sits within that subsection b and there is a subsection 4 added exception for public appeals, no committee shall be required to make disclosures for any contribution if the contribution was made solely in response to to public appeal. i would like to move amendment number 2. >> president breed: supervisor peskin has made a motion to amend according to his amendment item number 2. is there a second? seconded by supervisor tang. safai? >> supervisor safai: point of clarification. so on page 6 of your amendment, says disclosure requirements for contributions to ballot measure committee and committees on ie is it the intent of what you're asking here that there would be disclosure requirements for elected officials that would be making requests on behalf of ballot measure committees? >> supervisor peskin: that is correct. >> supervisor safai: that is the intent? >> supervisor peskin: that is correct. >> supervisor safai: not just ies? >> supervisor peskin: that's correct. >> president breed: supervisor peskin, would you be willing to adjust this to remove ballot measures specifically? >> super

a, sub-subsection 4. no city elected officer or member, board or commission may directly or by any means of an agency solicit or otherwise request that a person give anything of value to a third party if the person who was the subject of the request has a matter pending for the official, his or her agency or the official has final approval authority over the matter or the person who was the subject of the request had a matter before the official or his or her agency within the last 12 months and this section shall not prohibit any solicitations or requests made solely through a public appeal. i will repeat that mayor disclosure, and mayor disclosure of an amount which is a tremendous amount of money for a donation has the promise of no effect whatsoever for members of the public. and i will reiterate that the only people who will note that disclosure besides those making it 10,000 or more will be political junkies, campaign managers, administrative assistants in campaigns and maybe, maybe, the media. whic

>> you have after section 4, you have subsection a if the communication is a telephone call, a copy of the script, the communication is recorded, then the recording shall be provided, if the recording audio or video, a copy of the script and file shall be provided. >> i see what you mean. if you use social media and you want to print out a copy of the communication, can you provide a screen shot? i'm just trying to offer a little more clarification on the definition, i'm thinking of multiple ways to capture how we communicate. >> so the way we had written this, you could just provide a copy of what the social media statement was on facebook or instagram for example. i guess it could be a screen shot. but we were thinking of mirroring it similar to what the existing law said, communication for audio, video, a copy of the script, you don't have to provide a recording of someone on the telephone call talking to the member. >> what happens if someone is telling story visually? i know it's late in the hour, but it's something that is very real. i'm just thinking, you could -- >> you could p

if you refer to commissioner lee's amendment it's used in subsection 1 lines 4 and 5 page two. so it's the same as the conflict of interest prohibition but flush ought -- flushing outed the idea of use or office. >> ah. >> would overlap with conflict of from law but in some circumstances it can go beyond. it kind of goes both ways. >> again, i would respectfully suggest that we not take commissioner lee's amendments with regard to commissioner chu's amendments then i'll get to the amendments i have. i want it to affect every race as soon as it can affect it. as soon as there are provisions in file ending in 80 those i believe should be implemented on the effective date of the ordinance when it becomes law 30 days after the mayor signs it or it goes into effect without the mayor's signature. there's other provisions in consultation with staff will require formed to be create and negotiations with net file and to that end as one of my amendments, my seventh amendment, as a matter of fact, we broke out the dates on those that which will be implemented on the effective date and tho

capitol where just a small subsection however like i said it was not such a strong showing right so what does that mean does that mean that the movement is running out of steam. and certainly the national attention seems to be starting to shift away from this issue but not necessarily joe i don't think it necessarily means that the movement has run out of steam the real test is going to come in november's midterm elections to see whether these students can actually translate their anger into votes whether they can register and make it to the polls and send the message that they say they're going to lawmakers that they won't vote for a candidate that takes money from a gun lobbyist or that does not vote in favor of what they call commonsense gun legislation and also clear as you know of course today is the anniversary of the columbine high school shooting has it taken on a special significance this year. that's right it's the nineteenth anniversary today and they really tried to tie this date to the movement that's taken shape since the mass shooting at a park in florida high school they'

amendments en bloc offered pursuant to this subsection shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the committee on transportation and infrastructure or their designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the house or in the committee of the whole. f, at the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the committee shall rise and report the bill to the house with such amendments as may have been adopted. the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. section 2. upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider in the house the bill. h.r. 3144, to provide for operations of the federal columbia river power system pursuant to a certain operation plan for a specified period of time, and for other purposes. all points of order against consideration of the bill ar

