submittals are to the capital planning committee, the cpc. those are in advance of the operating budget. they're vetted through the separate committees independent of the overall budgets and then they both develop various funding scenarios, levels of funding and those funded under the scenarios and work with the mayor's budget office to come with a budget number and depending on that budget number, it would be funded and proposed as part of the mayor's overall budget on june 1st. so last year as part of the two year budget, we had two years of capital funding, the current year and the next year, the first year of looking at here. this is what we're currently funded this year, approximately 3.4 million and currently in the budget next year but will be reevaluated, general facility maintenance, specialized focus scope projects and in addition, some planning funds that go to future planning for the easter program, those are eventually reimbursed but can get the departments ahead as far as planning efforts. some of the current capital initiates w

the department's budget submittal is due on the 21st. june 1st is when the mayor's office submits a balanced budget to the board. budget hearings in june and july at the board. and then briefly, i wanted to touch on the conversion, just highlighting some of the documentation i provided to you. back earlier the city converted from the legacy system, so that's been a big adjustment for everybody. we're completely on the new system but there's been some issue with reporting and coding, and as the budget was transferred over, there's been no document changes, but you'll notice a lot of the coding and information has changed. there has been a complete overhaul of the coding and reporting system. the initial documentation to the commission is reduced from what's been provided in previous years, but i anticipate that being resolved by the second meeting that we have. and then just kind of highlighting the overview of what has been provided to you in your packets. it's just the overview of the base budget. so last year's process, the department

we're available for questions and the city is here to present the phase submittal. >> president hillis thank you. welcome. >> good afternoon, president hillis, and staff. happy 2018. so, out of respect for your time, i know you have a busy schedule. i'll try to go through high level overview of the first phase of the project quickly. i think the exciting thing to mention is given the conversation you were just having about the time frames for the master plan projects, we're hopefully going to be under construction in the next 2-3 months, which i don't know, i haven't gone back and looked back in the record, but it's possible that it could be the fastest from project approval to beginning of construction for a project master plan development project. what i want to do is walk through the principles of the phasing that in particular the first phase. i'm going to focus on the first phase. if you have questions on that, i'm happy to go into that after i conclude. there is obviously already a transitioning neighborhood, the american industrial center has been experiencing significant activi

>> they made a number of changes to their application with the december 26, 2017 submittal. the data sharing they were suggesting a different way that wouldn't allow us to access the data. they were some of the lab testings related to the safety of the bicycles and insurance requirements they did not submit as well. it was revived substantially but still did not meet all requirements. >> supervisor safai waiting patiently. >> it's been good to listen and have the settlement agreement in front of me. the real problem i have with all of this is it seems like it start started with an outcome you tried to back your way into it. this is the problem when have you an exclusive monopoly for one group and that's fine, that was negotiated 2015. but here we are very with one company with technology with removing from private spaces and since then the technology has changed rapidly and there's multiple companies doing this around the world not only in the public right of way but sidewalk. one question i have is how many of the other companies doing stationless bikes are electric? >> cur

following the submittal of the dr request, the residential advisory team reviewed it in light of the dr request, and recommended the project be revised such that a side set back be provided at the second and third floors of the addition to match the side set back at the rear of the dr requester's house. the residential design advisory team also recommended that the massing in the area of the third floor deck be reduced to minimize impacts to light for the dr requester's property. the project sponsor subsequently revised the project recommended by the design viezory team, and these are reflected in your design revision packets. it should be noted that the concerns raised by the dr requester -- planning department recommends the commission not take dr and approve the project as revised. that concludes my presentation. >> dr requester. >> good evening. thank you for taking the time. we also thank the planning commission for allowing this venue to allow us to present our concerns, because there was seemingly no compromise with the onset of this expansion unless directed by the city. as h

we have some applications where certainly the basic submittal requirements are met. people submit proofs of residency, id and things like that. we do our sort of deep dive and scrutinizing of that application. everything checks out. everything looks clean and it's easier to approve. we have situations where we want more documentation or a site visit. there could be individual circumstances of individual applications aside from any sort of pending application backlog. just plain by the nature we have questions and they take longer to get through and approve or in some cases denied. >> supervisor breed: thank you. i just wanted clarity on that. those are my two outstanding issues at this time. as i mentioned in my opening comment, if we are going to make changes in any way to this law, i do want to make sure that we have the appropriate data to do so. so, what would also be helpful, you know, i understand and respect and appreciate the feedback from members of the public, specifically those who have to wait some time for their application to be processed. but i also ju

this is phase 1 submittal. the board of supervisors approved the amendment related to the project in september, 2017. as related to the special use district for the project, the board of supervisors approved hearings to the historic commission and planning commission. these are required for the approval of the port of san francisco. each highlights the scope of work undertaken by the developer relative to the disposition and development agreement that was entered into by the board of supervisors. the phase one submittal includes the rehabilitation of building 2 and 12, infrastructure, construction of 3.4 acres of new park and open space. and preparation of the development paths for new residential and commercial development. this concludes my presentation. i'm available for any questions, along with david book from the port. >> good afternoon, commissioners, and president wolfram. happy 2018. may 2018 be a prove in the right direction for everybody. sorry. >> i think we fixed that mike earlier. [laughter] >> pr

