as we amend line 7 at page 3 and add subsection e to say "and the long-term effect of mou provisions." >> i want to clarify that in the process of the goa, the scope was significantly narrowed to look at some specific forms a premium pay. they would be looking at standby pay, supervisory pay. what came out of the last meeting it was a narrowing of the scope. we could certainly add to that the valuation. >> i am just reading the motion that is in front of us. this is very broad and it says that a financial impact with the benefit or pay increases. did this get narrowed? >> yes, i believe it did. what would have come out of the last meeting would have been looking at number day which is page three, line four. this had been very specific to premium types of pay which might not be relevant. >> i will respectfully disagree in that case. i think the party for the city should not be looking at special fiscal provisions, we should be looking at the impact of -- on the employer provisions. that is crushing our deficit. we have to move forward, i will not be supportive. >> any additional conver

president peterson: i have the code in front of me, and it appears to meet the requirements. 790.40, subsection be. >> that requires you to look at another planning code section. that is qualified specifically by 304.5. if you turn to 304.5, it refers to institutions that qualify under the master plan for san francisco. there will not be any smoking on the location in products being sold. the will not be anything along those lines. there will be medical cannabis and medical cannabis related edibles, a dispensary with a consumption on site. president peterson: i do not know what edibles are. sugar? commissioner hwang: i actually had another question. i think your client mentioned will pull hearings before the police commission. can you tell me that letter was then subsequently brought up during a planning commission hearing. captain schmidt was asked to specifically appear so the commissioners could ask the captain about the letter, about the statistics and where the information came from, and the captain appeared. there was a lead the dialogue. -- there was a long dialogue. they have been invol

that that is all very well as to subsection b. -- >> that is all very well as to subsection b. it does not say to communicate when the attorney general wants you to communicate or cooperate. this is a right under the fed rule statute for the local people to communicate with the attorney general. >> not should be part of a broader cooperative relationship -- that should be part of the broader, cooperative relationship. it's as to communicate with the attorney general and then it says otherwise to cooperate. >> besides communicating. >> otherwise to cooperate refers back to a. communications is part of the cooperative relationship between the state and the federal government. >> is not the obligation of the federal government made very clear by sections 1373-c entitled "obligation to respond to inquiries"? the ins shall respond -- i.n.s asked topond towhen ascertain that immigration status of an individual. it does not say when we want to, in our discretion, when we have funds available. it says shall. >> our point does not turn on the response that dhs makes, but on the amnesty

the second thing is that if you have this typo of subsection f, it does mean it could have been any of the other sections, right? >> we have to call upon the intent of the code. child care center is not included as a prohibited use within 1,000 feet of the mcd in any of the other planning code sections. go to article 2. go to article 8. it does not say you cannot be within 1,000 feet of each health care center. this is a code section that has been reviewed as in error. there is an error in having code section f. it has been applied. there are precedents. we have approved facilities under this as well. president peterson: all right. thank you. vice president goh: i have a question related to that. did the planning commission notice there was a reference to f? >> i do not believe the issue was raised. vice president goh: thank you. >> commissioners, if there are no further questions, the matter is submitted. commissioner fung: i can start. usually, i am one of the commissioners who asks questions, but i did not in this particular instance for two reasons. one is i was curious enough to g

particular agency heads, they are still required to fill out a form 700, but their move to a different subsection, as not being required to file with ethics. supervisor alioto-pier: with f.x.. ok -- ethics. ok. >> i apologize, i misspoke. supervisor alioto-pier: it is the opposite, isn't it? >> yes, i am sorry, your absolutely correct. they do file with them, others do not. supervisor alioto-pier: i do not understand why. people go to the ethics department to find out all sorts of things -- i do not understand why we would not just keep them there. >> that is section b1, those are people that need to list for 700 and two other f.x. forms. the sunshine ordinance declaration and to give it up training declaration. all those people must file all three separate things with the commission. department heads of those state entities only need to file form 700, which is why they are broken out in different sections. i'm sorry, they are listed on page 7 between lines 10 -- supervisor alioto-pier: i see it. >> i apologize. looks like we are deleting things, but we are moving them around. hopefully, next tim

and the next clarification is in the subsection, line 4-10 on page 9. he was mentioning that certain that listed had been in existence since 1995 had some additional grandfathering in terms of their location, and this simply clarifies that the only exemption that is allowed is for the new regulations of the department of public works, in terms of the vocational requirements, and the distance from this because they have been in this location for such a long time. some people interpret this to believe that this is for other kinds of exemptions, that this could be closer to the school, but the language that is here right now clarifies that this does not specifically say this, but these grandfathered projects, they have new and additional requirements outside of the legislation. that would still be subject to these limitations of 1,500 feet away from schools. on page 10, line #2, this deals with an issue that has come up quite a bit, the senior debt of all -- the single day of operations for the permit. if people like for the truck to come to their house or

