it's identical except it removes subsection c relating to real property and so it would be everything else will be identical. i have paper copies but it's stripping subject c that starts real property. that's a primary residence and so forth. i make that motion. >> supervise wiener is making the motion. is there a second. >> seconded by breed. any discussion? okay. >> i'm sorry, could you repeat the amendment again. >> the amendment is identical to the last amendment we just voted on with the exception that it strips out subsection c relating to real property since that last amendment fails, i'm removing the real property prevision. speaker: thank you supervisor wiener for picking out the c part of the original amendment. i'll support this amendment, but i want to also say that intuitive of an answer about the limitations and so forth, if i find out the limitations are harder than i had thought, i would -- i would like in the future and take that thing out of there, but for today, i will support the amendment. speaker: supervisor kim. >> actually to address the supervise yee's questio

i was in charge of materials analysis subsection of which the colonel is now the head.nder that body i was in charge of all types of trace evidence, forensic geology, fibers, all types of organic pollutants, crime scene investigations which were varied such as industrial accidents or theft or break ins or break outs. it's a very wide gentlist area for those i think thises that don't fit into little boxes or big boxes. most the people when i was in charge is there were the only person or maybe one of two with those specializations. it was diverse. at one stage it used to be called diverse analysis because of that my lady. >> were you consulted by other members of the forensic department? >> yes because my first specialization was as a geeoologist. that was why i was employed the first time by the south african police service. they needed a geologist. i often received calls from outside when other members of the forensic science in the laboratory were on crime scenes. there was something geological, trace evidence of dirt or things. i would go to crime scenes to assist or

3 change the 90 day period for 89 days for the rental payment schedule on page 3 and to delete subsection 3. if there's no reason to delay the implementation for the additional 90 days as was the case previously we should enact this for the people that are phasing eviction they benefit from the changes that are embedded in this legislation. by making this amendment the ordinance will go into effect thirty days after the board of supervisors overrides the mayoral veto. to you make that motion and ask for my colleagues support >> thank you supervisor campos has made a motion seconded by supervisor cowen we'll take that without objection. that's the case. on the underlying ordinance why not take a vote on supervisor farrell. supervisor kim. supervisor mar. supervisor tang. no. supervisor wiener. supervisor yee. supervisor avalos. supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor chiu. supervisor cowen. there are 79 i's and two notices. this ordinance is passed on its first reading (clapping) item 18. item 18 and 19 were referred without recommendation by the land use committee meeting to order

it is set forth in the ceqa regulation appendix g subsection 12. the 710 freeway project is probably best known case on displacement where there is a direct displacement where the the neighborhood was bulldozed. this was different. i think we have enough expert testimony to establish an argument to establish that it requires further review. >> my next question was on the classic exemption and you said that this is for scientific research project. our office has been able to pilot pedestrian safety and bike safety efforts in our district both on sixth street and folsom street on this time of exemption where we are studying removal of parking or car lane to but in a bulb out or put in an actual painted stripe bike lane to study as we move forward with a larger eir and redesign process for safety on those streets. the way you argued it seems that those types of pilots do not deserve those types of exemptions. i was hoping you would comment on it or how you would distinguish? >> i think this is a significant difference between this program and those. t

amendment is identical to the last amendment we just voted on with the exception that it strips out subsection c relating to real property since that last amendment fails, i'm removing the real property prevision. speaker: thank you supervisor wiener for picking out the c part of the original amendment. i'll support this amendment, but i want to also say that intuitive of an answer about the limitations and so forth, if i find out the limitations are harder than i had thought, i would -- i would like in the future and take that thing out of there, but for today, i will support the amendment. speaker: supervisor kim. >> actually to address the supervise yee's question, it would be great to find some type of resource to address retirement account issue, but i'm not sure who can provide us that answer so we can have some finals in the terms of including or not including this in the hardship. i'm open to the retirement account issue excludeing that from the assets, but non liquid properties is not considered. if you own expensive artwork or $203,050,000, that should be considered as part of what y

i would stipulate in subsection b to add the following to excluding the retirement act and non-liquid assess only subject to the displacement if a primary residence to the landlord and the only property by the owner. so in other words the landlord does not have to list any retirement accounts or non-liquid assets and would have to include real property, but not if they only own one small building that they live in, they would not have to include that building, but if they own more than one building, then the real estate is fair game. as supervisor kim mentioned you will sell the building, but if you are livingston -- living in the building it's a different situation. that's the amendment i'm proposed and i want to mention that and distribute it and put it in the amendment. i am supporting this legislation. i think increasing the relocation benefit is long over due. >> thank you, supervisor wiener has made a motion. seconded by supervisor breed. supervisor breed? >> >>supervisor london breed: i have a few comments. if we are concerned about speculators, we should come up with legislati

