted to the clerk. >> thank you very much. let's go to our second item. roll call? >> i can do roll call. >> commissioner avalos, present. commissioner breed, breed present. commissioner cam poes is absent. cruz is present. lindo is present. commissioner mar is present. mr. cha

guess the last couple of the 17 years been working with me he trying to get before you we provided a submittal that is complete in going through the things you've heard from the planning department george is here i'm going to turn it over to warren to show you the project i'm aware there's been questions asked perhaps amongst users that is better to respond to what we might hear from the members of the public or questions after you get the presentation thank you. >> warner. >> i'd like to talk about the architecture of the building first talk about it's context when we look at this particular site it is important site in many ways a wonderful location it's one of the 6 gore sites in the market octavia plan that has the educate characterization of the three-way intersection it's a tiny sight only 35 hundred square feet of area while the site is very, very important if the 85 foot we in the area two open market octavia we looked at the overall site in the surrounding blocks there are not a lot of clues in the architecture except this area is called the market street masonry discontiguous area th

. >> hi i'm tiffany i thought there were rules on submittal of exhibits i did not get to review their exhibit i couldn't read it not guilty in the plumber is reputable the plumb i had come out is licensed and with a great reputation when the shower doors on and the toilet in the space that was in there was not enough clearance that's that. >> i don't understand how? why? they're asking for an appeal board unanimously voted to keep the permit in its current it uphold the permit i don't understand why we're here and if dbi or the board of appeals has the ability to grandfather the bathroom in i'll put a fixture toilet and sink back in there whether or not we have an additional one plump swais says one thing and another plump another thing i know there's a pipe i feel like when you on the walls there's a huge issue with unforeseen unpermitted and illegal issues if i was to legalize the bathroom it will cost me on amount of money i don't have that in my budget that's the bottom line i did not take the bathroom out to disrupt their lives they made a complaint that's all i have to say thank

originally issued in 2011 proposed the staircase in a location not requiring a firewall following the submittal of the discretionary review the identical design team reviewed the issue and . >> snow unusual circumstances in the proposed firewall will not impact the dr light and air they recommend it not take dr and approve as proposed. >> thank you dr requester. >> yes. we prepared a passage for the commissioners. >> great. >> good afternoon, commissioners my name is tom i'm one the owners on waller street with my wife and housemate pamela we want to give you a history the project was initiated in the fall of 2011 right about that time our house caught fire and burned down we were out of position for a couple of years while the project move forward we got no notification that project was going to be put forth by the gentleman we've checked the radius as many list my name is not on it we had no idea that was going forward and this wall would be built facing our backyard the variance was granted in 2011 and the variance stated in order to comply that the gentleman needed to meet the city codes th

>> the way it works they inspect on a daily basis and weekly they're to submittal to dph we've reviewed those to the public records assess and got about two weeks' worth of requests and none of the check lists were signed they didn't have enough information and seemed like they were not up to standards probation officer that would be like an independent evaluation we're working with dph but again concerns to make sure it is being properly watched and all the dust rules are enforced. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good morning, commissioners i'm dr. is there any public comment? kins it was my last time i had the privilege of speaking before you that the city was supposed to prepare a presentation to the commissioners therefore if the city has presented a presentation i'll defer my presentation to you so that i don't waste the commissioners time open regurt issues on the report so up defer that the city is property presented my fellow city colleague have appointments i'll go last in the presentation and defer to my colleagues in that thank you. >> so mr. secretary do

i'll submittal this into the secretary for your consumption we want or went through point by point to the committee and one of the appalling aspects is affordability does affordability who does what when and who is in authority in our first meeting lamar simpleminded it and all of a sudden the chart got off bay and no one of the city staff respond we took them on that tour to face-to-face find out who is responsible for what when we called and submitted in writing our concerns we've not received it took andrew and the golden state law school to get the data and the data is partial it is incomplete here is a copy two copies i don't bring everything it would be about this big implicitly i didn't want to - this is a sample i ran a hospital as an undergrad the important thing i'm prep blood for transfusion is the chain of command that is a report typed out everyone and you have different people plus here on the signature page no signature on any of them not one you can't if you were at the hospital i cannot give you a unit of blood in any certified lab you can't issue out this report magi

uncomfortable voting i'm open in fact i'll support another conversation and trust the superintendant to submittal in proposal with the good intentions and add american people amendment or a final budget later but not interested in entertaining this at this point so i know it is seconded this is my comment we can take it for a full vote. >> can i ask for clarity the proposal and for clarity also turf there's .4 if in the piece around the pathway down to .2 under the proposal not completely - >> no, it's not a limit it takes to .4. >> i asked for .2. >> yes. it takes it to .2. >> but earlier, you said there was a .2 for the elementary schools so where's the additional .2 it is originally .4. >> overwhelmingly .4. >> i thought it was originally .2 you said - >> trying to move from the world language was originally .2 the tagalog filipino pathway was a .2 i wanted to move the .2 up to the tagalog filipino packet that's the remaining .2 fte for the world language placement for the elementary level but i also mentioned you were concerned about capacity and under the multi entry points for world languag

