the executive order amends subsection d of 13692, subsection d of executive order, subsection d of section 3 of executive order of 13827, sectionon d of 1385 and 6 of executive order 13850 to read, d, the term government of venezuela includes the state and government of venezuela and political subdivision, agency or instrument atlanta thereof including the central bank of venezuela,. any person opened or controlled controlled directly or indirectly the foregoing and any person who has acted directly or indirectly for or behalf of the foregoing including as a member of the maduro regime and i have issued signed donald trump, the white house, signed january 25, 2019. the speaker pro tempore: pevered to the -- referred to the committee on foreign affairs and ordered printed. pursuant to clause 12-a, rule 1, the chair declares twelltwell on the bill later this week, increasing federal pay for certain employees. americas continue off the floor to reach a deal on homeland security and border protection and funding the federal government beyond the february 15 deadline. we'll have live house cove

about a substantive change in regulationvi again without notice and comment rule rulemaking under subsection a and then to say manual instruction for policy or guidelines which do not have the force and effect of law and do not establish substantive legal l standards. and then like theth regulation today talks about nonbinding sorts of things but either way they should be made retroactive unless. >> canada inc. take you back to the original question but what on your theory if this provision accomplishes? if i understand the 1986, the prior year's provision congress already said for medicare substantive rules you have to go through notice and comment. i understand how this would not have been different if it was the original version to have a significant effect, but as written with your theory it seems like that 1986 command? . >> the house would have done something broader iner 1987 and the courts. >> i want to make sure i understand you say the compromise to just repeat the provision? . >> yes. and the conference committee reports the only thing to establish or to change that substantive le

and on page 5, line three, inserting a subsection b. with a reporting requirement starting with the quarter beginning july 1st, 2019, the s.f. p.u.c. shall submit quarterly written reports to the clerk of the board summarizing all agreements the p.u.c. has entered into during the prior quarter. each grant shall be submitted no later than 30 days following the completion of the quarter that is the subject of the report, and see, a sunset date and delegation of authority provided under subsection 280 of these ordinances shall apply only to grant agreements and amendments or modifications executed before july 1st, 2020, and expire by operation of law on july 1st, 2020, and the reporting requirements provided for under subsection two b. of this ordinance shall expire by operation of law upon submission of the quarter report covering quarter ending june 30th, 2020 i would like to make that motion , which i think is a good government motion so that all of these grant agreements are public, they go before the p.u.c. commission and are reported

, subsection b and insert section 201. i'd like to make that technical, nonsubstantive motion. >> president cohen: before we do our motion and accept the amendment, i have one question. i didn't hear this item on committee and i didn't really follow it start it finish. i've wanted to know what the spirit is. why are you bringing this to us? >> supervisor peskin: we all put proposition b on the ballot, whiches with a charter amendment that was aimed at precluding ethical compromise situations that when people were on commissions, that they would not be fundraising. and the voters voted to are that. unfortunately, we still needed to conform the election code so that when those individuals started fundraising, that would be the time when they would have to leave the commission. so you don't want somebody who, for instance, is on the planning commission, who is running for office, and fundraising for their run for supervisor while they're on a planning commission making planning commission decisions. so this conforming change

subsection e, by the way, was enacted at a later time, and so its text doesn't necessarily shed light on what congress did in 1987. the term rule in the lead in to subsection a2 includes statements of policy, so there is some redundancy or some -- superfluous there, anyway, no matter how you read it. so it is imprecise. the conference committee report in 1987, i want to stress this, again says recent court rulings. those could only have been apa rulings. and in fact, i take my friend to acknowledge that the american hospital association case was the leading case, and that case discussed the distinction between substantive rules and both interpretive rules and procedural rules. not just the one. and as we point out on page 11 of our reply brief, it did it in terms that are echoed in the text of hh itself. it says -- the ap a's notice and comment requirement applies only to substantive rules that create law, which goes to justice sotomayor's point about what does legal status mean. creates law and, quote, establishes a standard of conduct, which has the force of law. those -- that langu

it was a subsection of the navajo population who felt very mistreated shortly after the dam was built and they found out that one of their core sacred sites, americans know as rainbow bridge, navajo know it as the bridge that crosses over. it was a sacred point in navajo cosmology, is linked to their key religious -- one of their core religious beliefs. and when they find out that the dam is going to back up waters through the reservoir and inundate rainbow bridge, they are very upset and they actually with the environmental groups file a court case to stop the dam from filling to capacity to preserve rainbow bridge. >> along the arizona-utah border, has much changed over the last 50 to 60 years? as you walk through or drive through the area today, is it similar how it was in the 50's and 60's? prof. bsumek: it is radically different. an entire town has been built up in that region and the navajo nation gives the federal government land to build the dam which becomes part of arizona, which has grown significant way. if we were to go to hundred miles to the west of where the dam is tod