they also have to installing more needed to be working machines at the forty booths that subsection the trees is expenditure. in the supreme court on tuesday dismissed the federal government's be seeking an appeal office led a company with in depth and tends to be taken as a former prime minister nineteen ninety one times infinity commuted the death penalty is of some friends will think i'm a naughty but inside the inordinate delay in fastening them as he leaves one thing to keep its costs on to become a doctor government had decided to release one seven accused in the case. haha it was thomas then he's one of the petition by the federal government in nineteen ninety two was the prominent stuff india from nineteen eighty one to nineteen eighty nine one skilled in if you cite doused by the anti tipping an election campaign in nineteen ninety one. i did so in health benefits but it wasn't attached to something extraordinary. this unique invention. this look was all they say the technology that can be much more beneficent god they should be cutting in and has not been done is done and for

eating nowadays when my parents were in school kids choose what he was the big deal because the four subsection nutritious and not load up of chemicals. there were waves of obese children pack that even though my dad ate bread and butter with greasy meat every day of his childhood this is just another example of the government try to treat the symptoms but not the disease of overall awful quality of food that is going around fascist back the room tokyo speech. this is japan's largest could use money the only fresh food stuffs from every part of the country the summation wide distribution network to establish the seventeenth century. then possible to bring all kinds of fruit to tokyo from the province the development of a very sophisticated and cultured the extensive range of tastes took in what seemed to it. the japanese approach subtlety and artistic expression of seasonal thing ricky one of the world's great cuisine. do some leftist. gavin to reduce the dishes season. to hear from the fishing pole to pole will prove to be charcoal grill on the street. mr enjoyed coverage of lights from every

eating nowadays when my parents were in school kids choose what he was the big deal because the four subsection nutritious and upload up of chemicals. there were waves of obese children pack that even though my dad ate bread and butter with greasy meat every day of this job but this is just another example of the government are to treat the symptoms but not the disease of overall awful quality of food that is going around fascist lacking the room. we knew he knew. it all the thing off. it is decorate your thing. that time. sth. you will. we will eye. the licensees to me which adds to the bus and thanks for joining us. he knew the west russia and ukraine agreed to step in the adelaide tension a little list of some of the sand and go home. the russian protest is being used in ukraine's any player that might die it will feel more from our correspondent. russia's president wonderful calls for diplomatic efforts to continue but doesn't rule out sending in troops in ukraine

b, after reassembling, pursuant to subsection a, when the house adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to the subsection by its majority leader or his designee, the house shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the concurrent resolution is agreed to and a motion to reconsider is laid on the table. the chair will entertain requests for one-minute speeches. for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. lamborn: mr. speaker, last week we learned something shocking and appalling. the iranian government wants to appoint a terrorist as their ambassador to the united nations. a man who participated in the 1979 terrorist attack on our embassy in tehran. this is unconscionable and unacceptable. last week senator ted cruz and i introduced legislation to fix this problem. this bill gives the president the authority he needs to deny this individual a visa. senator cruz pushed the bill through the senate unanimously on

. >> pop down your next subsection. >> while poe says he hopes the jail's education program will helpm stay out of trouble the next time he's released -- >> let me see what you got. >> check it out. >> look. >> -- jacob cowin has turned to religion. >> ephesians, huh? >> i wrote that last night. why don't you read it to me. >> oh, armando. >> come on, read it to me, man. read it to me. i wrote it. tell me how it sounds. >> paul begins the letter to the ephesians by stating who he is. >> cowin has had numerous stays at santa rita over the past several years. not all the charges stuck. but one of his stays was the precursor to a five-year prison sentence he served after shooting and wounding another man in a bar fight. this time he's serving 75 days for battery and vandalism. according to police reports, he broke his girlfriend's door during an argument and punched her numerous times in the face and head. >> i only know how to do one thing, and it ain't good. you know? so it's like -- >> what is it? >> it's bad. just trouble. and the thing is trouble was getting me in trouble, you know