. >> can we add when we submittal that the board had been month to month on april 14th. >> i'm sorry director lee. >> thank you commissioner president murase that's fine commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell for us to say a little bit more than there's will be an amendment to say the timing exactly so i think that is not he'll done i want to say in terms of what happened the superintendent alludes to now and the 14th alike lecturer what i've heard we had a lot of boos to construct and modify the plan it is less clear at least to me what amendments would make sense based on the feedback that was provided tonight we heard questions we can follow-up open the additional questions but in terms of of version 3.0 and how it differs from 2.0 but speaking for myself didn't hear clear direction to you know that we should move in a certain direction on certain line items there were comments made and individual commissioners but it's less clear what modifications will be made than last week our main direction or follow-up to answer our questions and maybe that will illuminate things but as far as the b

community to submit bids we do have a requirement that bids be advertised at least 30 days with the submittal meetings at least 2 weeks before the bids are due. that's not to say that we are not going to push it earlier to allow time for folks to submit their bids. we have a requirement of a minimum of 30 days. >> okay. thank you. okay i have no other questions. any other questions, comments? >> yeah, i think i like the projects and this thing could be ironed out and we should not delay this. i think we should approve it. >> i agree. i think that the sooner they move forward with the project, the sooner they will be housing and it's a critical demand, but i also want more information. i would rather have contemporaneous information rather than delayed information because delayed information is looking in hindsight rather than anticipating. that's where the mayor's office of housing comes in. i don't think there is any impediment to continue this reporting on what's going on. in other words we don't have to have a commission meeting to get memos from staff. >> just to add, overall we've all be

having cost over runs and we are to some degree yanked around by caltrans with designs and the extra submittals but our hand was forced and they changed design standards and required information they didn't tell us about before and then you get a new set of review ares and new demand and there is nothing you can do except do it as quickly and efficiently as we can and that's the goal of finishing this project as quickly and as efficiently as we can and i am hopeful we don't find more things in the ground and this will more than cover our needs. the lead material aside and giving you back money at the end or not expending all of the money that is allotted. >> thank you. >> commissioner mondejar. okay. is there a motion? >> i was just going to ask a question of our director. so hearing that tiffany you hear my concern of over runs and costs because this is the people's money. it's not our money. it belongs to the folks and i think you share that as you stated. maybe some of our partners that we have chosen to partner with, you know, need to understand that as well. i would love your thoughts on i

necessarily offset that whole thing with it there other big drug that uf got to go out and buy submittals. erik: that is why i asked, could we see what happened to cancer drugs what happens with hep c drugs? drew: it is becoming a big issue. big organizations are saying we need to talk about cost with our patients now. they can be a major cause of bankruptcy. just take a lot of stuff that at seven and seven at upcoming you don't have a choice because you have cancer --adds up and as dds up, you don't have the choice because rough cancer. the therapy a lot of times is unique compared to other commoditized things. i don't think we are there yet and that is why people are willing to pay premium. stephanie: drew, thank you so much. erik: coming up, the best-performing exchange company in the world. you will hear from the ceo of the lse group. stephanie: stressed out -- banks are waiting to find out today how they did on those all-important said stress tests. ♪ stephanie: welcome back to "market makers." i am stephanie ruhle, with of the world's greatest partner erik schatzker. the european ce

throughout state compliance plans that are submitted to the epa for review and approval with initial submittals beginning in 2016. does the epa plan to require initial state plans in 2016? >> for many. we've also provided opportunities for longer periods of time if states are looking at doing things that require legislative approval like interstate agreements. we are trying to be flexible and we certainly need a signal in 2016 that the states are making a commitment to a path moving forward. and we've tried to define what that would look like in the plan itself. >> so under the unfunded mandates reform act you're required to estimate the burden on states to develop that plan. do you guys -- do you have an estimate of how much it will cost states to develop these plans? and can you supply those estimates? >> we actually have asked in this budget proposal for $25 million to support that activity to states. which is hopefully going to send a signal that if we want to get this done we need to work together and we also need to support the efforts of the states in moving this forward. but states are