commissioner sugaya. and commissioner antonini will be joining us shortly first, it the consideration for continuance item one case at 1010 bush stre 1010 bush street conditional use authorization is for case numbers d d and d and case 2010 at the 2820th century lake street conditional use are proposed for june 20th, 2014, i have no other items proposed for conditions i have one speaker card >> karen jones. >> other mike please. this is item one a-1010 bushy own the building next door i'm new to the process but this is the second continuance i'm trying to plan my summer vacation is there a limit to how much time something can be continued i want to be sure and there's no before and after but mr. magaziney. >> the project planner. >> okay. great. >> is there any public comment on items proposed for continuance seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner moore >> move to continue as noted. >> second. >> commissioners, on that motion as proposed. commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commission

>> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commission president wu? >> aye. >> so moved, commissioners that motion passes unanimously 6-0. >> do we need to keep this material? >> i would imagine you are going to be receiving revised plans. >> >> okay. commissioners, that will place you on your last agendized item, no. 17, for case no. 2013.340d, at 1423 [ao-fb/] avenue a request for a mandatory discretionary review. >> commissioner antonini. >> i am going to have to recuse myself from this. i am waiting for interpretation. i have project sponsor is a dental patient of mine. we're not entirely sure whether his services at this point and renumeration and once i have a clear understanding for project probings it may have a similar circumstance, but in this case we'll just have to ask for recusal today. >> move to recuse. >> second. >> good evening. >> sorry, one second. on the recusal of commissioner antonini commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner borden? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> excuse me, commissioner su

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner president wu that places you under your calendar and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. we have one item under consent item 5 at 840 irving street i have no speaker cards but i believe commissioner sugaya has an announcement >> i have a member of a medical group i impounded with a city attorney and he said there were no conflicting positions but i'll be voting on the item. >> commissioner fung. >> i'm a member of that group as well. >> commissioner antonini. >> seeing. >> we need to take public comment. >> then i move to. >> having is there any public comment on the consent calendar seeing none, public comment is closed. >> move to approve item 5. >> second. >> on that motion to approve item 5. commissi

commissioner moore and commissioner sugaya. commissioner borden is expected to run late this is items for continuance the first at the tennessee bush street for for the next case and 2014 d at the 3305 broadway restrict street are for may 14 and the next case golden gate avenue conditional use authorization and the next at 23 turk boulevard is for indefinite continuance and further on your regular calendar for the next case bona fide eating place we've received a request from the supervisors office asking for a continuance >> i have no speaker cards. >> are there that any comments on the items proposed for continuance? >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm mrs. mcauthor i live on bush street across from tennessee bush street this was brought brought to my attention i said have opposed it i want you to know we have a lot of elderly people on bush street and their concerned about the - ma'am, on this time we're only taking comments on the matters of continued. >> this is continued. >> this is to support the conditions to that cont

>> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commission president wu? >> aye. >> so moved, commissioners that motion passes unanimously 6-0. >> do we need to keep this material? >> i would imagine you are going to be receiving revised plans. >> >> okay. commissioners, that will place you on your last agendized item, no. 17, for

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you under commission matters item four for the draft minutes for may 8 >> is there any public comment on the draft minutes seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner sugaya >> i mows move to a adapt the minutes. >> commissioner antonini pr commissioner borden. commissioner hillis. commissioner moore pursue commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. commissioners, on that motion that passes so moved, commissioners, that motion passes and places you on commissions questions or comments and commissioner antonini >> i'm not sure this issue falls under the jurisdiction of mta or the city through planning or is state of california but i had it pointed out to me from a visitor out of town that almost all signs are packaging prohibited and under every sign is a pan herald so if it's the cities job or the states job it says civic job that's a local code. i don't need an answer today

