supreme court. oh such a moment. i would like to clarify how the vns elects the chairmen and judges of the supreme and constitutional e folk judges of the supreme court will also approve the supreme court. yes, this is a serious navel that covers the procedure for the formation of judges of the highest judicial instances. uh, the people's assessors of the supreme court have the same powers. and that the judges of the supreme court have exactly the same legal status. they take part. when considering cases and making a decision is therefore logical. and what about the formation of e corps? people's assessors , it is also attributed to the competence of the entire belarusian people's assembly on an equal footing with judges who perform their activities on a professional basis, and this approach is due to the message and requests that judges of the highest judicial instances be elected by the people. so here are the people's assessors. they will also go through this process. uh, the most worthy respected people who are also able to make, uh, legally informed decisions. here they will be discussed on such a high platform

supreme court. this is the first major abortion decision since last year when the supreme court overturned the constitutional right. reporter: the supreme court allow -- to reverse fda approval of the drug. the decision allowing the abortion pill to remain widely available for now is a legal challenge plays out in a low -- in a lower court. president biden said my administration will continue to defend fda's independent expert authority to review, approve and regulate a wide range of prescription drugs. this in your counsel for the antiabortion group which brought the initial case challenging its fda approval responding in a statement saying, we look forward to a final outcome in the case that will hold the fbi accountable. in less than one month a fifth circuit appeals court is due to here oral arguments on the drug case which could eventually arrive back at the supreme court. dr. jack resnick, the american medical association saying the case could have wider impacts on patient health and medical research. >> the risk is we will have judges all over the country looking at tylenol and drugs that were develop

one of the reforms ended quite recently it coincided with the constitutional for the first time in the history of its work in the supreme courtreceived constitutional status today the belarusian justice system is 157 courts and almost 5,000 employees a day 4.000. decisions also the supreme court controls the correctness of the sentences and ensures the activities of the courts are carried out and analytical activities. the first bate football classic of the season on city ​​stadium in borisov hosts dynamo minsk today the capital club under the leadership of vladimir skripchenko came to this trip as the leader of the championship and without loss three victories in the previous three rounds and nine points in the elbow of the borisov team only five points, and the last two games the yellow-blue completed with with a draw, both clubs are charged to win today and count on the support of the fans. it's hard to say whether it's an exam or an easy exam. how to say easy exams? never it happens. yes? naturally, when there is preparation, when there are ambitions, when there is responsibility. we always strive for high results, of cou

begins , this is where something that is worthy just now is considered not just by the supreme constitutional courtis before we tell what happened. i know that after this happened, you declared from the judges before that, before that, when i was refused repeatedly to examine the evidence, you were refused to challenge, but the application was left without satisfaction. what was the name of the judge. kurgus yulia yuryevna so, what happened, in fact, on march 28, 2023, when the jury was supposed to put the verdict on the table of the judge on the 28th, the jury, after hearing the arguments of the parties, removed the deliberation room to decide the verdict, and two questions were posed for their consideration. committed a crime and the second question? is it proven that this crime was committed by prudnikov? 28 they left the deliberation room and how long they deliberated for about 4 hours after the foreman of the jury handed over the question sheet with answers the judge, instead of checking the list as required by law and handing it over for the jury to announce it, the judge herself retired to t

courts of general jurisdiction. and, of course, this had to be enshrined at a fairly high legislative level, and the fact that article 112 note today, the constitutional status of the supremeur constitution. i'm fundamentally important. this is the first time in history, by the way, done and we answer very proud. well, the fact that we have the supreme court today has received such a high status not only as a body headed by the judicial system of courts throughout the jurisdiction, but also as a body of justice for civil criminal administrative cases. that is , today he combines the idea of ​​the most important functions of the function of pure justice, as an organ of justice and organs, as they still provide a functional system of su. general people are quite problematic and difficult, because to understand 157 courts of almost 5,000 workers and you need to make sure that every day there is everything is very sufficient all kinds of security, where they make our conditions about 4.000 decision. and now it's all in the supreme court today. well, the fact that he will be elected a judge of the supreme court, she was going to be dismissed when the native assembly here at suc

supreme court? >> the supreme court and the court system is part of the constitution and the democrats it seems to mepend a lot of time criticizing individual members of the court and for example my counterpart goes in front of the supreme court calling them out by name and threatened them with some type of reprisal if they ruled long way on —- the wrong way in a case but the attorney general seem to be unconcerned with security issues i have total confidence in the chief justice of the united states to deal with the core internal issues. [inaudible conversations] sue majority

