i do not think we should be doing subsections of any organization. we oppose terrorism on all human beings. chair barrasso: so we have a motion to substitute, and it has been moved and seconded. discussion on that language from the gentlelady from louisiana. ok. the delegate from hawaii. opposed to the amendment .uggested i think in this instance it is extremely important to name these groups in this case. we have done it in other parts of this platform, and i am totally in support of the statements from the delegate from rhode island. i think it is important to name them. [applause] chair barrasso: the delegate from west virginia. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i would just like to say i am in support of the substitution from the lady, the delegate from louisiana. terrorism,nst all iainst any human being, and did not believe we need to be naming out subsections of people because we are surely going to miss one, and we have all agreed that we are against human suffering and humans being murdered. so we are just against everybody as human beings being mu

i don't know how he can possibly avoid section 793, subsection f, which says in pertinent part, whoever being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document relating to the national defense through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than ten years or both. she clearly did that. there is no doubt. now, this whole idea that you can't prove intent. jim knows that we usually prove intent through circle evidence. circumstantial evidence. the circumstance of extreme negligence over and over and over again is the best proof of intent, also her destruction of 34,000 e-mails also proves intent. people have been charged under these it statutes for far less than this. and it's going to be almost impossible in the future for the fbi to justify a charge under any of these statutes. so i don't know what jim is doing. this is a -- to me, a extremely hard conclusion to, to justify. specifically section 793, subsection f, which makes gross negligence a crime. >> right. >> and j

he laid out compelling case there was violation of 18 usc 793 subsection f which is the gross negligence statute. which means the classified information is moved outside of secure channels and there doesn't have to be a threshold for intent. he also said that some of the information did bear classified markings but nonetheless, he felt what mrs. clinton and her aides had done should have been known to them violations in handling of classified information. >> seven email chains concerned matters that were classified at the top secret, special access program at the time they were sent and received. any reasonable person in secretary clinton's position or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters should have known an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. reporter: director comey confirmed for the first time there were multiple servers that were used by mrs. clinton and her aides for government business. over the years they had been decommissioned. once the programs were withdrawn from those hard drives, it became increasingly difficult to

subsection b of enacted park code section 3.21 authorizes the rec and parks commission to set different hours of operation for any park or part thereof based on operational requirements or neighborhood impacts via commission resolution. the cabrillo community expressed concerns and proposed for new park operational hours from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. during pacific standard time and 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. during pacific daylight time. the proposal was discussed in detail amongst over 50 community members at two public community meetings on september 17th and october 1st, 2015. meeting notices were deliver ed to all residences within the playground and contacts of the friends of cabrillo playground. in addition, the notice was posted on the friends of the cabrillo playground website and social media pages. since the community meetings. the leaders of friend of cabrillo playground has been gathering letters of support from neighboring businesses, and organizations. based on the support from community members, organizations, supervisor mar's staff, supervisor mar's office and staff it was de

under section 3.610 subsection a, we did as we indicated last month, we expanded the filing time from 30 days to quarterly or 90 days, 90 days from the date at which the 5 thousand dollar contribution was made or a series of -- and then in the next subsection 2, we left it at 30 days for those solicitation that is are made to solicited -- to interested parties. on the third page, we have that exception under subsection d for auction noes, we also undertook a definition and tried to carve out full time employees of non-profit organizations who have fundraising responsibilities and are soliciting charitable contributions on behalf of their non-profit employer, if you're working for a fundraiser as a none profiteer, that will be your job and you will be exempt from reporting every solicitation that you make with the exception that we do want you to disclose any solicitations made to interested parties. and lastly, ethics department staff request, we allowed for this not to be just reported on a form 803 but on some other electronic forms as staff sees fit, there's a reporting mechanism a