i decided to test that subsection of the road where that autopilot accident happened ...software developersla model s.as he approached the intersection of 101 and 85 in mountain view, he put his car on autopilot."... and the results are kinda freaky"with his hands off the wheel, the car begins to drift towards the barrier.he quickly took control.here it is again in slow motion.the company says its owner's manuals come with a long list of warnings..at the top is one saying "autopilot is intended for use only with a fully attentive driver."data recovered from the crashed vehicle indicated that the driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive. the driver's hands were not detected on the wheel for six seconds prior to the collision.tesla says the driver had about five seconds and 150 yards of unobstructed view of the approaching concrete divider.the vehicle logs showed that no action was taken.tesla says the model x autosteer technology is not able to accurately determine lane markings.and in this case, the markings are not accurate.as you can see. t

this would add language intersection 1.1.145 in subsection b1. is there a second? >> within, one moment, please. >> i'll second. >> commissioner lee has seconded. madame executive director would you call the vote. >> commissioner lee. >> aye. >> commissioner kop. >> aye. >> commissioner renee. >> aye. >> commissioner chu. >> aye. with the 4-0 vote the motion passes. i'd like to turn to amendment two under section 2.3 definition substituting the word agent for authorized representative and making a change intersection 2.3207a3. >> i'll second. >> commissioner lee. >> the clerk: aye. >> commissioner kop. >> aye. >> commissioner rene. >> aye. >> commissioner chu. >> aye. >> motion passes on a 4-0 vote. >> i don't want to interrupt but that was -- >> which tang was that? >> you replaced the agent which was stricken from the previous -- >> point of information. >> madame president, the amendment is it would read the immediate family -- >> oh, i was confused, thank you. >> commissioner kop. >> i understand we were voting on 2a and 2b separately. i intend to vote no on b.

it was a subsection. called the first monday. well the deal is still being reviewed by u.s.authorities the e.u. competition commission has approved the merger. we were able to do so because of the significant remedies the companies offered which made which let's come the tissue concerns in for. among other things buyer has to part with one of its pearls vegetable seed production in new nym the netherlands in any case the group hardly seems interested in such classic business anymore the competitor b.s.f. is likely to take over this area. conventional cultivation of tomatoes cucumber is another vegetables that's no longer interesting to buy instead it will focus on corn soy and cotton spread over huge areas with genetic engineering and crop protection products such as the controversy with life estate. not to us will probably turn out just as many had feared moving multinationals on the market with the blessing of the european commission. that's not good it is the. traditional farming versus high tech big business how will our food be produced in the future. german farmer ther

look back on the subsection.'t think will think about the first five games of the season. >> well let's hope not. a's and ranger at the coliseum. sh she is a gold glover makes the catch holding they feel in the right hand. 3-0 the in the third. another nice catch by a you bring the glove right there. 3-1 games in the fourth. ruing net a story contendland graveman allows 4 earned. 4-1 texas. bottom 7 odd t on for the a's ground to he feels andrews. the throw to gets away. and the bell tray holds on. this is his form tackling right here on jake smolenskip maybe an hr violation. a's stran the runners and don't score. right now we don't is have it filled in there but it was a 4-1 game at last check in the seventh. sharks fans getting the playoff chomp ready against dallas. team teal on the power play. brent burns to logan toourt with a wrister 1-0 sharks later in the first joe pavelski wins the faceoff. timo myher, whoa. turns and burns it. becomes the fifth being youngstown hark to reach 20 goals in shark's history.

i decided to test that subsection of the road where that autopilot accident happened ...software developerns a tesla model s.as he approached the intersection of 101 and 85 in mountain view, he put his car on autopilot."... and the results are kinda freaky"with his hands off the wheel, the car begins to drift towards the barrier.he quickly took control.here it is again in slow motion.the company says its owner's manuals come with a long list of warnings..at the top is one saying "autopilot is intended for use only with a fully attentive driver."data recovered from the crashed vehicle indicated that the driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive. the driver's hands were not detected on the wheel for six seconds prior to the collision.tesla says the driver had about five seconds and 150 yards of unobstructed view of the approaching concrete divider.the vehicle logs showed that no action was taken.tesla says the model x autosteer technology is not able to accurately determine lane markings.and in this case, the markings are not accurate.as you can