under section seven, subsection four, basically, a preliminary report is meant to be sent within 30 days. now what we need to know is, firstly, whether such a report has been written and sent to the other states. if it hasn't, when is it going to be sent, and if it has, are they going to release it. and i think that is one of the core questions, because you're talking here not about controversial issues of who did what in cockpits and who might have been responsible, you're talking about statements of fact, don, which are known and which can be released. provided, of course, i can hear the authorities saying it already, provided these facts are verified. >> richard quest, we'll see you a little later on from kuala lumpur. thank you very much. i want to bring in my panel of experts, jeff wise, mary schiavo, now an attorney for victims of transportation accidents. lieutenant colonel michael kay, a retired military pilot with the british air force and anthony roman, ceo of roman and associates, karlene petitt, author of "fight for control" and "flight for safety," and jeffrey thomas, editor

it seems to me there's always a sort of small subsection of american life that rallies around these kinds of issues. do you think it's growing in strength? do you think this has been a catalyzing moment for them? >> at least for the moment. we'll see if it really results in further confrontations. maybe it's worth remembering that there's a real history of these kinds of very hot and at times very scary confrontations. this happened in nye county, nevada back in 1991. a very, very tense confrontation between county officials who wanted to bulldoze a road, in fact did bulldoze a road into national forest lands, happened in new mexico, this is all an outgrowth, really, the sage brush rebellion and the idea, the theory that the states should have control of these lands that, in fact, were first ceded by treaties with foreign governments mostly to the united states federal government. >> what do you predict to happen next here? >> well, you know, my guess is, and it's merely a guess, is that the federal government will wait some months, and hopefully will go in in a much better and more rapid

and you look at the top of this it says subsection two begins each implementation cemented by a state under the chapter shall be adopted by the state after reasonable notice and public hearing. and each plan shall. then if you look at the bottom it contains adequate provisions consistent with the provisions of the subchapter and any source of other type of omission activity which will contribute significantly. >> okay, so if you are working for one of the upwind states and facing the three-year deadline than what would you told have told the state to do? >> certainly their basic methodology of using the cost threshold had been embodied in this in 1998. which i believe was promulgated in 2007. >> that's right. ahead of this comes to you and says, how much do we have to reduce our emissions to satisfy her arm and. and he would tell them what. >> we would tell them that we don't know yet. but that is not a fatal flaw in the argument. it is inherent in any legal contacts in which one person acts in themselves on transit in person reviews. and so it does point. >> that kind of glosses over

but the subsections, the biotechs, social stocks, they're in bear market territory. >> what about predictions for the market overall? >> it's been a long time since the broad market, the s&p 500 has gone through a correction. we almost got there in 2012, but we have to go back in 2011 in the summer where we would see a pullback of 10% from the recent peak. so some people are getting a little nervous. they're saying things could be getting a bit stretched here with the federal reserve changing its policy, companies could have a harder time making money and investors will have different choices to make. right now we're seeing a more defense of push into the stock market. overall real people, don't sweat it. you're a long-term investor, stay diversified, you'll be fine. >> thank you, jill. >> and some good news this morning on diabetes. a new federal study finds a drop of 60% in the rate of heart atax and the disease. the number of american adults with diabetes more than tripled over those two decades. >> it is time to show you some of this morning's headlines. "usa today" said food prices rose

subsection 221 of h.r. 4005 prohibits the secretary of homeland security from dismantling or disposing of any former lohran system infrastructure for one year from the date of enactment of the act or until the date the secretary notifies the committee that such infrastructure is not needed for a position navigation, the timing system to provide redundant capability in the event signals are disrupted, whichever is latter. is that the chairman's understanding? i'd like to ask the chairman, i am aware there are several important issues including this position associated with them that we should closely examine, deal with in an appropriate manner. i ask the chairman, my colleagues in the committee to work with me to resolve these issues in the context of h.r. 4005 as this bill moves forward. mr. hunter: to extent these issues are within the issues of the committee of transportation and infrastructure, i look forward to working with the gentleman from alaska with regard to the disposition of assets in a manner satisfactory to the longest serving member of the subcommittee and its predecesso

section 124, except as provided in subsection b, none of the funds may be used by the secretary to relocate a unit in the army that performs a testing mission. section 125, amounts may be transferred within the account in accordance with the reprogramming guidelines for military construction. section 126, none of the funds may be obligated for planning and design at arlington national cemetery. section 127, $125 million. section 128, $245 million. section 129, including rescission of funds, $79,577,000 are rescinded. section 130, including rescission of funds, $25 million are rescinded. section 131, including $100 sion of funds, million are rescinded. section 132, the term congressional defense committees means the committee on armed services of the house of representatives and senate. title 2, department of veterans affairs. veterans benefits administration, compensation and pensions, including transfer of funds, $78,679,709,000. readjustment benefits, $14,761,862,000. veterans insurance and ndemnities, $63,257,000. veterans housing benefit program fund, for direct and guaranteed loans suc

