it says notwithstanding subsection a. >> right. >> notwithstanding subsection a, somebody who is born outside the u.s., out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired the birth, nationality status of his mother if the mother is a u.s. citizen and had been physically in the united states for one year. so i don't see anything that says they have to be legitimized for the mother to get that. >> in 1409-a, it applies only after there has been -- >> in 1409-a. and what the first words of c are "not withstanding the provision of subsection a." anyway, i guess i can figure it out later. >> let me see if i can try and help you, justice breyer. the remedy imposed by the court of appeals is to as 1401-a7, the ten and five-year physical presence requirement, the court of appeals, that applies through 1409-a. 1409-a is the provision that applies to fathers. so the remedy would be to apply the one continuous year rule in 1401-7 as it applies through 1409-a. and that would put mothers and fathers on equal footing with respect to the physical presence requirements. and the legitimizization. the statu

notwithstanding the provision of subsection a. i guess i can figure it out later. >> let me see if i can try to help you, justice breyer. the remedy from the court of appeals, as 1401 a 7 which is the physical presence requirement, the 10 and five-year physical presence requirement, the court of appeals, that applies through 1409 a. 1409 a is the provision that applies to father. the remedy is to apply the one-year continuous rule to 1401 a 7 as it applies through 1409 a. that would put mothers and fathers on equal footing with respect to the physical presence requirements and then the legitmation requirement still applies to fathers. if i could address the government's u.s. connection interest in my time remaining. the statute here bars a u.s. citizen father under the age of 19 from transmitting citizenship to his foreign born child even if the father spent his entire life in the united states up until the day the child is born and even if the father legit mates the child and seeks to raise the child in the united states. by cont

it would have been a violation of my contract-- paragraph 76, subsection three. "employees of quark's bar and holding company "are strictly prohibited from leaving the work environment "during business hours "unless ordered to do so by their employer. "any failure to comply with this provision will result in severe fines and possible dismissal." it's a standard provision in all ferengi labor contracts. you mean, you don't get time off even if you're sick? it's all part of our... generous employee compensation package. "no sick days, no vacations, no paid overtime." it sounds to me like you need a better contract. there's no such thing. all ferengi labor contracts are the same. well, that should do it. but i want you to see memefirstg what you people need is a union. a what? you know, a trade guild a collective bargaining association, a union-- something to keep you from being exploited. you don't understand. ferengi workers don't want tostopthe exploitataon. we want to find a way to become the exploiters. suit yourself. but i don't seeyou? exploiting anyone. rom.

of his voters, particularly a subsection of his white working class voters. how do you see those two things intention or parallel? >> i think, first of all, the white working class that mistakenly voted for him and they're going to find out very soon just what an awful decision that was that they made. they're angry, they have a right to be angry, but they used him as a means for their revenge against the system. we won't be able to convince them right now. they're going to have to find out he's going to make their lives even worse as a result of electing him. our job right now really is to just not do a whole lot of thinking, don't -- >> i get nervous when someone says that. i really do. >> you don't -- you know this. you don't want to overthink things, right? you must have dated at some point in your life. don't overthink things, chris. you have to be spontaneous. you have to go, yeah, that's right. i've sat here for the last two or three days depressed, upset, how did this happen? how is it that the person who got the most votes is not the president of the

[inaudible] which out consider exercise discretionary review powders with the building sparrow subsection202 e: one. we receive only one letter to the project but i already passed that out. the department records the commission take discretion review and approve the project for the following region distribution of medical cannabis would be delivery only so no on-site distribution sales. no cannabis plants we cultivated on-site. and the site is well served by public transit in the insidious neighborhood serving that complies with all standards and requirements of the planning code in of dances the objectives of the general plan. that concludes my presentation and am available for questions. >> thank you. >> project sponsor. >> hello. my name is-owner of the collective. nonprofit llc as natural green relief and gr. i hold a small office in one of market are on the fifth floor is negligent or so smoking taking or on-site visits. i held a hearing brian invited the neighboring individuals as was the owners. i received nothing but positive remarks. from there i was and granted a letter of autho

