, subsection b and insert section 201. i'd like to make that technical, nonsubstantive motion. >> president cohen: before we do our motion and accept the amendment, i have one question. i didn't hear this item on committee and i didn't really follow it start it finish. i've wanted to know what the spirit is. why are you bringing this to us? >> supervisor peskin: we all put proposition b on the ballot, whiches with a charter amendment that was aimed at precluding ethical compromise situations that when people were on commissions, that they would not be fundraising. and the voters voted to are that. unfortunately, we still needed to conform the election code so that when those individuals started fundraising, that would be the time when they would have to leave the commission. so you don't want somebody who, for instance, is on the planning commission, who is running for office, and fundraising for their run for supervisor while they're on a planning commission making planning commission decisions. so this conforming change

article 25 indicates, you have to comply with various subsections. one of the subsections requires proof of compliance with public health compliance standard. now, in order to be satisfied, the proof -- pardon me, the proof of compliance with the public health compliance standards, the cellphone company has submitted a document and you can find this in the public works brief that is exhibit h, the radio frequency report. in that report, it addresses the noise that would be generated by the installation. as well as the frequency that would be emitted. when you look at the consulting engineer's report. they paid engineers to assess whether or not it was going to be compliant. so that they could satisfy article 25. the engineers did a fine job of weighing out the 11 points that are required in order to obtain the compliance. the most important to this analysis, item number 2 which requires a listing, i will read verbatim from the report. listing within 100 feet of the site that contributes to the radio frequency energy at this location. the purpose, of

h., and we would then remember -- realtor the other subsections, which reads, in addition to s.f. p.u.c., expects to incur bonded indebtedness to finance capital improvements for the repair, replacement, and expansion of the power enterprise, and will from time to time issue its revenue bonds to finance the cost of such improvements. it is consistent with what they do, but i thought it appropriate to make that additional mention. i want to thank the deputy city attorney blake for his quick action this morning and mr his carpool and the other representatives who are available to testify. we have not taken public comment period may be we can hear from the p.u.c. >> we have ten minutes. hopefully you will keep this very brief because we need to get out of here for the land use committee. >> thank you, supervisor his. thank you for your amendments. i am a cochair of the revenue oversight committee. we hold a monstrous monthly meetings that are open to the public on matters at the s.f. p.u.c.'s water, sewer and power programs to ensure a culture of transparency and trust as valuable to

subsection of the navajo population who felt very mistreated shortly after the dam was built and they found out that one of their core sacred sites, americans know as rainbow thege, navajo know it as bridge that crosses over. it was a sacred point in navajo cosmology, is linked to their key religious -- one of their core religious beliefs. and when they find out that the dam is going to backup waters through the reservoir and inundate rainbow bridge, they are very upset and they actually with the environmental groups to stop the case dam from filling to capacity to preserve rainbow bridge. >> along the arizona utah border, has much change over the last 50 to 60 years as you walk through a drive through the area it similar how it was in the 50's and 60's? is radically it different. an entire town is been built up in that region and the navajo nation gives the federal government land to build the dam which becomes part of arizona, which has grown significant way. if we were to go to hundred miles to the west of where the dam is today, there is st. george, utah, which existed in the 1960

and moving forward, the next subsection of our notification process is the notice that we givetor the final determination as we move from a tentative approval to the final determination, and that code is addressed in section 1514 ofdes addressed in section 1514 of article 25. approval to the final determination, and that code is addressed in section 1514 of article 25. determination, and that code is addressed in section 1514 of article 25. and also in public works code 184504 section 14. in this case, we noticed that the department issued an e-mail on september 19 of this year to neighborhood associations and protesters, anyone who had protested. and that e-mail was issued on september 19, again. and then, applicant is required under the public works order to notice by posting. and here's a screen shot of the posting on the subject post in front of 1509. that, i believe, is it for my slides. thank you very much. >> vice president swig: thank you. >> clerk: okay. we'll hear from the permit holder. you have three minutes. >> good evening, vice president swig and commissioners. my name

any offense that is not otherwise listed in this subsection for which the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than one year and quote, has an element, the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another. i have never seen that definition, physical force against the person or property of another. we went to the sentencing commission and said how many crimes would that include? they said it's impossible to calculate but we think that at least 30,000 people would be ruled ineligible by those words that i just read, who might otherwise be eligible for earlier release. so what he's come up with is his own definition of criminal standard, one which we have never seen before, and he wants that to apply to this bill which we worked on for six years. so i would say when it comes to the cotton amendments, members of the senate really have a very clear and stark choice. they can support a bill which has been worked on in a bipartisan basis and enjoys the support of police, prosecutors and those groups which protect our constit