supreme court. this is the first major abortion decision since last year when the supreme court overturned the constitutional right. reporter: the supreme court allow -- to reverse fda approval of the drug. the decision allowing the abortion pill to remain widely available for now is a legal challenge plays out in a low -- in a lower court. president biden said my administration will continue to defend fda's independent expert authority to review, approve and regulate a wide range of prescription drugs. this in your counsel for the antiabortion group which brought the initial case challenging its fda approval responding in a statement saying, we look forward to a final outcome in the case that will hold the fbi accountable. in less than one month a fifth circuit appeals court is due to here oral arguments on the drug case which could eventually arrive back at the supreme court. dr. jack resnick, the american medical association saying the case could have wider impacts on patient health and medical research. >> the risk is we will have judges all over the country looking at tylenol and drugs that were develop

high legislative level, and the fact that these are the ones, 112 note today , the constitutional status of the supreme courts enshrined in our constitution. this fundamentally important. by the way, this was done for the first time in history and we are proud of it. well, the fact that we have the supreme court today has received such a high status not only as a body headed by the judicial system of courts within the jurisdiction, but also as the highest body of justice in civil criminal administrative cases. that is, today he combines the idea of ​​the most important functions of the function of pure justice, how he conducts justice and bodies, how they still provide a functional system of courts of a common religion, this is quite problematic and difficult, because to understand 157 there are almost 5,000 ships operating and we need to make sure that every day there is everything very enough all kinds of support, where they make about 4,000 decisions. and now it's all in the supreme court today. well, the fact that he was elected a judge of the supreme court there, was going to be dismissed when the peopl

order was sealed we let off out with the supreme court, the supreme court why should they take it up, our argument, you're the supreme court and under our constitutionthe orders coming out of your judges just like i am policing conduct averse solicitors in south carolina. >> you know general, you are a lawyer, and attorney general, not an investigator but i want to ask anyway whether or not you have learned or you know, did the prosecutor initiate this, was that the lawyer legislature that you and i both made reference to, god knows it was not the judge they came up with the idea. whose idea was it to go to the judge, the prosecutor or the defense attorney. >> it was a defense attorney's petition the judge and the facts of the petition that there was a motion and the motion was verbal in the judges chambers on the last day of the judge being in office and there was no formal motion it was the petition of the defense attorney. notably we are grateful that the supreme court took up this case so quickly and i sent a letter to the chief justice of the supreme court last friday ahead of the hearing saying we appreciate you taking the hearing so quickly.

it ended quite recently, coincided with the constitutional one for the first time in the history of its work and the supreme court received constitutional status, the main law regulated general issues of the judiciary and the status of judges, including taking into account the formation of a new body of the belarusian national assembly. vns, some of the powers of the head of state have been transferred. it will form the highest judicial bodies of the country and solve a number of other issues. other body, this is not my merit. this is the merit, first of all, yours, you have always initiated certain innovations and innovations before the president. and i never refused you, and thus we went through three stages of reforming our system. for all our dictatorship, with you in this regard, out of fifty-four thousand inmates at the beginning of my presidency today, 24. that's the whole dictatorship. this is a two -fold reduction over the period that we have gone through. this suggests that without excessive humanization it is somehow customary for you to say that we have made the country humane and our justice humane.

changes were made to the fundamental law of our country in accordance with which the constitutional status of the supreme court was determined for the first time, as the highest judicial body heading the system of general resection courts , the results of all judicial reforms were fixed at the constitutional level. they have been further developed. which the fundamental principles of justice have been created as an additional guarantee for the supreme court, and their election and dismissal by all the belarusian people's assembly, as a general result, the judicial system headed by the supreme court in our country has taken place. it fully ensures the implementation of the constitutional right of citizens to judicial protection and responds to all modern challenges and threats. provides a high level of public order and today i express my deepest gratitude to those who, together with we have gone through this difficult path and achieved high results. first of all, these are judges of district regional courts , who are entrusted with the bulk of justice and who are a kind of supporting frame of the judicial syste

courts of general jurisdiction. and, of course, this had to be enshrined at a fairly high legislative level, and the fact that article 112 note today, the constitutional status of the supremes enshrined in our constitution. i'm fundamentally important this is the first time in history, by the way.