certainly subsection a guest to the issue of who is allowed to go on the convention floor and then be talks about press and staff being admitted to the section or sections of the hall authorize to them. there is nothing specific in rule 28 with regard to guests. guests have their own section where they are seated separate from the delegates, alternates, the press, the staff, the incumbent governors and senators , and, congressman. that is the purpose for this amendment. and i appreciate being brought to the attention by what our guests. >> thank you. >> a question. i moved the previous question. make privilege. >> privilege motion. >> it is not a privilege motion. i understand your intent, but i'm going to recognize the veto. -- mr. devito. >> i oppose this amount. >> anyone else who wishes to be recognized in support of the amendment? anyone opposed to the amendment? >> i'm of the previous question. -- move the previous question. debate. some closing those opposed? directly a vote on them and motion. all of those in favor of adopting the motion? any opposed? nays have it. .e will go

under section 3.610 subsection a, we did as we indicated last month, we expanded the filing time from 30 days to quarterly or 90 days, 90 days from the date at which the 5 thousand dollar contribution was made or a series of -- and then in the next subsection 2, we left it at 30 days for those solicitation that is are made to solicited -- to interested parties. on the third page, we have that exception under subsection d for auction noes, we also undertook a definition and tried to carve out full time employees of non-profit organizations who have fundraising responsibilities and are soliciting charitable contributions on behalf of their non-profit employer, if you're working for a fundraiser as a none profiteer, that will be your job and you will be exempt from reporting every solicitation that you make with the exception that we do want you to disclose any solicitations made to interested parties. and lastly, ethics department staff request, we allowed for this not to be just reported on a form 803 but on some other electronic forms as staff sees fit, there's a reporting mechanism a

under section 3.610 subsection a, we did as we indicated last month, we expanded the filing time from 30 days to quarterly or 90 days, 90 days from the date at which the 5 thousand dollar contribution was made or a series of -- and then in the next subsection 2, we left it at 30 days for those solicitation that is are made to solicited -- to interested parties. on the third page, we have that exception under subsection d for auction noes, we also undertook a definition and tried to carve out full time employees of non-profit organizations who have fundraising responsibilities and are soliciting charitable contributions on behalf of their non-profit employer, if you're working for a fundraiser as a none profiteer, that will be your job and you will be exempt from reporting every solicitation that you make with the exception that we do want you to disclose any solicitations made to interested parties. and lastly, ethics department staff request, we allowed for this not to be just reported on a form 803 but on some other electronic forms as staff sees fit, there's a reporting mechanism a

it is acknowledged from fremont and the report in the report required by subsection c-4 a nuke of types of conversions and such others information as the director and the board of supervisors determines lawyer with no decision makers and the public just to be clear section 3 so 7 of both of the pieces of legislation grant the zoning administrator authority to bring grant waivers from the density and parking rear yard closures and open requirements this is circumstance subscribed and limit by them so forth in sections 2 c-4 and c sub it. >> supervisor cohen you may have wasted a lot of energy with all that talk our deputy city attorney as comments with our read into the record amendments. >> mr. gibner. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so we've not prepared supervisor peskin the amendments that supervisor peskin read into the record i understand the goal here on going both items the amendments that supervisor farrell will read in in a few minutes to make the items identical the most of amendments that supervisor cohen's just read are in supervisor farrell's version which we have as

it is acknowledged from fremont and the report in the report required by subsection c-4 a nuke of types of conversions and such others information as the director and the board of supervisors determines lawyer with no decision makers and the public just to be clear section 3 so 7 of both of the pieces of legislation grant the zoning administrator authority to bring grant waivers from the density and parking rear yard closures and open requirements this is circumstance subscribed and limit by them so forth in sections 2 c-4 and c sub it. >> supervisor cohen you may have wasted a lot of energy with all that talk our deputy city attorney as comments with our read into the record amendments. >> mr. gibner. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so we've not prepared supervisor peskin the amendments that supervisor peskin read into the record i understand the goal here on going both items the amendments that supervisor farrell will read in in a few minutes to make the items identical the most of amendments that supervisor cohen's just read are in supervisor farrell's version which we have as