. >> commissioner sugaya. >> yes. the academy has had hair marching orders since 2010 it's now 2014. so beyond the scope we're sitting gifting the academy another year to finish the eir. november 1st comes around and mr. sanchez has said if they don't meet the deadline the penalties will accrues as of the second that stand and will not be resend >> so as part of the process part of the release of stay the appeal periods for the violations and penalty will run and their ability to appeal that with the determination in there about the november 2nd date the time is now. >> and do the penalties start to accrues between the time they started to delay or descending second. >> so they've been in violation since 2006 or 7 or 8 when they bought the properties and no penalties assessed for the entire years only starting on november 2nd so they're getting away with murder again so i don't understand what the issue is with commissioners who can't say we're going to schedule a hearing to have a discussion about what the hearing in

commissioner sugaya. i move to continue those to the dates >> commissioners, on that motion to june 12th. commissioner antonini pr commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes amazing 7 to zero and places you under our consent calendar and routine commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests cafe and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 3. case q at the seven hundred street and item 4 at the 545 request for xhvgs request requests for condominium conversion there are no speaker cards >> any public comment on the consent calendar. okay. seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner antonini >> move to approve. second >> on that motion to approve commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner

commissioner sugaya. >> yes. i'm in sympathy with commissioner hillis's attitude i've never found a facade to be a successful solution if you go to tell the truth and folsom there's the facade of a former industrial building didn't work. other examples downtown near my opening technologist on sacramento street there's a corner building lopped off in the back it's not new anymore but the high-rise in the back of that and even a worse one on montgomery which retains portions you have to go down into the retail this is more sensitively done a couple on salt lake i'm not going to - i'm not to vote because i'm in favor of removing the one on the corner to the gas station returning that to an urban design so the gentleman may have comments with respect to that option and similar discussions were brought to staff levels commissioners and the project sponsor is willing to eliminate that one building they have an image to present but handled at the administrative level just to speak for the facade with regards to

commissioner sugaya. >> yes. one last question ms. flores can you repeat this the grocery store aspect is in phase one or mr. rich whatever i think there's a provision in there there's a length of time that's been set forth in which they're going to get a grocery store into the space and emily can help me confronting the grocery store must be included in phase one and the key kick in when the project sponsor comes in for phase two and it can't be granted until phase one has received the t co and pulled ti permits to make sure the groceries is happening. but in recognition i'll tell you we've been working with the project sponsor this is not an easy location for a grocery store it takes work to get an operator there a because not a lot of housing and the other side of my office has been working on that we needed an outlet and this is several years down t down the line if we demonstrate to the commission that's not possible to get business there's they'll be let out of the agreement >> i'll go ahead a initi

. >> commissioner sugaya? >> one of the difficulties that we run into, and especially i hate to say this with at&t is the amount of coverage that at&t is much less i can characterize it that way, mess less than verizon or sprint or the other carriers and so there are a lot more, if you will, at&t around the city than the other carriers but that is a technical issue. and i don't know in the future, you know, whether they will be new technology, or whether they will be taking them down, or whether we are going to go even further the other direction, but i just wanted to say that for the members of the public as to why you might see these popping up in areas where the carriers don't seem to have antennas. >> >> commissioner moore. >> the yes question that i would like to ask, is have you worked with at&t on exploring in that location, less intrusive placement or volume configuration of how the antennas could be placed more in the middle and more in the back? because the outline seems quite extensive while the oth

commissioner sugaya. and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. commissioner fong >> i was absences at the leasing last hearing and had the ability to look at it on line and prepared to take action. >> i believe there's a request to make a statement. >> good afternoon, commissioners we were just informed today that the public health department has made a question on the developer and granted a permit through the change of ownership we request that item 15 the discretionary review on ocean avenue be continued to the commission can include and consider supervisor yee's legislation on the developer clustering the supervisor is not against the applicant but we're incentive to the clustering of the cannabis dispensaries on motioning mission avenue. >> commissioner sugaya i wish the city attorney were here i have a procedural question maybe staff know the answer. since this is pending as has been pending for awhile even if supervisor yee's legislation going into effect if we delay it aga