completed quite recently, it coincided with the constitutional for the first time in the history of its work, the supreme court received constitutional status. and this is a reason to be proud of this in the project of the tv news agency and question number one said the chairman of the supreme court valentin sukana. this is done for the first time in history. and in principle, in its development, the national judicial system has chosen its own path without looking back. to other countries. only during the period of independence of the state, three stages of reform have been carried out and today, belarus has turned out to be a modern look, justice. the new time will leave new tasks to make the system efficient, economical, and the court with a high level of public confidence. the task to do in the morning in not for everyone is that synonym for justice, then it is equal to this, which means that, in general, fair on the main thing after all , judicial activities are trust of the people, because any trial begins with the question of trust in the court. and so, if this there is trust in society. well, then we ca

first for the most part constitutional conflict did not take place in the supreme court. right. this has been a theme of the class thus far so this probably doesn't surprise you but the worst constitutional problems were primarily engaged by the president and congress. the supreme court played a pretty insignificant role in the civil war and there are many reasons for this but we will talk more about them on thursday. this is a reminder that constitutionalism and constitutional interpretation particularly in the 19th century is often found outside the supreme court the supreme court does not control constitutional interpretation. second there were often no answers to be found to the crisis in the constitution itself. there were no clear provisions for what the constitution meant in case of secession for how you were supposed to behave in relationship to secession. and as the war went on congress and the president made decisions whose legality under the constitution may have been disputed. but became constitutional because of what lincoln called the friction and abrasion of war. s

supreme court. >> yes, the supreme court and the court system is a whole separate part of our constitution. in the democrats it seemed to me, they spent a lot of time criticizing individual members of the court and for example, my counterpart went over in front of the supreme court he called out two of the supreme court justices by name and actually threatened them with some kind of reprisal i don't know what kind. if they rule the wrong way in a case for karen about. the attorney general seem to be largely unconcerned with security issues around the homes of supreme court members. i have total confidence the chief justices of the united states and the deal with these court internals issues. >> leader mcconnell. [background sounds]. sue majority leader chuck schumer no democratic leaders also spoke to reporters on capitol hill, during his remarks senator schumer discussed his plans work this year he committee in the absence of california senator dianne feinstein in the ongoing debate over the ceiling. [background sounds]. [background sounds]. >> get around people, where is that from coming o

completed quite recently, it coincided with the constitutional for the first time in the history of its work, the supreme court, received constitutional status, the basic law regulated general issues of the judiciary and the status of judges, including including taking into account the formation of a new body of the all belarusian people's assembly. vns, part of the powers of the head of state was transferred. it will form the highest judicial bodies of the country and solve a number of other issues. this is not my merit. this is merit. first of all, your you have always initiated before the president of the people or other nations. introduction, and i have never refused you, and thus we have gone through three stages of reforming our system. with all our dictatorship, with you in this plan, out of fifty- three thousand inmates at the beginning of my presidency today is 24. that's the whole dictatorship. this is a two-fold reduction over the period that we have gone through. this suggests that without excessive humanization it is somehow customary for you to say that we have made a humane country and humane ou

that is, the judicial court of the supreme court received a higher constitutional status you know, if we talk about the constitutional consolidation of the entire belarusian people's assembly, let's say this is also, in general, an idea that was hatched and suggested itself. yes quite a long time ago it so happened that i took part in all six russian people's meetings myself, and at the first one after the belarusian people's meeting. the minister even spoke in the future , together with me, justified the need for such a forum, and, of course, even then it was clear that hmm it was very effective. and the form, but it is necessary just very such extreme in situations of such emergency there may be situations in the life of each party that this was not fixed on, so to speak, necessarily. level probably it should have been suggested it was necessary in a modern judge of the supreme court, what kind of person is, in short, this is certainly the best judge in the country, a judge who was recognized by the children's community as the best authoritative judge judge not only as high professi

supreme court. >> yes, the supreme court and the court system is a whole separate part of our constitution. in the democrats it seemed to me, they spent a lot of time criticizing individual members of the court and for example, my counterpart went over in front of the supreme court he called out two of the supreme court justices by name and actually threatened them with some kind of reprisal i don't know what kind. if they rule the wrong way in a case for karen about. the attorney general seem to be largely unconcerned with security issues around the homes of supreme court members. i have total confidence the chief justices of the united states and the deal with these court internals issues. >> leader mcconnell. [background sounds]. sue majority leader chuck schumer no democratic leaders also spoke to reporters on capitol hill, during his remarks senator schumer discussed his plans work this year he committee in the absence of california senator dianne feinstein in the ongoing debate over the ceiling

there is no constitutional provision, there is no law, not any supreme court decision telling us we can't. the constitution contains no time limit for ratification of amendments and there is clear precedent for states taking years, decades, even centuries to do so. the 27th congressional amendment was ratified in 1992 that was a full 203 years after it was enacted in 1789. another issue raised is the five states that have attempted to rescind the ratification of the constitution doesn't contemplate rescissions and there is clear precedent for congress determining that rescinding an amendment after ratification is ineffectual. in 1868 congress adopted a concurrent resolution declaring the 14th amendment had been ratified despite the fact that two states in ohio had attempted to rescind the prior ratifications. again the purpose is to secure full equality for women and there should be no time limit on that. men and women should be treated equally under the law and that is not a controversial position. it's a widely held view. the fact of the matter is the vast majority of americans support