some of the key things we looked for and happy to provide more detail on that or the application submittal itself if that's of interest. >> how did you know jump was the best company for san francisco? >> they were the first company to meet our requirements and we wanted to proceed cautiously with the program and not issue a large number of permits. >> you didn't do a comparative analysis with the other companies so how can you discern one is better than the other when you don't take into consideration the others? the other companies application materials were also reviewed. >> but they didn't know the criteria. >> the requirements meeting all 47 permit requirements or whatever was in there those were shared with all companies and they were all aware of those requirements. i think my point is they didn't know you'd only approve e-bikes. it's a little bit flawed and unfair. >> i just want to get on the record or clarify, were other companies notified, yes or no there was a requirement to have e-bikes? at the same time? they were all given the same requirement at the same time and would not

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www. >> we think over 50 thousand permanent residents in san francisco eligible for citizenship by lack information and resources so really the project is not about citizenship but really academy our immigrant community. >> making sure they're a part of what we do in san francisco the san francisco pathway to citizenship initiative a unique part of just between the city and then our 5 local foundations and community safe organizations and it really is an effort to get as many of the legal permanent residents in the san francisco since 2013 we started reaching the san francisco bay area resid

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www. benedict. >> we're back in session and we'll now go to item nine which is discussion of the enforcement report and discussion on various program highlights and various activity since the last monthly meeting. >> thank you, chair. we had a productive month. received nine new complaints. we opened 11 new investigations, and we dismissed 23 complaints which put a significant dent in our outstanding preliminary review matters. the details for which i can -- oh, no, i have it in here. 58 complaints only remain in preliminary review. so when we started this process, when we were down all inve

over allegedly racist twitter posts as though many came now explains the lawyer for no a back away submittal time in setting out his client's reaction to the comments that were posted on twitter by the alternative for germany a member of the german parliament meyer mr becker's lawyer says that his client believes that it was a racist comment and he is seeking legal redress he is suing mr maher but also in a civil sense but also seeking a criminal investigation to be made into the comment posted on the account of yens meyer the point to make here is mr meyer says that the post was made by a colleague of his his and that the comment has been deleted another thought is though the issue of race and how the alternative for germany party is dealing with it this is not the first instance in the car past week or so in which the issue of race race has been raised by elements inside the alternative for germany party they are tricks from stalk a leading member of parliament over the new year period referred to in terms that others have believed to be disparaging about islam and about members about musl

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection.re required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifyi purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving ♪ >> welcome to hamilton recreation and aquatics center. it is the only facility that has an integrated swimming pool and recreation center combined. we have to pools, the city's water slide, for little kids and those of you that are more daring and want to try the rockslide, we have a drop slide. >> exercises for everybody. hi have a great time. the ladies and guys that come, it is for the community and we really make it fun. people think it is only for those that play basketball or swim. >> i have been coming to the pool for a long time now. it is nice, they are sweet. >> in t

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www.you. >> today, i wanted to kickoff and welcome you to the first every family well forum (clapping.) >> compromising is carmen chu currently which this of the family forum we put this event dough went to a lot of community meetings and we're he and she about families worries and troubles aaron planning for the future and ahsha safai for buying a home and college and retirement and for many of the seniors how to passing on their prompts to their kids. >> the family forum benefits throughout san francisco i'm supervisor norman yee representing district 7 people are homeowners fritter buyers

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittalmployees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www. >> good morning and welcome to the treasure island mobility management agency meeting of december 12th. mr. clerk, can you call the roll? >> clerk: commissioner breed, breed absent. commissioner cohen. present. commissioner farrell, absent. commissioner fewer absent. commissioner kim. present. commissioner peskin. present. commission commissioner ronen absent. commissioner safai present. commissioner yee, present we have a co have quorum. >> we have a motion to excuse commissioner fewer and seconded by commissioner yee. >> motion to excuse commissioner breed. >> we'll take this motion fir

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www. an -- welcome to members of ocii and the public. madam secretary, please call the first item. >> thank you. first order of business is item one, roll call. commission members please respond when i call your name. [roll call taken] >> all members of the commission are present. the next order of business is item two, announcements. next regularly scheduled meeting held on february 6, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. at city hall room 416. b, announcement of prohibition of sound producing electronic devices during the meeting. please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar s