the term, subsection a 2, include statement of policy so there is some redundancy, and no matter howyou read it. the conference committee report in 1987, i want to stress this, recent court rulings could only have been apa rulings and i take my friend to acknowledge with the american hospital association says was the leading case and that case discussed the distinction between substantive rules and interpretive rules and procedural rules, not just the one and as we point out on page 11, it did it in terms that are echoed in hh itself. it says the notice of comment requirement applies only to substantive rules that create law which goes to justice so5 tomayor, establishing a standard of conduct which forced the law. that language is very close to what is in a statute as and acted. this is the last program one would expect congress to have created such a transformation of administrative law as respondents are proposing. interpretive rules such as manuals, not the only manual. >> why is that? this court did allow the government to engage in retroactive adjudications that affect substant

and moving forward, the next subsection of our notification process is the notice that we givetor the final determination as we move from a tentative approval to the final determination, and that code is addressed in section 1514 ofdes addressed in section 1514 of article 25. approval to the final determination, and that code is addressed in section 1514 of article 25. determination, and that code is addressed in section 1514 of article 25. and also in public works code 184504 section 14. in this case, we noticed that the department issued an e-mail on september 19 of this year to neighborhood associations and protesters, anyone who had protested. and that e-mail was issued on september 19, again. and then, applicant is required under the public works order to notice by posting. and here's a screen shot of the posting on the subject post in front of 1509. that, i believe, is it for my slides. thank you very much. >> vice president swig: thank you. >> clerk: okay. we'll hear from the permit holder. you have three minutes. >> good evening, vice president swig and commissioners. my name

requirement -- the recommendation which you adopted, the full commission adopted that under the subsection operates in partnership with one or more community based organizations. we are -- ask it to be amended to say san francisco. the community based organizations. i will see if it is specific to the commissioner's recommendation which you have adopted. and we will see if that gets in the final legislation. the director is working on that. we are yet to see. and then, the regulations that you did here with nicole, the director nicole elliott. those have been amended at different times. i have not been able to really go through and things have been added and changed. so it has its second reading tomorrow. so after it is finally passed, i will do a briefing on what was in the final legislation because the legislation that you heard and provided comment on was the first draft. so there -- and quite a few amendments and changes. and i just wanted to highlight for you that supervisor cohen is creating an african-american arts and cultural district in the bayview point. just to let you know tha

secondly in section 5.8 of the purchase and sale agreement, subsection b i quote, the staff of the real estate division will cooperate in good faith with buyers. by this cooperation paragraph, it's clear that it was contemplated bethe party that would be rezoning and because of timing, the city wanted to enclose this transaction use those proceeds for the 49 south van ness project with the rezoning to lag behind. >> supervisor peskin: thank you through the claire for those responses. obviously when a property is owned by the city zone p and so far as we know longer own them, which seems appropriate those of us were members of the board at the time of that sale was cognizant of the purchasing sale agreement. i appreciate there was an appraisal and office comps were use and independent review of that appraisal and have no further questions. i'm subject to public comment, happy to forward these items to the full board with recommendation as a committee report. >> supervisor safai: thank you supervisor. unless there's any other questions any members. let's open it up for public comment. eac

the first chapter and the first subsection of the chapter is called betrayal. i also buried my memories of her mistreatment to honor her but bt one day and the law office in the once famous cover in buffalo, new york, i was asked by my attorney to portray her in order to win my freedom in the land of the free. how audacious attempt to even suggest. this immigration hearing needed to be the final because i was running out of stamina and coping mechanisms. just how long could i maintain the charade of being a normal american girl. my pro bono lawyer had assured me everything but go smoothly. after august 9, 2004 approached. today's appointment was an actual hearing rather then a calendar appointment. it meant i would be able to testify and present my witnesses on my behalf. why don't you come into my office for a second, he commanded interrupting. what's wrong? in my office. i went. i knew him well enough by now to distinguish between his condescension and concerned. he had a plain face which offered him little distinction. the kind you could look at it for hours