. >> the medicaldevice subsection is themoc taking profits on that had big rallies an big losses for the sector's high fliers. like cardio device. still up for the year it's trading at more than es60 t expected earnings per share aftequarter. analysts at ubs said in the year ahead, demographicme funals of an aging population still favor device makers. the continued expansion of medicaldvantage bodes well for the health insuranceector ich has held on to the 4% gain for the year. but the legal challenge to the affordable care act can hang over them like well care which t has lost ard of the value in the fourth quarter. the trump administration's proposed rules on medicare drug pricing will pose a majoread wind for drug makerin 2019 like regeneron. the maker of high priced eye treatment which could see reimbursements sk shed. biotech sector is down 14% for the year. but b contrast, traditional drug makers have held up relatively well durthg the fouarter pullback. as investors have looked to traditional safe havens. sort o rejuvenation of that with the breakdow in the market. again with

it is sexual thirteen subsection two provides that the meaningful vote should so far as practical be held before the european parliament decides whether to consent to the withdrawal agreement now the withdrawal agreement has been concluded but not approved can my honorable friend assure the house that the meaningful vote will take place before the european parliament makes that decision. yes i have given a short. caramel of the mississippi can't make this this whole situation is bonkers in the public and frankly i'm fed up with this carry on we all get to know the impact it's having on the academics a touch so what that the minister can from the lightning this to drag into new year is simply unacceptable to delay to it and will keep categorically rule out the possibility of the government until march before the known saying no deal here i'd say too little late i couldn't be much clearer my statement earlier that we will be having a meaningful vote before twenty first of january now i'm very clear i want the prime minister to go and get the issue. and to see seek him to come back to h

no vote on the deal by the 21st ofjanuary, then the government will still abide by section 13, subsectionstatement and an amendable vote on its plans, including whether or not this means no deal and that will happen under any circumstances by the 21st ofjanuary. i make no apology for my purpose in doing this, i already think the 21st ofjanuary is too late with departments already thinking they have to chuck everything at preparing for no deal. i want to stop this country careering into no deal with the damaging consequences forjobs, prosperity and our national security without parliament having a say and without parliament being able to stop that happening. even if other members do not agree with me, i hope they will agree that this parliament cannot be ignored and that is why we need the attorney general's written advice. well our chief political correspondent, vicki young, is with me now. let's talk about what theresa may is hoping to achieve because as the adage has been going for a long time, that clock is really ticking. it is whether that ticking clock is herfriend, if he it is wheth

requirement -- the recommendation which you adopted, the full commission adopted that under the subsection operates in partnership with one or more community based organizations. we are -- ask it to be amended to say san francisco. the community based organizations. i will see if it is specific to the commissioner's recommendation which you have adopted. and we will see if that gets in the final legislation. the director is working on that. we are yet to see. and then, the regulations that you did here with nicole, the director nicole elliott. those have been amended at different times. i have not been able to really go through and things have been added and changed. so it has its second reading tomorrow. so after it is finally passed, i will do a briefing on what was in the final legislation because the legislation that you heard and provided comment on was the first draft. so there -- and quite a few amendments and changes. and i just wanted to highlight for you that supervisor cohen is creating an african-american arts and cultural district in the bayview point. just to let you know tha

. >> i just notice the report i didn't change the year to the right year on page 5 under subsection kyear five of the program, the controller shall produce and follow the board of supervisor as a report on the fund. >> that's the form of an amendment. is there a second to that amendment? seconded by supervisor mandelman. colleagues, can we take that amendment without objection? all right. madame president, we can take that without objection. now for clarification, supervisor tang, this needs to sit until the next board meeting. >> wasn't to be supervisor tang. it must be continued. >> i'm sorry, supervisor kim. could you make a motion, supervisor kim, please? >> a motion to continue. >> i'll make a motion to continue to december 11th as a committee of the whole. >> thank you, madame clerk. >> supervisor: without objection. without objection objection. >> who was the second? >> hilary ronen. >> clerk: thank you. >> as amended without objection. all right. madame, i believe it brings us to item 25. >> supervisor: >> clerk: this with us heard and an ordinance amending the police code to

people still have guts, to which george conway retweeted and added a comment say file under 18 usc subsection 1503 and 1512. those are federal statutes involving witness tampering and influencing jurors. eric trump criticized conway. he said -- >> kellyanne conway has weighed in in the past on some of the tweets that her husband has tweeted. she said he's an outspoken and he has his own views. she might not share them. we have not heard from her today on this dust-up back and forth between george and eric, shep. >> shepard: john roberts reporting from the white house. big headlines to get to on a jam packed news day. after a briefing with the central intelligence agency, this just happened. top republican senators say there's no question the saudi crown prince, the day-to-day runner of that country, ordered the killing of the washington columnist, jamal khaishoggi. so why has president trump been contradicting his own intelligence? plus, republican officials now say hackers stole their e-mails during the 2018 campaign. a rising football star facing new accusations after he was caught on camer

service announcement, in your civics textbook, when you get to the chapter on public corruption, subsectionf-dealing, this could be a shaded sidebar. it's pocket sized. we even know how this ends. i don't know in this white house if trying to pull off a scam like this amounts to a firing offense. it's possible, in this white house, this is one of the things you do to prove yourself. this is how you get your bones and then you can move up once you pulled up a scam like this. but the democratic party is about to take over congress, which means republican congressman bill schuster's house committee which implicated itself in this scam by almost letting it happen, that committee is is now the transportation and infrastructure committee, won't be headed up by schuster, it will be headed up by a democratic pit bull named peter di fazio who we contacted today. we have not heard back from him but we will let you know if we do. but if what happened is a pocket-sized platonic ideal of corruption and self-dealing from the white house deputy chief of staff, presumably this will be a matter of investiga