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www. up early to watch this, we thank you. we know that this will be played at subsequent times for others to be able to see what we are doing here. okay. also, the president is going to join us. she's the -- a commissioner of this committee. >> this is to address the infrastructure and transportation and that do not appear on the agenda. in addition to public comment, public comment will be held on each item on the agenda. >> there northeast public comment. >> i'm no. 3, consent agenda. all matters listed here under a constituted consent agenda are considered to be routine by the committee

but we'll come to you at subsequent meetings to discuss thoughts and get feedback prior to budget submittal next month. on the 9th, just yesterday, the deputy chiefs and i met with one of our employee groups, rescue. lgbtq employee group, to just engage, talk about some of the issues they wanted to discuss and just update where the department is, goals for 2018, so forth. on january 15th, monday is a holiday but many of us will be in the martin luther king march starting at 11:00 a.m. at the cal tran station and this follows the meeting on the 24th but on the 26th, if anyone is interested, station five and you'll get at the next meeting deputy chief nicholson's report where she'll talk about work with the puc, some of us are meeting with them on awss issues, different options. i believe there's a hearing for awss- -- president cleaveland, your concerns and points. but on the 26th station five will have the topping off ceremony, basically when the steel has -- the steel completion of the project. that's our division two house. many of us will be there at 1:00 p.m. we'll provide you further d

that would include the 66 classifications that are identified in the submittal. within that, there are many s subclassifications, many, and ten classifications unique to the city and county of san francisco adopted by the board of supervisors, gathered data from the appropriate labor organizations, collective bargaining agreements and collected those for approval as the prevailing wage provisions for those classifications. >> supervisor yee: no questions, any public comments on this item? seeing none, public comment is now closed. a motion, please. >> supervisor tang: make motion to send to the full board for recommendation. >> clerk: i believe the budget analyst has a report on this item. >> supervisor yee: you know, i was not trying to ignore you, but yes, go ahead. >> good morning, supervisor yee, supervisor tang, the impact of this on the city in terms of the prevailing wage rates would really depend on the negotiated amount in contracts going forward. we do point out that the administrative code requires the civil service commission to propose these wage rat

in 2014 as we understand, the permit submittals came as a result of a new owner from 2002. so 12 years later, somehow magically that planning approval stayed in place. that planning approval was sent to restore and retain -- i'm trying to think of the right word, preserve the existing northeast and west facades. so in winter 2014, the neighbors began to complain in the early winter of 2015, a neighbor said the front wall of the building which was to be preserved was hanging in space. this call came to d.b.i. so the investigative process we saw moments ago would have had d.b.i. on site and planning notified that this permit is now suspended, notice of violation, stop work. no. no. no. the building -- the contractor told the building department it was rotten and needed to be taken down. the building department took it upon themselves to keep every permit application submitted after that fact to themselves. joe duffy took one of them in. a permit to alter a building that is going to remove all the framing and he didn't catch that -- it went to the building departme department

whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www.

i have a diagram here, which is also in the brief that i submitt submitted. if we could show that, please. it shows a plan view and an elevation view of this area of the project which projects onto the elevation where the windows in mrs. mcateer's building fall. two of them are a story above the height of this firehall. the lower tier is interrupted by the fire wall that comes about one-third of the way up the height of the windows and it's five feet. her windows are five feet distant from the property line, which i believe is an extreme, little bit of an extreme statement to say that deprives those windows of light and air. i also think procedurally, this is something that was observed and commented on and discussed the last time we came before this board. i don't believe it's legitimate grounds for an appeal. i'm gonna give the rest of my time to the building owner. >> thank you. reza ansari, the building owner. just to refresh everyone's memory on the history of this project. this is the fourth meeting. 2005 we were here in front of you with discussions wi

has evaluated how the project would affect existing businesses and residents in the area and their submittal. the project is not currently displacing any resident as the site is existing -- or tenants as the site is an abandoned gas station. the project sponsor's analysis concludes that the project is supplying housing which is in heidi manned across the city, and that the project will not exact demographic changes occurring in the mission, nor will it cause direct or indirect displacement. although the project sponsor concurs that no residents are being displaced because of the project, demographic changes in the city have been occurring of independent whether development is occurring or not, and it is unclear if the construction is tracting new upper household projects that would occur without the project. this is described in the section general plan compliance of the attached draft conditional use authorization motion. conversely, the project is in potential conflict with the mission area plan, pdr retention and development objective due to the loss of the gas station and potential lot o

it illustrates the practice of unlawful demolition by serial permitting, submittal of plans, et cetera, et cetera, as we just saw from many examples. 841 chestnut is one of the most egregious in terms of the importance of the loss of the building, the level of intervention and audacity of the demolition, this development illustrates incentives for developers to do illegal work for great financial gain at little risk of penalty. you may recall that the property was purchased in 2012 for $4.5 million and was appraised at a value of $30.2 million in 2016. finally, i'll mention that we believe there is a historic cottage on this site, but in what condition we don't know. i believe that -- and supporters are trying to have an inspection organized -- we ask that the commission take action to better protect its city's historic buildings and welcome your comments on how the department intends to do that, thank you. >> president hillis: thank you, next speaker, please. >> good afternoon president hillis, members of the commission, i'm an architect here in the city. i would like to further addre