>> commissioner sugaya. >> yes, thank you. people that know me, i think, know that i have been involved in historic preservation for many, many years and actually since the mid-70s as a professional. so therefore, i would usually be on the side of allowing a conversion, because one of the ways that historic preservation has tried to preserve structures is to introduce incentives among which are liberalizing or added uses that an historic building may be put to beyond what the base zoning usually allows. i think that kind of approach exists in almost every major city in the country. and it's the kind of thing that historic preservation people look to, i think, to say that if there are promises made, and documents signed, which have already taken place with respect to this building, in terms of a maintenance plan, et cetera; that they will follow the standards when they are doing renovations. those are the kind of safeguards that preservationists have instituted in order to keep building alive and in use. however, i think that t

so i agree with commissioner sugaya. i think we're doing this back-yards backwards and need to wait what dph says so we can talk about the issue of clustering and regardless of supervisor yee's legislation. >> is there more than one location within the 1,000'? >> there is another mcd located within 500'. >> so i was thinking even if the other location is ultimately denied i did dph, this would be [po-urbl/] for cu. >> other mcd is located within a thousand -- it's outside of the 500'. >> i suggest that we go ahead with the hearing and hear from the public. they have waited all day to talk. and then discuss. commissioner hillis? >> no, i'm fine with that. >> well, that concludes my presentation. and i'm available for questions. thank you. >> project sponsor. >> hello commissioners my name is greg and i'm the sponsor of very passat health centers at 1423 ocean. a little bit about myself, i grew up in a family business -- we're in security business. i got into medical cannabis for my injury for pain, which we still continue

commissioner sugaya. commissioner president wu. sxhun so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero . >> good afternoon. welcome back to san francisco planning commission regular hearing for thursday, may 8, 2014, i'd like to remind members of the public the commission that the commission does not permit outbursts of any kind and please silence all electronic devices. that mating may signing seen off and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. commissioners we've left off in your your regular calendar the sponsor planning codes to eliminating fees. good afternoon. welcome commissioner i'm kevin i'm the fence and i t manager for the planning department i'm here to ask for eliminates of fees i've presented this to the commission on february 5th and 4th i presented the planning proposal on february 5th and you approved the departments budget the property code amendments eliminates the fund foreclosure fees for the reactuation for closed case

. >> thank you commissioner sugaya. >> yes. in the discussion one of the reasons for expanding is to try to capture some of the local businesses. so ones that are sided like phil's cfo goes to 11 and 20 some of the businesses will be able to open without a cu but we're not using local as a definition correct because blue bottle is part of san francisco but not headquartered in oakland >> part of that is correct and part not we can't give preference to businesses that are locally owned or here it would benefit the start up and local businesses some examples that are locally started was shthsdz you're familiar with who would be effected. >> that's good i don't like blue bottle anyway and the band like has a valley and north beach and the special controls and cds. >> it will stay in hayes valley if we change the distinction like supervisor breed wants it changed it will focus has a valley the definition we'll change universally. >> and then under the administrative review the potential for someone if the director as indians okay t

commissioner moore >> commissioner sugaya. no. commissioner fong. commissioners that motion fails three to 2. 3 i's >> i'm sorry the motion does pass because otherwise, we'd, or be stuck that motion moved and gets continued to july 17th because a majority of the commissioners voted in favor of the continuance >> we have two other matters. >> do we keep that that i commissions on 16 a and b on broadway restrict street mandatory discretionary review on a demolition and construction. >> g good evening. i'm christen planning staff. the item is a mandatory discretionary review for broderick. the project is to demolish a one story single-family dwelling and construction another one the property is located on the west side of broadway restrict street. the subject lot measures 25 feet by 94 feet deep and continuing lot area. the lot continues a single-family residence. the property is located within the rh 3 district. the surrounding neighborhood has 2, 3, 4 residential dwellings and the block facing the property while buildings in the middle of the block h