overtimex pence for security services at the airport in fiscal 2017/'18 pursuant to the charter 9.113 subsection c. this item requires eight votes of the membership. >> supervisor breed: can you read item 9? >> clerk: ordinance to de-appropriate $ turn.3 million from permanent salaries, fringe benefit expenses and appropriate to overtime in the police department and emergency management to support the projected increases in overtime and add salaries in the public health department for fiscal years 2017/'18. this item has an 8-vote affirmative of the membership. >> supervisor breed: seeing no names on the roster, can we take these items same house, same call? without objection, those ordinances pass unanimously on the first reading. >> clerk: resolution to approve the duty-free and ruchl ll ll l luxury lease. >> supervisor breed: same house, same call? without objection, adopted unanimously. >> clerk: item 11 is a resolution to retroactively authorize the fire department to accept and extend a grant from fema in the amount of $800,000 to purchase thermal imaging cameras and resources for its stre

a cohort of trump's base, a subsection of that base, this syria action is nothing short of betrayal. >> betsy woodward joruff from washington. >>> and we're going to hear from a member of the armed services committee, somebody who felt they should have been consulted about this. next. -if you told me a year ago where i'd be right now... aah! ...i would have said you were crazy. but so began the year of me. i discovered the true meaning of paperless discounts... and the indescribable rush of saving drivers an average of $620. why does fear feel so good? i fell in love three times -- once with a woman, once with a country, and finally... with myself. -so, do you have anything to declare or not? -isn't that what i'm doing? >>> okay. we're back with breaking news on u.s.-led missile strikes on syria. pentagon officials say three sites were targeted. two in the city of homs. one a research facility in damascus. the pentagon explained today why they think last night's missile strikes will have a more lasting effect than the one president trump ordered last year. >> i believe, however that

and there were a bunch of requests in it which were subsections of the stormy case about the payments to her, about his communication with the president, about those payments and his communications with the campaign. i was also sold that the search mentioned election laws. questions raised about whether this money was used improperly. and then smaller issues about other investments that could or could not be related to the stormy issues, the sources weren't clear. and so i think that it was broad in one sense, but we do know that it's largely related to the stormy daniels' case. >> let me clarify something you said. you said according to your source there was some of the things being looked at were communications between michael cohen and the president or the campaign about the payments. is your source saying that the president knew about the payments or the campaign knew about the payments? because michael cohen has said he didn't tell anybody. the president last week said he didn't know anything about it. >> the president also announced michael is my attorney, so you assume it is pr

operated in san francisco for more than 20 years but less than 30 years, it may still satisfy this subsection if the small business commission finds that the business has significantly contributed to the history or identity of a particular neighborhood or community and if not included on the registry, the business would face a significant risk of displacement. you have to identify pretty much everything in this paragraph, which you'll see. number two, the business has contributed to the neighborhood's history and/or the identity of a particular neighborhood or community. number three, the business is committed to maintaining the physical features or traditions that define the business, including craft, culinary or art forms, and if the small business commission makes all three findings, it shall include the business in the registry as a legacy business. note i'm proposing that letter's d and e which follow be moved to the section of definitions of keywords and phrases; and also, the word shall will be added to both sections. i placed it incorrectly and discovered it when i was doing the power

we are tracking what's late in the subsection but much needed rain heading our direction. look at the view from the camera of san francisco. it's a nice view. you can see the visibility is loking really different tomorrow. temperatures right now mid-to upper 50s from san francisco to san jose. half moon bay, 54 leer is a live picture from emeryville camera and the commute will look extremely different come friday. friday afternoon and morning as well. but tomorrow, that storm has slowed down. i'll show you time line in a moment. temperatures in the 50s right now from santa rosa to fairfield, concord 60 degrees. one other live picture from the dgo roof camera the wind is light. light rain tomorrow afternoon. soaking through saturday morning. and drying out sunday. first thing tomorrow morning the fog and clouds around. temperatures in the mid-40s to low 50s. so definitely a cool start but not terribly cold. in the afternoon it will be in the low 60s to low 70s with the rain firps arriving around mendocino county and lake county. well call it a level one for tomorrow. light

