in particular, department's report having lots of challenges regarding supervise oriole -- supervisorial datast apartments lack clear quality issuance and protocols when it comes to bilingual staff training. although there are clear gaps, the majority of departments rate themselves as meeting the lao requirements. finally, here's an example of how our tier 1 departments shape up. the top three departments -- elections come and human services agency, and department of public health -- ranked very high with our compliance criteria. the most improved departments have shown clear efforts and are on the right track. the department's in the "in development" colorado -- colorado -- column are meeting some requirements but need assistance. we had specific concerns with signeage around city hall. oewd says they did not provide services to the public, but we know they are providing services, so it may just be a matter of their own reporting. finally, the compliance plan is mostly in progress, and they are also working with our office to meet the lao requirements and make improvements. so, supervisors,

data with us? >> in the proper way that doesn't require me to talk about confidential supervisory information, i would be happy to provide more information, including the information we've gathered and information companies have submitted to us. companies have submitted information to us, both through their public comment letters, already available to you and companies have also submitted confidential information to us through the supervisory process, which they intend for us to use as we move forward to a final rule and have the best information available. we have all that information. >> so what will be public? that's sort of my question. i can't predict how we're going to move forward toward a final rule. when we do the final rule, we'll certainly come out with a discussion of how we weighed the comments we received and what judgments we made based on the comments to move from the proposed rule to the final rule. >> thank you. mr. canseco. >> thank you, madame chair. i noticed at the february 1st fsoc meeting you updated the council on comments that it had received regarding the second notice of pr