b, after reassembling pursuant o subsection a, when the house adjourns on a motion pursuant to this subsection by the majority leader of his designee, the house shall stan adjourned pursuant to the first section of this resolution. section 3-a, the majority leader of the senate or his designee, after concurrence with the minority leader of the senate, shall notify the members of the senate to reassemble at such place and time as he may dez egg nate if, in his opinion, the peculiar interest shall warrant it. bmbing, after reassembling pursuant to subsection a, when to the senate adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its majority leader of his designee, the senate shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the concurrent resolution is agreed to and the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? mr. wood al: i ask unanimous consent that when the house adjourned today on a motion pursuant to this order it adjourn to mee

amendments en bloc offered pursuant to this subsection shall be considered as read. shall be debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the committee on transportation and infrastructure or their designees. shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. d, all points of order against the further amendments printed in part a of the report of the committee on rules or amendments en bloc described in subsection c are waived. section 3, no further amendment to the senate amendment as amended shall be in order except those printed in part b of the report of the committee on rules accompanying this resolution. if such further amendment shall be considered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, may be withdrawn by the proponent at any time before action ther

administrator on page one. >> much to my chagrin, for a moment we are going back to section 2, subsection c 6 on page one conducting periodic and random audits and body worn cameras and does include that administrator and the risk management office which has the authority to do that. so does that satisfy your question, commissioner hwang? >> it's generic. it could cover that. i remember reading some other department where the officer had on multiple occasions, every time there was use of force they just turned off their cameras. >> there is two ways to address that. one way is i think one suggestion i have is that as a commission we set a 6-month deadline and ask the department to conduct and audit of compliance for the first 6 months when the cameras are on. for me an issue at the very top is officers turned their cameras on and there can be a grace period where they are learning the technology. but the e 85 data, it's a new normal and the cameras need to go on and if you are not turning the cameras on, that needs to be addressed sooner than later. i know with the e 585 data, it's depend

will premiere on the network here on kcci and the whole series will move to the all access digital subsection service. it is the first original service for cbs all access. russell wilson stopped by the ellen show later today. elizabeth: she announced she will be in the upcoming pitch perfect three and ellen has questions after her recent summer vacation in >> >> this is called fly boarding. apparently you can die. that's what i was wearing a helmet. you are jet propelled into the air. >> i've seen this, it seems very frightening in how they can let someone do that. >> i didn't. i think they were saying whatever. elizabeth: she also completes allen's challenge and received a $10,000 donation from shutterfly for her charity. 'tis the season for toys for tots. area businesses, if you want to collect, you can pick up your boxes starting today. you can stop by the kcci studios from 8:00 to 5:00 today. we are just off keo way. the kcci morning team is life with new overnight news and here is what we are working on for our next full hour. alyx: take advantage of this weather. before colder temperatu

administrator on page one. >> much to my chagrin, for a moment we are going back to section 2, subsection c 6 on page one conducting periodic and random audits and body worn cameras and does include that administrator and the risk management office which has the authority to do that. so does that satisfy your question, commissioner hwang? >> it's generic. it could cover that. i remember reading some other department where the officer had on multiple occasions, every time there was use of force they just turned off their cameras. >> there is two ways to address that. one way is i think one suggestion i have is that as a commission we set a 6-month deadline and ask the department to conduct and audit of compliance for the first 6 months when the cameras are on. for me an issue at the very top is officers turned their cameras on and there can be a grace period where they are learning the technology. but the e 85 data, it's a new normal and the cameras need to go on and if you are not turning the cameras on, that needs to be addressed sooner than later. i know with the e 585 data, it's depend

to continue items 2 a to next week where i agree with a speaker that we [inaudible] section 4, subsection 6 c, we do not allow the project sponsor to withdrawal his application that we-that is part the bargain on this. [inaudible] >> december 3. >> to when we can get a motion >> you said next week. >> december 3. >> second. >> commissioner antonini. >> on a couple items, first of all on the ord court it seems to me and i can be corrected if the project sponsor revises a project no longer need of approval there is no reason for it to come before us. >> the project sponsor could revise the project to a code complying project and believe the zoning administrator at the time stated that would be a significantly different project that what comes before you than conditional use so that would go through its own process. i think what commission richards is pointing out is the rules and regulations spell out after a motion orphintent and stopped reading after the first sentence incorrectly and after the commission adopt as motion of intent to approve or disapprove that action be completed. >> comp

