david: after 13 years, did you think you had a chance to be on the supreme court? justice ginsburg: no one thinks, "my aim in life is to be a supreme court justice." david: when you first got on the court, were other justices saying, "we're happy to see you? here? let's go have dinner together?" just. ginsburg: justice o'connor was the most welcoming. he gave me some very good advice. >> would you fix your tie, please? david: well, people wouldn't recognize me if my tie was fixed, but ok. just leave it this way. all right. i don't consider myself a journalist. and nobody else would consider myself a journalist. i began to take on the life of being an interviewer, even though i have a day job of running a private equity firm. how do you define leadership? what is it that makes somebody tick? when you went to cornell, your grades were obviously very good. you applied to law school at harvard. you got into harvard law school. was the class half women and half men? [laughter] justice ginsburg: in those ancient days, i went to law school from 1956 to 1959. in my entering

did you think you had a chance to be on the supreme court? stice ginsburg: no one thinks my aim in life is to be a supreme court justice. it is not realistic there are only nine of us. with whoa lot to do are the particular nine at a particular time. growing up, i never had an idea of being any kind of a judge. were -- when carter became president, there was only one woman on a federal court of appeals. the first ever secretary of education. and then there were none again. carter changed that. no president ever went back to the way it was. reagan did not want to be outdone by carter so he was determined to put the first woman on the u.s. supreme court. he made a nationwide search and with sandra day o'connor. david: when president clinton became president, you were obviously somebody being considered. president clinton talked to somebody who was pushing for your appointment, daniel patrick moynihan, and president clinton said, women do not want her. how could that have been the case when you are the leading lawyer in gender discrimination? why

school the supreme being or goes. why do we go to war because we view the key to economic growth as oil and energy we go to war is vice president cheney said for the oil that's why they invaded iraq for the oil that's why trump says the one thing we want to syria we really don't want to go to war with russia we want to just control the oil. and the gas lines and the pipelines through afghanistan so the military is really an extension of controlling a world of energy and oil. 6 am a general terms for morning practice she has a busy day ahead she was right a letter to her mother and help the judea girls group prepare for tomorrow's council excel. better. hours here. horsehair. can you shoot not over yet sara. 0. 00 just as yet you build the business. as i would have. you know my. son came home coming all. the time of this. time with hope. and mama socialism you can hit it like it's the abaya of the day and i'm to be in control i should stand this would seem to count as so. i can call my mind and call to have a dad and d

to the supreme being or goes. you know we talked a lot on the show many years about economy and currencies and what makes a currency usually what makes a currency is scarcity for example gold is a currency it's money because it's scarce that's the primary reason people use it as money keynesian economics or socialism is usually a workable because the people who are organizing it think that well you can just print all the money you need you need a program print more money there's socialism for banks on wall street as was pointed out recently one of the big presidential debates you know a bank gets in trouble just print more money well what's the ultimate scarce commodity what is the ultimate scarce commodity think about it what is the ultimate scarce commodity. in the headlines for this hour a bomb blast rips through a football stadium in eastern afghanistan earlier today according to police 3 people killed there and 11 others. coming off the taliban said it would resume its operations against afghan security force

to the supreme being or knows. the question as well as ben what do you do when a global economy that relies on just in time to livery of parts and services mostly from play wage china is interrupted by a global pandemic and can't be overcome with more money printing that's the big question. join me every thursday on the all excitement and i'll be speaking to guest of the world the politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then. here in moscow the headlines this hour calls for calm several countries witness a wave of panic buying with shoppers popping up on the same chills in anticipation of a worsening. season to tell the people who because just. the e.u. accuses turkey of weaponize it refugee flows as the block bolster the security of the greek border left tens of thousands of migrants. and 3 whistleblowers confront the world chemical weapons watchdog demanding a fair hearing after breaking ranks who disagree with the organization's findings on the 20. syria.

