so we are currently with the general manager, reviewing all these submittals and again that will take us through december, through mid-december for us to be able to finalize and package up to present to you in january. as noted here, we had a number of meetings over the past few months, we had six baseline review meetings, which we started the whole process by discussing our current service levels so what are we doing today, how does that compare, are we meeting our service levels, are we exceeding them, not exceeding them, falling short. that was helpful for the general manager to understand as a precursor what potential gaps exist and to make sense of what the potential budget submittals might look like. then we've also had ten separate budget steering committee meetings to review not only operating budget strategy but how are we going to approach staffing, how are we going to approach certain program growth and that sort of thing, as well as peer review of all the agm's operating budget submittals. the meetings have been long and interesting as we worked through all the details but

and so did get the submittals in. and did inform us they will be assisting those businesses that are office space. the legacy program so we're in our final stage of selecting so we'll have a decision done by the end of week and be able to inform you on that for the plaques. then we're in the new position for the legacy business program is making its way through the approval process through h.r. and the budget office. couple things i wanted to bring to your attention is that the sfmta is going through a whole new look and potential revision to the curb color management. i wanted to bring that to your presentation. if you'd like a presentation we'll work to schedule that. there's a congestion pricing advisory committee meet from external stakeholders and internal. so for the external stakeholders the sfcdma mario magonom is on that committee but i do think it's probably advisable we ask for updates to be presented to the commission as well. so if you would like that, let me know. and we can start scheduling those update

submittal 6,000 a year. 20,000 permits that are starting and routes through the department of publicworks. when we think about all of these i am going line by line with staff to understand how every step works and how it will work in the new world to figure out how will step by step work electronically? it is complimentary. what does it mean? moving from the paper based to an electronic based system to provide huge efficiency to standard review comments. never will we have a loss of plans. it enables the departments to do that communication and collaboration they want to be doing. there is cost savings and environmental improvements by moving in this direction. this is a great example where the team can have benefit. we have 15 departments that need involved in this. there is no way a department like d.b.i. producing so much work per year could take this month. we are out of contracting i am happy to report. we have procured blue beam which is what the private standard partners are using to review and market plans. sfo is using this for two years and there are many localities moving

it allows us to ballet written submittal from the development proposals along with an oral interview and that allows them to bring out elements of it that we might not look at. in the selection process we talked about this and it's which of the proposals we received that meet the minimum qualifications and we'll do that and that's our homework. we contact with a third party consultant to look at financial technical feasibility of the proposals. the scoring panel will convene and it will review the proposals and review the consultant report and score the responses, we come back to the port commission twice. the first time is informational item only. we'll present the section you tive summaries of the scoring panel processes and produce the results of the scoring panel and it's an opportunity for the teams themselves to give a short presentation at this informational hearing. then, the second commission meeting will be an action item and we would request the authorization to enter an exclusive negotiating agreement with the recommended proposals. and on that, this is also a snapshot of

industrialised countries to to ask them to do that i mean these countries are island nations are the lowest submitters and yet they're feeling the impacts of climate change most another issue like i said is the carbon markets so that is particularly controversial environmentalist argue the carbon markets aren't going to help at all and that it takes away from the idea of the parts agreement to just reduce carbon dioxide emissions and there's this this argument that's going to take place negotiations and we'll see what comes out of non the united states has pulled out of the cold but china is still in and china is an absolute terms the biggest emitter off carbon dioxide emissions is it taking enough action will china is one of the countries that is going to meet its target. possibly early so that is something that's obviously positive from them they're also the largest developer of renewable energy in the world so there's definitely something in their favor but the problem is that their targets are just too low and if they continue the way that they're going we're still going to see that global tempera

i hope we can submitter comments to the record. we engage in fund-raising. we have been successful in raising approximately $1 million annually to provide the wraparound services and level of staffing required to truly serve the underserved community of the bayview. this is not a liability. it is an asset for stu sfusd ths why they come to enroll. they want services we provide. one purpose mobilizes individuals and foundations to invest in future success of bayview students as evidenced in the letters of support written to you. we work to expand the donor base each year to provide school year programs, wraparound behavioral services and family engagement and learning events the community would otherwise not receive. >> good evening. i am david allen, business manager at one purpose school. in terms every serve the ending fund values start at $478,862 for the 1920 year and increase to 6 82,00 82,000 4. this is between 18 to 19% of expenses. the california department of education has rated one purpose in good condition with healthy reserves under their physica

prior to the submittal of the application, the sponsor conducted a preapplication meeting with the department of building inspection and fire department to ensure it was fees building from a technical and safety standpoint. they signed preapplication meeting notes stating it was feasible. the project sponsor will provide further specifics on the safety measures taken given the limited access. additionally, full review of the project by d.b.i. and fire would occur after the potential planning approval. this would ensure no construction occurs until d.b.i. and the fire department have fully vetted the project of any concerns. since the publication of the case report, the department received 25 letters of opposition detailing concerns about the address, density, safety and environmental impact of the project. on balance, the department finds the project to be compatible with the general plan and necessary and desirable for the city and recommends approval with conditions. while the lot presents challenges, the project maximizes density and is designed with the residential guidelines, creating mi