susan: the bigger players have stronger ad models, subsections and it will be able to be more -- subscriptions it will be able to compete for more of the sports rights. emily: the headlines talk about youtube at war with the music industry. everyone from taylor swift, paul mccartney that say they do not like the way you do business. you see a future where there is a middle ground? susan: working with the music industry, i learned there are a lot of constituents in the music industry and they do not all agree with each other, right? there will be labels, artists, publishers, and so i remain very hopeful that as the online models of subscription and advertising become more developed that over time we are able to come to a place where everyone agrees on that future vision. i actually think we are getting there because we are starting to see the online subscription and streaming numbers pick up. we are starting to see more revenue from advertising. we have put up $3 billion for the is again is free, good growth numbers of overall i think as more time goes by, it will become more clear on what thes

it says notwithstanding subsection a. >> right. notwithstanding subsection a somebody who is born outside the u.s. out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother if the mother is a u.s. citizen and had been physically in the united states for one year. i don't see anything that says they have to be legitimized for the mother to get that. >> in 1409-a it applies only after there's been -- >> in 1409-a and what the first words of c are notwithstanding the provision of subsection a. >> right. >> i could figure it out later. >> let me try to help you. the remedy imposed by the court of appeals is as 1401 a 7, the physical presence requirement, the court of appeals, that applies through 1409-a. that's the provision that applies to fathers. the remedy would be to apply the one continuous year rule in 1401-a-7 and this is complicated. as it applies through 1409-a. that would put mothers and fathers on equal footing with respect to the physical presence requirements and the legitimation requirem

in 1409-a it applies only after there's been -- >> 1409-a, notwithstanding the provision of the subsection. anyway, i guess i could figure it out later. >> let me see if i can try and help you, justice breyer. the remedy imposed by the court of appeals as the physical presence requirement, the 10 and five your physical presence requirement, the court of appeals, that applies through 1409-a. 1409-a is the provision that applies to fathers. a remedy would be to apply to one continues to your role, and i grant you this is complicated, as it applies through 1409-a. that would put mothers and fathers on equal footing with respect to the physical is private. the. the legitimation requirement still applies to fathers. but if i could address the government's u.s. connection interest in my time remaining. the statute here absolutely bars a u.s. citizen father under the age of 19 from transmitting citizenship to his foreign-born child, even if the father spent his entire life in the united states up until the day the child is born, and even if the father legitimates the child and seeks to raise the

it's just a theory. [ telephone rings ] on pages 414-416, subsection "g" -- the randall-salassey morbidity test. that remains as is. have you, uh, ever asked yourself just what is a morbidity test? if it don't cook, it don't belong in a book. all right, now just tell me what this looks like. then i can look it up in appendix "b," and i can tell you just how depressed or whatever you are. now what do you see? let me think here a minute. i got...let's see. ice pair of ripe melons. [ snickers ] no, no, wait, wait! i got it. ah! got it. a great, big pair... of tickets. you know, you can never take things serious, lou. to you, everything is a big joke! well, come on, stush, back off a little bit. just trying to have a little fun. yeah, okay. be back in 20 minutes. you see how it is down here with the kids with the golf clubs? believe me, they are not headed for the back nine. no offense, officer hill, but this is a dangerous neighborhood for white people. mr. dunlaw, you were sentenced. now it is our duty to take you to 226 freemont. but at least you'll stay with me, right? till i get some lock

there's paragraph 1, subsection b and c. you know what, sometimes you have to set limits. if a kid comes home and is living under your roof, you can set rules. >> or you can downsize the house and take their rooms away. >>> turns out those who prefer quiet time are more intelligent adults. everyone always thought it was the case that spending more time with others, you're a happier person, but it turns out smarter people can more easily adapt to surroundings in the modern world, so they don't need healthier relationships for food, shelter. i'm going on and on. >> no, keep going. other anymore. no, i think about my dad, and he's one of these guys who likes his own company. he's very social as well, but he can hang and do his own thing. >> i have met him. you can bring him anywhere, talk to anyone. but it's so cool to know that at 92, he's just as happy as alone. >> you have got to be your own best friend. are you your own best friend? >> i am, but i don't know if i'm intelligent. i wouldn't go that far. >> of course you are. do you prefer alone time or are you social? >> yo

