which are the founding countries of the un, but no one anywhere saw any signatures of the whole reason from the side of the russian federation, moreover, even the supreme council of the russian federation or the program what was the name of the meeting at that time, i don't remember exactly , uh, they could, well, at least to create the appearance of such legality, also, well, let's say , to verify the un charter in 1991, that is, this was also not done nationally, by the way. that is, you are talking about the fact that the russian federation now i am present in the un illegally, illegally, yes, at least legally, it is unclean, any lawyer will tell you that something is wrong here, and one more moment , finally, what is new? i saw on these ion samples, these are statements in which directly russia is accused of nuclear terrorism, that is, tsia the country violates the nuclear non- proliferation treaty of 1968, in which, by the way, there are also guarantors , this is the same nuclear five. and by the way, on the basis of this treaty, the so-called infamous budapest memorandum was signed, that is, which lavrov said once again at this geoassembly that but russi

are the founding countries of the un, but no one has seen any signatures anywhere er, the whole reason on the part of the russian federation , moreover, even the supreme council of the russian federation or the program meetings, what they were called then, i don’t remember exactly in 1991, that is, this was also not done nationally, by the way. that is, you are talking about the fact that the russian federation is now present in the un illegally, illegally, well, at least legally, not purely . any lawyer will tell you that something is wrong here yes, and one more point in conclusion. what 's new? i saw at these ionosemblies these statements that directly accuse russia of nuclear terrorism, that is, this country violates the nuclear non-proliferation treaty of 1968 in which, by the way, also has guarantors, this is the same nuclear five , and by the way, on the basis of this agreement, the so-called infamous budapest memorandum was signed, that is, which lavrov said once again at this geo-assembly that russia did not violate anything at all, this is a piece of paper that there is no legal force. that's all for you russia's attitude to international law and, i

of the independent ukrainian state. i am now. while you were asking, i mentioned and one of the first decisions was the resolutions of the supreme council of the russian federation by khasbulatov with pictor and they made a decision about sevastopol, said sevastopol, where is er, it is er, the territory of russia, it was not transferred together with crimea for soviet songs and so on myshkovkina is the landing of the russians, look what, but then there were still factors that prevented russia from focusing on the ukrainian direction. the first chechen war. somewhere there is an opportunity to strengthen one's ukrainianness, the ukrainian state, to such a vulnerable region as crimea, but the kyiv of that time was a political kyiv, a ukrainian politician in general, and the presidents who came one after another did not implement a coherent and comprehensive state policy regarding crimea and, in particular, regarding the restoration of the rights of the crimean of the tatar people, you are absolutely right now that russia has always created a parallel background, the background is so informative, and in this background, she used the theme of returning to the tsaris

members of the public integrity council my colleagues and i found out that another judge of the supreme court, valentyna symonenko, has a tax payer identification code of the russian federationshe denied that she did not receive it herself because she is crimean and after the occupation of crimea by the russians, this identification code was assigned automatically but somehow it happened to everyone. why, valentina symonenko simply did not take into account in her lies the fact that this identification code was not issued to her on the basis of her old ukrainian passport, data about which were in the crimea in the 14th year, and on the basis of her passport, which she renewed in 2015 ago. to pay land taxes to the occupying russian authorities in crimea. we did not get this information thanks to some secret access to secret registers. in general, we are talking about dual citizenship, in particular, we are talking about the second citizenship of the russian federation, this applies to our officials, and perhaps it would be worthwhile to compile not one separate case there, but to compile a large case of people who, in a hidden way, occupying public office, are political resid

chairman of the supreme council of belarus, on may 10, left in munich leonid kravchuk former president of ukraine june 19 in baku gennady burbules former secretary of state of the russian federationst to leave the ship, the first and last president of the soviet union he lived for 91 years, and another 8 september elizabeth ii died not just the queen of great britain but the symbol of the british monarchy, the island. what kind of tradition and refuge of russian oligarchs? so it turned out ironic, as i would say. nikita mikhalkov or symbolically, it seems, she is again preparing for something new, important, unprecedented special. if so, then it 's time to reflect on what has already happened, what it is connected with by chance or even a coincidence, how can we live with this now. so we are discussing. beijing global times published an obituary read by an unscrupulous minion of the us and the west who committed blunders in the international arena and caused economic chaos. inside the country, which serves as a reminder to other countries. we must be wary of any attempt at such a peaceful evolution in quotation marks at the behest of pro-western forces. russian people. writes a c