subsection 2, to create jobs through the regional expansion of manufacturing facilities to produce clean energy technology. to create jobs. so how many jobs is this going to create? will it replace the 2.5 million jobs that ll be lost each year as a result of this bill? i can't tell. then we get to page 68. the secretary shall award grants to states to establish revolving loan funds to provide loans to small and medium sized manufacturers. so who is going to compensate manufacturers for putting them out of business with more loans? let me get to page 70. in particular, where mass layoffs have resulted in precipitous increase in unemployment. we have a provision in here that recognizes that millions of american jobs will be lost, but don't worry, we'll extend your unemployment. most of my constituents who are unemployed don't want unemployment they want a job. and this is going to kill them. i hate to do this to all of you, i do. i hate to do this. but when you file 300-page amendment at 3:09 in the morning somebody needs to work on it. i worked on it today. and i want to make sure everyb

and they need to meet the requirements established pursuant to subsection f for qualifications regarding consideration of -- consideration of any renewable energy sources or energy efficiency. so every appraiser is not only going to be retrained but now we're going to send them all to school. let me get to page 157. the appraisal subcommittee, another new part of the bureaucracy, shall establish requirements for state certification of state certified real estate appraisers and for state licensing. of state licensed real estate appraisers to ensure that the appraisers are qualified to consider in determining the value of a property any renewable energy sources or energy efficiency or energy conserving improvements or features of the property. interesting. and the secretary on page 158, shall require the housing assistance council to encourage each organization that receives assistance from the council with any amounts made available from the secretary to provide that any structures and buildings developed or assisted under projects, programs and activitied funded with such amounts complie

subsection b of that section provides that the president's authority in paragraph a to remove satellites and related components from the united states munitions list may not be exercised with respect to any satellite or related component that may directly or indirectly be transferred to or launched into space by the people's republic of china. do you agree with me that the intent of paragraph b is that with respect to any transfers to or launches by china, no satellite or related component shall be removed from the united nations munitions list? mr. berman: would the gentleman yield? mr. rohrabacher: i yield. mr. berman: i appreciate it. the answer is that i certainly do agree. in the case of china under our legislation all satellites and related components must remain on the united states munitions list. mr. rohrabacher: thank you very much, mr. chairman. i thank you and the ranking member. this is a vitally important clarification for our aerospace industry which is -- and at the same time while opening up better trade and technology with friendly countries, it ensures that we do not s

each building code enforcement department receiving a grant under subsection a shall impanel a code administration and enforcement team consisting of at least one full-time building code enforcement officer a city planner and a health planner or similar officer. now i've got some big towns in my district. hamilton, middletown, west chester they can probably afford this. new enforcement. but i can take you to chickasaw, mercer county in my district. they don't have one full-time person that works for the village. not one. look at the mandate on every city, village in america, right here in this bill. so that we're not only going to tell you what the codes are going to be, but we're going to tell you how many people you need to hire to enforce this in this section of this code. i did take time, most of today, trying to understand what was in here. how about page 53. solar energy systems building permit requirements for receipt of community development block grants. so, what are we doing here to amend the community block grant program? we're going to impose global warming requirements on all the citi

further down the page, it talks about indirect carbon factors under subsection b three. can anyone tell me how to -- tell me what an indirect carbon factor is? them get to page 226. not more than 85% of the imports are manufactured and have met the criteria of that section. now, many did we are going to try to control imports. the use of data to determine factors. where it is not possible to determine the precise electricity emissions foreign entity using this methodology in clause 1, in what instances with this not be possible to determine what that is? let me get to pitched 233. in each eligibles sector, using an average of the four most recent years, for the purposes of the list, the administrator shall use the best available data for the maximum number of years. why every four years? what is this data used for? then it goes on. the administrator shall limit the direct greenhouse gas emissions calculated under paragraph 4 for any eligible industrial sector to amount no greater than any previous of ministration under this section. so, what is the cost of the spurs -- p

it says pursuant to the entities indirect carbon factor in calculated under subsections b3. can anybody tell me how to calculate an indirect carbon factor what an indirect carbon factor is? page 226, not more than 85% of the u.s. imports data met one criteria in that section -- then the 10-year note production schedule is given. we will try to control imports from countries based on what they are doing with regard to their energy policy. use of data to determine factor -- where it is not possible to determine the precise emissions. in what instances would it not be possible to determine what that is that page 23? page 233. the administrator shall use the available data for the maximum amount of years. why every quarter years? bridgett four years? -- four years? what is the cost of this provision? on page 234 the administrator shall use it from the registered on one section. how much is this going to cost? promoting international reductions in emissions, pay ge 236. that is the policy of the u.s. to work proactively under the u.n. framework to manage climate change and other

we serve a broad subsection of the public. >> fit this in the government structure, who is the boss of the boss of this kind of place? >> well, we work for the u.s. department of the interior. overall it's the secretary of the interior, and above that it's the president of the united states. we work for what administration is there. >> what is the budget for an operation for a year? >> our budget is a little more than $23 million a year. and that gives us more than 600 events a year and more than 6,000 people coming through the programs. >> in history how much are we spending on this effort compared to 50 years ago? >> i don't think we were spending much money 50 years ago, i am first fish and wildlife personnel and that's 10 years. and in the last 10 years, we created a history program. and we run tight, we don't purchase artifacts. we manage an archive and museum. >> so both of you could have what you wanted to make this better, what would you ask for? >> what i would ask for is for the public, the general public in the u.s. to all know who the fish and wildlife service is. we have d

