that is, this is a very strange decision of the previous composition of the supreme council of justice. wellinteresting that it heated such people, but how the school of judges can solve the problem of drunk driving and creating a deadly danger on the road, and the supreme council of justice reached concluded that it was the professor's unsuitability that forced the lunatic to drive under the influence, however, according to the de jure foundation, the judge skipped the judges' school during his training , oleg luhanchuk served as the head of the odesa district administrative court for 15 years in a row . the law on the judiciary and the status of judges expressly forbids this, however, the lunatic remained unchanged despite the dubious reputation, high-profile scandals and criminal cases. unfortunately, it is the sum of yanukovych's times, and not only when there are in fact eternal heads of courts who, er, look at the court and on their judges as on their estates well, as on their subordinates and commanding them and the mini-project procedural independence in lviv cannot be spoken of in 2

that is, it is very a strange decision of the previous composition of the supreme council of justice welled such people not only interestingly, but how the school of judges can solve the problem of drunk driving and creating a deadly danger on the road, and the council of justice also came to the conclusion that prof. unfitness forced luhanchuk to drive under the influence, however, the judge skipped the school of judges, according to the de jure foundation, during his studies, luhanchuk was in dubai. oleg luhanchuk held the position of head of the odesa district administrative court for 15 years in a row. the law on the judiciary and the status of judges expressly forbids this, however, luhanchuk remained unchanged despite a dubious reputation, high-profile scandals and criminal cases. unfortunately, of course, during the times of yanukovych, and not only when there are in fact eternal heads of courts who look at the court and at their judges as their own fatherland subordinates and commanding them of the project, the procedural independence of the judiciary cannot be spoken of. in 2017,

that is, this is a very strange decision of the previous composition of the supreme council of justice. well it was not only interesting that it heated such people, but how the school of judges can solve the problem of drunk driving and creating a deadly danger on the road and in the supreme council of justice came to the conclusion that it was the professor's unsuitability that forced gluhanchuk to drive under the influence, however, the judge skipped the school of judges , according to the de jure foundation, during his studies, gluhanchuk was in dubai oleg luhanchuk held the position of head of the odesa district administrative court for 15 years in a row law on the judicial system and the status of judges directly prohibits this, however, gluhanchuk remained unchanged , questionable reputation, high-profile scandals and criminal cases. the eternal presidents of the courts who look at the court and at their judges as their own people as at their subordinates and command them procedurally the independence of the judiciary is out of the question in 2017 the national anti-corruption criminal

provisions determined by the second part of article 19 of the constitution of ukraine, the supreme council of justice as well as other bodies of state power and their officials are obliged to act only on the basis within the limits of authority and in the manner provided by the constitution and by the laws of ukraine. well, the independence and inviolability of the courts is guaranteed by articles 126 and 129 of the constitution of ukraine. it is forbidden to influence a judge in any way . in this way, the supreme administrative court signals to us that it would not be good to evaluate the work of the judge who dealt with this case and handed down the verdict. moreover, that they do not have the right to interfere directly in the case itself and evaluate it yes yes yes to their places in italy, said the transcarpathian journalist again in contact with us yes, i apologize to my colleagues so, regarding the fact that the girls are already working in fact, professional lawyers, lawyers, please help to gather a group of lawyers who are specialists in this field, i repeat once again that, until now, the girl was

ah, and what are the specific stages, that is, well, it will probably be like this it is not an easy path, but by the way, the supreme council of justicew that it is already there . well, it has new members, just who will examine the judges who take bribes there, that is, or appoint new judges there. that is, i understand that there are huge changes in this direction, despite the fact that there is a war going on, and despite the fact that i understand that there is a huge resistance , well, let's say so, we thank the corrupters. thank you, vasyl furman , doctor of economic sciences. thank you for finding time for us on sunday . i will still allow myself here. to say why this is a big, huge problem. first of all, i absolutely support mr. vasyl because he says that in the 15th year reforms began , and i remember the years 15, 16, and 17 when everything that could be negative came down on the head of the national bank, mr. gontariv. they criticized and set fire to something and did a lot of such negative things, and the critic was so mad when i found out that she had moved to work , it seems to me that the london school of economics was

well, as the council thought, which as we all thought for the first time. something interesting in the judicial biography of the candidate for the supreme court of justiceemind you that this body is responsible for the integrity of the entire judicial corps, evaluates the professional level of judges and their compliance with ethical standards. ella kataeva considers herself worthy of a high position . the disciplinary chamber of the high council of justice considered a complaint against the head of the odesa district administrative court oleg gluhanchuk, who was caught behind the wheel while drunk not only did she not condemn the moral act and actions of her manager, but she also positively characterized and supported him, she worked with him for 10 years and it was not his lifestyle, that is, it was the first thing when he got into such an unpleasant situation, i know in opposition to alcohol consumption at work in general. that's why i knew that he was on the other side. or maybe she was connected with the head of the odesa district administrative court by a joint risky adventure , according to the information of the resonance publication, the candid