point i will pickup item 6 at 215 it through 54 market street this is a condominium conversion subsection. >> my pleasure to introduce my new member todd he returned from chid i can't think wyoming and sentiment in the city of the arizona and holds a bachz decree from argues argues university he's living in gilroy he works on his family farm he enjoys finishing and other outdoor activities todd welcome. >> thank you, john mr. chair and members of the commission good afternoon todd kennedy from san francisco planning staff item before you i hear and my manager maybe stepping in just a minute you i'll do a quick briefing this is the request for a see community investment & infrastructure subsection on market street located in the upper market neighborhood commercial transit district to describe the project a little bit the project proposes to convert 2 3 unit buildings into 6 condominiums in total there are no alternatives to the buildings proposed other than those that result from the department of building inspection reports under sections 1332 of the cities subsection code a see condomin

formally for the suspension basically to cover new year's eve and so as per that same section and subsection e i'm required to report to the entertainment commission both the recommendation of the sfpd and my reasons for not following that recommendation as i'm going to do it is not that complicated after consideration staff chose choose to issue a suspension under the police code and this decision was made on a number of factors first, the permittee voluntarily surntd his permit and not intending to be on on the first of january so the word would have been no entertainment to suspend in my case it's additionally, there had been again, a request to do use the 72 hour suspension it's called the office in between the city attorney when it was written called the emergency suspension it was written in and created as a way to provide a short but immediate suspension in cases we were concerned about this rotating tally violence that was not a contemplated basis have to spend suspend with someone with a chronic problem and this has been discussed they have a chronic problem in front and around the

also, in part because the subsection b. could be direct to establish the formal procedures for this decision could be interpreted to bar them from noticing the rulemaking in this area and if that is the intent we oppose it. expecting them not to expand statutorily to establish obligations is one thing but we believe that it would be a mistake to prohibit them from providing the comment rulemaking out of the detail and the certainty to customers and consumers and businesses below the ceiling. in conclusion mr. chairman i look forward to working with you and your committee to ensure that the internet openness of the net neutrality is maintained in defective and of course i welcome your questions. >> thank you and we look forward to working with you as well. i think we have ways to address a lot of what you pointed out and may actually already have but we look forward to working with you. next we go to the executive vice president general counsel of the hispanic media coalition. we are delighted to have you here at the subcomm

even they admitted they left out cartoons deemed to offensive and relegated the cover itself to a subsection of the paper. >> patrick pinter is a cartoonist. you are a veteran. you produced every -- one every day for 30 years, 43,000. i am a veteran i should say. >> you lost friends. >> one of them was just buried this afternoon. and another is buried in paris. i started as a young guy create i was 10 years old. i went -- that was they just welcomed me and they were nice with me it i stood to be a cartoonist. >> what do you make of today's cover? what do you think your friends would have made of it? >> when you realize how powerful is a cartoon, we can manage to make [indiscernible] im am in favor of an open-minded world. i would be very pleased just to face the reality. i would be happy to face a cartoon. we are different but we can mend us to come together. -- managed to come together. they were good guys, they were intelligent, clever, and will and minded and they died. >> i just wanted to ask you as well, talking about religious sensitivity. there has been a lot of outrage and people say

they have a program in pediatric nash, a subsection of the intercept indication. that data, phase 2 data could come in may of this year. raptor usually reports at the end of february. part of the reason the stock has been weak is that q4 has been weak for pediatric orphan indications. you might want to watch the quarter but do not forget the may data catalyst. >> rito, thanks so much for coming by. we appreciate it. >> we know where to go. acadia, specifically. if they are right about this parkinsons, your price target of 46, you have to double that if they get right. as you know a lost these names become binary. not that it is but it is pretty close to that. if you are in the mood for high risk and high reward, this is a very interesting stock. >> one of the things i would like to say is that in a difficult market be worried about biotech. talk about gill iad. it is a stock really proven to have resilient around that 95 level. you are not chasing the moon. it is a marketcap and cash burn that you can get behind. >> now we turn b.k. who is looking at yields in ger

