two one violation of government code subsection a for failing to file a campaign fund by required 12 of july 31st, 2013. 3 one violation of california government code subsection a for failing to file a campaign statement by required deadline of january 31st, 2014, arrest each commissioner would participated in the decision as you certificate on the record that jorge reviewed the testimony and reviewed the entire record of the proceedings. regulation each commissioner must publicly certify on the record >> commissioner renne commissioner andrews. commissioner hayon. commissioner keane. i also so certify >> the respondents are presumed to be innocent until the preertdz on the merits unifies regulations for investigation regulations the executive director shall issue an acquisition and the next announcement at a special meeting open wednesday, may 28, 2014, in the matter of ethnics complaint the commission made a determination there's probable cause to building that the following government passing as conduct code and the respondent committed them one the violation of california code su

for failing to include a disclosure side our an hang and one conduct code subsection for failing to include a disclosure section type size on a door hanger and each commissioner who participated must certificate on the record that he or she personally reviewed the evidence or otherwise the entire procedures. commissioners so certificates. vice chair commissioner renne >> so certified. commissioner keane. i so certificate the respondent is presumed to be innocent and subsequent hearing the executive director shall issue a statement for investigations for enforcement proceedings. at the regular meeting on the matter of ethics complaint you tell ethics commission made a desertion there's probable cause to building the following violations of the california government code was by the conduct code and the respondent melissa committed them one violation of the cool code for failing to file a campaign statement by the required deadline of january 31st and one violation of the government conduct code subsection a for failing to file a campaign statement by the required city council of july

statement by the required deadline of january 31st and one violation of the government conduct code subsection a for failing to file a campaign statement by the required city council of july 21st, 2012, and 3 the violation of the government code for failing to file a campaign statement by the required deadline of january 31st, 2013, and four one violation of the california government code subsection a for failing to file a campaign attempt by the required deadline of january 31st and 5 one violation of the government code section subsection a for failing to file a campaign statement of january 31st, 2014. each commissioner would participated in the discussion must certificate on the record they reviewed the buyer xeerdz >> commending. softly. commissioner hayon i certificate as well. the respondent is presumed to be innocent in a sunset hearing the executive director should issue an accusation with the ethics commission regulars is for investigation and enforcements proceeding. finally in its regular commission of monday, june 23, 2014, in the matter of ethics commission complainant number 20

662 subsection 4 the following sentence projects that as of the effective date of this subsection have a term sheet endorsed by the board of supervisors and have finding fiscal feasibility and agriculture to be community investment & infrastructure commission the projects to made sure hiring per exorbitantly by oewd pr that's a fourth exemption to the newly expanded code. >> thank you very much. >> there's an enforcement section and it has two provisions in one section. >> please read that this is what i was river to the giant in forest city to make sure that the decisions they voluntarily made and the language you're going to present right now. >> given the agreement of going up to thirty this fits spots exemption this roadways a new subsection a to say that oewd shall issue rules and regulations for enforcement of the policy where the construction contract is issued but an entity or individual other than the city so would give oewd enforcement over the class and at the end of that section the following sentence would be added for projects i'm sorry for projects where the construction

and are there any other phrases that need to be adjusted in that subsection. just those two. so those two amendments would be my request that the committee adopt. >> okay. any comments about this? >> supervisor tang. >> thank you supervisor wiener. i think we were surprised about what happened in light of the ballot measure and what highlighted this motion, so i would like to accept the amendments and move it to the board for full recommendation. >> for amendment -- to accept the amendment, if there's no objection, we pass it. moving onto recommendations. before we do that, i also -- and i'm thankful for supervisor wiener for bringing this ordinance to us. this makes sense to me and one of these things were maybe an oversight when the original ordinance was put in there and never thinking that one would actually abuse the system that much so. thank you for closing that loophole. >> thank you. >> i neglected -- i wanted to thank my legislative jeff for working on this. so thank you. >> there's a motion on floor to pass out with positive recommendation. without objection, the m

for failing to include a disclosure side our an hang and one conduct code subsection for failing to include a disclosure section type size on a door hanger and each commissioner who participated must certificate on the record that he or she personally reviewed the evidence or otherwise the entire procedures. commissioners so certificates. vice chair commissioner renne >> so certified. commissioner keane. i so

for failing to include a disclosure side our an hang and one conduct code subsection for failing to include a disclosure section type size on a