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 17 for the next case at the 1118 polk street request for authorization >> good afternoon commissioner burns with the planning department staff this is for the conditional use authorization doorknobs as the shop and the applicant wants to establish the new formula rail use in a vacant commercial store front within the local mayor's office investment in the area. the subject of the chain specialize in supplements and the proposed operation or 8 to 4:00 p.m. and higher part time folks. there are no newt traffic shops in san francisco and they've got the rights within the 71 that is specializing in nutrition has two out of 4 hundred and 11 maximum spaces. there's one vitamin shop within a quarter of a mile within the use their formula retail establishment and two walling greats that sell supplements and the nutrition stores are within the proximity within there are 11 gyms and personal exercising stor

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that unanimously and places you on item 15 item 14 has been continued and the next case at the 777 van ness street is a public informational hearing to review the inclines of continues >> good afternoon this is an informational discussion of the business operations at the 77 van ness street perkins approval for the conditional hearing for the business operations this continues a live microscopic venue and an outdoor activity area that opened in 2013 and the outdoor activities opened that on a few times basis thereafter and there's two conditions the first one is excessive noise complaints from neighborhoods from patron noise think the street and open doors and i woulding vehicle noise ass and the recircling the garbage the other xooedz the hours including the trash picks up are occurring outside and the community staff has worked the neighbors to solve the concerns and continued conversation wi

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> the commission want to >> good afternoon. welcome to san francisco planning commission regular hearing nor thursday, may 15, 2014. i'd like to remind members of the audience that the commission does not permit outbursts of any kind please silence all electronic devices. that may sound speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. . commissioners we left off under our regular calendar for items 13 a and b for the case e and c at the 1634 on pine street

commissioner moore commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 12 a and braxton building inspection commission on bush street a request for kufks and we're consider requires for variances. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and members of the board. i'm with the staff. the project is located at 1430 bush street and a conditional use authorization to construct a hundred and 15 at all mixed use construction and with the rent a car at the current location. you may recall it was heard by planning commission on september 9th of 2013 and just to bring to our memory the project that was shown at that time, in september. one hundred and 15 foot tall building with 32 unit facing a alley and at that time, there was a few members of public that spoke in opposition and if the commission continued to further work on the design. and there were concerns about a central courtyard in which the unit that faced the courtyard and at that time that was 33 to 38 feet betw

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> the commission want to >> good afternoon. welcome to san francisco planning commission regular hearing nor thursday, may 15, 2014. i'd like to remind members of the audience that the commission does not permit outbursts of any kind please silence all electronic devices. that may sound speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. . commissioners we left off under our regular calendar for items 13 a and b for the case e and c at the 1634 on pine street commissioners you'll consider the environmental impact report and hamburger from the staff on the on the conditional use authorization please know the revised porlgsz portion of draft eir end and public comment will be received but not responded inform in writing >> that good afternoon. i'm jenny from the planning department the certification of an eir draft motions was published and the public hamburger was held on november 7, 2013

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero >> the commission will take a 20 minute break. >> thursday, may 22, 2014. i'd like to remind please silence all electronic devices. that may sound off and and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. commissioners we left off under your regular calendar on item 11. the mission alcohol beverage special use ordinance amending the alcohol beverage special use district. diego sanchez i'll be talking about the special use district alcohol beverages, however, i'm i'm to provide supervisor campos office with time to present on the motivator >> good afternoon, commissioners the amendment to 9 special district is pretty small a narrow exception allowing the miniature golf course to serve alcohol beverages and bowling alleys enjoy this similar section and approached by a company and the business was conceived the people have been in the neighborhood and look

commissioner sugaya. commissioner president wu. sxhun so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero . >> good afternoon. welcome back to san francisco planning commission regular hearing for thursday, may 8, 2014, i'd like to remind members of the public the commission that the commission does not permit outbursts of any kind and please silence all electronic devices. that mating may signing seen off and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. commissioners we've left off in your