. >> there is a separate subsection for television, music, fashion, and it is all public funds. so you have some who thought they would do something like deforestation projects and instead they are being pop-culture impresarios. >> explain how active the government is in its support of korean culture and exports. >> this is unprecedented in world history that a government has made a national priority of making korea the number one pop-culture exporter in the world. it is entirely run by the government, made possible by the fact korea is the only capitalist liberal democracy in the world that can, when necessary, function as a command economy. >> would you say it is working? we have seen some success. is it working? >> it has been working for korea, not just pop culture, but for korea this cooperation between government and private industry. pop-culture now, the k-pop industry is subsidized by the government. when the industry was suffering a few years ago because of piracy, they had a bailout, the same way goldman sachs did in the united states. they bailed out the k-pop industr

any brief right at the bottom it talks footnote of the case quote healthy and safety section 980 subsection c to has having the following requirements in deciding whether to require the vacation of the building or repair the endorsement agency shall give preference to the repair of the building whatever feasible to do so without having to repair more than 75 percent of the dwelling again, if we have an illegal unit and i don't think that is contested and if it is required by state law that certain vblthd w be made before being destroyed and user lock too involved an illegal unit then where was that determination made? in terms if dbi is to make it says the law requires such a vblthd where is it i didn't see it in the reference earlier to the july 28th notice of violation that doesn't appear there either and this is part of the request for the judicial notice so if such a finding is required again where is the tenants opportunity to contest or ask or to bring in an expert i royals that didn't need to be done but if state law at least on the face of this requires it why isn't it being done? n

sanchez street conditional use authorization and item 7 for 1678 through 88 condominium conversion subsection i have no i have no speaker cards. >> any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner moore. >> i move to approve all items on the consent calendar. >> second. >> on that motion to approve matters under consent calendar. >> commissioner antonini well commissioner johnson. >> well, i'm sorry. >> commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong. >> and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that amazing 7 do zero and the draft minutes for december 11th and december 8, 2014. >> my on the draft minutes seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner moore. >> i received a note from the public asking that we consider changing item under meeting minutes of december 11th page 12 item 18 that changes stair to stare case i building that from an architecture lingual planning department as well as the lingual stair applies staircase and stair applies stair i don't

statement those are opportunities we're looking at right now i'd love to see those occur with the subsection we expect that will occur with a lot of effort i'll expect a pro forma presented in 20 days will change but if you notice we didn't say my wife and i anything about tesla we want to get the revenue from 12 to 18 months tesla is a great opportunity but right around the window of 18 months we're going to try to get the revenue from tesla our goals to go ahead and increase revenue and fund the opportunities. >> since our friends in labor are excited that is wonderful is there a range of jobs with this new activity. >> obama we're trying to go ahead and get a good grasp of the volume some maybe spot business that's okay as long as we do that on a consistent basis. >> i'd like to go back and answer the question that commissioner brandon asked as well, maybe the 3 of you and maybe commissioner president katz can help the primary thing that changed be since 2008 the market is come back ems we hit a pretty deep trophy in terms of the market the market in the bay area slipping up trembling but

this was in the subsection, 8-c. the august, ten, 2013, the effective date of the da. and no alternates start date is identified with this obligation. and the purpose is serviced, and to encourage the employee public transit use at all four cpmc campuses speaking personally for pacific campus i know that the garage is quite small and employees have a hard time getting into parking and when i get out at night at 11:30 getting the cars out of the garage so that it is a very tight situation. for parking a vehicle in there. and also, to reduce the automobile use, traffic, and parking congestion, pollution and greenhouse gas emissions of course, and cpmc pacific campuses in a residential neighborhood and all of the people driving into work, definitely present the traffic issues on those streets. and to reinforce the city, transit first policy. performance, cpmc has not yet implemented the subsidy and myself and the other nurses have requested by calling into sutter health to get this subsidy, however it has had zero effect and is not being offered at this time. the city rep

second in subsection f, they could engage in reasonable network management.d be viewed suspiciously if in practice it undermines prohibitions of blocking throttling, prioritization, et cetera. third, the discussion draft bill is unclear or silent on an important point of clarification. which bartparts of the network are covered by the net neutrality protections? as indicated earlier consumer will not care where in her service provider's network any interference with net neutrality occurs, only whether it occurs. these three areas of discussion should be modified in order to ensure the internet open necessary is maintained and effective. in addition to discussion draft should be modified to provide adequate legal detail and certainty to consumers and businesses in the internet ecosystem. like all businesses, internet companies need confidence in the state of law and regulation in order to innovate and invest in products and services and behalf of their customers. details including the factors considered during formal complaint procedures are essential for busi