at the end of the bill before the short title, except as provided in subsection b, none of the funds made available by this act may be used by an officer or employee of the about foreign intelligence information acquired understood they are foreign intelligence act of 1978 using a united states person identifier. b, subsection a, shall not apply to queries for foreign intelligence queries authorized under section 105- 03, 704, or 705 of the foreign intelligence urveillance act of 19 -- 1978. regardless of under what foreign intelligence surveillance act authority it was collected. c, except as provided for in subsection d, none of the funds made available in this act may be used by the national security sthirgete central intelligence stiget mandate or request that a person as defined in section 1801-m of title 50, united states code, alter its product or service to permit the electronic surveillance as defined in section 180146 f of title 50 united states code of any user or said product product or service for said agency. d, subsection c shall not apply with respect to mandate or re

a 10 to now subsection b 10. i think that is, that is clarifying language. so, those are technical and nonsubstantive and ask that we also include this as well. >> okay. can we take those amendments without objection. without objection those amendments passed. [gavel] >> okay. and on the final legislation, president chiu, were we asking that it be forwarded to the full board on june 3rd or june 10th? >> what i'd like to propose is rather than forwarding it out for june 3rd, which still gives us a week-and-a-half, we forward it out on june 10th to see if there are issues that can be sorted out. and i'm also happy, supervisor tang, if that particular 5 01 c-6 wants to have a conversation, happy to sort of understand that i do want to note that 5 01 c6 organizations include, and i'm looking on wikipedia right now, major chambers of commerce, securities industry association, national foodth ball league, home builders association, real estate board, i think many of those are entities that we would expect to file lobby

peers the department wants to request an agreement to clarify the property owners name on page one subsection b and that's the san francisco, llc represented by bay west group. that concludes my presentation. . and if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them along with my colleague tim fry to answer any questions >> thank you very much. why don't we take a - okay. the project sponsor are you here. okay. i building i have a couple of questions describe to us what you intend to do with this and how much office space in the building >> the building represents 3 hundred and 11 thousand this is two henry adams we have a sister property on 101 henry adams those total 6 house thousand square feet it is for the landmark of henry audiotapes. subtract to the the office allocation that's requesting a conversion up to two hundred and 45 thousand square feet this is everything above the ground floor of two henry adams that stays as pdr that represents the building and stays as pdr the second to the fifth floors will be converted we have existing leases in place that extend through 2024 there's

digging whether or not to initiate litigation and it says if the session is closed pursuant to subsection a the party shall state the identity of the litigation to be discussed unless the body says to do so will justices of the peace the agency ability to service of progress upon one or more parties or jeopardizes it's ability to include the settlement negotiations you're talking about settlement in the agenda item. i thought. oh, stimulation i'm sorry oh, the point has been made. thank you. >> commissioners, comments or questions. is there a motion to go into closed session with respect to agenda item 5? >> so moved. i'll second >> in favor i. opposed. hearing none. that motion passes. agenda item 6 discussion regarding the status and background of pending litigation with gross man and the san francisco ethics commission public comment? >> commissioners ray heart for open government api i've been wade for keen anticipation whether to handle this agenda item in full view of the public hell i'm curious whether you'll let the public have my opportunity to observe your discussion i'm good mo

the budget is going up because of capital regulatory electrical costs in particular the subsection agreement and pg&e has proposed to do very significant rate increases for transition distribution as well as the street lights of all san francisco. personnel covets and other costs are largely increasing the majority of our budget is in capital related. the next couple of charts summarize the important things like 90 percent plus gets paid for by service charges and property rentals as well. the use society is capital costs about half of our budget is through debt service e.r. capital that continues to be the course over the next several years. on the water department on slide 9 you'll see the changes are largely capital on the wastewater department slide 10 the changes are capital and general reserves and those will be used to curb on the impact over the years. the house/senate water and power which is the part of the discussion on april 30th shows you here that with large increases of electrical power costs and also the impact of the drought i should mention the cost of the drought meant the

second whereas down, subsection 2 which currently reeds title and all transferable liability associated will transfer upon completion of the heavy lift operation. i'm inserting four words to that. it will now read title and all transfer from associated so that captions the idea that there may be some technical way of we still having liability, even though it presents zeros financial exposure to us. second is the first line of the first resolve clause. after waiver, the new language includes, "or administrative waivers from administrative departments." that's been a recent development [inaudible] through the board of supervisors. those are the two changes or two amendments and i'm open to any questions. thank you. >> for a motion and a second. >> so moved as amended. >> second. >> is there any public comment? any commissioners comment? >> the completion of lift operation, that's when it arrives or when the dry dock is lifted. >> when it's lifted out of the water so the heavy [inaudible] probably going to be a swan, they'll go to anchorage nine, will submerge itself down about 25 feet, dr