. >> pop down your next subsection. >> while poe says he hopes the jail's education program will helpout of trouble the next time he's released -- >> let me see what you got. >> check it out. >> look. >> -- jacob cowin has turned to religion. >> ephesians, huh? >> i wrote that last night. why don't you read it to me. >> oh, armando. >> come on, read it to me, man. read it to me. i wrote it. tell me how it sounds. >> paul begins the letter to the ephesians by stating who he is. >> cowin has had numerous stays at santa rita over the past several years. not all the charges stuck. but one of his stays was the precursor to a five-year prison sentence he served after shooting and wounding another man in a bar fight. this time he's serving 75 days for battery and vandalism. according to police reports, he broke his girlfriend's door during an argument and punched her numerous times in the face and head. >> i only know how to do one thing, and it ain't good. you know? so it's like -- >> what is it? >> it's bad. just trouble. and the thing is trouble was getting me in trouble, you know what i

page 1 line 1, we include a sentence under subsection a, establishment of the fund state the department embraces geographic and social economic equity as a guiding principle and expend the funds across open space to provide park and recreational access to all of san francisco diverse communities. page 8 line 12, we have copies of this for the city attorney, the operational plan shall include a equity analysis of park department program jz resources. [inaudible] for low income neighborhoods and disadvantage communities with programs available to the city as a whole. i want to thank supervisor avalos on these items and make sure they are reflected here. i will say in conclusion, i'm a firm believer clean and safe park enhance the quality of life for san francisco residence and provide countless benefits as well. they are a source of pride for the city of san francisco and a source of quality of life for everybody that lives here. our world class parks and open space deserve sustainable funding source to make the badly needed improvement and upgrades from everything from fixing the swings

and this is just striking a phrase in the subsection, b and we want to strike the last five words in the current fiscal year. could i entertain a motion to accept that change? >> so moved. >> okay. motion by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. as it relates to the bla recommendations. personally i think that item number, or the first regular daysing, regarding the reporting makes a ton of sense and i would love to be updated here, as supervisors in this committee and i do take heed to what mr. dodge mentioned, especially in this arena, we need to be able to act quickly. and so i would be, okay. keeping it, as a category, 8 fund and that is my perspective. supervisor, taning. >> i too, originally asked, you know, why we can't use the existing homeless fund through the mayor's office but i understand, especially the inception of the navigation center was started by a large, private donation, anonymous one, $2 million i believe. and so that i think that it, and it is fair for this, generous donor or any future ones to expect that the city would need to demonstrate th

before i have to do, and thank you for inviting us and pushing the subsection four, we think it is incredibly important. without a doubt, we see businesses in the hospitality industry attempt to silence critics of their services. and this place up across a number of industries. you mentioned amazon. we've seen it with yelp in trying to push and bully yelp reviewers or other reviewers to remove their comments, to reduce the severity of their comments. bury thoseght comments with omore positive comments. i thought you made a great point when discussing how consumer reviews make markets stronger and more efficient, because they help guide consumers to the best products. to what extent do you think gag clauses may be distorting the market? are most consumers aware? >> they are only a small part of a much larger problem. there are so many disincentives for consumers to share their opinions and perspectives about the businesses they deal with. and each of those becomes a friction point or a wedge in their witness to share. not palmer said she has been bullied off the internet. most consumers do not

page 1 line 1, we include a sentence under subsection a, establishment of the fund state the department embraces geographic and social economic equity as a guiding principle and expend the funds across open space to provide park and recreational access to all of san francisco diverse communities. page 8 line 12, we have copies of this for the city attorney, the operational plan shall include a equity analysis of park department program jz resources. [inaudible] for low income neighborhoods and disadvantage communities with programs available to the city as a whole. i want to thank supervisor avalos on these items and make sure they are reflected here. i will say in conclusion, i'm a firm believer clean and safe park enhance the quality of life for san francisco residence and provide countless benefits as well. they are a source of pride for the city of san francisco and a source of quality of life for everybody that lives here. our world class parks and open space deserve sustainable funding source to make the badly needed improvement and upgrades from everything from fixing the swings

page 1 line 1, we include a sentence under subsection a, establishment of the fund state the department embraces geographic and social economic equity as a guiding principle and expend the funds across open space to provide park and recreational access to all of san francisco diverse communities. page 8 line 12, we have copies of this for the city attorney, the operational plan shall include a equity analysis of park department program jz resources. [inaudible] for low income neighborhoods and disadvantage communities with programs available to the city as a whole. i want to thank supervisor avalos on these items and make sure they are reflected here. i will say in conclusion, i'm a firm believer clean and safe park enhance the quality of life for san francisco residence and provide countless benefits as well. they are a source of pride for the city of san francisco and a source of quality of life for everybody that lives here. our world class parks and open space deserve sustainable funding source to make the badly needed improvement and upgrades from everything from fixing the swings