also, in part because the subsection b. could be direct to establish the formal procedures for this decision could be interpreted to bar them from noticing the rulemaking in this area and if that is the intent we oppose it. expecting them not to expand statutorily to establish obligations is one thing but we believe that it would be a mistake to prohibit them from providing the comment rulemaking out of the detail and the certainty to customers and consumers and businesses below the ceiling. in conclusion mr. chairman, i look forward to working with you and your committee to ensure that the internet openness of the net neutrality is maintained in defective and of course greg i welcome your questions. >> thank you and we look forward to working with you as well. i think we have ways to address a lot of what you pointed out and may actually already have but we look forward to working with you. next we go to the executive vice president general counsel of the hispanic media coalition. we are delighted to have you here at the s

. >> the invisible primary is lining up donors, a small subsection of the american electorate. extremely wealthy, unrepresentative of the republican base. >> yes, it's no keep these ads going. >> beauty pageants judged by billionaires. thank you. >>> in his first conversations, mitt romney said he is intent on running to the right of jeb bush. first of all, why? what would that gain him? second it is remarkable to see the unself consciousness that he will try out for this campaign. there is a moderate mitt, then a severely conservative version. now there is romney 3.0, the more conservative. he picked a strange way of going about it. >> it is a human tragedy that the middle class in this country does not belief the future will be brighter than the past, or their kids future is better than their own. more people are in poverty in america than ever before. >> this week he is talking about man made climate change. he described him as one of the republicans that think the world is getting warmer. that kind of rhetoric managed to alienate one of his former supporters. romney now int

a subsection of what the current iphone that uses are.times this, somewhere between 10 million and 20 million units in the first year. come to about two hundred million iphones. much smaller. down the road, this could be a 50 million business. this is not going to be a 300 million business for apple. x ever? -- >> ever? what is the thing that you will say, oh my god, this is taking off? >> well, some people use their phone as a watch. if you think about the watch the pocket watch was basically eliminated when the wristwatch came out. there is a lot of utility from having something readily available on your list. the value is going to come from things that can be accessed. rocks. going to check into your hotel you don't even have to talk to anybody, you grew up to your room and wait for your watch. eventually, assuming the battery holds up, you can do that with your car. with your home. everyday things that are annoying that you take out of your pocket. keys. phone. and that on your wrist is going to be some of the initial big value. longe

we think a good way to think about this is a subsection of what the current iphone uses are, so the bigs this. about this as it is somewhere between 10 million units and 20 million units in the first year, and that is going to compare with about 200 million iphones, and down the road, this could be a 50 million unit type of business, but it is not going to be a 300 million unit type of business. >> ever? >> i think it would be tough. you do not want to say never but probably down the road, that is a possibility, but not in the near term. >> i guess my question is, what is the thing that is going to make this incrementally where you say, oh, my god, this is taking off? i mean, what is the one thing that can change that? >> if you look at the basic level, the watch part, and obviously people use their phone as their watch, but the pocket watch was basically eliminated when the wristwatch came out, so there is a lot of utility having some things readily accessible on your wrist, so i think to answer your question, to some the value will be for things that are easily accessed whether it be

it with a good way to think about this is a subsection of what the iphone users are.bout this as a bubbly somewhere between 10-20,000,000 units the first year. that will compare to about 200 million iphones. it will be much smaller. maybe down the road, this could be a 50 million unit type of business that this will not be a 300 million type of unit business. >> ever? >> i think it would be tough. i don't want to say ever. you don't want to bet against it. if down the road that's a possibility but not in the near term. >> what is the thing that will make this say this is taking off? what's the one thing that could change this? >> if you look at the most basic level -- people use their phone as their watch but you look at the watch, the pocket watch was eliminated when the rich wasp -- when the wristwatch came out so there is utility and having things rentable read -- readily accessible on your wrist. some of that ireland is come from things that can be easily accessed whether it's -- you can go in check into your hotel and you don't have to talk to anybody. you just w