in pennsylvania has subsection of the pennsylvania disorderly conduct code can make using obscene language or gestures a crime if the person does it with the intent to cause inconvenience annoyance or harm to the public but that word obscene is pretty vague and the. active rose says it is supposed to be limited only to words of gestures that are sexually obscene at nature with no redeeming value but apparently the police there use that vagueness of the law very loosely that's according to the lawsuit that bridge has now testified he alleges that the police there have a pattern of issuing illegal play taishan under the disorderly conduct code to citizens who use speed that is protected under the first amendment he says his priest speech rights were violated and that he suffered personal humiliation embarrassment and emotional harm from the whole ordeal as a result he's looking for punitive damages in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars to which i say good for him just as the wording of the disorderly conduct code is arbitrary so is what we consider to be bad words in the first place

. >> colorado is -- i mentioned the two different subsections earlier. but it's -- we expect almost 100% of the time it's a consent offense but within the statutes we're able to work through that and what consent means. so i don't know there's a model being proposed out there but cost is a workable series overstates we can private -- of statutes we can provide. >> we'll pull the. >> i'm surprised there isn't one. >> yes. >> i'm going astray for a second but earlier you asked the question about where you might be able too help on the administrative side. identity i'd like too bring up one thing from the law enforcement side. it does have a overlap at the university. we still have an extreme shortage of same programs and the ability for survive users to come forward to get exams and while that's helpful to me on the forensic evidence collection, there's the well-being and safety and medical support that the survivor is lacking and getting, and i've been working hard in establishing one in my community... or university-based medical and nobody is equipped t

international mortgage desk on wall street, but his business cards are printed with section 4-08 subsection p of the new york city traffic code as it pertains to engine-idling. roughly speaking, it is prohibited for more than 3 minutes and carries potential fines of several hundred dollars. pakenham is concerned about the quality of the air and the quantity of oil, and he has distributed nearly 2,000 cards." >> "nearly 2,000 cards over the past two and half years to drivers who refuse to shut off their engines at curbside. he typically begins with a rap on the window and a preemptive apology." >> we live on the upper west side, and i lived here 50 years ago as a single person, and then we got married, and we moved to, uh, long island, and we've been there for 50 years, and came back to the city, and i feel as if i were coming home. so, i feel very proprietary about coming home. and therefore, when i, uh, saw people, uh, idling their engines at the--at the curb, i went over to the window, and i said-- are you aware that it's illegal to keep your engine idling for more than 3 minutes? no, it'

>> they exist but it's a matter of incentivizing the players and i think there are significant subsection of the iraqi population as well as of the ease leads that think this war is worth fighting for now and they're doubling down. >> how do you see this playing out over the next couple of weeks? >> i think there's going to be a very long and torturous political negotiation process. on the military front i anticipate that i.s.i.s.'s advance will slow down around baghdad. they're not capable of taking the capitol city nor is that their intention at the present at least, they can hold primarily sunni territory but once they go into nonsunni territory things get more difficult for them. i think north and west of the capitol. >> fasil atani thanks for joining us. >> thank you. >> you're welcome. >>> a u.s. court today made public a secret government memo that justified killing an american man in yemen. the dron are drone killed anwarl liki. >> it argues the drone can kill a u.s. citizen abroad if the american is plotting against america and the americans can't catch him. drone strikes like th

that all nationally prevalent sources of air pollution achieve minimum emissions standards and the subsection of that part has become the legal basis for the epa to act. >> guest: the clean air act was not designed to regulate carbon. people will disagree about that. we do not believe it was designed to regulate carbon. we have now is 650 page proposal which is going to show how difficult and complicated is to try to reduce carbon emissions from utilities in this country. >> guest: so mr. billings is exactly right. this is why the clean air act is written weight is to deal with these problems and the supreme court has already ruled twice that carbon dioxide and carbon pollution is the subject of the clean air act if it's determined to be dangerous and the epa is partly determined it to be dangerous. the company sued again over the danger finding and the courts ruled against them. the supreme court turned that case down. the law is crystal clear on this that this is what the clean air act is for, to its deal with pollution problems that we recognize as the science. in fact senator muskie and t

. >> colorado, i mentioned the two different subsections but we expect that almost 100% of the time. i don't know that it -- i don't know that there's a model being proposed, but colorado is certainly a workable series of statutes we can provide through either one of those. >> we'll pull some of the statutes and take a look. >> i'm surprised there isn't one. >> yeah, i'm going astrayed for a second, but earlier you asked about where you might be able to help on the administrative side. i'd like to bring up one thing we and the ability for survivors to come forward and get -- and cephalically while that's successful for me, but there's the well-being and safety and medical support that the survivor is lacking in getting, i've been working hard in establishing one in my community. we have all kinds -- >> there's not one in boulder. >> no. i know. we are progressive and we are educated intel gent in this area, about you it becomes a lack of funds. you can say go get a grant, but everybody's competing for those grants. nobody thinks it's their one job or role to provide the sane exam. >>

