still, many tory mps were, like most of westminster, waiting for sue gray.e finally published her full report, and it was quite the read. this is it, finally. we've been waiting months for this report. it gave details of late night drinking, even vomiting. there were photos of several events as well as criticism of a lack of leadership. did you tell parliament the truth, prime minister? do you stand by everything you've told mps before? i have been as surprised and disappointed as anyone else in this house as the revelations have unfolded. that report lays bare the rot that under this prime minister has spread in number ten. with nothing more left to wait for, more tory mps got out their pens to try to trigger a confidence vote. it's thought 28 have now been sent. 5a are needed to trigger a vote. as the country spent the weekend celebrating thejubilee, the prime minister was booed on his way into st paul's cathedral and the tory drumbeat of discontent finally reached a climax. it's monday and mps return to westminster today amid growing speculation that bori

for a brief while, an unknown civil servant , sue gray, seemed to be servant, sue gray, seemed to bet powerful woman in the country. as she prepared her report into downing street's misbehaviour. but when it came , misbehaviour. but when it came, it was a bit of a damp squib. thatis it was a bit of a damp squib. that is because, mr. speaker , that is because, mr. speaker, the report does absolutely nothing to substantiate the tissue of nonsense that he has just. however, boris johnson wasted no time creating a new crisis for himself with a swipe at sir keir starmer over the jemmy savile scandal. he spent most of his time profligate eating journalism, failing to prosecute jemmy savile as far as i can make it. mr. speaker. well, several of the prime minister's top aides resigned. one of his closest saying that there was no fair or reasonable bafis there was no fair or reasonable basis for this claim . but the basis for this claim. but the jemmy, savile row was rather thrown into perspective by vladimir putin's illegal invasion of ukraine in late february . westminster was february. west

investor , or the famous sue gray investor, or even the investigation many years ago into priti patel years ago into priti patel, these were things that took months and months and months to conclude it very differently . so conclude it very differently. so laurie magnus is investigation into the conduct of the team zahawi took around one week much faster than anyone was really and it has to be said the prime minister did act quick , clean minister did act quick, clean off the back of the of this investigation . the report was investigation. the report was handed to the prime minister this morning and at 9 am. the prime minister made his decision to sack the chairman of the conservative party . it must be conservative party. it must be noted that the criticism in the report and indeed the breaches of the minister ariel code as they were laid out were not to do so much with the fact nadhim zahawi had to pay a tax penalty to hmrc . it's zahawi had to pay a tax penalty to hmrc. it's that he was obfuscating whether or not he was under investigation , that he was under investigation, that h

are very used to this tactic, whichjohnson made his own, of setting up inquiries and waiting for sue gray to do the same thing for waiting for the ethics investigation— you don't need an ethics investigation to know certain facts. nadhim zahawi did not pay the taxes he should have done, that's now undisputed fact. he lied about it, that's a breach of the minister will code. he threatened people who are making the allegations against him with very expensive libel lawyers — i would say that's a breach of the ministerial code, as well. �* , , ., , well. but surely all this will come out from the _ well. but surely all this will come out from the ethics _ well. but surely all this will come j out from the ethics investigation, if what you say is true, surely that will be the result and there can be consequences. but why shouldn't there be an investigation, what's there be an investigation, what's the point of having an ethics adviser if he isn't allowed to investigate this kind of think was yellow he can investigate all he wants, but i'm saying to you is there are facts already established wh

the sue gray defence. concluded. the sue gray defence. is it.an i understand it will report next week so really that's what i understand that it's going to be a very quick investigation if it drags on and on and on then it's just inevitable he will go if it's going to be reported next week in close up, then he probably survive. you can probably do however long it is into next week . if it's however long it is into next week. if it's going however long it is into next week . if it's going beyond that, week. if it's going beyond that, he is not going to survive and we all know it and is part of that. it's how he dealt with the issue . it became public issue. it became public threatening journalists with legal action, saying he's been smeared so on. what is very interesting is an article on page two of the daily mail today that seely, the conservative that bob seely, the conservative mp, has actually said that this is a sort of a i'm not quite sure of the words used, but he's saying people who are using the law to silence criticisms is almost a no

is saying that the government is saying one thing and that's that they can't say anything until sue graymuch out of the government until laurie magnus has until sir laurie magnus has completed into the completed his report into the goings on of nadhim zahawi, the chairman of the conservative party, of course, who was for that three month period between july and september of last year . and that's where the crucial question lies. of course, what happened? nadhim zahawi was chancellor and was anything improper done in terms of settling that dispute . hmrc, settling that dispute. hmrc, whilst he was in of the treasury, many , many questions treasury, many, many questions to be asked. there of course, which the government is now delegated to. the ethics tsar , delegated to. the ethics tsar, if you will. so laurie magnus, who is conducting a report and i'm afraid to say we don't have timescale for this report in terms of when it will be concluded. it's operationally independent from the government is not setting terms. they're leading, they're leaving that to the ethics adviser himself self.

sue opened up about her condition while responding to a tweet from gomez guitarist tom gray, who toldof adhd? adhd affects one in _ across a diagnosis of adhd? adhd affects one in 20 _ across a diagnosis of adhd? adhd affects one in 20 people. - across a diagnosis of adhd? adhd affects one in 20 people. but i across a diagnosis of adhd? sél�*thli affects one in 20 people. but it across a diagnosis of adhd? sélthli affects one in 20 people. but it is significantly under identified and under diagnosed in the uk, largely because there has been a lot of stigma and enduring myths about adhd. there are many adults who have struggled for years with lots of different characteristics of adhd. but didn't think they had it because i didn't identify with that in culture rated kind of belief that we were all given in school that if you had adhd you were less intelligent, less able, badly behaved. and of course, that is all complete nonsense. there are a lot of adults now, now that it is better understood, who are beginning to realise that maybe a lot of the reasons they have struggled were in fact