a the subsection a criminal data and humiliation.if if you visit las vegas today, one of the new sites is the museum of the law which celebrates the rich criminal history of las vegas. it is quite an interesting museum. this is how the museum begins. a room where you can line up and pretend to be on a criminal lineup. one of you has a long rap sheet, and people think it is hilarious , a lot of cackling and laughter. it is it is not so funny when it actually happens in real life. there is the 13 million americans arrested, only some of whom actually face criminal charges. in recent years some entrepreneurs have made a business of publicizing these mugshots of course public record record documents. for the overwhelming number of people they were in court records. away from the general public. so one chapter in my book talks about the mug shot business. here is -- the chapter looks at a company called busted mugshots. his innovation was to print up a little magazine busted, in austin texas and put funny photos of people and sells it. af

section 2 subsection e private property savings clause. nothing in this act alters any federal, state or local process or condition in effect on the tate of enact to secure from private property to cross border facilities described in section a. so we tried to make sure -- and fourth-hour, -- furthermore let me read judicial review. we also provide that section -- i won't read it but we provided for judicial review so if any of these issues are a concern, in addition to the language we put in to protect states' rights you also have judicial review. i don't know how much more we can do to make sure that any and all concerns she just raised in regard to the process of the individual states is protected. and, again i make the case they've all gone through great lengths to approve the gentlewoman and -- the project and we're the only entity blocking it after more than six years is the federal government. and one other point i'd like briefly before turning to the senator from west virginia and that is the good senator from washington talked abo

this is consistent with the purpose of statute as stated in 15-111 -- >> the subsection you are referring to says classes that include the history of a subgroup. that would suggest a class in mexican-american history. that is not just including, but about that. and it is likely most of the students would sign up for that would be mexican-americans, and that seems to run afoul of subpart three. >> i don't think it runs afoul of subpart three unless it is designed for the purpose of separating out those students and teaching a separate history that is not applicable to all the students in that school or that district. >> i am not maybe not following you, and it may be my fault. what is an example of a course that would not violate one, two four, but would violate three and therefore would be prohibited? >> if you had a class that is designed for one ethnicity for the purpose of separating them out, the irish, the germans, jews, asians, but is not about that group. >> i'm not quite sure what you mean by "purposes of separating them out" unless you are talking about number four, advocating et

a the subsection a criminal data and humiliation.if if you visit las vegas today, one of the new sites is the museum of the law which celebrates the rich criminal history of las vegas. it is quite an interesting museum. this is how the museum begins. a room where you can line up and pretend to be on a criminal lineup. one of you has a long rap sheet, and people think it is hilarious , a lot of cackling and laughter. it is it is not so funny when it actually happens in real life. there is the 13 million americans arrested, only some of whom actually face criminal charges. in recent years some entrepreneurs have made a business of publicizing these mugshots of course public record record documents. for the overwhelming number of people they were in court records. away from the general public. so one chapter in my book talks about the mug shot business. here is -- the chapter looks at a company called busted mugshots. his innovation was to print up a little magazine busted, in austin texas and put funny photos of people and sells it. af

section 2 subsection e private property savings clause. nothing in this act alters any federal, state or local process or condition in effect on the tate of enact to secure from private property to cross border facilities described in section a. so we tried to make sure -- and fourth-hour, -- furthermore let me read judicial review. we also provide that section -- i won't read it but we provided for judicial review so if any of these issues are a concern, in addition to the language we put in to protect states' rights you also have judicial review. i don't know how much more we can do to make sure that any and all concerns she just raised in regard to the process of the individual states is protected. and, again i make the case they've all gone through great lengths to approve the gentlewoman and -- the project and we're the only entity blocking it after more than six years is the federal government. and one other point i'd like briefly before turning to the senator from west virginia and that is the good senator from washington talked abo

section 2 subsection e private property savings clause. nothing in this act alters any federal, state or local process or condition in effect on the tate of enact to secure from private property to cross border facilities described in section a. so we tried to make sure -- and fourth-hour, -- furthermore let me read judicial review. we also provide that section -- i won't read it but we provided for judicial review so if any of these issues are a concern, in addition to the language we put in to protect states' rights you also have judicial review. i don't know how much more we can do to make sure that any and all concerns she just raised in regard to the process of the individual states is protected. and, again i make the case they've all gone through great lengths to approve the gentlewoman and -- the project and we're the only entity blocking it after more than six years is the federal government. and one other point i'd like briefly before turning to the senator from west virginia and that is the good senator from washington talked abo