-- i will not belabor you -- are you reading subsection c? the tonnage per year requirement , with the absurd result that .ollows >> well, i would be happy to get to that point about the connection between the operation of the to, because i think it is of critical importance here. underou're supposed to do use best available control technology to get above program sethe nsps everystandards on an eight-year basis. nsps program was enacted as part of the 1970 act. program was added in 1977, and it was added because of dissatisfaction, and it is it's because under 7411, epa has to go one source category at a time. it has to do refineries in the next thing and the next thing. so epa had not got standards in place for all the different sources. the point of the psp program is to put in place an additional requirement, this is jack lew what congress was after. when there isn't a standard like 7411, psd is supposed to fill the breach. makes sense because you want to get the psd program -- it -- if you want to get in there at the beginning so they do

. >> colorado and i mentioned the two different subsections earlier. we expect almost 100% of the time consent defense but within the statutes we have there able to work through that and what consent means so i don't know if there is a model that's being proposed out there but colorado certainly is a workable series of statutes we can provide to either one of those. >> we will pull some of the statutes. >> i'm surprised there isn't one. >> i'm going astray for second in early u.s. the question where you might be you might be a lookup lookup on administrative site and i'd like to bring up one thing from the prosecutor law enforcement side and it does have luck with the university. we have an extreme shortage of saying programs in and the ability for survivors to come forward. while selfishly that is helpful to me on the forensic evidence collection there is that side but there's the well-being and safety and medical support that the survivors lacking. i've been working hard in establishing one in my community. >> there's not one in boulder? >> no. i kno

. >> colorado, imagine the two different subsections earlier, but we expect almost 1% of the time consent defense but within the statutes that we have we are able to work through that and what consent means. i don't know that there's a model that's been proposed out there, but colorado is certainly a workable series of statutes that we can provide through either one of those. >> we will pull some of those statutes and take a look. >> i'm surprised there isn't one. >> i'm going astray for a second ago you asked about where you might be able to ask -- help on the administered site. i'd like to bring up one thing from the law enforcement side, and it does have overlap with the university. we still have an extreme shortage of sustained programs and the ability for survivors to come forward to give exams. while selfishly that's helpful to me on the forensic evidence collection, there's that site but there's the well being and safety and medical support that the survivor is lacking in getting, and i've been working hard and establishing one in my committee. we have all kinds of -- >> there's no

ensure all nationally prevalent sources of air pollution were never located, and one sub sects -- subsectionthat has become the legal basis to act. act was notlean air designed to regulate carbon. now have a 650 page proposal which will show how difficult and complicated it is to reduce carbon emissions in this country. exactly right. this is why the act is written the way it is. to dear with -- deal with new problems. the supreme court ruled twice that carbon pollution is subject to the clean air act if it is determined to be damage -- dangerous. companies sued again over the finding and the courts ruled against them. the supreme court turned the case down here in the law is crystal clear on this. this is what it is for, to deal with illusion problems. the senator and the congressman at the time knew about, -- climate change. we knew carbon dioxide was hoping up in the atmosphere and starting to overheat the planet. time to start curbing the pollution. questioning is from rhode island, democrat line, good morning. >> good morning. thank you for c-span. i have two questions. the first one is

no limit or other prohibition under this section except as provided in this subsection applies to a vehicle transporting raw or unfinished forest product and operating on interstate route 39 from wisconsin for mile markers 175.8, to mile marker 189 if such vehicle has a gross vehicle weight of 98,000 pounds or less. the chair: the gentleman from iowa is recognized. mr. latham: i reserve a point of order on the gentleman's amendment. the chair: a without objection is reserved. the gentleman from wisconsin is recognized for five minutes. mr. duffy: thank you, mr. chairman. in central and northern wisconsin a logging is an incredibly important industry for our community and economy. and in mosnewa, wisconsin, we have large paper mill. and the vast majority of the wood that feeds that paper mill comes from northern wisconsin. what happens is the wood is harvested in northern wisconsin and it comes down highway 51 where the weight limits for a truck is 98,000 pounds. but in warsaw, wisconsin, highway 51 turns into i-39. and it's at that time that the weight limits go from 98,000 pounds down to 8