under section 3.610 subsection a, we did as we indicated last month, we expanded the filing time from 30 days to quarterly or 90 days, 90 days from the date at which the 5 thousand dollar contribution was made or a series of -- and then in the next subsection 2, we left it at 30 days for those solicitation that is are made to solicited -- to interested parties. on the third page, we have that exception under subsection d for auction noes, we also undertook a definition and tried to carve out full time employees of non-profit organizations who have fundraising responsibilities and are soliciting charitable contributions on behalf of their non-profit employer, if you're working for a fundraiser as a none profiteer, that will be your job and you will be exempt from reporting every solicitation that you make with the exception that we do want you to disclose any solicitations made to interested parties. and lastly, ethics department staff request, we allowed for this not to be just reported other electronic forms as staff sees fit, there's a reporting mechanism and per staff's report whic

language here is that the commission may designate to the power to extend the deadline according to subsection h i'm asking the commission to discuss and then possibly move is that extension of authority to staff you know in a formal way we can go ahead and do pretty much what we were doing prior to this change we've called it clean up anyway you need to formally adopt this and that's have a communication about that. >> all right. commissioners seems straightforward you, you guys want to discuss this you. >> it's a good idea in planning the cases so - i'm many in support of extension for the full 24 months up to. >> up to; right? >> up to. >> commissioner thomas. >> have we had many people and applicants in this position. >> i mean do you guys know the number we've had. >> how many people extend- i mean, i don't know i want to give this guess and probably in the order of 20; right? 20 percent or so typically, we'll run into some kind of snag on a bureaucratic level and many cases like building an electrical or plumbing issue sort of things i'm kind of - who knows so maggie inherited and cammy

language here is that the commission may designate to the power to extend the deadline according to subsection h i'm asking the commission to discuss and then possibly move is that extension of authority to staff you know in a formal way we can go ahead and do pretty much what we were doing prior to this change we've called it clean up anyway you need to formally adopt this and that's have a communication about that. >> all right. commissioners seems straightforward you, you guys want to discuss this you. >> it's a good idea in planning the cases so - i'm many in support of extension for the full 24 months up to. >> up to; right? >> up to. >> commissioner thomas. >> have we had many people and applicants in this position. >> i mean do you guys know the number we've had. >> how many people extend- i mean, i don't know i want to give this guess and probably in the order of 20; right? 20 percent or so typically, we'll run into some kind of snag on a bureaucratic level and many cases like building an electrical or plumbing issue sort of things i'm kind of - who knows so maggie inherited and cammy

that i've distributed and given a copy have to the clerk set forth on pam number 4 at the bottom subsection two subsection d into page 5 and then with that amendment and send this to the full board with recommendation. >> we'll accept the amendments and move 24 item as amended to the full board supervisors you lived with recommendation and without objection. >> without objection. >> okay madam clerk i think we'll go back to item 7 that's correct. >> yeah. >> item 7 a hearing on the federal management the flood insurance and to solicit input. >> i introduced this is as the city administrator's office for the city and public have a coordinated opportunity to provide feedback on the fema flood map every 5 years fema reviews the flood map with local governments and provides accurate an accurate understanding of the sea level rise change to the flood plan insurance requirement as you can imagine this is incredibly important and fema has presented to the port and airport including the respective fell tenants and to inform as you as we gather input from stakeholders at this time i'll call up jenni

that i've distributed and given a copy have to the clerk set forth on pam number 4 at the bottom subsection two subsection d into page 5 and then with that amendment and send this to the full board with recommendation. >> we'll accept the amendments and move 24 item as amended to the full board supervisors you lived with recommendation and without objection. >> without objection. >> okay madam clerk i think we'll go back to item 7 that's correct. >> yeah. >> item 7 a hearing on the federal management the flood insurance and to solicit input. >> i introduced this is as the city administrator's office for the city and public have a coordinated opportunity to provide feedback on the fema flood map every 5 years fema reviews the flood map with local governments and provides accurate an accurate understanding of the sea level rise change to the flood plan insurance requirement as you can imagine this is incredibly important and fema has presented to the port and airport including the respective fell tenants and to inform as you as we gather input from stakeholders at this time i'll call up jenni