as we've killed more leaders how is it worth staying in the game of killing a broader subsection of people may not be an imminent threat to the united states? host: this shows you the area that has been a target of u.s. drone attacks. i want to ask for a response to comments of michael mccaul with regard to aqap. he said "this is probably the greatest external threat to the homeland itself." would you agree or disagree? guest: it is among the threats from the al qaeda affiliates or like-minded groups we have seen emerge in the last 10 years to 12 years. we've seen them in places like some only a. early on my biggest concern after 9/11 was indonesia. a lot of people died in bali and jakarta. i think the serious threat today is syria. if you're looking for magnets that attract potential jihadists let me tell you one thing look -- look at what the british security services are saying about the number of kids they are having go to syria fight and then return home. those kids aren't going to yemen. those kids are going to syria because it is the place to go if you are a jihadist in europe or th

historic international treaty that protects the most vulnerable among us children the treaty is a subsection of the one thousand nine hundred nine convention on the rights of the child or c.r.c. and for the first time it allows children to complain directly to the u.n. about everything from child slavery to prostitution that is of course if your country has ratified the treaty and only ten countries of those far ratified this latest clause the larger c.r.c. it would just stablish the standard for the civil political and social rights of children has been ratified by every single u.n. member state that is except for two countries some malia and the u.s. that's right things to pressure from right wing groups and religious organizations who don't want the u.n. raising america's children the convention has gone on ratified for nearly twenty five years is apparently ideas like an adequate i'm sorry adequate nutrition free primary education and safe exposure to leader ideas that are just too radical for this country to grapple with obama has even gone as far as calling the failure to uphold the tr

controlled subsect he can unilaterally his administration can reclassify reschedule marijuana out of a schedule one it's not in schedule one of many states is the reason they haven't fired him as he hasn't done anything in this area and not only has he not done anything he's hindered the states he's still raiding medical marijuana as his administration the d.e.a.'s the executive branch he's still in forcing marijuana laws so it's not just that he hasn't just fired this woman but he's done other things he hasn't done anything he's totally let down a large part of the constituency the motive for him by saying he would do something on this like many other issues he's not enough to remember when he was opposed to gay marriage and then he became for it and suddenly you know i think that was one of those big propelling things i think he was actually a little ahead of the curve on that maybe just in a matter of months but he was just a little ahead of the curve on that on this he's behind the curve in my opinion and it seems to me that particular with the election coming up in two thousand

political commentator subsects reports on the latest latin american country that has challenged washington's claims. the fallout from the recently disclosed zunes n.a.o. program has reached a nother latin american country kosta rico the a.p. reports that the coastal region government is demanding answers from the obama administration about how usaid improperly used assets in coasta rica to develop zunes in a oh the social network deployed in cuba in two thousand and nine to reportedly disrupt the castro government that repeated claims by usaid that the program was not overt were belies by lawmakers like senator patrick leahy who claimed earlier this month that he didn't know about it the legislation doesn't say anything about setting up a cock i mean the idea in cuba was twitter accounts and all and now the coastal region government claims it didn't know about it either despite reports that a base of operations for zooms in a.o. was run from within their country closer because communications minister told the a.p. quote the government of the republic was not aware of this we are awaiting the

price, requires, and i quote, employment and labor supply analysis in subsection b. now, that's incredibly important, mr. chairman, because what we do in washington absolutely has consequences. and what those consequences are, it's a fair subject of debate here in the chamber. but today there is no mechanism for determining, again, employment and labor supply numbers on a dynamic basis over time, recognizing what those actions are. now, my concern about the amendment from my friend is that rather than scoring those jobs dynamically, again, understanding that for every action there is a reaction, it scores aness at that timic methodology, assuming -- estatic methodology, assuming they can create a job. short of putting someone on the federal payroll, this amendment perpetuates the myth that the government is in the job creation business. the government is absolutely in the job destroying business, and we both work together on that facet. and we can make some decisions that help the private sector to succeed. it is those decisions, mr. speaker, that the bill, as drafte