in the specific subsection of the central soma plan area. the area immediately adjacent by requiring conditional youth authorization for the developments during in the next 18 month said. we heard the item before and want to thank you for your support two years ago and ask your support again. >> thank you supervirez kim. alright. i don't see question from the colleagues, let's take public comment on this item. does any member please come up. podium is yours. you have two minutes. welcome. good to see you. >> thank you. pat valen teeno the copresident of sogetd beach merchant association. thank you for how and why these interim chrome said are so important. having lived in the-air area we have seen the ground floor space go to office. that space seems to be ideal for the new companies that have come into town or start up or expansion space for larger companies and puts pressure on rents. all our merchant board members talked about competing rents and concerned when their leases expire and renewing. it is also a neighborhood that is becoming m

in the specific subsection of the central soma plan area. the area immediately adjacent by requiring conditional youth authorization for the developments during in the next 18 month said. we heard the item before and want to thank you for your support two years ago and ask your support again. >> thank you supervirez kim. alright. i don't see question from the colleagues, let's take public comment on this item. does any member please come up. podium is yours. you have two minutes. welcome. good to see you. >> thank you. pat valen teeno the copresident of sogetd beach merchant association. thank you for how and why these interim chrome said are so important. having lived in the-air area we have seen the ground floor space go to office. that space seems to be ideal for the new companies that have come into town or start up or expansion space for larger companies and puts pressure on rents. all our merchant board members talked about competing rents and concerned when their leases expire and renewing. it is also a neighborhood that is becoming m

were had how often of those individuals that will address them and on page 5 a clarification in subsection on line 10 says the residential unit is an insert and the permanent person uses the preliminary residents registrations on the short-term rental registry are not transferable and only rae nude by the permanent folks not a property right it runs with the priest no, not with the property and deputy city attorney does it cover the amendments that - >> the additional amendments? >> good morning deputy city attorney andrew one minor amendment is that i believe the office of short-term rentals wished to include a clarification that anyone who having 2k3wr5ir7b9d in will not lose the grandfathered status with the third amendment and all 3 amendments are not substantive and can move forward today. >> thank you counsel as to the third amendment we support where will that be no see it our intention to include that. >> i don't unfortunately have a copy but come back as we so forth. >> is kevin imply the person on the - and supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chair it's been a very interesting an

were had how often of those individuals that will address them and on page 5 a clarification in subsection e on line 10 says the residential unit is an insert and the permanent person uses the preliminary residents registrations on the short-term rental registry are not transferable and only rae nude by the permanent folks not a property right it runs with the priest no, not with the property and deputy city attorney does it cover the amendments that - >> the additional amendments? >> good morning deputy city attorney andrew one minor amendment is that i believe the office of short-term rentals wished to include a clarification that anyone who having 2k3wr5ir7b9d in will not lose the grandfathered status with the third amendment and all 3 amendments are not substantive and can move forward today. >> thank you counsel as to the third amendment we support where will that be no see it our intention to include that. >> i don't unfortunately have a copy but come back as we so forth. >> is kevin imply the person on the - and supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chair it's been a very interesting

were had how often of those individuals that will address them and on page 5 a clarification in subsection e on line 10 says the residential unit is an insert and the permanent person uses the preliminary residents registrations on the short-term rental registry are not transferable and only rae nude by the permanent folks not a property right it runs with the priest no, not with the property and deputy city attorney does it cover the amendments that - >> the additional amendments? >> good morning deputy city attorney andrew one minor amendment is that i believe the office of short-term rentals wished to include a clarification that anyone who having 2k3wr5ir7b9d in will not lose the grandfathered status with the third amendment and all 3 amendments are not substantive and can move forward today. >> thank you counsel as to the third amendment we support where will that be no see it our intention to include that. >> i don't unfortunately have a copy but come back as we so forth. >> is kevin imply the person on the - and supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chair it's been a very interesting