been presented om performance enhancement and it would strike the word a at the beginning of the subsection and insert the following language on or after presidential election. >> is there anyone who would like to speak in opposition to the motion? mr. ryder, are you approaching the microphone? mr. ryder is recognized in opposition to the motion. >> this is a point of inquiry. i was having trouble finding this language in the rule. and where does it fit? could we get some clarification on that? >> do we have this up on -- if the staff could put this up. s it the change? .ll right, 16-c-3 if i understand it correctly, mr. ash, just perhaps to expedite this. >> certainly. >> it looks like you are proposing that -- would be proportional up to march 31. >> that's a current change of 15 days or 16 days? >> correct. is everyone clear on what the amendment would be? all right. is there anyone who would like to speak in opposition? we have not had someone speak in pposition to the motion. is there anyone would like to speak in favor? >> madam chairman, if i could. while it's up there, this is a con

page 22, line 16 subsection b should actually be subsection i in parentheses. that subsection of four in's. second, i want to add a new section, section in parentheses, v, at the bottom of page 22 that ensures that developers comply with the state and federal relocation requirements. here's the section. documentation that the applicant shall comply with any applicable provisions of the state relocation law or federal uniform relocation act when a parcel includes existing commercial tenants. so, with those three amendment to lines and a typo, i would like to motion that to be accepted. >> supervisor avalos has made a motion to make amendment. is there a second? moved and seconded. colleagues, can we take the amendment without objection? without objection the amendment passed unanimously >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin >> i just want to acknowledge that it has been a long and twisty road to get here but i think we have made it better and it will be a useful tool and i would like to congratulate supervisor tang on her good work. >> thank you. supervisor yee >> than

under section 3.610 subsection a, we did as we indicated last month, we expanded the filing time from 30 days to quarterly or 90 days, 90 days from the date at which the 5 thousand dollar contribution was made or a series of -- and then in the next subsection 2, we left it at 30 days for those solicitation that is are made to solicited -- to interested parties. on the third page, we have that exception under subsection d for auction noes, we also undertook a definition and tried to carve out full time employees of non-profit organizations who have fundraising responsibilities and are soliciting charitable contributions on behalf of their non-profit employer, if you're working for a fundraiser as a none profiteer, that will be your job and you will be exempt from reporting every solicitation that you make with the exception that we do want you to disclose any solicitations made to interested parties. and lastly, ethics department staff request, we allowed for this not to be just reported on a form 803 but on some other electronic forms as staff sees fit, there's a reporting mechanism a

and it would strike the word a at the beginning of the subsection and insert the following language on or after march 31st of a presidential election. >> all right. is there anyone who would like the speak in opposition to the motion? are you approaching the microphone? mr. ryder is recognized in opposition to the motion. >> no. this is a point of inquiry. i was having trouble finding this language in the rule. >> i was having the same difficulty. where does it fit? can we get some clarification? >> all right. do we have this up on -- yeah. if the staff could put this up. a change? 16 3 2. >> if i understand it correctly, to expedite this. >> certainly. >> it looks like you're proposing that -- >> it would be proportional to march 31st. >> that's a current change of 16 days. >> correct. is everyone clear now on what the amendment would be? all right. is there anyone who would like to speak in opposition? we have not yet had someone speak in opposition to the motion. is there anyone who would like to speak in favor? >> madam chairman, if i could. we covered it a little bit except at the

the voters the problem with that applying that principle here is that in other words, to apply subsection d so our pre1996 retiree not only are you taking out the clarification language but inserting the language full funding provision will be applied to those who retire before november 6, 1996, that's not consistent with severance principles so what you get back to then is what did the voters intend we draw upon other principles that is a difficult question one of which our fiduciary duty your fundamental constitutional obligation to our members did that that answer the question no not completely you have a fiduciary obligation to our active members your deferred members and members that retired last week and thirty years ago and as we who work in this fiduciary arena understand those duties are complex and cross cutting. >> not deservedly clear and circumstances where our duties to some members you give precedence in exchange you is a duty of impatient with our members we try to achieve a balance we exercise our discretion and best judgment we interpret ambiguities in terms and understa