in to cases the chinese are requiring you to include a chinese party subsection in your corporation too business there so they can control what you are doing. it's malpractice for these ceos. trish: people are saying am is hurting because of the china thing. so what? apple hurts a little bit because of the china thing. but i don't want to wake up one day and turn into france and let china,r be the new united states. >> china is doing it by stealing our technology. we are still the innovators and the bright light of the world. they are building it off our work. we just need them to stop doing it. trish: as far left as you can get. that's what a lot of politicians are looking at as you have the likes of alexandria ocasio-cortez talking about socialism. but you know what? they can push those socialist agendas, healthcare for all, redistribution of everybody's wealth flips one former sweden resident here tonight warning this giving tree mentality, you remember the book, the giving tree. tree. that's mentality is country beauforting to sweden's downfall. i'm setting the record straight on w

this first chapter, the subsection of the first chapter is called betrayal. when i buried my mother i also buried my memories of her mistreatment to honor her but one day in a law office in buffalo, new york i was asked by my attorney to betray her to win my freedom in the land of the free. how audacious of him to even suggest. this immigration hearing needed to be the final because i was running out of stamina and coping mechanisms. how long can i maintain the charade of being a normal american girl. john james, my lawyer, assured me everything would go smoothly. august 9, 2004, date approached, today's appointment was an actual hearing rather than an appointment. it meant i could testify and present my witnesses on my behalf. why don't you come into my office for a second, john james commanded the morning of my hearing interrupting my reverie. what is wrong? in my office. i went. i knew john well enough to distinguish between his condescension and concern. he had a plane face which offered him a little distinction, the kind of face you could look at 4 hours

i have a whole subsection about students getting in trouble for profanity and i'm being sarcastic wasy about criticizing the university. parents seeing the f-bomb, and the f-bomb on the window and all of this stuff. a lot of people don't know this is it's not uncommon for students students or professors to get in trouble what antiracist speech. >> these cases, although used by opposite ends of the political spectrum, they really do defy ideological classification. >> and there's two chapters on coddling the american mind. and there's this kind of big middle of cases that come to my organization which are about students being told more than to limit their sfeech tiny free speech zones. and it's interesting a lot of times media doesn't cover these cases if they don't conform to a preexisting stereotype. >> fate narrative. let's make clear. she has a right to say f-nazis, right? >> absolutely. the supreme court -- very specific about once again the f-bomb as we're forced to call it on cable news is protect itted. and there's a wonderful line but one's vulgarity is another man's lyric. >>

about a substantive change that regulations have to go through notice and comment rulemaking under subsection a. then it goes on to say manual instruction or statements of policy or guidelines that do not have the force and effect of law they are not substantive rules and do not establish or change legal standards. >> it just extinguishes right then and there the nonbinding sorts of things that either way that they have interpretations to be made retroactive. >> may i take you back to one of the justices questions that is on your theory this provision accomplishes? because as i understand the 1986 prior-year congress already said for medicare substantive rules you have to go through notice and comment so i understand it would be different as the original version but as written it seems to repeat the 1986 command? mimic the house would have done something broader in 1987. >> i want to make sure i understand you say the compromise was essentially to repeat the 86 provision? . >> yes. the conference committee report stresses the only thing it establishes are the legal standard. and the rulemakin

. >> chair peskin: within a reasonable -- this is the subsection b-1. >> supervisor safai: yes. >> chair peskin: within a reasonable period of time after the administrative hearing, this is for anybody who's watching, old language -- the director shall issue a written decision on the permittee's cure, if any, and the public revocation petition and fine based on the public interest that the director will reject the petition, approve the petition or initiate revocation of the permit on the grounds -- on grounds other than those identified in the petition. the director shall mail notice of this decision to the lead petitioner, the permit holder, and you are suggesting at line 22 that the director shall do this by certified mail? >> supervisor safai: yes, just based on problems that we've had in the past based on individuals not receiving. that's a friendly amendment. >> chair peskin: i personally do not care. there are many notice provisions, and there are many definitions of notice, and i will ask deputy city attorney jon givner to opine about the definition of notice. >> mr. givner: deput

because they do not meet the ten year threshold that gives us review authority under section 9.118, subsection b. of the charter. i wanted to ask the budget and legislative analyst if you are aware of what criteria, and if not, maybe we can ask the department what criteria would be used to extend those contracts for the additional two one-year terms. >> through this charity supervisor peskin, i'm not able to speak at this moment to what criteria the department may use. the office of -- contacted administration for extending these terms. they are not subject to board of supervisor approval. they will be approving the extensions today proactively. i do want to say that these are as needed contracts that city departments purchased from -- there are rules in the administrative code about the departments being required to get competitive proposals from the 19 vendors that are being proved today, if they are purchasing between 10,000 and 2.5 million in terms of i.t. purposed -- purchases. there are some roles in play. our experience with the prior marketplace contracts, which departments purchased h