administrator on page one. >> much to my chagrin, for a moment we are going back to section 2, subsection c 6 on page one conducting periodic and random audits and body worn cameras and does include that administrator and the risk management office which has the authority to do that. so does that satisfy your question, commissioner hwang? >> it's generic. it could cover that. i remember reading some other department where the officer had on multiple occasions, every time there was use of force they just turned off their cameras. >> there is two ways to address that. one way is i think one suggestion i have is that as a commission we set a 6-month deadline and ask the department to conduct and audit of compliance for the first 6 months when the cameras are on. for me an issue at the very top is officers turned their cameras on and there can be a grace period where they are learning the technology. but the e 85 data, it's a new normal and the cameras need to go on and if you are not turning the cameras on, that needs to be addressed sooner than later. i know with the e 585 data, it's depend

b, after reassembling pursuant to subsection a, when the senate adjourns on a motion offered pursuantto this subsection, the senate shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the concurrent resolution is agreed to and the motion to reconsider s laid on the table. for what purpose does the gentleman from louisiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent that when the house adjourns today, it adjourn to meet at 5:00 p.m. on friday, november 20, 2015, unless it sooner has received a message from the senate transmitting its concurrence on house concurrent resolution 95 in which case the house will stand adjourned pursuant to that concurrent resolution. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. under the speaker's announced policy of january 6, 2015, the gentleman from louisiana, mr. graves, is recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader. mr. graves: mr. speaker, three years ago the louisiana international guard began a turnaround, after coming in 3

administrator on page one. >> much to my chagrin, for a moment we are going back to section 2, subsection c 6 on page one conducting periodic and random audits and body worn cameras and does include that administrator and the risk management office which has the authority to do that. so does that satisfy your question, commissioner hwang? >> it's generic. it could cover that. i remember reading some other department where the officer had on multiple occasions, every time there was use of force they just turned off their cameras. >> there is two ways to address that. one way is i think one suggestion i have is that as a commission we set a 6-month deadline and ask the department to conduct and audit of compliance for the first 6 months when the cameras are on. for me an issue at the very top is officers turned their cameras on and there can be a grace period where they are learning the technology. but the e 85 data, it's a new normal and the cameras need to go on and if you are not turning the cameras on, that needs to be addressed sooner than later. i know with the e 585 data, it's depend

think it's surprising or inappropriate for them to heckle hillary clinton because they are not a subsectionnization. so if they are truly believing their message, they should stand up and protest at her receptions, her events, at bernie sanders, ao'mallt o'mall and everyone's. if they weren't heckling her, i wouldn't think they were true to their cause. they should get their voices out and make sure every candidate and all the republicans and democrats are addressing the issues that matter. >> which is doing best here, morris? >> i think it's too early to tell. frankly, i think this is a process. what you say ooh the congressman knows this. if you can look at obama. what you say on a campaign trail does not mean the reality of what you'll do in office. i think whoever becomes the nominee, that's when they really need to sit down and get some concrete commitments from them. as a cand daylight, you are just a candidate. when you become a nominee you start to committee and when you become president you have to follow through. >> that does address what we're seeing with the question about jeb b

under no obligation to help crown castle the standards for a granted rehearing is outlined art 5 subsection the board migrant a rehearing only if new circumstances has arisen or sycamores known at the time could have effected the hearing and crown castle has therefore to justify a hearing has not been met a rehearing is not to revisit the merit of the application but referred to - they have appealed to the manifest injustice in our rules explicitly as an extraordinary case not to revisit the facts of the case more an appellant to rehear it and they've shown no new evidence in light of the standards of nyu materials and the extraordinary sxold said it was a manifest injustice they failed to have new evidence and neither rerespectfully ask crown castles request be denied. >> thank you, mr. chin. >> gene chin public works i wanted to say for the ford record that public works supports the request for the rehearing the appeal was yantd on the basis the conditions were different on the permit than on the tenant of approval and it was not originally identified as a basis secondarily in regards to

to continue items 2 a to next week where i agree with a speaker that we [inaudible] section 4, subsection 6 c, we do not allow the project sponsor to withdrawal his application that we-that is part the bargain on this. [inaudible] >> december 3. >> to when we can get a motion >> you said next week. >> december 3. >> second. >> commissioner antonini. >> on a couple items, first of all on the ord court it seems to me and i can be corrected if the project sponsor revises a project no longer need of approval there is no reason for it to come before us. >> the project sponsor could revise the project to a code complying project and believe the zoning administrator at the time stated that would be a significantly different project that what comes before you than conditional use so that would go through its own process. i think what commission richards is pointing out is the rules and regulations spell out after a motion orphintent and stopped reading after the first sentence incorrectly and after the commission adopt as motion of intent to approve or disapprove that action be completed. >> comp