i would like to leave over-the-counter permits alone until we see it is working with submittal permits first. this turn and is working well. it is important not to disrupt that. we have been talking about it behind-the-scenes start with big then medium. then get to otc when they work well and staff is comfortable. i can tell you when we get to that eventually, and i am not sure on the timeframe. when we get to that i like the idea of starting with it being all in person so you are home, you know you want to apply because of the great communication to tell you, and you go and you go to the city's website, fill out the basic information and submit your plans. it is a question if that city website tool will be integrated with pts or if they will need to move them from where they go into a blue beam. then you need to come in. when the plans are quality controlled while you get there, you will walk around from station to station and give a project id. that is every project created. i think that is the way to go. moving the slow pilot in testing. i have heard there is a future state of the w

request the couourt to reme in thee from its list alteternative to reject the provisional measures s submitte. amy: during the international court hearings, the former nobel peace prize winnerer repeatedly tried to deny y the burmese military has carried o out gegenocide against the muslim rohingya, althouough she never once used the word "rohingya" during her speeches. the burmese military killed and raped thousands of rohingya and forced more than 700,000 to flee into neighboring bangladesh in a brutal army crackdown in 2017. in india, police killed at least two protesters amid massive demonstrations against the citizenship amendment bill, which many have denounced as a major step toward the official marginalization of india's 200 million muslims. the upper house of parliament has passed the highly controversial legislation, which provides a path to citizenship for immigrants from afghanistan, bangladesh, and p pakistan -- unleless they are e muslim. ththe government has also arresd hundreds of protesters, cut off internet access, imposed curfews in parts of northeast india amid ongoing pro

preparation of written proponent and opponent ballot arguments and rebuttal ballot arguments for submittale voters for the march 3, 2020, consolidated presidential primary election >> copies should have been distributed. amendments are to clarify the authors for the proponent arguments for the ballot measures on march 2020 election. amendments are as follows: the leading -- the opponent on page 1, line 3, since there are no appointed arguments being author authored, having mayor breed as the official author of the ballot measure for the charter amendment to provide retiree healthcare benefits to employees of the housing authority, that's on page 1, line 19 and 20 and page 2 of lines 25. and then next, having supervisor peskin be the pry player author for the ordinance -- be the primary author for the ordinance, that would be on page 3, line 9. next, deleting the withdrawn initiative ordinance by the mayor on page 3, lines 10 through 17 and finally, deleting language referring to opponent ballot arguments, that's on page 3, 3 through 6. so colleagues, can i have a motion to adopt these? i'l

that should have no impact on the submittal before you today. it's worth noting that 21(c)(3) has not changed from the previous years. it reflects no change in that item. >> could we have the bla report, please. >> good morning, chair and members of the committee. this is just the annual approval by the board of supervisors of the prevailing wages for 2020 for covered classifications. we talk about -- page 3 of our report shows the various categories of workers that would be covered, and attachment 1 gives more detail on some of the classifications to be covered by this. catchment 2 summarizes some of the changes for each of the categories of workers that would be covered. in terms of the impact -- so the proposed prevailing wages based on collective bargaining agreements and was approved by the civil service submission. the potential impact to the city is unknown. it would really depend on how much of this is passed through in contracts to the city, but because the board has discretion over how they choose the wages and doesn't have to take the

but in every incident, okay, i'm the boss, i have the gavel, they a submitt submitted. i wonder if people aren't giving to wonder did he submit to anything under the law. i mean, this is not a crazy thing now. he has not honored the constitution. >> this president has used the dangerous rhetoric of a sitting president of civil war. there will be civil war if i'm removed. now, that is inflammatory langua language. and that is xwad fis bad for th. and to chuck's point, one thing that we have to remember is donald trump also didn't hand over a thing. richard nixon handed over evidence before u.s. v nixon. donald trump has done something much more radical, which is to say that i will not fear any political consequences for refusing to do anything to turn anything over. and so i think to your point, chuck, i have much more faith in our institutions and the ability for them to help this president look if it were to come to that, but your you underlying point is right and that is why we're sitting here today. >> is this a day this is a day d certainly a message of justice. we'

the project sponsor -- yeah, having gathered additional signatures and letters in support in their submittal. this concludes my presentation. the project sponsor is in attendance and wishes to provide their own. i am happy to answer any questions you may have. thank you. >> thank you, jonathan. hello. >> could we kindly get 10 minutes to kind of go through a little bit? thank you. >> representing the project sponsor, so for 220 post, they are requesting conversion of the third, fourth, and fifth floors. each floor is about 6,175 square feet. the building has a mid block, approximately 50 feet frontage on post. and then the secondary facade facing hampton place. and the building has now been vacant for over three year. we look at multi-story buildings and it's extremely difficult to find a retailer who is interested in taking a third floor or higher floor in addition to taking the first and second floor. the other option would be to look at leasing it to stand alone and therefore, to a third retailer, but that requires for the building to have excellent access and visibility especially from t

the department has received nine letters of opposition to the project and the petition submittal of 107 letters in opposition. currently no letters of support have been received. the opposition to the project centers on the perception of the area as primarily residential, concern over increase in crime and the concern the establishment doesn't include parking as part of the proposal. the department initially had concern regarding the small size of the proposed establishment, however maintaining small and affordable spaces is a goal of the calle 24 plan and there's other dispensaries in the city approximately the same size. the project does not include any request for on-site consumption and the space is too small to be able to include on-site consumption in compliance with the health codes requirements. staff recommends approval to prohibit any on-site consumption. as the project complies with the planning code and the policies of the general plan, staff recommends approval. >> thank you very much. 171 square feet. that's pretty small. >> yeah. >> okay. do we have a project sponsor? >>