i am open to keeping subsection . -- subsection d. this was put forward because there were concerns from supervisors about this coming out of the general fund. the school district offered to put this in their budget. if folks want to keep subsection d, that is something i would continue to support. i would still support the second draft of this measure as well. thank you so much for your flexibility on this. if you have any questions, please contact our office. we are more than happy to answer questions. president chiu: can we take the motion without objection? that shall be the case. these items will be considered in committee of the hole in two weeks. can we now proceed to the adoption without committee reference text >> items 35 through 40 will be acted upon by a single roll call vote unless a member asks discussion of these items. president chiu: would anyone like to sever any items? supervisor elsbernd: 37. president chiu: if we could take a roll-call vote on items 35 through 40, except for item 37? supervisor kim: aye. superviso

district will set any salary for school board members and the second is potentially taking out subsection b and that's something we're still in discussion about but the school district has mentioned an interest in actually funding the salaries for board of education members themselves. they do not want this tied to the public enrichment fund or rainy day fund as they're worried that voters would not appreciate funding used in that way, coming from the city. but if that amendment is not made, the other amendment was another suggestion from supervisor elsbernd which was to put a sunset date potentially for 10 years so after prop 98 is back filled by the state, and/or 10 years, whichever comes sooner. any discussion or comments from my colleagues? supervisor farrell? commissioner farrell: just so we're having our hearing right now, given the amendments for next week, maybe tell me what we plan to do today in terms of voting or not going or going forward here. commissioner kim: at this time i'd be looking for a motion to move this forward to the board of supervisors as a committee report. com

should there be a future change by a court, subsection 3 will resolve that.ervisor mirkarimi: supervisor campos? supervisor campos: thank you. good morning. trying to understand, looking at the ordinance, the language that is underlined, is that all new language being added? >> 4506? supervisor campos: i am looking at section 1290. >> you may not have the substitute legislation in front of you. i can circulate that. all we are doing is tricking the word "firearms," and making it apply simply to fireworks, where we have more authority to limit their discharge, and removing all of the language regarding firearms to section 4502. supervisor campos: i see. ok. thank you. supervisor mirkarimi: i almost wish -- i don't know if the city attorney can speak to this, but lawful self-defense in the city and county of san francisco -- does that also implicate the question of somebody who has a permit to carry that weapon? >> the use of the word "lawful" means the person has complied with every law requiring -- required to have a gun, including what types of firearms are

i assume you are taking out subsection c? lifetime health benefits? that is gone.proposing that? supervisor kim: [inaudible] supervisor elsbernd: ok. i am more than happy to adopt the amendment right now. supervisor kim: thank you. is there discussion on this item? >> let me share some of my thoughts. thank you for addressing the health benefit issue. i think it is a bit misleading to say this is based solely on the first-year teacher. that is the first year. as i read the proposal here, beginning in 2013, regardless of what the teacher makes, there is an increase for the salary. prospectively, down the line, the salary is going to continue to escalate year over year. eventually, it will be higher than more than one half of a first-year teacher. i think we should be very careful how we sell what the salary is. since this will be in committee next week, i imagine some folks at the school district are watching or word will get back to unhook. there are couple of questions of like them to answer. the city funding. i like that there is an attempt to said that the cost

the school district would like this to come out of their own budget and so i am asking to strike subsection b. >> do you have copies that you can circulate? no, i don't have copies. >> why don't i suggest if your staff could bring some copies and once they have, we can come back to this item. >> ok, thank you. >> can we go to item 33. >> these items were considered -- item 33 is a resolution determine that the issuance of an on sale beer and wine license will serve the necessity and to be is to the people of san francisco. >> can we take a roll-call vote? >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> this resolution is adopted. >> item 34 is a resolution urging the san francisco municipal transportation agency to adopt changes to the use fleiss line discount fast as program for low-income youth. -- for youth lifeline discount fast-pass program. >> i would like to thank the agencies responsible for supporting this, the department of children, youth, their families. i would like to thank america for his support of this item. for those of you who ar

to and said subsection, including transfers and obligation limitations. section 1102, appropriations made by section 1101 shall be available in the manner that would be provided by the pertinent appropriations act. section 1103, appropriations provided by this division that carried a multiple year or no year, period, of availability shall retain a comparable period of availability. section 1104. the requirements, authorities, and other provisions of the appropriations act referred to in section 1101-a shall continue in effect to the date specified in section 1106. section 1105. no funds made available or authority granted shall be used to initiate or resume any projects for which appropriation funds or other authority were specifically prohibited during fiscal year 2010. section 1106. unless otherwise provided, appropriations and funds made available and authority granted pursuant to this division shall be available. section 1107, expenditures made pursuant to the continuing appropriations act 2011, public law 111-242 shall be charged to the applicable ap

and if you turn over to page 119, capital b subsection, it says abortions for which public funding is prohibited. but if you go to subsection little ii, it has this title, abortions for which public funding is allowed. that's not all. legal clinics are financed and required to be financed under this bill, and there is no prohibition either by the hyde amendment or any provision in this bill or the executive order that legaly prevents -- legally prevents federal funding for allowing abortions in some of those medical clinics that are established and will happen. also, if you flip over here, and you wouldn't find this in a word search for abortion because it was too cleverly put back, but if you look at 122, it is required to have insurance plans and there will be federal funding involved to make this happen, that there be, quote, at least one such plan that provides coverage of services described in clauses i , and ii in subsection capital b. the chair: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. gohmert: that's abortion, folks, there's money for it here. thank you. i yield back. the chair:

three, extended authority defined in this subsection, the term extended authority means any authority available under a, an amendment to section 105-c-2, 501 or 502 of the foreign intelligence surveillance act of 1978, 50 united states code 1805, c-2, 1861, 1862, that took effect after october 25, 2001, where be it section 101-b-1-c of such act as amended by section 60-01-a of the intelligence reform and terrorism prevention act, law 105.451, 118 statute 3742. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california is recognized for five minutes in support of his motion. >> thank you, mr. speaker. the patriot act gave law enforcement some necessary tools to keep up with technological advances being used by those who would do harm to our country. it did not abolish our responsibility to make sure that the constitutional rilets of law-abiding citizens are protected. this motion to recommit will guarantee that the powers of the patriot act being voted on today are not used to violate the constitutional rights and freedoms of the american citizens. more specifically,

the clerk: subsection c through d of this section shall apply to funds appropriated by this division in lieu of section 7076 of division f of public law 111-117. title 12, chppings, housing and urban development and related agencies. section 2201, the level for the department of transportation, federal aviation administration operations, $9,523,028,000. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? mr. nadler: mr. chairman, i have amendment 511 at the desk. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. >> mr. chairman? the chair: the clerk will read one more paragraph. the clerk: section 2202, the level for department of transportation, federal aviation administration facilities and equipment, $2, 736,203,000. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? mr. nadler: i have amendment 511 at the desk, mr. chairman. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. >> mr. chairman? i reserve a point of order on the gentleman's amendment. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 511 in the congressiona