according to government code 53750 subsection h b 3, it allows for any parcel change due to density, intensity or nature of land use to be put into the assessment formula in the management plan and not go against the cbd's. if you have an empty lot that goes into a skyscraper. it would be charged to the assessment with the rest of the district. with the highway code is the way we need to go with that, however for a cap, if a cdbd has a change in the market since they did in 2015, they may go above the assessment level which is allowable in the highway code but not allowable due to the management plan. >> understood. >> any questions on that? >> supervisor breed. are there any members of the public who would like to speak on this item? please come forward. public speaker: good morning, supervisors, my name is david harrison. a property owner in the district and member of the board of directors. i'm here to offer my support. it allows us to equitably assess all the properties in the district. it does not change the assessment for any existing property owners who don't change their prop

you look at us 793 subsection f, there is gross negligence or gross negligence. there's no requirement for content or willfulness in that action and if there had been an opportunity to ask questions, the question would be what would the director sayto government security clearance holders who had been prosecuted and jailed for so much less in similar cases john ? jon: under the title or imprisoned, not more than 10 years or both, the statute goes on to say. catherine herridge, i'm sure you have a lot of work to do. thank you for sharing time with us today. so there you have it. hillary clinton appearing this beside me on screen, a campaign appearance in washington right now and a load off her shoulders as the fbi director says he will tell the justice department that he recommends no prosecution for the careless handling of her email, personal email server and the state departmentdocuments thereon. it is thebig story of the day , more coverage i had , "happening now". hii'm here to tell homeowners that are sixty-two and older about a great way to live a better re

page 22, line 16 subsection b should actually be subsection i in parentheses. that subsection of four in's. second, i want to add a new section, section in parentheses, v, at the bottom of page 22 that ensures that developers comply with the state and federal relocation requirements. here's the section. documentation that the applicant shall comply with any applicable provisions of the state relocation law or federal uniform relocation act when a parcel includes existing commercial tenants. so, with those three amendment to lines and a typo, i would like to motion that to be accepted. >> supervisor avalos has made a motion to make amendment. is there a second? moved and seconded. colleagues, can we take the amendment without objection? without objection the amendment passed unanimously >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin >> i just want to acknowledge that it has been a long and twisty road to get here but i think we have made it better and it will be a useful tool and i would like to congratulate supervisor tang on her good work. >> thank you. supervisor yee >> than

according to government code 53750 subsection h b 3, it allows for any parcel change due to density, intensity or nature of land use to be put into the assessment formula in the management plan and not go against the cbd's. if you have an empty lot that goes into a skyscraper. it would be charged to the assessment with the rest of the district. with the highway code is the way we need to go with that, however for a cap, if a cdbd has a change in the market since they did in 2015, they may go above the assessment level which is allowable in the highway code but not allowable due to the management plan. >> understood. >> any questions on that? >> supervisor breed. are there any members of the public who would like to speak on this item? please come forward. public speaker: good morning, supervisors, my name is david harrison. a property owner in the district and member of the board of directors. i'm here to offer my support. it allows us to equitably assess all the properties in the district. it does not change the assessment for any existing property owners who don't change their prop

page 22, line 16 subsection b should actually be subsection i in parentheses. that subsection of four in's. second, i want to add a new section, section in parentheses, v, at the bottom of page 22 that ensures that developers comply with the state and federal relocation requirements. here's the section. documentation that the applicant shall comply with any applicable provisions of the state relocation law or federal uniform relocation act when a parcel includes existing commercial tenants. so, with those three amendment to lines and a typo, i would like to motion that to be accepted. >> supervisor avalos has made a motion to make amendment. is there a second? moved and seconded. colleagues, can we take the amendment without objection? without objection the amendment passed unanimously >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin >> i just want to acknowledge that it has been a long and twisty road to get here but i think we have made it better and it will be a useful tool and i would like to congratulate supervisor tang on her good work. >> thank you. supervisor yee >> than