supervisor elsbernd: all that i am looking at here is on page 3, subsection one, renting the event site. there are other exemptions later? >> the commander was right, the details will be implemented. supervisor chiu: again, i want to thank the stakeholders for the many months of work on this. to the commission and the police department, the office of small business, cmac, my staff, and representatives from the industry and neighborhoods. colleagues, can this be moved forward with recommendation? without objection, it will be moved forward with recommendations. madam clerk, please call items three and four together. >> item #3, hearing to review the current state of maintenance and repair of pg&e's pipeline and electricity transmission infrastructure in san francisco and to receive an update on actions to be taken by pg&e to mitigate safety risks and economic impact, including pg&e's plans for installing modern safety features such as automatic shutoff valves and leak-detection systems and monitoring of underground electrical vaults. item number four, hearing on the intitial report regar

particular agency heads, they are still required to fill out a form 700, but their move to a different subsection, as not being required to file with ethics. supervisor alioto-pier: with f.x.. ok -- ethics. ok. >> i apologize, i misspoke. supervisor alioto-pier: it is the opposite, isn't it

exhibit d, subsection -- i believe is 10, part of the agreement is that two vehicles would be give to the san francisco police apartment and will fall under the general fleet for the sfpd. filming has concluded, and we are trying to fulfil this agreement. supervisor chu: 90, and the type of vehicle that has been gifted -- is this for general use, is this a police officer vehicle? what kind of vehicle is it? >> vehicles are described before you. 2007 honda and 2008 toyota. they would become the property of the police apartment and more than likely would be used in an undercover capacity because they do not have any markings of a traditional sfpd vehicle. they would be used in undercover operations whether a sign to the bottom detail, narcotics detail, gang task force, or any similar unit. supervisor chu: ok, are there any members of the public who wish to speak on this item? we have one individual. >> walter paulson. ♪ a sun goes up a car goes by thank you for your gift thank you for your gift today hitching a ride with two cars by our side ♪ supervisor chu: thank you very much. are th

this subsection right here, madam speaker. subsection -- item number 2. maximum amount. the total. a payments and debt relief pursuant to action commenced under section 3 shall not exceed $100 million. that's consistent with what the chairman of the ag committee told me. $100 million will cap the united states' government's liability to black farmers for discrimination by adding an additional $100 million to the previous $1.05 billion that had already been distributed, to clean up anything that's left out there, and here's the language that says so. this is intent language. it says, it's the intent of congress as to remedial nature of section, it is the intent of congress that this section be liberally construed so as to effectuate its purpose of giving a full determination on the merits for each pigford claim previously denied that determination. that means if anybody was denied a determination, even by statute of limitations that closed this on october 12, 1999, that this $100 million was to be the sum total that would be used to settle this issue. the secretary of agriculture sa

it is what can happen when a subsection of the banking industry is left unregulated. it also led to the securitized of bad assets, which was initially organized by the government, to deal with the problem of these bankrupt s&ls. key moments in the past couple of decades, but there are lots of key moments, that lead to a market that is out of control. joseph stickups if -- steiglitz, who had been a longtime supporter of the markets, wrote a paper prickly question in the securitization phenomenon, where is that going to lead? will it lead to lenders being less responsible out the loans they were issuing? of course, that was a question that we sell answered in the most devastating sorts of ways, when we found there were no standards for lending, making sure that loans were made responsibly, because of this phenomenon. they were only connected by an interest payment. yes, that is a key moment in this phenomenon. host: mike on the independent line, michigan. caller: i have several comments i want to make, but i disagree on with your comments about the clinton administratio

are you familiar with the audit requirements in subsection h? general, yes i am. >> could you tell us what those requirements are? >> that we would conduct thorough audits of the spending associated with our contribution to construction in afghanistan -- reconstruction in afghanistan -- >> i am not try to play gotcha here, general, but there are seven requirements in subsection age. after i read each one, i would like you to tell me if they had been completed, and if so, when. the first one -- these are the things at a minimum you are required to examine as special spector general. the first is the manner in which contract requirements were developed and contracts were task and delivery orders it rewarded. has that been done by sigar? have you examined contract requirements in afghanistan, contracts, tasks in afghanistan, how they were delivered ordered? has your agency done that to date? >> we have conducted several contract audits. each of those audits has addressed matters associated with how contracts came about. >> how many contracts audits