there has en a gnifica increa in the at and ithe suers. theahara is rig on he otheride of t mountai and is ving towds this gion ve steadi. ounirbbar speing french] bargachfog takeaway a youvisuals.hen itomes ry, verslowly and gciously i run is organation th tod has theargest futioning g collecon project in the world. barga: the fogoes thrgh t net, anthen themall moleculeof waterhat are insi the fog are ught in e honeycb sort f netng. anthen wi avity, ey descend io a tter, anthen gather em. [abbarpeaking ench] [derhem speaking french] [abbar speakinfrench] [indistit convesation] [houssn sousane speing nativlanguage [abbar speaking french] [tzroutepeaking nate langua] ousane eaking naive langge] [derhem speaking french] announcer: "earth focus" is made possible in part by the orange county community foundation and the farvue foundation. pgdki÷ ÷ 03/27/23 03/27/23 [captioning made possible by democracy now!] amy: from new york, this is democracy now! >> what we're doing tonight this protesting the government. we are fighting for our democracy

[♪♪] [female narrat] thiss how i remember ibeginnin itas theiddle of a h, dry suer.'s a lit breeze the y is a dmatic ange.. d it's swing. cept it ...it's h,all... from a dtant fort fire fuelleby clima change. m not su ce whaturprisede more--. e ash faing with caress grac orhe feeli th rose upithin me as ifell. e ash faing with caress grac it was gef. knew it ll. [♪♪] anthis tim it w for thehanging rld arah bai] evyone canelate to grief of losg a loveone, becae, i mea that'sniversal but grie of ling youromeland? never, er thoughof this as . but grie oitl be los forever? t... [voi shakes]..it is. earfully] i don't know how to explain it, really. iti ver, er thoutou, grow. out thermight be a ti when thice wasn't gng to beolid travel . don't thk, um... i n't knowow to beble to expla it to y... you n't rely reali homuch y've lost til you op anthink abt it. [wds gusting] [derekottle] a t of tim, when ii st stop., i op... and i ok. i look o in the stance and i sato mysel "are my es seein what mgreat-grdparentsaw?" army eyes eing e same ldscape? and used to sten and i ask se

suer photo iss my favite backck too i was ynger, it blue. here'one withe in a suitand w uncomftable i was weing it en i wasoung er i was really close with my mother and my sis ter, so i just felt like i was just one of the other gir ls. and i remember playing with my si ster and sharg outf sand i ink that when i starterealiz g as got old thathis is w i am, ani'm not e of theoys d i'm noth emi'm t a brother. my m was a ltle moreon the lient s id and unrstand g. enever ias playi witholls, likeshe woul't think twiceabout shwould ver li dge me f it. en as i got der, shstarteddisappving aut it. " m!""w t?" "i think'm g ay >>eah, i rember that.>> and answere "no u're n ." i remember that oo. >> i said, "noyou're n u're conse " was bornn guatema from a familyith fouren kids. when we t pregna we aays sa "i'monna he a boy,i'm goa ve gir l, u knowbut we d't choos that why is ha rd i started seeing the behavior. i was thinking that, um, maybe it was my fa ult. but now i know that it's not my fault, you k now, things h pen. i uld caller a dierent na; i walike h mom, tt's nomy name". ke i wand to

suer photo iss my favite backck too i was ynger, it blue.here's e withe in a suitand w uncomftable i was weing it en i was young er i was really close with my mother and my sis ter, so i just felt like i was just one of the other gir ls. and i remember playing with my si sterand shing outfits and i thk that'shen started aliz in i got oer th this isho i a ani'm not e of theoys d i'm noth emi'm t a brother. myom was aittle mo on theenient s id and unrstand g. enever ias playi witholls, likeshe woul't think twiceabout e would ver li dge me f it. en as i got der, shstarteddisappving aut it. " m!""w t?" "i think'm g ay >>eah, i rember that.>> and answere "no u're n ." >> i rember that oo. >> i said, "noyou're n u're conse " i s born iguatemalfrom family wh fourte kids. when we t pregna we aays sa "i'monna he a boy,i'm goa have gir l, u knowbut we d't choos that whyt's ha . i started seeing the behavior. i was thinking that, um, maybe it was my fa ult. but now i know that it's not my fault, you k now, thingsap pen. i uld caller a dierent na; i wal

someone like that the person suering under a term limit ... >> the statute of limitations isoslikelytheperson bringing the ai it's about the defendant . the puosi'm trying to focus in on for the traditional purposes of the statute ofimation that affects the defendant so why is t dendant in any different position, not the person bringing the claim, the defendant stes that we will rule your way versus eser reads way. >> t me explain what i believe that type of approval on the plaintiffs time. best served by having to find tharnot made illegal individuals looking to extend the length of their claim as long as limitations in some way a statute or because it gives someone exposed to tort claims or other claims definition as to when they no longer have to be on essentially preparing for litigation for those things. the flsi is an accrual rule typically marks when a person makes a firstege suit . this court discussed t possibility of a claim that could be brought but that has t t accrued. that is a very san possibility. when we're talking aboutn accrual rule that happens, it gives states defed

connolly: i would point to summers, and suer this court held in an environmental organization had standing to challenge the four seices approval of the burnt ridge project. and because before service approve that without going through notice and cme. and that environmental organization hadtaing because there was some possibily at if they went throh e proper process, that the for service would change its nd and would not approve the burnt bridge project. i think it's the same thing here. if the secretary goes through the proper processthe's some, and negotiated rulemaking, notice and cme, there's some possibility that he will change his mind and forgive our debts. justice thomas: we are the procedures in summers applied in summers? mr. connolly: where they implied? justice thomas: no, applied. mr. connolly: oh, applied. in that case, yes, the court id, the court found it was drawing a distinction beee why they would've had standing in one place and woun't of in another. and the reason that the group ultimately did not have standing is because they had settled it. but the court said that if

if you look at the breadth of this programi's not about helping people who are uniquely suering fromhe pandemic. it's lpg 95% of all borrowers, except for the respondents here. and so, i think when you look at thnare of the program at ise, plus the campaign statements, plus the fact that they've neverotn up here and denied it, you put all that togetherani think we have a strong, at a minimum, some possibility th ty're going to get, when this programs declednlawful, and they go back to the drawing board, i don't think they're going to fo up shop. i think they're going to say, how about the hea? >> what's your theory, if any, maybe i should be asking theth side this, but your three for what they didn't want notice and comment? >> i think because it, the negotiated rulemaking process anthe notice and comment process, i mean, it'a ng process. and agencies probably would, most agencies would prefer not to have to do that >>s is an emergency. an emergency statutes typically do not have noticed and comments, do they? >> if this were authorized by the heroes act, than they could've gone unde