under section 3.610 subsection a, we did as we indicated last month, we expanded the filing time from 30 days to quarterly or 90 days, 90 days from the date at which the 5 thousand dollar contribution was made or a series of -- and then in the next subsection 2, we left it at 30 days for those solicitation that is are made to solicited -- to interested parties. on the third page, we have that exception under subsection d for auction noes, we also undertook a definition and tried to carve out full time employees of non-profit organizations who have fundraising responsibilities and are soliciting charitable contributions on behalf of their non-profit employer, if you're working for a fundraiser as a none profiteer, that will be your job and you will be exempt from reporting every solicitation that you make with the exception that we do want you to disclose any solicitations made to interested parties. and lastly, ethics department staff request, we allowed for this not to be just reported on a form 803 but on some other electronic forms as staff sees fit, there's a reporting mechanism a

nine, the proposed amendment is to move the sentence starting on line 10 from current section to subsection on management of the federal government where appropriate. >> good afternoon. >> one minute. and you have to speak right into the microphone. can we get the amendment up on the screen? one second. it is 135 in your book. we will get it on the screen as soon as we can. go ahead. >> the language of 135 is actually found on page 23, line 10, talking about the aggregation of data -- >> get closer to the microphone. there we go. >> that happens when you are height challenge. basically it starts on page 23, line 10, what were trying to do is move this line that talks about the disaggregation of data collected from asian-americans of pacific islanders and to move it to a section that talks basically to all federal governments where appropriate. the present section where it is found in basically talks about health issues. we believe that the ability of the federal government to make good decisions as it affects asian-americans and pacific islanders, it needs to be available to all branches of

until the office is vacant, appointing, in this subsection, makes an appointment, and confirmed by the board, the police commission shall appoint a director, to serve at the pleasure of the police commission. >> based on deputy supervisor, attorney's, with kim's, amend, supervisor avalos. >> i support that. >> okay, supervisor avalos has made approval of the amendments, is there a second? by supervisor mar. madame clerk, can you call the roll? farl? no kim? aye. mar? aye. peskin? aye. tang no. weiner no. supervisor yee? aye. supervisor avalos? aye. breed? no. supervisor campos no. supervisor cohen no. >> the amendments pass. aye 78, supervisor campos made a motion to continue it to july 26th. seconded -- >> in a committee of the whole. >> thank you madame clerk. to a committee of the whole because it was amended. colleagues, can we take that without objection? without objection this item will be continued to a committee of the whole on july 26th, 2016. as amended. the motion to table item number 29 is there a second? >> 79. >> 79. seconded by supervisor mar. colleagues, can we take the

language here is that the commission may designate to the power to extend the deadline according to subsection to discuss and then possibly move is that extension of authority to staff you know in a formal way we can go ahead and do pretty much what we were doing prior to this change we've called it clean up anyway you need to formally adopt this and that's have a communication about that. >> all right. commissioners seems straightforward you, you guys want to discuss this you. >> it's a good idea in planning the cases so - i'm many in support of extension for the full 24 months up to. >> up to; right? >> up to. >> commissioner thomas. >> have we had many people and applicants in this position. >> i mean do you guys know the number we've had. >> how many people extend- i mean, i don't know i want to give this guess and probably in the order of 20; right? 20 percent or so typically, we'll run into some kind of snag on a bureaucratic level and many cases like building an electrical or plumbing issue sort of things i'm kind of - who knows so maggie inherited and cammy inherited it,too the straddl

sisters with the concerns of the backdoor neighbors i moved here from hawaii and lived on a private subsection and been through this where certain requirement need to be meeting the demands of the parties and seen it successful and i do understand the concerns overall with noise applicants and night life so i also building that over the process over the next couple of months and years we'll work together to create a liveable environment and situation for all the neighbors and parties and end up with a conclusion that allows us to co-exist peacefully so that concludes any testimony thank you. >> my name is jeff lee and my partner kres spoke earlier unfortunately, the director the chinatown neighborhood had to leave i want to read his letter to you on behalf of chinatown neighborhoods i'm here to support this project this empty theatre alone been closed for many years and this project will create jobs and revives the community as you may know within the last 20 years 5 chinese movie theatres dr. been clotted and a few restaurants closed in chinatown as a result a few hundreds jobs have been lost