in addition to any activity permitted pursuant to the sub section c, nothing in this subsection prohibits the following activities. appearing before ones' own department or commission or on behalf of ones self. filing or otherwise pursuing claims against the city on his own behalf. running for city elective office or making a public records disclosure pursuing of the sunshine ordinance. unless noted in this section or b, an advance written determination sunday sub sections c concludes that such activities are not incompatible and the following activities are expressly prohibited by this section and i could keep on reading. this goes on like that. i think you seem to understand the laws. i don't wanted to hold up this process but statement, at the i want to have a discussion or have the city attorney look at this issue before this item comes to the full board. i would like to make a motion to send this out of committee with no recommendation to the full board. >> before that, supervisor stephanie had a comment. you want to move on that motion? she had a comment. is that ok? >> rescind the

service announcement, in your civics textbook, when you get to the chapter on public corruption, subsection self-dealing, this could be a shaded sidebar. it's pocket sized. we even know how this ends. i don't know in this white house if trying to pull off a scam like this amounts to a firing offense. it's possible, in this white house, this is one of the things you do to prove yourself. this is how you get your bones and then you can move up once you pulled up a scam like this. but the democratic party is about to take over congress, which means republican congressman bill schuster's house committee which implicated itself in this scam by almost letting it happen, that committee is is now the transportation and infrastructure committee, won't be headed up by schuster, it will be headed up by a democratic pit bull named peter di fazio who we contacted today. we have not heard back from him but we will let you know if we do. but if what happened is a pocket-sized platonic ideal of corruption and self-dealing from the white house deputy chief of staff, presumably this will be a matter of inves

eventually, a subsection of the latin quarter became to be associated with mexicans and spanish speakersthe area was called by the press as spanish

a deal, even though we haven't voted on it and thereby avoiding the requirements of section 13, subsectionarliamentary vote. we need written assurances from the attorney general on the government's interpretation of the act and we need that assurance that even if there has been no vote on this deal, evenif there has been no vote on this deal, even if they are still claiming the deal applies even if there has been no vote on the deal by the 215t of january, then the government will still abide by section 13, subsection seven to 11 and ensure there is a statement and an amendable vote on its plans, including whether or not this means no deal and that will happen under any circumstances by the 215t of january. i make no apology of my purpose in doing this, i already think the 215t ofjanuary is too late with departments already thinking they have ditto everything for preparing no deal. i want to stop this country by no deal with the damaging consequences forjobs, prosperity and our national security without parliament having a say and without parliament having a say and without parliament havi

eventually, a subsection of the latin quarter became to be associated with mexicans and spanish speakers. the area was called by the press as spanish settlement, spanish colony, little mexico, and eventful, bario once the church was built. it was centered on five blocks from montgomery to mason streets. our lady of guadalupe church was built to serve the spanish speaking population, and the settlement in the area, nea neae intersection the browed and powell streets. over two decades of use, the church was destroyed by the earthquake and fire of 1906. only portions of the expee exter remained, and displaced residents lived inside the church wall. the spanish speaking community of the church once again initiated a fundraising campaign to rebuild the church. the church was rebuilt in 1912, and the second it ration was designed by prominent church architects and constructed with reenforced concrete. the early 20th mission revival church continues the highly ornate interior with elements of orientation. there's murals painted by io it willian artists, in addition to the murals at the church,

they select half and investing only in that subsection rather than just all of them. and they came to us because if they knew we were doing something on the equity side in that regard and said take a look at this. >> you are going to be co-portfolio manager >> it will be the same thing as the schiller fund. and he went through and his team tortured the data and looked at it there seems to be something there and it shows pretty substantial outperformance and so we'll be doing that we think that it will do the same as the schiller fund did which is way ahead so we are optimistic on that also investors have a really hard time investing in real estate of the big institutions that have the wherewithal to buy buildings themselves fully a third choose not to do it because it's just a pain and it's very liquid and takes a lot of effort. i think liquid real estate is an interesting idea and that's what this fund offers you can get in and out of it without having to hire a broker and sell a building. >> it is an interesting time in real estate, commercial real estate given wher

george conway retweeted trump's tweet about roger stone and added this, "file under 18 usc subsections1512 which are the states of witness tampering and obstruction of justice." the best part of that move is at y tweeting out the actual laws, he made sure trump will have no idea what he's talking about. [ laughter ] "18 usc 1503. what the language is this? you know what, i'm just going to click translate tweet." [ laughter ] [ cheers and applause ] so, trump has en dangling the pe pr of a pardon and hoping manafort and stone will refuse to cooperate with mueller. if you're mueller, the question is how do you respond to that? and we found out on tuesday when fhe filed a sentencing me ex-national security adviser jachael flynn and recommended that flynn get n time. because he's cooperating with multiple investigations. and yet, trump's lawyer rudy giuliani tried to argue that was actually good news for trump. although i can't reallfollow his logic or his syntax. here's a text message that rudyiuliani, the president's lawyer, sent to a political reporter after the flynn news broke. "wow,