be immune to these injustices. at worst, it was a threat targeting two sitting members of the supreme court. now either way i encourage my colic the d democratic leader to apologize to those supreme court justices and to do it here on the floor. >> my nordic leader. >> i plan to spend my remarks today discussing our bipartisan agreement to fund the fight against the new coronavirus. i was looking a forward to congratulating all of my colleagues in discussing the important ways this funding will help our public health experts, frontline healthcare professionals, and state and local officials combat the spread of this virus and mitigate its effects. it's a serious agreement to meet a serious challenge. and today we will send it to president trump's desk. said today will be an important day for the country. b and it was going to be a proud day for the senate. but instead, the nation's eyes are on this body for an entirely different reason. a few weeks ago, i spoke on this floor about a dangerous trend that threatens our self-government. i explained how some of the democratic party appear more i

do nothing if they disagree then something should happen. >> sitting before our case to be heard threatening supreme court justices when they have the power of confirmation of how to make a decision on that case with coequal branches but he's doing it as a leader in the senate of an entire party that he leads he voices that concern and doing it with a cases heard at the senate and it is over a case and how to decide the case. >> are there some compromise? >> i would get to a point to find some compromise i do believe we can get there we've been talking with steny hoyer on the democrats we have been waiting for them to give the feedback i thought we would get 12 days ago because time is running out when we get done with this conference a leader has a colloquy on the floor right now. >> is is pure politics quick. >> is not politics at all. the knowledge of when i became aware of it we were not the ijority i think partisan politics should ever play into that. you that this couldn't -- this looks wrong and is wrong, that you say you did not speak to your son about it but you have pictures on a golf cour

that with even the me the loser is everything going to be sunday it's as important as having a supreme being in light of. the rivers and lakes of the amazon are central to the coup camas culture they believe there's another world under the water where their ancestors gather and where people spirits and animals all live together. for the comma any harm to the rivers and lakes would threaten the balance of the spiritual realm. do you believe. but the protests against the new water highway also have a very practical dimension. still that runs a painting school. she says you only have to look at the course of the river to see that dredging and channeling are a bad idea. going to. see this going and seeing the river here is constantly changing older people here will tell you that 2 streams appear and disappear give us a little theme but we're not meant to interfere. still this point is one leading scientists are raising as well. many of them have reservations about the project one is jorge a bob barr mental engineer who has spent years researching the amazon. he says the network of waterways here

david: after 13 years, did you think you had a chance to be on the supreme court? one thinks,burg: no my aim in life is to be a supreme court justice. david: when you first got on the court, whether justice is saying, let's have dinner together? justice ginsburg: just as o'connell was the most welcoming. he gave me some very good advice.

david: after 13 years, did you think you had a chance to be on the supreme court? one thinks, "my aim in life is to be a supreme court justice." david: when you first got on the were there other justices saying, "we're happy to see you? let's have dinner together?" justice ginsberg: justice

david: after 13 years, did you think you had a chance to be on the supreme court? jus. thinks my aim in life is to be a supreme court justice. david: when you first got on the court, were other justices saying we're happy to see you? let's have dinner together? just. ginsburg: justice o'connor was the most welcoming. he gave me some very good advice. >> would you fix your tie, please?

david: after 13 years, did you think you had a chance to be on the supreme court? sburg: no one thinks, "my aim in life is to be a supreme court justice." david: when you first got on the court, were other justices saying, "we're happy to see you? here? let's go have dinner together?" just. ginsburg: justice o'connor was the most welcoming. he gave me some very good advice. >> would you fix your tie, please? david: well, people wouldn't recognize me if my tie was fixed, but ok.

introduced by a lot of people over the years, but i have to confess, it is an odd sensation to be introduced by a supreme court justice. perhaps one of the few things more odd still is being in the audience when a mighty supreme court justice introduces a lowly law professor. it must feel a little like you're at a really fancy restaurant where the main course arrives before the appetizer. the sort of proper standard of affairs has been woefully inverted. justice elena kagan did the introducing tonight makes this occasion all the more thrilling for me. not only did i have her as a professor, i was also a third-year law student at harvard when she became the dean. and she transformed that institution. i saw it happen almost overnight. there was free coffee for students. [ laughter ] there was an ice skating rink. students were smiling. these were all new things at harvard law school. and she did this not only in a wholesale way, but also in a retail fashion. to decide which, you know, very esteemed federal judge that i was going to clerk for after i graduated. i understand these are very much first-world p