. >> commissioner sugaya. >> here. >> first is considering for items proposed for continuiation yawntem no. 1, 2013-1 166t amendment to the planning code sections 303i formula retail and is proposed to continuance to june 5 2014. item 2, case no. 2010.0726x at 20 a1 third street, request for large project authorization is proposed for continuance. and item 2013.0465d at 2479 francisco street has been withdrawn. >> any public comment on the items proposed for continuance? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner sugaya. >> i will move to continue items 1 and 2 to the dates noted on the agenda. >> second. >> commissioner antonini. >> this is an item for the consent calendar. so i will wait until after. >> there is a motion and second to continue items 1 and 2. on that motion, roll call. (roll call) so move commissioners and that motion passes unanimously 7-0 and places you under your consent calendar. all matters listed here constitute a consent calendar. are considered to be routine by the planning commission and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commissio

. >> commissioner sugaya. >> yeah. i make a motion to not take dr. >> second. >> commissioner moore. >> i'd like to note? a citizen activity designed with respect to the courtyard it creates spaces including the rooflines that's sensitive to the x we don't have rules against density indication that has the types of shadows we're experiencing there's indeed room for desecration but it's not in a way impacting sometimes, we see where we modify a building not to talk about that earlier today but the discretion this is way within the boundary of good projects. >> i understand this is in this courtyard but this project is sensitive in the way it is we see projects that are much more aggressive. >> commissioners there's a motion and second to not take dr and commissioner antonini. >> commissioner borden. >> confusing second year commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on public comment i have in speaker card >> any

>> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commission president wu. >> aye. >> so moved commissioners and that motion passes unanimously 5-0. >> to staff, to work with the neighborhood groups to see if they wouldn't come up with a position in the next 2-3 weeks. maybe it's asking too much, but they have known about this information. >> i can reach out to the community groups and ask them what their position is supporting it or neutral? >> thank you, tell them we're asking them. >> i will do that. >> commissioners, if there is nothing further on this matter, that will place you on public comment and i have no speaker cards. >> any general parkway public comment? >> seeing none, general public comment is closed. meeting adjourned. >> so become everybody this the may first thank you for jefferson city us for the celebration of asian pacific it's the international looibd to celebrate of the success around the world and may first, it the the state of hawaii with this we have a special, special hawaii culture and the asia

>> . >> aye commissioner sugaya? >> commissioner fong? >> aye. >> commissioner president wu. >> aye. >> that motion passes unanimously -06789 commissioners that will pace you on item 14 or case no. 2012.04 the 3x1201 request for authorization. >> good afternoon agencies, rich sucre department staff and the project is a large project authorization for proposed project at 1201-1225 tennessee street and seeking modification for rearar, dwelling unit exposure, off-street loading, horizontal reduction and accessory for dwelling units. the proposed project including demolition of existing two-story commercial ware hughes building and automotive service station, and new construction after i 6-story residential building with 259 dwelling units of which 34 will be affordable dwelling units. and grund-floor corner retail, approximately 2260 square feet. 2-car share parking spaces, 147 off-street parking spaces and 259 class i bicycle parking spaces. the project includes a dwelling units consisting of six 3-bedroom units, 105,2-bedroom, 49 one-bedro

commissioner sugaya. >> in terms of wind exception, it's stated that nonetheless, because as we all just talked about and scott clarified a little bit, the project isn't reducing the speed. it's not increasing the situation. but we still need to have an exception and the way it's stated an exception is warranted because the project will not add to the amount of time that the comfort level is exceeded. but then there is a second statement that says, "the project cannot be shaped in other wind baffling measures cannot be adopted to meet the comfort criteria with unduly restricting the development potential of the site >> have you seen any attempt at adopting wind-baffling measures and shaping the building that resulted in unatractive and ungainly building or not? >> in my experience, i have not. i think, with this project, taking a look at planning code section 148 to be able to address the wind concerns they have definitely designed a building that has improved the wind situation at this project site. so the three exceedances have been reduced to two. >> so you are saying there wasn't --