. >> your proposal is to amend the ordinance to provide as a new subsection at the end the board of supervisors may amend the provisions of this measure at any time, period. >> supervisor tang: any time to promote or better achieve the underlying goal of protecting and enhancing the pdr's. we would strike a couple of words from what supervisor kim's office has brought to us, that last clause. --- so why don't i make a motion or suggest a motion to amend into the legislation one last paragraph which would say the board of supervisors may amend the provision of this measure at any time after its initial effective date to promote or better achieve the underlining goal of protecting or enhancing this pdr for institutional and art activity uses. that will be supervisor cohen to make a motion. >> supervisor cohen: so moved. >> i'll second that. let's do a roll call. >> on the motion by supervisor cohen. >> supervisor mar: no. >> supervisor cohen: aye. >> supervisor tang: aye. >> supervisor mar absent. >> supervisor tang: g1 (gavel) >> supervisor tang: any project fully approved by the planning commis

. >> your proposal is to amend the ordinance to provide as a new subsection at the end the board of supervisors may amend the provisions of this measure at any time, period. >> supervisor tang: any time to promote or better achieve the underlying goal of protecting and enhancing the pdr's. we would strike a couple of words from what supervisor kim's office has brought to us, that last clause. --- so why don't i make a motion or suggest a motion to amend into the legislation one last paragraph which would say the board of supervisors may amend the provision of this measure at any time after its initial effective date to promote or better achieve the underlining goal of protecting or enhancing this pdr for institutional and art activity uses. that will be supervisor cohen to make a motion. >> supervisor cohen: so moved. >> i'll second that. let's do a roll call. >> on the motion by supervisor cohen. >> supervisor mar: no. >> supervisor cohen: aye. >> supervisor tang: aye. >> supervisor mar absent. >> supervisor tang: g1 (gavel) >> supervisor tang: any project fully approved by the planning commis

are familiar with the rules will no doubt note this proposed changed to the resolutions committee subsection of this rule would comport it to be consistent with the standing committee on rules. shall be elected by the committee from amongst its members. this would make the resolutions committee consistent with the rules committee in terms of the election of the chairman. and that is the purpose for the amendment. thank you. >> thank you, anyone else who speaks in opposition. are you rising in opposition, mr. little? >> yes. >> you're recognized. >> i believe the resolutions committee is fundamentally different from the rules committee. we have resolutions that are out there every day. and attend of the every meeting they'll affect the position of the republican national committee. whereas the committee on rules doesn't report except once every four years. so, this deals with oppositions on the issues of the day, day in and day out. we have a chairman of the republican national committee. we rise and fall on our chairman. and i believe our chairman should have the ability to appoint the chair

that is 793 subsection f.owever, it has been exceedingly rare, in fact i cannot think of a single gross negligence prosecution that the department has brought in these matters based on the publicly reported cas cases, the evidence that is required to go forward has always been willfulness despite the fact that there is a provision in the statute. >> so when giuliani was on, rudy giuliani was on earlier, he argued that you never actually find express willfulness. nobody writes down, i want to break the law. what they look for are patterns of behavior and repeated patterns of behavior that suggest a willfulness. and the fact that the numbers cited by the fbi director he felt were certainly large enough to suggest willfulness. >> i missed that part of mayor giuliani's comments, but, you know, it is true that whether you're talking about a white collar case, a securities fraud case or a mishandling case, it is rare to ever identify express evidence of intent. however, as in complex white collar matters, security m