be from texas. and will the supreme court be in any kind of position to suddenly understood mine the precedent from ago and uphold this law. >> if the supreme court rules in favor of the louisiana law, does that set a table for a situation where basically states will be able to restrict and regulate abortion to the degree that it is essentially illegal or almost illegal under mining roe v. wade? >> it would undermine roe v. wade which is the landmark decision that made abortion legal, and undermining the supreme court case below it, but just so you understand that abortion is not illegal nationwide, but it is an invitation to more state regulations and the regulations are on physician and clinics and what could happen is that the states may try more ban-type regulations that would outlaw abortion at certain points, and that would become the ultimate test of roe v. wade. right now what is at stake is access and especially for the poor women in rural areas who would have to travel so far to find a physician who would meet the criteria that we are talking about in the louisiana law. so it has real worl

be split on this hot-button issue with justice roberts the key swing vote here. decision is due by late june, of course right in the middle of election year when the supreme court isuaranteed, bret to be a factor for a lot of folks considering votes. >> bret: we just got that sound bite from chuck schumer and he referenced earlier in the piece. let's take a listen. >> i want to tell you, or said i want to tell you, brett kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. [cheers and applause] you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> bret: now before chuck schumer's office, a reference to the political price republicans will pay for putting them on the court and a warning that will unleash grassroots efforts. it is pretty pointed to brett kavanaugh l. >> he said you will pay the price and the only remedy he would have to go after them at this point would be impeachment. but other than that my threatening enough to the chief justice that he thought it was something that needed to be addressed. he very rarely does this as we noted but he did say something to brush back president trump when he referred to a judge

supreme court by schumer. if a republican did this he or she would be arrested or impeached. serious action must be taken now. to that end, josh holly says he will introduce a motion to censure chuck schumer for attempting to intimidate the justices tomorrow. schumer was speaking at a pro-choice rally outside the court today as the justices were hearing a key abortion case inside. >> reporter: from the moment donald trump won the presidency the left has been warning his appointments to the supreme court would be aimed at one thing, overturning roe v wade. the justices including two appointed by the president heard the case for louisiana law that requires doctors to perform abortions to have admitting privileges at hospital within 30 miles a clinic. in 2016 the supreme court struck down similar portions of texas law, justice ginsburg question the real aim of the louisiana law and noted how challenging it can be for abortion provider to gain the necessary hospital privileges, quote, abortion providers will never if they are not also doing obstetric and gynecology they will neve

hearing them, they're going to be hearing them, what does that say about the politicization of the court? >> i think there have always been attacks over time that the supreme in the justices. i mean, even in these days of hyper partsan rhetoric and rancor. i think the justices still try to look at each case on the merits. they can't avoid the political noise that sort of rises around these issues. but this is our institution. this is our system of government, for better or worse. and the supreme court has to wrestle with issues that have significant political consequences. >> glen kirshner, thank you so much. >> thank you. >>> breaking news in the coronavirus outbreak, we're live in california as thousands of cruise ship passengers are finally headed to shore. only to face more uncertainty. >>> plus we're just moments away from pope francis making a big change to his sunday service. we're live in rome. 're live in e let's be honest. quitting smoking is hard. like, quitting every monday hard. quitting feels so big. so try making it smaller, and you'll be surprised at how easily starting small can lead to something big. start stopping with nicorette. startin

sentence may be those factors that charge talking about would be more mitigating but to me it's just incredible that you know the 3 judges in the supremes court made the decision the dude. shirley or you pointed out the fact that he wanted to be in the military he dreamed about he was not able to because of his autism and that this was more of a hobby for him and hobbies are well and good but aren't there certain things that are just too dangerous to be obvious no but i think i mean like i said now that you know at least we know now it wasn't dangerous dangerous it didn't prove to be dangerous i mean i suspect david said now you know they can be no legitimate reason so that's exactly what the court said that they can be they're not saying that they always is they're not saying anyone who have a does that regardless of the circumstances must be acquitted what they're saying is that they can be as was in this case and i think that's the important issue here that we can't just arrest someone or convict someone or call someone a terror a terrorist or a terror suspect or an extremist just because they have they possess those substances and i