and this is just striking a phrase in the subsection, b and we want to strike the last five words in the current fiscal year. could i entertain a motion to accept that change? >> so moved. >> okay. motion by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. as it relates to the bla recommendations. personally i think that item number, or the first regular daysing, regarding the reporting makes a ton of sense and i would love to be updated here, as supervisors in this committee and i do take heed to what mr. dodge mentioned, especially in this arena, we need to be able to act quickly. and so i would be, okay. keeping it, as a category, 8 fund and that is my perspective. supervisor, taning. >> i too, originally asked, you know, why we can't use the existing homeless fund through the mayor's office but i understand, especially the inception of the navigation center was started by a large, private donation, anonymous one, $2 million i believe. and so that i think that it, and it is fair for this, generous donor or any future ones to expect that the city would need to demonstrate th

to continue items 2 a to next week where i agree with a speaker that we [inaudible] section 4, subsection 6 c, we do not allow the project sponsor to withdrawal his application that we-that is part the bargain on this. [inaudible] >> december 3. >> to when we can get a motion >> you said next week. >> december 3. >> second. >> commissioner antonini. >> on a couple items, first of all on the ord court it seems to me and i can be corrected if the project sponsor revises a project no longer need of approval there is no reason for it to come before us. >> the project sponsor could revise the project to a code complying project and believe the zoning administrator at the time stated that would be a significantly different project that what comes before you than conditional use so that would go through its own process. i think what commission richards is pointing out is the rules and regulations spell out after a motion orphintent and stopped reading after the first sentence incorrectly and after the commission adopt as motion of intent to approve or disapprove that action be completed. >> comp

and this is just striking a phrase in the subsection, b and we want to strike the last five words in the current fiscal year. could i entertain a motion to accept that change? >> so moved. >> okay. motion by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. as it relates to the bla recommendations. personally i think that item number, or the first regular daysing, regarding the reporting makes a ton of sense and i would love to be updated here, as supervisors in this committee and i do take heed to what mr. dodge mentioned, especially in this arena, we need to be able to act quickly. and so i would be, okay. keeping it, as a category, 8 fund and that is my perspective. supervisor, taning. >> i too, originally asked, you know, why we can't use the existing homeless fund through the mayor's office but i understand, especially the inception of the navigation center was started by a large, private donation, anonymous one, $2 million i believe. and so that i think that it, and it is fair for this, generous donor or any future ones to expect that the city would need to demonstrate th

order accepted those printed in part a of horlt 114-326, and the amendments en bloc described in subsection c of that resolution. each further amendment printed in part a of house report 114-326 shall be considered only in the ordered printed in the report and may be offered only by a member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and opponent. may be withdrawn by the proponent any time before action thereon, shall not be subject to amendment, shall not be subject to demand for division of the question. it shall be in order at any time for the chair on the committee on transportation and infrastructure or his designee to offer amendments en bloc to consisting of amendments printed in part a of house report 114-326, not earlier disposed of. such amendments en bloc shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the committee on transportation and infrastructure or their designees, shall

page 1 line 1, we include a sentence under subsection a, establishment of the fund state the department embraces geographic and social economic equity as a guiding principle and expend the funds across open space to provide park and recreational access to all of san francisco diverse communities. page 8 line 12, we have copies of this for the city attorney, the operational plan shall include a equity analysis of park department program jz resources. [inaudible] for low income neighborhoods and disadvantage communities with programs available to the city as a whole. i want to thank supervisor avalos on these items and make sure they are reflected here. i will say in conclusion, i'm a firm believer clean and safe park enhance the quality of life for san francisco residence and provide countless benefits as well. they are a source of pride for the city of san francisco and a source of quality of life for everybody that lives here. our world class parks and open space deserve sustainable funding source to make the badly needed improvement and upgrades from everything from fixing the swings

page 1 line 1, we include a sentence under subsection a, establishment of the fund state the department embraces geographic and social economic equity as a guiding principle and expend the funds across open space to provide park and recreational access to all of san francisco diverse communities. page 8 line 12, we have copies of this for the city attorney, the operational plan shall include a equity analysis of park department program jz resources. [inaudible] for low income neighborhoods and disadvantage communities with programs available to the city as a whole. i want to thank supervisor avalos on these items and make sure they are reflected here. i will say in conclusion, i'm a firm believer clean and safe park enhance the quality of life for san francisco residence and provide countless benefits as well. they are a source of pride for the city of san francisco and a source of quality of life for everybody that lives here. our world class parks and open space deserve sustainable funding source to make the badly needed improvement and upgrades from everything from fixing the swings