5 line 15 i'll read the subsection in the second sentence this quote didn't confer a right to over a unit for such use is not allowed by law a homework associations or rental amendment i want to add covenants or restrictions or other restrictions or enforceable things cc&rs are part of the category of agreements we're not intending to impact. so >> 1 and 75 days. >> hold on one moment and one - go ahead. >> so sorry to interrupt deputy director i think i had a drafting error i believe that tax records are comfortable making those available to the tax collector not to the planning department and so that's the sixth within you read in and i had inveterately saying the tax record should be available to the planning department that's an error. >> on top of that one additional change in subsection g one a to state point residential unit is occupied by itself permanent resident for 2 hundred and 75 case or proportional share if they xnt have not owned it for the year there's a suggestion 2 hundred and 75 days in the preceding calendar we're going on that the proximity resident it required

unless i'm missing something in the submittals. >> a clear recent photo. >> yeah. >> certainly under subsection b. >> right. under submittal b. >> we can certainly add that. >> okay. great. >> seeing no other comments right now, we'll open up public comment regarding rules and regulations. any member of the public wish to talk about rules and regulations, no, we'll close public comment and come back to commission. >> mr. frye and i have been working on a session not of the rules and recognizes, -- regulations that will expand on this section a little bit. we'll give pointers to people for how they can effectively organize and make their presentation and those helpful hints will refer to the appendix that i just wanted to make sure that everybody realized that we have not approached the folks on getting the presentation. >> do we have a motion? >> i so move that we adopt the rules and regulations with the amendments the people have proposed including yours. >> i second it. >> thank you. >> this you commissioners, on that motion to adopt the new rules and regulations as amended today, commissione

on count three contravention of section 120, subsection 7, alternatively count 120, subsection 3a andfurther alternatively section 120, subsection 3b of the firearms control act number 60 of 2000, the accused is found guilty of the second alternative that is the contravention of section 120 3b. on count four contravention of section 90 of the firearms control act number 60 of 2000 the accused is found not guilty and discharged. you may take a sit, mr. pistorius. >> if it is good with no previous convictions. >> thank you. before i even ask counsel to address me i need to address the issue of the indemnity of mr. fresco. >> as the court pleases. >> to discuss fresco, who was one of the gentlemen that was involved with the shooting the gun through the sunroof so once they get through that i'm assuming we'll discuss this, guilty of culpable homicide. apparently there were four charges, the ammunition charge, the shooting through the sunroof and now we'll see what comes up with the guilty of culpable homicide, what are your thoughts on this? she's been lenient saying the state didn't prov

in that the accused is guilty of the offense of contravening the provisions of section 120, subsection3, 121-a, section 121. and section 151 of the firearms control act of 2000, discharge of ia firearm in a built-up are or in a public place. the indictment carries on in that on or about 30 september, 2010, and while traveling in a vehicle with other passengers, on a public road, the accused did unlawfully discharge a firearm by firing a shot with his own 9 millimeter pistol through the open side door of the car they were traveling in. alternative to count two, con a contravention, number 60 of 2000, that the accused is guilty of the offense of contravening the provisions of section 120, subsection 3-b, with sections 1, 103, 121-a, section 121, and section 151 of the firearms control act, 60 of 2000. reckless endangerment. in that on or about 30 september, 2012, the accused mentioned in count two above discharged a firearm, to whit, his 9 millimeter pistol with reckless disregard for other passengers in the car. and/or people in the vicinity. count three, contravention of section 120 of

resolution 149 dash 23 f-2 revisions for board policy p 5 one 0 one a motion and second for the subsection of the rules for first reading. >> roll call vote please. >> (laughter). >> i will second to the realize. >> thank you commissioner norton in the middle of laughing roll call vote please. on suspension mr. haney ms. maufas ms. mendoza-mcdonnell dr. murase ms. norton ms. wynns no no? president fewer that fails. >> well, can i have a remove of a vote. >> let me continue mr. haney on suspension of the rules for 5101 policy? thank you and dr. murase >> thank you 6 i's. >> all right. may i have a motion and second for formal introduction okay. mr. superintendant. >> who will read the resolution into the record. >> thank you president fewer i'm going to ask the executive director darlene to read the resolution but as a preamble i lloyd like to say to the boards request this is the sprntsdz proposal i was asked to help to sensitive vices our attention to willie brown junior's for the class we're going to start with the sixth grade class with students and the year after that for a total of of