[applause] this last june that conservative majority on the rear -- on the supreme court recognized a constitutionalight to self-defense exists not just inside the home but outside the home as well. i am incredibly proud to say the majority in the decision included all three of the supreme court justices are administration appointed to the highest court in the land. thank you for your support for those years, thing for the honor of serving as your vice president. the greatest honor of my life. [applause] my life has changed a lot since the last time i stood at this podium. standing before the nra. two years ago we moved back here to indiana. bought five acres and a pond. i got a riding mower. john deere, 54 inch deck, zero turn radius, 25 horsepower. one of the great things about no longer being vice president is you get to drive your own car. one of the bad things is you get to pay for your own gas. maybe most important of all. karen and i are the proud parents of three we have become grandparents three times over in the last two years. [applause] man. we find it. out the reason we had kids was to

beginning for the right to life -- an this last june that conservative majority on the supreme court recognized that constitutionallf-defense exist not just inside the home but outside the home as well. an i'm incredibly proud to say the majority and bruin decision included all three. of the supreme court justices that our administration appointed to the highest court in the land, so thank you for your support. for those consequential four years, and thank you for honor of serving as your vice president, it wasf the greatest honor ofas my life. [applause] you know, my life is changed a lot since the last time i stood at l this podium. standing before the nra. two years ago we moved back here to indiana, bought five acres and a pond. i got a riding mower. john deere 54 inch deck zero turn radius. no longer being vice president you get to drive your own car. one of the bad things is you get to payiv for your own gas. and maybe most important of all, karen and i are the proud parents of three we actually have become grandparents three times over in the last two years. [applause] we figured out the red kids was to hav

the responsibility and the authority of the supreme court to interpret the constitution. clear local, federal courts were instructed by the supreme court to issue such orders and decrees as might be necessary to achieve admission to public schools without regard to race. and with all deliberate speed, during the past several years, many communities in our southern states have instituted public school plans for gradual progress in enrollment and attendance of schoolchildren of all races in order to bring them into compliance with the law of the land. thus, they to the world that we are a nation in which law, not men, are supreme. i regret to say that this truth, the cornerstone of our liberties, was not observed in this instance. it was my hope that this localized situation would be brought under control by citizens state authorities. if the use of local police powers had been sufficient, our method of leaving the problem in those hands would have been pursued. but when large gatherings of obstructionists made it impossible for the decrees of the court to be carried out, bo

european integration, because this is demand number two among seven, the first one is the constitutional court, the supremen , number two among those related to our european integration and the opening of possible negotiations on accession, which has a report . the first oral meeting will be in may, and the second official meeting will be in october. if we are ready, and of course if there is no normal higher collegial commission of judges no, no negotiations will open us up to the second - it is basically about the development of the country, and well, listen. in the east, we are not fighting to be the same as russia there it would be possible then not to fight. it seems to me that the whole country is meant, the armed forces heroically protect you and me, so, oh, if we, well, if we saw that and allowed that we will continue to have a corrupt judicial system, it will not happen there will be no rule of law, there will be no protection of human rights, there will be no investments , there will be nothing like that, it would be possible and not to do this, it is so obvious that we have another plan, another

it is a question of candy supreme court survive as the final arbiter of the constitutional principles if it is not following ethical principles, and it is not right now. >> all right, we will have to

tonight, nine months after the supreme court overturned americans' constitutional right to an abortionoviders are once again scrambling. at issue, use of a key abortion medication after two conflicting court opinions. last night a federal judge in texas blocked the federal government's approval of mifepristone, rulingerly tested. another judge ruled the drug is safe and should remain available in a swath of states. >> reporter: the biden administration immediately filed a notice to appeal the texas judge's decision late last night. now the two competing rulings set up a high-stakes legal showdown that's likely to end up before the u.s. supreme court. federal judge ordered a hold on federal approval of mifepristone, the most commonly used abortion drug. the biden administration says the controversial ruling eliminates basic freedoms for women, putting their health at risk. >> it's contrary to what makes for good public health policy to allow courts and politicians to tell the fda what it should do. >> reporter: the judge appointed by president trump issued a 67-page opinion, asserting t