requirement is only required in the u numerated zoning districts of sally -- et cetera, listed in the subsection so if you need that you need a cu and otherwise you're not subject to that requirement. >> okay great. so if i am hearing correctly everything is aligned and only the planned areas described by this measure, the cu requirement and the replacement requirement apply to all the same places? okay. great. thank you. >> my apologize. thank you to the city attorney for that clarification. we do however put in an amendment later in the legislation that does -- sorry, actually address that particular amendment regarding a cu and 100% affordable housing where pdr is replaced and i am open to discussions with the rules committee on that one because i know that was a point of debate. we also on page eight provide several other exemptions based on the discussion that occurred at rules committee last week, so on lines one through four any property under the jurisdiction of the port or recreation and park commission and all redevelopment plan areas as effective july 1, 2016 and zoned p public after

want to give the public advocate the appointment power, you could really just take out that entire subsection good i'm sorry, that entire section, 104. then, leave olse as it is which is a office created by ordinance >> okay thank you for that clarification i mean, that would be my preference. of course, we can take that motions on these amendment later. supervisor cohen anything else? >> yes. i want to emphasize just in case it was not clear when we're previous session the amendment i'm proposing i like them to be in both versions of the legislation. we duplicated the file. i'd like to make sure my amendment that i proposed are in both versions. any questions? >> yes. i am not sure-so, we have you mean you would like a version of supervisor campos's charter amendment as it was on today's agenda and you would like to make the amendment i just circulated on that version and you would also like to make those amendment on a version that incorporates supervisor campos's amendment today >>> >> that's correct >> a third version that would be at the board of the pending in this committee would be a

requirement is only required in the u numerated zoning districts of sally -- et cetera, listed in the subsection so if you need that you need a cu and otherwise you're not subject to that requirement. >> okay great. so if i am hearing correctly everything is aligned and only the planned areas described by this measure, the cu requirement and the replacement requirement apply to all the same places? okay. great. thank you. >> my apologize. thank you to the city attorney for that clarification. we do however put in an amendment later in the legislation that does -- sorry, actually address that particular amendment regarding a cu and 100% affordable housing where pdr is replaced and i am open to discussions with the rules committee on that one because i know that was a point of debate. we also on page eight provide several other exemptions based on the discussion that occurred at rules committee last week, so on lines one through four any property under the jurisdiction of the port or recreation and park commission and all redevelopment plan areas as effective july 1, 2016 and zoned p public after

want to give the public advocate the appointment power, you could really just take out that entire subsection good i'm sorry, that entire section, 104. then, leave olse as it is which is a office created by ordinance >> okay thank you for that clarification i mean, that would be my preference. of course, we can take that motions on these amendment later. supervisor cohen anything else? >> yes. i want to emphasize just in case it was not clear when we're previous session the amendment i'm proposing i like them to be in both versions of the legislation. we duplicated the file. i'd like to make sure my amendment that i proposed are in both versions. any questions? >> yes. i am not sure-so, we have you mean you would like a version of supervisor campos's charter amendment as it was on today's agenda and you would like to make the amendment i just circulated on that version and you would also like to make those amendment on a version that incorporates supervisor campos's amendment today >>> >> that's correct >> a third version that would be at the board of the pending in this committee would be a

according to government code 53750 subsection h b 3, it allows for any parcel change due to density,ntensity or nature of land use to be put into the assessment formula in the management plan and not go against the cbd's. if you have an empty lot that goes into a skyscraper. it would be charged to the assessment with the rest of the district. with the highway code is the way we need to go with that, however for a cap, if a cdbd has a change in the market since they did in 2015, they may go above the assessment level which is allowable in the highway code but not allowable due to the management plan. >> understood. >> any questions on that? >> supervisor breed. are there any members of the public who would like to speak on this item? please come forward. public speaker: good morning, supervisors, my name is david harrison. a property owner in the district and member of the board of directors. i'm here to offer my support. it allows us to equitably assess all the properties in the district. it does not change the assessment for any existing property owners who don't change their proper