going back to this subsection, i understand that the commission wanted to retain findings around parkingther words, here is a hypothetical, not to implicate number 2 on the agenda, but if for instance you needed a see you for a cannabis dispensary at the ground floor, they would still have to make findings under 328. that is correct? >> yes. that is correct. >> if it was relative to conditional use for height, they would not. >> correct. >> and so the real issue here is appeal ability to the board, versus the board of appeals. >> correct, and if i may, in practice, when a project is coming to the planning commission, typically a new project doesn't have the ground floor use decided already, unless already it is if safely decided to build on they wanted to go and start. in practice, what will happen as a project will go to the planning commission and get approvals, and then later, when they decide when the space is ready to be filled, that tenant will go to the planning commission separately and probably require -- if it requires a.c.u., it will still require a.c.u. >> good explanation. >

this official had been communicating death threats under 8:30 six subsection ten is a second-degree felonyn arrested and me a prohibitive processor a full year before. >> martha: he knocked his adoptive mother's teeth loose assaulting her. to the family said he used a gun against people before, they were very concerned. scott israel had a reaction today. i want to play that for you and get your thoughts. >> i intend to vigorously fight this unjustified suspension both in court, and before the florida senate. this was about politics, not about parkland. and now the national rifle association controls the governor's actions. and today are now trying to control law enforcement in broward county. >> martha: yeah, well, i think he needs to say that to the families pay to tell the families that it was unjustified, this is not about the nra, this is about 17 lives lost, 17 that should not have been lost and could've been prevented pretty needs to stop his politicking paid he has been held accountable, god bless the new sheriff in town. >> martha: dana, thank you very much. of dana loesch, big new

eventually, a subsection of the latin quarter became to be associated with mexicans and spanish speakersthe area was called byh

eventually, a subsection of the latin quarter became to be associated with mexicans and spanish speakersthe area was called by the press as spanish settlement, spanish colony, little mexico, and eventful, bario once the church was built. it was centered on five blocks from montgomery to mason streets. our lady of guadalupe church was built to serve the spanish speaking population, and the settlement in the area, nea neae intersection the browed and powell streets. over two decades of use, the church was destroyed by the earthquake and fire of 1906. only portions of the expee exter remained, and displaced residents lived inside the church wall. the spanish speaking community of the church once again initiated a fundraising campaign to rebuild the church. the church was rebuilt in 1912, and the second it ration was designed by prominent church architects and constructed with reenforced concrete. the early 20th mission revival church continues the highly ornate interior with elements of orientation. there's murals painted by io it willian artists, in addition to the murals at the church, hi

you can't just search and find -- >> guest: you can find craigslist but you can't find the subsection on sex ads with the google search engine. that's the deep web. and in the darknet, the dark web is the inner workings of the system that can be only accessed through something like tour. that is software that you can download off the web and then gives you anonymous entrÉe into the bowels of the system, the enormous section of the system of the web that is not ordinarily accessible. but there are no search engines that function there. so you have to come the addresses are unused and you have to know what you're looking for before you go there. that's part of the connection between social media and the dark web. for example, people post on reddit and other forms of social media addresses for the dark web. so people looking for drugs may go to a open posting, find an address that they can use once they go into the dark web and order their drugs. >> host: and this is what is expanding. i mean, it's interesting to note, the technology itself by itself is not necessary illicit, right? ther

he said he cannot obstruct under a particular reading of a subsection of a particular statute. i don't agree with that, but that's a mainstream conservative view of the article two authorities to run and control the executive branch. i do believe that the premises of your question is exactly right. the obstruction is the collusion. that's where we should be looking. >> it was interesting to hear bill barr explain how a president can break the law. >> for a member of the president's family or business associate was under investigation and he tries to interve intervene. he is the chief law enforcement officer and he has the power, but that would be a breech under the constitution to faithly execute the laws. if a president attempts to intervene in a matter that he has a stake in to protect himself that, should first be looked at as a breech of his constitutional duties. whether it violates a statute depending on what all the facts are. >> did he outline a case for impeachment? >> that's what it is. a case for impeachment and not for the criminal prosecution of the president by th