so it's certainly not unusual for the future of the supreme court to be a big issue during a presidential that's true here is the difference do they want to leave the mark on the court ledges hraeufbg body because the ledges hraeufbg body doesn't have enough guts to put certain things before their members to vote on? that's what we are dealing with, martha. the fact is the democrats are pushing for things that don't make sense they want to take the court and make it into a separate legislative body. what they need to be doing is saying we just want people to look at the constitution, judge it for what it says. and apply the law. that's what republicans want. i, for example, i don't want a conservative court. i just want a constitutional court. >> martha: well, therein lies the difference between the way democrats and republicans look at the court and the way that it should serve. this is chuck schumer back on february the 13th before he made these comments. he tweeted this with president trump publicly attacking a judge now would be the time for chief justice roberts to speak up. now woul

meantime sonoma supreme courts will be closed through april 3rd. only urgent and emergency cases will be heard. cases like family law and domestic violence cases. however, traffic trials, motion hearings, juvenile arraignments are cancelled until further notice and jury duty summons for this week have been postponed. >>> people all over the bay area have learned a new way of life. tourists in san francisco are certainly noticing how different things are. >> it's a little erie we'd put it. not a back up on lumbard street. >> normally it would be packed but yesterday the cafe and bar were packing up irish coffee and stew to go. both of them were just laid off from their jobs. >> we're just trying to figure ou the next move. do we stay here in the city or are we going to seek out family. >> if it was going to be a couple of weeks we'd probably stay. but we have no idea. >> mayor london breed asked the public to be patient says this is about saving lives even if we don't have any idea how long this health crisis will last. >>> the empty streets are bec

supreme court. arguments were being heard about louisiana law regarding access to abortion.es asked questions suggesting that the law which requires doctors to have admitting privileges in local hospitals could serve a valid purpose. that prompted schumer to attack justices gorsuch and kavanaugh. appointed by trump. here's what he said. >> i want to tell you gorsuch and kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind. and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> the chief justice reacting to schumer's statement immediately. basically accusing the senator of threatening gorsuch and kavanaugh. in a rare rebuke, roberts released a statement. this morning senator schumer spoke in front of the supreme court while a case was being argued inside. senator schumer referred to two members of the court by name and wanted to tell them you have released a whirlwind and you will pay the price. you will not know what you hit you if you go forward with the awful decisions. justices know that criticism comes with the territory. but threa

tender possibility of the prime minister the current prime minister being asked to form a government while under indictment the supreme court may be asked to rule on that and that will generate a lot of uncertainty but the fact that the likud is leaving is the major difference for now let me jump in on that what are your thoughts we'll do to go see asians that will be ahead now that you mentioned will they lead to a majority for benjamin netanyahu or will we see continued political deadlock. well there is another option that people started to talk about which looks also likely or possible which is that the likud when it's while it's forming the government and you know who can ask people to defect from the other side there's no rule that a person or a faction within the party cannot leave and join another party remember that. many of our parties are coalitions of smaller parties that came together and there are laws against individual defectors or that place heavy sanctions on small you know small portions of the party defecting but if there is a faction and existing faction within a party from the center a left and we

experimenting with explosives in britain can be lawful supremes court clears amount of terror related charges we discuss the ruling. did it was just experimentation it was just learning as the supreme court said you know sense lining.

a major supreme court case today right being heard on the at this that is essentially the same exact basic bill or the same as that piece of legislation that was ruled unconstitutional out of texas a few years back what's change to new dude on the supreme court that so you know and so if that if if the louisiana bill gets. is allowed to move forward it's going to unload unleash another wave of abortion bans so the answer your question is yes it is getting much worse for access to abortion which also means it's getting much worse for access to basic reproductive health care where men for choice comes in as we're not leading this movement we are partners and allies only and whatever you say in the show is needed whatever the organizations in the local level tell us are necessary our job is just to get more men to show up and support that so as an example in georgia we're going to launch have a launch event in georgia in a couple weeks here on march 14th all our strategy there is to mobilize people in georgia to support the organization organizations in georgia or and i want to say than