conditions and restrictions again to clarify cc&rs will not be over ridden by the legislation on page 19 subsection 5 line 15 i'll read

office space without this amendment this would be adjudicated that's not her intent so section 2 b subsection 6 it says the project approval under the planning provision add into this and section 802.9 on or before - as provided above in 2 b-6 no project within the s l a district would be xemd exempted so this only effects one district. >> thank you very much supervisor kim is there anything else before we move to. public comment is closed. on item 4 i have no speaker cards >> please come forward. >> thank you good afternoon, supervisors i'm ass list light the director of community planning at todco here to speak in support of the pdr conversions i want to note that for the public that within pdr production distribution and repair this includes the artists activities that's important many the selma neighborhood we're very pleased that the mayor and supervisor kim included this this in their recently compromise i want to thank supervisor kim so far following through with the ordinances we're seeing today the pressures to pdr and selma are 53 very real we see it everyday artists and pdr small b

on page 19 subsection 57 line 12. >> thank you very much. >> i'm going to call additional cards i want to speculate some people may not have waited for their cards to be called (calling names) >> next speaker. >> good afternoon. supervisors i'm chris, i live in district 10. supervisor cowen's district and i are happen to work in supervisor kim's district i've taken the day off to discuss this important topic. when i became a citizen easily this year i made a pledge to uphold and have full faith of the laws of the united states and as an air b and b host i want to do this legally it's important to me and important to my husband that we're following the laws in this i have to say it bothers me we're not curling within the boundary of the law and appreciate supervisor chiu's legislation and the amazing amateur of work he and his staff and supervisors have done. to make it so people like us can do this legally. i have to say we live in the bay area and you may think we because of that we cannot host very frequently given certain conditions in the be sure we're full about 60 percent of the

it would just repeat the same thing throughout the table as you go down to different subsections. in other districts they make use of that. it serves for a dozens zoning districts in one table and how to make that useful. that's the confusion. >> thank you. >> they need more tables. >> that's the plan. >> i think my comments relate to 3809. >> okay, seeing no other questions or comments at this time we'll move on and before we go to the next item, the meeting back to order. good afternoon and welcome back to the san francisco historic preservation wednesday hearing for september 17, 2014. commissioners you left item 12 for case 20141249 item12: 2014.1249t s. wertheim; 4155 558-66122 planning code amendments related to office conversion controls in landmark buildings in pdr districts the historic preservation commission will consider a resolution to approve amendments to the planning code. the amendments are intended to limit the conversion of production, distribution, and repair pdrr space to office space in landmark buildings in pdr districts. the planning code is proposed to be

. >> questions were raised about a textbook that only covered d-day and holocaust in a subsection onanother publisher anotheringed 8 years of the reagan administration but wrote about hillary clinton's campaign. the texas network objected to how some noted the influence of moses and the ten commandments on the drafting of the constitution. kathy miller who leads the groups says their concerns are not just limited to moses. >> the problems run the gamut. they adopted curriculum standards that were heavily politicized and were not accurate. the reviewers they have don't possess expertise in the subject matter. >> they lost the battle over this issue in 2010 with 18 months of testimony with thousands of people participating. what you see now is this liberal group attacking christianity and essentially wanting to erase it from history being caught taughr public schools. >> they are proposing corrections but the debate is far from over. >> that is rawed key koski reporting. in november they will decide what books to use for the following school year. >>> it is time now to brew on this. th