i have circulated amendments that highlight one change in the ordnance under section 361, subsection c and i can go through it later. i'm proposing oh change from the minimum number of attendees from 20 to 50. i want to thank john gibner and brad hufney for this and all those who have come out to speak today. chair sheehy, i'll turn it back over to you at this time. >> sheehy: great. just one thing, could we also have a motion to excuse vice chair ronay as well? >> supervisor stefani: yes. >> sheehy: do you have anyone to call up? >> supervisor stefani: yes and then we can provide to public comment. >> i'm alison andrewman at the law center to prevent gun violence, the gun safety organization led by gun violence and former congresswoman gabby giffords. for 25 years we have been providing legal and policy expertise to legislatures nationwide. on behalf of our organization i urge you to support the ordnance introintdu. where there's guns there's gun incidents whether intentional or accidental. at rallies, protests and other types of public demonstrations these types of guns incidents a

(b) the chair may postpone further consideration of a motion considered pursuant to subsection (a) to such time as may be designated by the speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from colorado is recognized for one hour. mr. buck: for the purposes of debate only, i yield the customary 30 minutes to my friend, the gentleman from massachusetts, mr. mcgovern pending which i yield myself such time as i may consume. during consideration of this resolution all time yielded is for purpose of debate only. i ask unanimous consent that members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks. i rise in support of the rule and the underlying lemmings. the rule makes in order one bill reported favorably by the committee on financial services. the committee held several hearings on the topic of this bill in the spring of 2017. it was marked up in committee and a democrat amendment in the nature of a substitute was adopted and there was a strong bipartisan vote of 50-10. the rule makes in order no amendments to the bill. why? because there were none offered. additionally,

>> it tells me that the jurors are marching through each of the subsections of the aggravated indecent assault statute and likely went into the room, sat down and said, let's start with number one. which is the absence of consent. after that, they have to consider whether ms. constand was unconscious or impaired. that may be what they're doing, is starting with the issue of consent. now, pennsylvania law just dough fines consent as a defense if it negates and element of the crime. so that's not much help. in this case, the judge has to tell them it's whatever you think it is. >> what's different about this second trial, it's the #metoo movement. a few other things but the way they with and talk about things. the attention given has been exponentially more than the first trial. i wonder, does it make it more risky for the defense team to go after constand, or is that the only play they have in a situation like this to discredit her? >> #metoo aside, the defense absolutely has to go after constand. she is the sole accuser, and the case rises and falls on the credibility of her allegation

i was told that it has a number of requests, all of which are subsections of this big request, as it was described to me by a source with knowledge, that is, the payments to stormy daniels, communications with the president about this, and communications with the campaign about this. the warrant also includes some kind of smaller investment issues, that could be related or unrelated to the stormy daniels issue. my source was not sure, but interestingly enough, it does mention election laws. and we know that michael cohen took out this private lone and paid it on behalf of the president. i also know from sources who are close to the president, that they believe that they crossed a line. and you heard that in the president today, that this is his personal attorney. they believe they have been playing nice and cooperating with the special counsel and i think they now believe the special counsel has escalated this. so that's over. >> yeah, it's a major moment right now. preet, you heard the president reacting angrily to the raid on michael cohen and his offices, saying this is a whole ne

i decided to test that subsection of the road where that autopilot accident happened ...software developershantanu joshi owns a tesla model s.as he approached the intersection of 101 and 85 in mountain view, he put his car on autopilot."... and the results are kinda freaky"with his hands off the wheel, the car begins to drift towards the barrier.he quickly took control.here it is again in slow motion.the company says its owner's manuals come with a long list of warnings..at the top is one saying "autopilot is intended for use only with a fully attentive driver."data recovered from the crashed vehicle indicated that the driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive. the driver's hands were not detected on the wheel for six seconds prior to the collision.tesla says the driver had about five seconds and 150 yards of unobstructed view of the approaching concrete divider.the vehicle logs showed that no action was taken.tesla says the model x autosteer technology is not able to accurately determine lane markings.and in this case, the markings are not ac

i'd make a quick footnote that this related to a subsection of the lisbon treaty about notification but not about the decision that parliament is meant to take of the matter. but that is another story under litigation at the moment in the uk, so i will leave it to its own devices. but, this the vote in the house of commons for notifying the eu proceeded pretty well as followed. mp after mp after mp after mp went into the lobby to vote in favor of the bill saying this is a terrible idea, this is a very bad idea, we hadn't be doing it. it is known that the majority of members of the house of commons and an even larger majority of members of the upper house, the house of lords, are what is known as remainers, that is, people who don't want brexit to happen. and yet they have supported the government. both the government governing party, the conservative party, and the opposition party, labor party, have supported these measures. because the leaderships of the two parties have demanded of their mps that they vote according to the leadership's wishes. they've been whipped, as the expression