president trump suggests that senator chuck schumer should be arrested for his verbal attacks on conservative supreme court justices. >>> and why is president trump disputing the experts on critical coronavirus information based on his own -- and im oo'm using his word -- hunch? i'm brooke baldwin. we'll be right back. it's like getting a samsung galaxy s20 5g, and not getting it with at&t. america's best network. bingo! no, you can't have bingo. i just called out two numbers. you do this every week! get the most from your revolutionary samsung galaxy s20 5g. switch now and get one free from at&t. building 5g on america's best network. when i switched to geico. this is how it made me feel. it was like that feeling when you go to high-five a coworker, and you do a perfect high-five. everyone is really excited for you because it was such a great high-five. and then... ...the boss comes in. and she wants one too. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. fifteen minutes could save you stand up to moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. and take. it. on with rinvoq.

be the same problem which is coronavirus like you. will continue to track it next and then the president said move britain supreme court has found that experimenting with explosives can be legal it saw for a man was cleared of terror related charges he is 22 year old jed's copeland whose dog those with autism was arrested in 2018 after making homemade bombs and conducting experimental explosions in his backyard he was initially charged with 6 counts of possessing information likely to be useful for an act of terrorism copeland has earlier handed a 22 month prison sentence but is now being cleared of the more serious terror charges as a matter of law personal experimentation and self education are lawful objects we talked about in more depth and with david low he's a former police officer and senior research and also human rights lawyer. obviously every case is different and we have to look at the fact of each case and this case the explosive substance that this 22 year old at the time perhaps even younger had made in in the unit in the garden shed in his house was just less than 10 grams of that substance my main question is why would

be speaking to the world of sports i'm sure. i'll see you then. lead. welcome back in an unprecedented move britain supremes court has found that experimenting with explosives can be legal as also a man was cleared of terror related charges 22 year old charles copeland who was diagnosed with autism was arrested in 2018 after making homemade bombs and conducting experimental explosions in his backyard he was initially charged with 6 counts of possessing information likely to be useful for an act of terrorism copeland was earlier 122 month prison sentence but has now been cleared of the most serious terror charges. as a matter of law personal experimentation and self education are lawful objects we discuss the ruling with former police officer and lead to beckett university law school senior research david lowe and also human rights lawyer showup khan. obviously every case is different and we have to look at the facts of each case and this case the explosive substance that this 22 year old at the time perhaps even younger had made in in the you know in the garden shed in his house was just less than 10 grams

be heard. he's threatening supreme court judges when they have the power of confirmation to them on how to make a decision on that case. if you have co-equal branches, that's not a role for him, but he's doing it as a leader in the senate, of an entire party he leads, he's voicing those concerns. and he's doing it before the case is being heard at the senate. so the actions and the words that he's using spread out to everybody else, and it's over a case and how to decide that case. what else? reporter: sir, can you update on the fisa talks? there were some attempts to come to a copper brown eyes -- to come to a compromise. how are things standing? mr. mccarthy: i'd like to see the -- get us to a point where e can find some compromise, find some reforms. i believe we can get there. we have been talking with steny hoyer on the democrats -- the democrats in the appropriate committees. we have made ideas across to them. we have been waiting for them to give us their feedback or make an offer back, if you would call it that. i thought we'd get one two days ago. i thought we'd get one yesterday. i wa

waged across the united states decades ago the protections provided under the landmark supreme court legislation are being a race largely in republican led state legislatures with enraged wavering support from president from his minions and those who would like to invoke religion when it comes to women's pregnant bodies but take no issue with not providing food housing or bible education out when a child's home is in the womb yet folks the same religious right that had no problem voting for and supporting an adulterer with multiple divorces a penchant for lying and a low porn stars but somehow this group wants to regulate when a woman decides to become a mother from legislative prescriptions on access to forced ultrasound balls and the cool as a nation of abortion providers the hurdles to abortion access are still in fact more than 2 dozen states have moved forward with abortion bans in the 2 years since justice cavanagh's confirmation to supreme court conservative men seem to not have big thing the problem with legislating women's bodies even though most of them can't actually tell you anything about wom