for the submittal requirements the site permit is for land-use entitlement and over all bulk and voo lum that the planning department is concerned with. if you want to pick up a building permit applications at the website or so on it will list exactly what you need to submit. >> yes, sir? the question is we talked about going up, what about going down. it's the same process going down. but going down would mean the one added thing you definitely have to have, maybe is that your con track thor may be required to have, cal - 'cea permit. if the structure was already built that way - down? rooms down - again you can come in for site permit or full blown permit. it doesn't prevent you from doing a full blown permit. if you're not changing the building envelope probably don't need engineering. depending if your moving walls or something if your trying put rooms in your existing garage, i would come in with the full blown thing. yes, ma'am?

>> i think there is a misunderstanding between 2006, which was our first submittal. first resubmitted, -- we submitted. because the home association stopped it, we had to comply. pdç77çÑi the one that is, you know, legal. we cannot go away from that. yes, we have the same approved plan. zyvsrÑiçóof those te plans that you handed to the appellants last week -- are those the plans? ño% hky0lñr>> . which we did only after we got -- after we received a permit in ó no, wt to have a two-car garage. no, wt whenever the neighbors have, that should be what we have. -- whatever the neighbors of -- have. that is what i gave to the neighbor. plan that added space to the garage. but that is not what was approved, right? >> to get approval from another department. from the building department. there is another department where you give addendums, changes in your approved plans. commissioner hwang: that might have been for a curb cut. commissioner fung: a curb cut. if you want to speak, speak at the microphone. >> this is very clear. commissioner fung: it is not clear. your docume

after you go through the initial screening phase and deemed as your prooth submittal is complete and of a high kwoolty, you'll get the go pay and we'll take your project and you get to go home and again, the initial permit review station will determine the routeing for the necessary review stations and agencies. so, again those review agencies are the same as the ones you may have seen earlier with over the counter. they include planning. bureau of streets and mapping, puc. if your opening a restaurant the department may need to be involved. it depends obviously on the scope of your work. if you pay earlier, well you have to pay again. assuming you went through the planning review stage and got all your corrections done now you have an approval project and you can come back too pick up that approval and you get to pay fuel fees, transit impact fees, school fees, puc, and then issued a joob card. the fees in general are the same, depending toon scope of work certain parts of government get a piece of the action. what happens is the only difference between over-the-counter review and a

the permit holder's submittal was in 2010, and they do show s. that is not the project. that is a much, much wider driveway with two garage door entrances,6lf!v77óçi where we h. they have a 20-foot curb cut, so that is not the project. i do not know if that is version two or three. commissioner fung: it does not matter. there are two questions. ûñthe volumetric -- was equivalt to what was provided to the homeowners? >> yes. commissioner fung: is the floor plan the same? >> yes. Ñiçy/ fung:and the space? >> yes. commissioner garcia: is the first floor have a boat -- have a boat --d] is the first floor habitable? >> the building department can discuss that because that is a technical issue about when you determine a story. 18 or 12? -- are we add 18 or 12? -- at 18 or 12? excavation? >> no, it is my understanding could submit an excavation permit. i would defer to the building department. addendum or not, appealable to the board of appeals. ]tçcommissioner fung: :jqe[tódoe sed elevations for the different floors? >> what was included in my pack it does not show -- include

the only jurisdiction that is continuing some incentive money, i believe, is the sacramento county submittal, because they have a partner. in fact, smnud is actually the administrative body that sacramento county is using, and they were able to put all -- some of their own money together, so the federal government said, ok, you can go ahead and use some of the -- the sacramento municipal utilities district, and that is a publicly owned utility. so if we had community choice aggregation, we might be able to do this for some of this, but they are affecting the natural- gas side, not the electric side, but in the nsmud side, they do not have a lot of certain times. this gave them the opportunity to combine funding that we do not have, so it was not an argument i could make. they also described helping commercial buildings. we're staying focused on residential. this program, while we might direct these in lower-income neighborhoods or median incomes, there was no particular help, per se. we're going to be utilizing our block grant money for that purpose, and we will be able to utilize some of ou

review subject to this section is triggered by submittal of a 309 application or a building or cite permit. it is the same thing but relocated. >> ms. sullivan, all i am saying is that you are skilled to read this and write it and immediately deed me to where i need to go. and in my position, i read it and say, oops, a major change and you have to go two pages beyond it to find it again and by that time my thread is lost. and there are changes if nothing else and i think it was expressed in this room. that it would have been good to have a blackboard and this is what it is, this is the way we're simplifying it, do you agree, is it clear? most of us are on the laymen end of things as well. i don't have the comfort to see this -- >> commissioner moore, that is why this is here. >> it is not in there. >> commissioners, the motion on the floor is for approval with a one-word change related to section as the notice in 311. with access. >> that motion passes 5-2 with commissioners moore and sugaya voting against. thank you, commissioners. presid

land and issue an additional for the f -- the first allows the contractor to begin procurements, submittalsand some field surveys. one challenge we are encountering on the bay division pipeline 5 project, we have encountered a high concentration of nickel in some of the soil we dug up for trenching activity, so that will be requiring special hazardous material handling and compliance with more stringent disposal requirements. also on that project, we have m site that will require us to tunnel under that site, which, ofrhvok course, is going to bee costly. we also have five other sites withó archaeological discoveries that could impact construction, so we are monitoring those very carefully. we are trying to work through some last minute changes, skit under control of facilities with our operations map. some late changes have impacted our construction activities, and i have asked our engineering staff to work closely with the water enterprise engineering staff to try to resolve this issue by the end of the quarter. we need to do a better job act identifying control needs earlier on -- bette

panel is community involvement and outreach and from the inception of this program, it's through the submittal of an application that's available on our website, livablestreets.org. and residents complete an application and let us know of the worse locations and we need time and signatures and to verify support and we take the applications and review it and take data and wo

near the end, the mms talks about the fact that there had been a deviation from the permitted plan submitt to the mms in this 2002 set of incidents. would you agree with me that one lesson learned from this come if didn't already know it, was that youdon't want to deviate from the permitted plan that's been approved by the mms, is about right? >> in this case there was actually debate about, it had t do with the use of th diverter, which in a plan covered the drilling, but the context of thisas using it during the cementing of the well. and so there's a great debate about that. that wasn't in the plan. therefore, it was a deviation from the plan. i think over time that got resolved and for the communicate and. . . it there is a regulatory body and all, then we will look to adjust those plans to the regulations as they exist. >> once the operation is completed, it should be done in accordance with what the mms has approved, should it not? not? >> once again, i'm not going to talk about the mms because i don't know. but i o believe if we made adjustments to a plan and there is a regulatory r

i'm submitt smitten with the mi. this is michigan.l this little area up here. it's like a combination of nantucket slash -- oh, gosh. i can't describe it. all the houses are victorian. lawns down to the -- and the water in lake michigan, you won't believe this, hoed dachlt i went swimming. i didn't care about -- >> the satellites in the sky? >> we came back from 4 and 5-mile walks. it looks so clean and you can see the water. it's freshwater. you ride along, walk along, and there's little fountains, and it's the water from the springs. so it's the first time in my life i'm swimming. i'm swimming around and i want a drink in the water. it is gorgeous! and everybody said -- some people said don't tell anybody about this area because it's so beautiful. we don't want it spoiled. >> that's up near canada up at the top. >> yes. i have a little gift from you. this is from a shop called american spoon. it's all the products, everything. it's got your mittens and everything is made from michigan product. >> i love that. barbecue sauce. >> i'm