in the program if the offense for which the person is charged is domestic violence as defined in subsection 3 of the penal laws of 1991, chapter 261, 2 c colon 2019. that reads it includes assault. there you have it, folks. the football player gets not only preferential treatment but treatment outside of the law. now i take no position as to whether ray rice should play football. i really don't care. that's a totally separate issue from whether he should be held accountable for his crime and i don't want to hear that that wife didn't want to go forward. i prosecuted domestic cases where the victim was testifying for the defendant and i've still convicted the abuser. and by the way, the prosecutor doesn't need much more than, lights' out, let's go to the videotape to prove our case. janay, i have a message for you. you may forgive him, but by so doing you send him a message and an even worse message to battered women abusers. if a man beats a woman, he's going to continue to beat her and the beatings will increase in intensity and frequency as time went on. i know. this was my crusade when n

the secretary shall deposit into the account established under subsection a, $10 million of the total of the amounts received by the united states each fiscal year under lices sued under this -- under leases issued under this act. c, availability and use of funds. one, in general, subject to paragraph 2, the amounts in the accounts established under subsection a shall be made available to the commodity futures -- mr. schneider: i ask unanimous consent to dispense with the reading. the speaker pro tempore: is there objection? >> objection. the clerk: trading commission, to use its existing authorities to limit excessive speculation in energy markets. two, subject to appropriations. the authority provided in paragraph 1 may be exercised only to such extent and with respect to such amounts as are provided in advanced in appropriations acts. section 2, protecting national security. any issue shall specify that united states oil, petroleum products and natural gas shall not be exported to any nation. the speaker pro tempore: the clerk will suspend. mr. hastings: i ask unanimous consent tha

b, after reassembling pursuant to subsection a when the senate ajurns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its majority leader or his designee, the senate shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution. section 3, a, the speaker or his designee after consultation with the minority leader of the house shall notify the members of the house to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if in his opinion the public interest shall warrant it. b, after reassembling pursuant to subsection a, when the house adjourns on the motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its majority leader or his designee, the house shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the concurrent resolution is agreed to and a motion to reconsider s laid on the table. without objection, pursuant to senate concurrent resolution 44 , the 113th congress, the house stands adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on wednesday, novemb >> remarks know from former secretary of state and p

cannot deny the progress that this group has made but at the same token this group is only a small subsectionof a larger group. so that becomes the major contradiction and what that group needs to do, along with poor folks, is talk about black equality and racial and economic justice because we can't just say we have got barack obama and the civil rights movement is over. >> guest: i agree with that entirely but let me move it into the political arena. we just experienced some riveting depictions in ferguson, missouri but let me tell you something. i have looked at this. i had my staff did a little bit of research and we found out that if you look at the 2012 elections in ferguson, missouri, 56% of african-americans in that community loaded in the presidential election in 2012. in april of this year, only 6% of them bother to vote. in the local elections for a mayor, a guy who they say is insensitive, he was up for re-election, unopposed and only 6% of them bother to vote. now something has to be done it seems to me to get people to understand today that your job is not over when you elect an

immigration debate has not gone away in the states, it is still very there and among some of the subsections of the population, it is very sail yenlt. honduras, guatemala, kids coming up from el salvador, i was stuck in dallas getting my plane rebooked and the woman behind the counter was talking to me about honduras and about what she should go down there and help with the kids, because she was with the church. that's the kind of things people in texas are thinking about. congress has certainly been kicking the can for a long time. the courts are getting involved to a certain extent. but they're going to have to pick those issues backs up. and to make a really broad annal squli, tomorrow i'm running an international conference on violence. one thing we know about violence from mexico is that when you have a series of cartels that are fighting each other, and a government comes in and fightings with one of them, you actually don't just weaken that one cartel, you start violence between the cartels, because one's weak and now everyone else wants their turf. you start succession crisis within

