vice president goh: i wonder if you could walk me through 790.141, the reference to 790, subsectionf, and how that references a and not b. >> it is simply a typo. it there is not at section. there has never been a section f. if we look at article 8, article 7 and eight were to fall to run the same time, the late 1980's, and have a different format from the rest of the planning code. it is a chart with references to definitions and back. they have many of the same numbers. it is a different number in each article. in the definition of a medical cannabis dispensary, it references 890.50a. it is a typo, and i am interpreting what that means is a reference to 790.50a, which would be consistent with article 8. vice president goh: are there any rulings from this board or other body that finds that to be the case? >> no, this issue has not been brought up before. we have something pending, code cleanup language before the board of supervisors. i was not able to confirm this was in there or not, but it is something that now that we are aware of it will include in the code cleanup legislation.