on page 2 subsection c 1 it says no new fringe financial business be for use. but an existing one is allowed. it's permitted. >> under only the following provision which requires, but that's continuations of existing prohibited, fringe financial. the prohibited ones are the new ones. that's your interpretation. >> that's the way i interpret it. this continuations of existing prohibited fringe financial service uses. so the prohibition according to commissioner fong is the only prohibited fringe financial service uses are new ones. that's why they intended to let this forever. >> there is multiple fringe argued in the city. north of market is one also. i believe there is probably what, four or five, mr. sanchez, fringe financial rud's restricted use districts? >> if i'm out of order. >> you are out of order. >> i would equate it to when had a, let's take an example of a building that extended to the property line and the residential district. the rear property line. that at one time may have been allowed, but as a code change, that is now prohibited. therefore t

b, a review of the type of information shared with the federal government under such subsection. c, a review of the actions taken by the federal government based on such information. d, appropriate metrics to determine the impact of the sharing of such information with the federal government on privacy and civil liberties, if any. e, a list of the departments or agencies receiving such information. f, a review of the sharing of such information within the federal government to identify an appropriate stovepiping of shared information. and, g, any recommendations of the inspector general of the department of homeland security for improvements or modifications to the authorities under subsection. two, privacy and civil liberties officers report. the officer for civil rights and civil liberties of the department of homeland security in consultation with the civil rights and civil liberties oversight board, the senior privacy and civil liberties officer such of each department or agency of the federal government that receives cyberthreat information shared with the federal government u

c, d, little i, e, g, h or i of section 212-a-2. then subparagraph roman numeral two, section 212-a-3, paragraph roman numeral subsection 3, subparagraph a, c, d or e of section 212-a-10. so if i'm a united states senator and i'm trying to protect the interests of the people of the united states to understand what a piece of legislation means, i've got to go back and read every one of those subparagraphic exceptions. this is gobbledygook. my staff tells me every time you go back and read it, you see more -- more difficulties. i haven't even had a chance to look at this. and it's all through this piece of legislation. oh, but don't worry about it, we have set up a vision, we have got a vision of this great immigration bill that's going to be comprehensive, fix all our problems, trust us, don't worry about it. you'll find out what's in it later. right? just like health care, i guess. and this is not a way to do business. the immigration policy of the united states perhaps is as important as the health care policy of the united states. and i'm not going to consent to this. we're going to find out what's in it. it goes on, more and more an