subsection g requires minimization procedures. it was understood that this tool could be used to obtain data that could relate to a number of u.s. persons. the statute requires that the government proposed and then an element of the program be robust minimization procedures. they spelled out any orders of the fifth but that there would be rejections around the use and dissemination of the data. >> it would be possible to spell out something in legislation of this program were going to be authorized by congress explicitly that said what made sense and what did not. this as the attorney general has to specify. the record is basically just sign off on what the attorney general asks for. it made more restrictions. that was because of the effort to be more restrictive. they are operating in an expert take complex. here is what would be better or we think this is what the constitution requires. the government looks and says there are things that you should tell us to do. those are approved. y concern about all of this is it is fine to s

it specifically has a provision. 6t is subsection i on page that says nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific authorization for the introduction of the united states armed forces into hostilities or into situations where hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances. >> i have read that and very pleased to see that because it would be harder to vote. thank you very much. >> thank you. thank you for being here. generally, when we refer to a unit being appropriately vetted, we are not referencing whether they are members of extremist group but whether they have committed human rights abuses or not. can you tell me is the training and arming of these forces subject to the leahy law? >> it would be my assumption that it would be subject to all existing federal laws. guilty of aho is human rights violation would not be able to be trained or to be armed or equipped? >> i would not be qualified tonight to give you the exact characterization of the leahy law and what those criteria are. that while to say you have the other federal laws, at a minimum, the ve

. >> yes, ma'am, there is a specific provision that it is subsection i on page 6 that says nothing in the section shall be construed to put the united states armed forces into hostility or where hostility is included in the circumstances. >> i read that and i was pleased to see that because it would be a harder vote. >> further discussion. thanks for being here. you know, generalry when we refer to a unit being vetted we are not references members of an extremist group but whether they committed human right violations or not. is the training subject to the law? >> it would be my assumption it would be subject to all existing federal laws. >> anybody who is guilty of a human rights violation would not be able to be trained or to be armed or equipped? >> i wouldn't be qualified to give you the exact characterization of that law and what the criteria. what we wanted to say in this is while you have the other federal laws that at a minimum the vetting would include, in this circumstance, where or not these individuals or groups had these affilations with terrorist and were affiliated with

subsection g requires minimization procedures. it was understood that this tool could be used to obtain data that could relate to a number of u.s. persons. the statute requires that the government proposed and then an element of the program be robust minimization procedures. they spelled out any orders of the fifth but that there would be rejections around the use and dissemination of the data. >> it would be possible to spell out something in legislation of this program were going to be authorized by congress explicitly that said what made sense and what did not. this as the attorney general has to specify. the record is basically just sign off on what the attorney general asks for. it made more restrictions. that was because of the effort to be more restrictive. they are operating in an expert take complex. here is what would be better or we think this is what the constitution requires. the government looks and says there are things that you should tell us to do. those are approved. my concern about all of this is it is fine to

a new drug which was for a subsection of patients that was cystic fibrosis that have a particular geneticwas the first drug that treats the underlying cause and not just the symptoms with the devastating and this has been transform of a and provides the patients and the cystic fibrosis foundation made this work possible because they helped to create the patient kmund necessary to move into the trial to get the tissue as well as the patients that could create a foundation for understanding the opportunity and moving forward quickly on it. that's to conduct the critical resources and the patients and the dollars to help move it forward so there is a lot in this area. i think we need to look at what's being done and it's incredible success and importance and build on it. >> thank you. >> thank you, chairman. that won't be one of the test objects. you objected on each criteria and that was discrimination on your part. >> i had to object myself. >> i still stand ready to offer my services. we had a good with manhattan institute, we had a good and that was part of that. i have been in boston. t

i spoke to a subsection of that group and i gave a talk similar to the one i gave you today and i opened by asking the group, raise your hand if you're on medicare. more than half the room raised their hand. guess what, you're on single-payer health care. they were stunned by that. of course, this is a group that's very passionate about wanting to repeal obamacare. the trojan horse for single-payer medicine in america. what i would urge my conservative brethren to do is, we have to do a much better job of explaining to the public that we didn't have a market health care system in 2009. there were serious problems with access and cost in the health care system before 2010. if our voters believe that repealing obamacare will fundamentally solve the health care problems in this country, it won't. i don't think we've done a good job of that and we have to do a better job and that's on us. encouraginge more remarks i've heard this morning from brad and joe is this issue of transparency. that's been missing. look at healthns care is a little bit like blindfolding people and shoving them into a