[inaudible] which out consider exercise discretionary review powders with the building sparrow subsection202 e: one. we receive only one letter to the project but i already passed that out. the department records the commission take discretion review and approve the project for the following region distribution of medical cannabis would be delivery only so no on-site distribution sales. no cannabis plants we cultivated on-site. and the site is well served by public transit in the insidious neighborhood serving that complies with all standards and requirements of the planning code in of dances the objectives of the general plan. that concludes my presentation and am available for questions. >> thank you. >> project sponsor. >> hello. my name is-owner of the collective. nonprofit llc as natural green relief and gr. i hold a small office in one of market are on the fifth floor is negligent or so smoking taking or on-site visits. i held a hearing brian invited the neighboring individuals as was the owners. i received nothing but positive remarks. from there i was and granted a letter of autho

in the specific subsection of the central soma plan area. area immediately adjacent by requiring conditional youth authorization for the developments during in the next 18 month said. we heard the item before and want to thank you for your support two years ago and ask your support again. >> thank you supervirez kim. alright. i don't see question from the colleagues, let's take public comment on this item. does any member please come up. podium is yours. you have two minutes. welcome. good to see you. >> thank you. pat valen teeno the copresident of sogetd beach merchant association. thank you for how and why these interim chrome said are so important. having lived in the-air area we have seen the ground floor space go to office. that space seems to be ideal for the new companies that have come into town or start up or expansion space for larger companies and puts pressure on rents. all our merchant board members talked about competing rents and concerned when their leases expire and renewing. it is also a neighborhood that is becoming more

in the specific subsection of the central soma plan area. the area immediately adjacent by requiring conditional youth authorization for the developments during in the next 18 month said. we heard the item before and want to thank you for your support two years ago and ask your support again. >> thank you supervirez kim. alright. i don't see question from the colleagues, let's take public comment on this item. does any member please come up. podium is yours. you have two minutes. welcome. good to see you. >> thank you. pat valen teeno the copresident of sogetd beach merchant association. thank you for how and why these interim chrome said are so important. having lived in the-air area we have seen the ground floor space go to office. that space seems to be ideal for the new companies that have come into town or start up or expansion space for larger companies and puts pressure on rents. all our merchant board members talked about competing rents and concerned when their leases expire and renewing. it is also a neighborhood that is becoming m

were had how often of those individuals that will address them and on page 5 a clarification in subsection e on line 10 says the residential unit is an insert and the permanent person uses the preliminary residents registrations on the short-term rental registry are not transferable and only rae nude by the permanent folks not a property right it runs with the priest no, not with the property and deputy city attorney does it cover the amendments that - >> the additional amendments? >> good morning deputy city attorney andrew one minor amendment is that i believe the office of short-term rentals wished to include a clarification that anyone who having 2k3wr5ir7b9d in will not lose the grandfathered status with the third amendment and all 3 amendments are not substantive and can move forward today. >> thank you counsel as to the third amendment we support where will that be no see it our intention to include that. >> i don't unfortunately have a copy but come back as we so forth. >> is kevin imply the person on the - and supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chair it's been a very interesting

were had how often of those individuals that will address them and on page 5 a clarification in subsection e on line 10 says the residential unit is an insert and the permanent person uses the preliminary residents registrations on the short-term rental registry are not transferable and only rae nude by the permanent folks not a property right it runs with the priest no, not with the property and deputy city attorney does it cover the amendments that - >> the additional amendments? >> good morning deputy city attorney andrew one minor amendment is that i believe the office of short-term rentals wished to include a clarification that anyone who having 2k3wr5ir7b9d in will not lose the grandfathered status with the third amendment and all 3 amendments are not substantive and can move forward today. >> thank you counsel as to the third amendment we support where will that be no see it our intention to include that. >> i don't unfortunately have a copy but come back as we so forth. >> is kevin imply the person on the - and supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chair it's been a very interesting