. >> the actual subsection says if the secretary has reason to believe they use or consumption of or exposures to an article of feared may cause adverse health consequences of the actual standard is reason to believe and of the may cause is in there but it really is a standard of which is very protective of public health. >> dr. jones? >> i agree with those comments the. >> i believe it is much more vague them that. >> i hope we can work to clean up that language and i think there is an opportunity then ask the subpoena question again to those who want to talk about there are three criteria of section 311 which i did not delude to is any other proceeding respecting a violation of the act? i think most people agree. and a hearing or investigation to determine if a person is in violation or provision of this act? i think the average person would say okay. subpoenaed of the babies. >> any other matter relative to the commissioners jurisdiction and the public health prithee anti-tampering after any other matter. vague? >> mr. ambrosio? >> it is vague. >> yes. it is paid. >> actually thes

this is in -- on page four, subsection e, faculty development. >> i'm informed the purpose of this sentenceis to basically say that the surgeon general will be responsible for deciding what are the important things that he wants these public health officers to know. and thereby can direct what the curriculum will be to meet the needs of the public health service. >> well, it indicates pretty clearly that the surgeon general shall development the programs and curricula. and so if it's not the intention that that be the surgeon general's role that they just kind of be more of an oversight, perhaps we need to look at that language. >> yeah, maybe we should change the lawn to say that the surgeon general is directed to ensure that the curricula meets the needs of the public health service. that's the idea. >> if you're willing to work on that language. it seems to me the surgeon general has a lot of thing he is needs to be -- >> i agree. i don't think developing the curricula is not necessarily what we want him to be doing. >> right. >> i'm glad to work with you to get that flaung a form that b

receiving it, we ought to be toing more to receive info than giving it out, i draw your attentions to subsection d-2, which says after obtaining information from relevant stake holders, d-5, paragraph d-5 says that the council shall establish processes for continual public input, including input from state, regional, and local leadership, communities and other relevant stake holders. so i don't see how it can be clearer than that, tom. >> the difference is you create a level. i take the people that are there already and put them together. you create another level of bureaucracy, and what i do is i take the people that are already there that actually have knowledge about this and redirect it. >> that's what we're doing. we're just saying, people from the existing agencies. we're not creating a new bureaucracy. people that are already there, we're just pulling them together. >> i stand corrected. >> i take -- >> the other thing is we have a set of goals. it's called healthy people 210. right? >> yeah. >> what this coordinating council will say, how do we get there? that's one of our standards that

under the program descrubbed in subsection a. i have a bit of a problem with "a." but i like the idea of having states thinking about how they would like to streamline in these programs and stuff. i suppose if you just say they can do it, i don't know, would they do it? or should you say they shall do it as a prerequisite to getting these grants? i don't know. >> just think about the burn jag grants. i know them very well. >> they're very flexible. so that oklahoma may have this need on meth labs. may have this need on drug courts. may have this need over here. and what happens is, we give them ultimate flexibility with that money. we give them ultimate flexibility to meet the need. and the way this is written, there's not -- because if you don't have a need, you're out of luck in applying for the grant, even though proportionately, your total need in your state as far as the workplace shortage r >> i think it's get don't go restrictive in the sense of where states can have a multiple of interests that they want to serve, some have more priorities than others. but

that's why we still have the same problem on the subpoena power issue because in this subsection three and says, and the other matter

of the treasury shall notify the committees of any proposed transfers of funds available under subsection g-4-b. section 538, if the assistant secretary decides that an airport does not need to participate in the illegal immigration reform and immigrant responsibility act of 1996, the assistant secretary shall certify to the committees that no security risks will result. section 539, for analysis and operations, $2,203,000 is rescinded. section 540, the statement in section 4 public law 101-161 is deemed to be amended. section 541, section 203-m of the robert t. stafford disaster relief and emergency assistance act is amended. section 542, for the infrastructure protection and information security account, $5,963,000 is rescinded. section 433, the secretary shall use such sums as may be necessary to make improvements to public access to the buffalo light house. section 544, the secretary may provide to personnel appointed to serve abroad allowances similar to those provided under the foreign service act of 1990. section 545, extension of programs. section 143 of division a of the consolid

section 217, section 5759 of title 5, united states code, as amended by striking subsection e. section 218, subchapter 4 of title 5, united states code, is amended. this title may be cited as the department of justice appropriations act of 2010. title 3, science, office of science and technology policy, $7,154,000,000. national aeronautics and space administration, science, $4,497,100,000 of which not to exceed $450 million, shall remain available until september 30, 2011. aeronautics, $501 million of which not to exceed $50 million shall remain available until september 30, 2011. exploration, $3,293,200,000 of which not to exceed $330 million, shall remain available until september 30, 2011. space operations, $6,9 -- $6,097, 300,000 of which not to exceed $610 million shall remain available until september 30, 2010. education, 175 million. to remain available -- $education, $175 million. cross-agency, $3,064,000. construction, remediation, $441,700,000 to remain available until september 30, 2015. office of inspector general, $35 million. provisions, funds for announced prizes