i spoke to a subsection of that group and i gave a talk similar to the one i gave you today and i opened by asking the group, raise your hand if you're on medicare. more than half the room raised their hand. guess what, you're on single-payer health care. they were stunned by that. of course, this is a group that's very passionate about wanting to repeal obamacare. the trojan horse for single-payer medicine in america. what i would urge my conservative brethren to do is, we have to do a much better job of explaining to the public that we didn't have a market health care system in 2009. there were serious problems with access and cost in the health care system before 2010. if our voters believe that repealing obamacare will fundamentally solve the health care problems in this country, it won't. i don't think we've done a good job of that and we have to do a better job and that's on us. >> one of the more encouraging remarks i've heard this morning from brad and joe is this issue of transparency. that's been missing. the way americans look at health care is a little bit like blindfolding p

a new drug which was for a subsection of patients that was cystic fibrosis that have a particular geneticker. it was the first drug that treats the underlying cause and not just the symptoms with the devastating and this has been transform of a and provides the patients and the cystic fibrosis foundation made this work building on research on which francis collins did a while back. this has been transformative and the cystic fibrosis foundation really made this work possible because they helped to create the patient community necessary to rapidly move into clinical trials to get the tissue as well as the patients that could create a foundation for understanding the opportunity and moving forward quickly on it. and put up some critical resources, not just patients but also dollar resources to help move the project forward so there's a lot of important activity in this area and i think we need to look at what's being done and its incredible success and importance and then build on it. and i do think this effort can put a major focus on this and help us advance this work. >> thank you. mike

it still there and in certain subsections of the population it is very salient.duras, guatemala kids coming up from el salvador, that issue is still very real. i was stuck in dallas getting my plane rebooked and woman behind the counter was talking to me about honduras and whether she should go down and help those kids. she was with a church. that's an issue people in texas are thinking about. so those issues, we are not getting with them here. congress has sorely been kicking the can for a long time. the court for getting involved they will have two victims issues back up. to make a broad analogy, tomorrow i'm running a conference on violence and one of the things are looking at is what we know about violence. one thing we know about violence from mexico is that when you have a series of cartels that are fighting each other and they government comes in and fights with one of them, you actually don't just weaken that one cartel, you start violence between the cartels because one is wea weakens now everyone else wants their turf. you start succession crisis he's a

so the immigration debate has not gone away in the states, it is still very there and in certain subsections of the population, it is very salient. the honduras, are gatt ma la, kids coming up from el salvador, that issue is still very real. i was stuck in dallas getting my plane rebooked and the woman behind the counter was talking to me about honduras and whether she should go down there and help those kids. she was with a church. that's the kind of things people in texas are thinking about. we're not dealing with them here. congress has certainly been kicking the can for a long time. the courts are getting involved to some extent. but they're going to have to pick those issues back up. >> tomorrow i'm running an international conference on violence. one thing we know about violence from mexico is that when you have a series of cartels that are fighting each other, and a government comes in and fights one of them, you actually don't just weaken that one cartel, you start violence between the cartels because one's weak and so now everyone else wants their turf. you start succession crisis w

the republican legislature as i mentioned created the majority minority districts and subsection fivedo it. the only reason we pass black voters into the districts have such high rates can and they are luckily 65 to 77% in certain districts, the only reason we did this is because we have to comply with section five of the voting rights act and what certainly the legal defense fund tuesday and they said in the amicus brief that we filed, it requires a much more nuanced analysis and a district by district and analysis analysis of the minority voting power determining how much traditional redistricting criteria played into the legislative redistricting process and how much did the rates paid a predominant factor lacks all of those particular questions are on the district by district basis. so we are looking at the contours of the aggression and standards and the districts can come in all shapes and sizes and depends on the general redistricting criteria in determining what is a constitutionally viable majority minority district and one that would be protected under the act. another inter