were had how often of those individuals that will address them and on page 5 a clarification in subsection e on line 10 says the residential unit is an insert and the permanent person uses the preliminary residents registrations on the short-term rental registry are not transferable and only rae nude by the permanent folks not a property right it runs with the priest no, not with the property and deputy city attorney does it cover the amendments that - >> the additional amendments? >> good morning deputy city attorney andrew one minor amendment is that i believe the office of short-term rentals wished to include a clarification that anyone who having 2k3wr5ir7b9d in will not lose the grandfathered status with the third amendment and all 3 amendments are not substantive and can move forward today. >> thank you counsel as to the third amendment we support where will that be no see it our intention to include that. >> i don't unfortunately have a copy but come back as we so forth. >> is kevin imply the person on the - and supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chair it's been a very interesting

this should read, when 15 days after adopting an initial goals for the program under subsection d-one the office of early care and education cell summit submit a copy to the board of supervisors. these rules should not become effective and office of early care and education shall issue [inaudible] there under until at least 90 days after the office of early care and education has submitted the wolves to the board of supervisors to any subsequent rules or rule amendment adopted by the early care and education to become effective immediate upon adoption. switches added that last part. any other questions bequest? can i bring up speakers right now >> yes sure. two questions will at this looking at this. the 90 days, why will he wait for 90 days? what's the 90 day buffer in therefore? >> basically we are asking the officer early care and education to do is him up with a game plan or a program that would with rules and so forth. so what i would like to do, i would like to weigh in on those by having a hearing on it within 90 days but we can't get together by 90 days is can go forward that

this should read, when 15 days after adopting an initial goals for the program under subsection d-one the office of early care and education cell summit submit a copy to the board of supervisors. these rules should not become effective and office of early care and education shall issue [inaudible] there under until at least 90 days after the office of early care and education has submitted the wolves to the board of supervisors to any subsequent rules or rule amendment adopted by the early care and education to become effective immediate upon adoption. switches added that last part. any other questions bequest? can i bring up speakers right now >> yes sure. two questions will at this looking at this. the 90 days, why will he wait for 90 days? what's the 90 day buffer in therefore? >> basically we are asking the officer early care and education to do is him up with a game plan or a program that would with rules and so forth. so what i would like to do, i would like to weigh in on those by having a hearing on it within 90 days but we can't get together by 90 days is can go forward that

commission determines a legacy business faces a immediate risk of displacement and that a grant under subsection c 1 of will prevent displacement, but there is insufficient funds in the legacy rent stabilization account, after subtracting amounts to be paid in the fiscal year, the small business may request the supplemental appropriation on the board of supervisors. i can continue to just to completely quote that paragraph. such supplemental appropriate is used first to pay the graant to the legacy business that face as immediate risk of displacement with any remaining amount available to pay grants it new qualified lap lords. do you conclude that you can steek seek more money than you thought is required to cover the businesses facing immediate risk of displacement? >> sure-i this can the commission can always request more if it wants to and the boferd supervisors can always approve or choose not tew prove more. what the last sentence suggests is that the board can appropriate amounts sufficient to pay the grant and there could be remaining amount left over. >> potentially you could seek more m

and what the first words are not within the provision of subsection a. anyway, i guess i could figure it out later. >> let me seif i can try and lp you. the remedy imposed by the court of appeals is due,s 1401, the physical presence requirement, the urt of appeals, that applies through 1409(a). 1409) is the provision that applies to fathers. the remedy would be to aly the one continues rule in 1401. this is complicated. 14 '01 ait appes through 1409(a) and that would put mothers and fathers on equal footing with respe to the physical presence requirements and then the legitimization part still applies to fathers. if i could aress the government's.s. connection interest in my time remaining. the statute absolute bars the u.s. citizen filed under the age of 19 from transmitting citizenship to his foreign-born child, eveif the father spent his entire life in the united states up until the y the child born and even if the child -- five legitimate the jump and seeks to raise the child in the united states. i contrast the statute automatically confer citizensh