[applause] and this last june, that majority on the supreme court recognized a constitutional right toelf-defense exists, not just inside the home, but outside the home as well. [applause] i'm proud to say the majority in the room included all three. -- thank you for your support. for those consequential for hears. in queue for the honor of serving as your vice president. it was the greatest honor of my life. [applause] my life has changed a lot since the last time i stood at this podium. standing before the nra. two years ago, we moved back to indiana, bought five acres and a pond, i got a riding mower. john deere, zero turn radius, to five horsepower. the great thing about no longer being vice president, you get to drive your own car. one of the bad things is you have to pay for your own gas. to most important, we are the proud parents of three, have become grandparents three times over in the last two years. [applause] we figured out the reason we had kids was to have grandkids. times have changed for us although, haven't they? today our country is almost unrecognizable to what it w

by trying to keep this affair, if it happened secret, there is a huge constitutional problem there the supreme courtterated, that state officers cannot prosecute federal law,only the federal government can, president and attorney general are charged by the constitution with enforcing federal law. supreme court has struck down efforts of states like arizona for example triening to force immigration law. i believe this could get to the supreme court and dismissed on law. trey: thank you so much for joining us. on easter sunday, look f for forward to your analysis. >> thank you. trey: there was a time when a mug shot might hurt you politically. not any more. no mug shot was taken of former president trump, his campaign raised money off of a fake mug shot. there was a time when being arrested and indicted and handcuffed might be a political liability. not any more. some members of congress want to be arrested. they want to be in handcuffs. at least one faked being in handcuffs during a protest. there was a time when payments to actresses and pornographic movies might hurt you politically when payments t

supreme court occupies a worthy place. among state bodies it has a well-deserved authority and a high level of trust in society its status as the highest judicial body is enshrined in the constitution the basis of the activities of the supreme court are the principles of the rule of law, legality and justice achievements in the judiciary are marked by fruitful work and professionalism of all generations and employees i am convinced that in the future you will responsibly cope with the tasks entrusted to you, faithfully and selflessly serve in the field of justice in the interests of your native land and the belarusian people , i sincerely wish you good health, prosperity and professional success april 15, 2023 alexander lukashenko friends take this opportunity i want on behalf of the government of the republic of belarus and on my own behalf, add a few words of congratulations to the entire judicial community in the history of the supreme court, many significant and glorious pages over the past century, the judiciary. it has acquired the status of an independent and influential force of the belarusian statehood, which firmly stands on the protection of the interests of the law, the

supreme court justice does it. and the reason there is a distinction is that supreme court justices are considered constitutional officers, and with separation of powers. congress can make a law that ties the hands of financial disclosure and makes it a crime if you don't do it properly for district and circuit judges, but not for constitutional officers, which are the supreme court justices. similar to the executive branch. the president and vice president are exempt from any criminal violations for not doing financial disclosures, but a cabinet secretary would be subject, facing criminal charges. so the point is, and that's the reason why he wants the chief justice to appear before the committee and not just justice thomas, because he's basically saying justice roberts, it's up to you as head of the judiciary branch, to put an enforceable ethics code on the books. the bottom line is, there is none. all of this are essentially simply suggestions to the nine supreme court justices. >> there is so much i want to say right now. unfortunately, we don't have enough time with you. it's like, the supreme court, which is to uph

the responsibility and the authority of the supreme court to interpret the constitution. our very clear local, federal courts were instructed by the supreme court to issue such orders and decrees as might be necessary to achieve admission to public schools without regard to race. and with all deliberate speed, during the past several years, many communities in our southern states have instituted public school plans for gradual progress in enrollment and attendance of schoolchildren of all races in order to bring them into compliance with the law of the land. thus, they to the world that we are a nation in which law, not men, are supreme. i regret to say that this truth, the cornerstone of our liberties, was not observed in this instance. it was my hope that this localized situation would be brought under control by citizens state authorities. if the use of local police powers had been sufficient, our method of leaving the problem in those hands would have been pursued. but when large gatherings of obstructionists made it impossible for the decrees of the court to be carrie

now that the supreme court has overturned the constitutional right to abortion, terminating a pregnancy as a criminal offense and numerous us states now. so might law enforcement use data from period tracking ups to see who has had an abortion? or is that unrealistic? well, just a few months ago, law enforcement in the us state of nebraska already used messages sent on facebook to investigate. a reported abortion. and other research found a u. s. data broker was offering information on smartphone users that connected them to the health care provider, planned parenthood. this is an organization that provides abortion advice, and can also carry out the procedure on location. the data being sold by the data broker showed how long a woman had visited a center, and where she travelled from. no wonder then that experts are warning users to be extra cautious with period tracking ups. so whenever you download an app, make sure to take a close look at the privacy settings and where possible don't allow your data to be shared with 3rd parties, especially in health apps because they manage some of