it's the common-law comity analysis, whether they are the factors that are now laid out in the subsection of the cloud act to potentially be examined down the road, we are looking at many of the same sort of things, just any more informal context in communicating with an entity that we are investigating. where asking ourselves, sorry, those questions that are common sense. is there another source? and if there's not or if there's not one that is readily apparent, and often we need the company or entity to help us to get that out, what laws are actually implicated? what are the real limitations, or not loopholes, but availability to get around those limitations by examining them? and really we do place the burden on entities to come forth, whether it's via white paper or another form of presentation, to do a very thorough analysis of the law that they may be invoking as preventing them from providing something. because -- the many, many prosecutors that work in the front section cannot be experts in all of the different data privacy regimes intimate types of blocking statute that existing

first of all, the oms system beneficiariesrt b , which is subsection of our larger medicare and medicaid population. feedback, wef the significantly strengthen and do anythingability oversight through the oms distant. enabled us to be a to show that we cut over 85% of them with our new improved expansion of the system and additional edits that we put in place. we've been continuing to implement the cdc guidelines, our new safety edits and a overlooking how we can expand it to cover the rest of the program. >> could you send us the backup documentation on that? it looks like we're falling way short of the total goal. let me go to a specific subset of folks. it's my understanding that people who experience a non-fatal overdose, that that experience alone is not a sufficient criteria for being part of the opiate utilization monitoring system, but yet we have had a spike in nonfatal overdoses. my understanding is almost half the time there is a nonfatal overdose that precedes a fatal overdose, so it is obviously a very dangerous event. inuld a nonfatal overdose and of itself be sufficient cr

>> this morning are hearing that the retail subsection has gotten over 115 times.uld give themselves 10 minutes. himtal: the usual cousins -- mechanism is that anything over five times would be automatically allocated to retail investors. in this case, and the first morning, it has always surpassed 95 times. so we are not worried about retail demand at all. we should be worried about institutions either. cornerstoneh a 50% and 25% retail, you always have 25% so for days is asher quite doable. -- actually quite doable. rishaad: let's look at tencent. what are we hearing about that? we have spotted by involved. crystal: we heard that tencent music was planning an ipo. so we still don't know where and when this is exactly going to happen. there decided between the u.s. and hong kong. what we know is they want to raise about one billion u.s. dollars. you are right about the spotify idea. spotify has a stake. revealing thee is valuation of tencent music would billion andut $17 we are expecting the ipo to definitely not be like that. definitely we can expect that to be a

first of all, the oms system only covers part d beneficiaries which is a subsection of our larger medicare and medicaid population. as a result of that feedback, we significantly strengthened and significantly improve our ability to do but it's an oversight through the lms system which, when we reran the oig beneficiaries they had identified, it enabled us to show we caught over 85% of them with our new improved expansion of the system and with the additional edits we put in place. we've been continuing to implement the cdc guidelines, our new safety edits and a number of other coronation edits are really good at that but were looking at how we can expand this to cover the rest of the program. >> can you send us the backup documentation on that. >> sure. >> it looks like we're falling way short of the total goal. to go to a specific subset of folks, it's my understanding, anyway that people who experience a nonfatal overdose , that that experience alone is not a sufficient criteria for being part of the system, that by itself it's not sufficient, but yet we've had a spike in nonfatal overd

b, upon the addition to the engrossment of h.r. 5444 of the text of the bills specified in subsection a-1 that have passed the house, such bills shall be laid on the table. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from washington is recognized for one hur. mr. newhouse: mr. speaker, during consideration of this resolution all time yielded is for the purpose of debate only. i yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from colorado, mr. polis, pending which i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. newhouse: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. newhouse: mr. speaker, on monday, the rules committee met and reported a rule house resolution 831, providing for consideration of two important pieces of legislation, h.r. 5444 the taxpayer first act and h.r. 5445, the 21 century i.r.s. act. the rule provides for consideration of these measures under a closed rule. both of these pieces of legislation were in