and tru celebrating with some very audience oohs al ratings tomorrow - [ laughter ] tomorrow is supreme court sce ruth bader ginsbur 85th birthday. no one surprise her! [ laughter ] selling a giant egg made up of over 100 grams of cheddar cheese ahead of easter. "guys, i think you lost the plot here," said jesus. [ laughter ] italy implemented new laws this week that will finparents up to $560 for sending unvaccinated children to school if they're between thages of six and 16 [ cheers and applause said anti-vaxers, "that's fine, i don't believe in italy."[ ughter ] and finally, scientists may have discovered a new killer whale species. said one scientist after making the discovery, "you're orca. [ light laughter ] called "one of my writgment explains their joke. ♪ [ applause ] >> seth: ian, you want to -- you want to talk us through that one? >> yeah. [ laughter ] so you know how the scientific name for a killewhale is an orca >> seth: yep i do, i do >> and also are you familiar with the ancient greek mathematician and inventor archimedes [ light laughter ] well, it was he who upon discovering

supreme court as of constitutional questions. we see that especially in the showdown with andrew jackson in the 1830's on a couple of questions. one is a national bank, even though the u.s. supreme court under martial had already of how -- alreadyution is held up the constitutionality of , the national bank, in maryland. andrew jackson vetoes the bill to recharter the bank and says that he as president has just as much power to interpret the constitution as the supreme court. then finally on andrew jackson, he also expresses his opposition to the supreme court's ruling having to do with the cherokee nation, worcester versus georgia, in the 1830's, where jackson may or may not have actually said "john marshall has made his ruling, now let him enforce it." if he did not say it, he certainly acted as if he said it, in how he was able to basically stand up to the supreme court, even though the court had held against jackson's policy of trying to force these members of southeastern indian tribes out of oklahoma. jackson was able to implement that. all that is simply to say that the founding generation didn't necessarily know. they t

the supreme court here which i s loyal to nicocolas maduro -- but he wasn't immediately taken into custody -- t pererhaps thehe hint not from the venezuelan vice presidentnt that they could b be measures taken against him. in the days to come no one quit- has warned against that he spopo ouout on social media is warning the govevernments of nicolas maduroro not to o in his words kidnap him. saying that if they did that that would be a mistake on the loss mistake they ever made. catherine quite -- clearly a man with the plan is there any sign. coming from his sources as to what that plan might be what happens next. what happens next is one wider has said that he will spend tuesday meeting with union leaders with? civil service public sector well he's trying to keep up the momentum he's an artist his supporters to keep on the streets to keep on demonstrating to keep up the pressure. on that nicolas maduro and his government. he's also called for more mass ronnie's in venezuela across the country they sent today hoping to keep up that pressure. i'm hoping that we'll have some kind of affect.

after that ruling, the supreme s court made i ruling in that case, striking down mandatory sentencesve. so t.re are two questions he first of all, should it apply to cases like malvo's, but secondly getting to your question. the issue is was there a mandatory sentence in his case because a jury did impose the life without parole sentence. the sate said it was not mandatory, it was decided by a jury. his lawyers said it wasn't much of a choice at all, they had to choose between the death penalty and life in prison. >> i remember so clearly some of these killings happened in maryland, some in virginia, the trials were in two different aces. explain, if you would, does this affect maryland, virginia? >> just virginia. actually, he was --e g the death penalty from a jury trial, then he pleaded guilty and g a second death penalty -- i'm sorry, those are the two life without parole sentences, those are the two sentences he's he has appeals pending on the maryland sentences, but those haven't reached this stage yet, those will go first and however the supreme court decides this case could h

it did uphold an earlier new york supreme court decision that allowed the case to go for word s&p the connecticut state supreme court ruled that parents of the victims in the sandy court school shooting can sue the company that made the weapon used by the gunman. court reinstated the family's lawsuit over how remington marketed its ar-15 bushmaster rifle. the lawsuit claims it is too dangerous for the public and that remington florida identified the weapon in marketing to young people. remington has denied any wrongdoing. the 20 children and six educatorred died when i gunman opened fire in that school in 2012. >>> say man accused of stabbing a woman to death inside her home in san he say has been charged with first degree murder. carlos carranza appeared in a san jose courtroom yesterday. he is accused of stabbing to death 59-year-old bambi larson inside her home last month. >> our office will hold him fully accountable if this brutal murder show can he die in prison. >> carranza is an undocumented immigrant from el salvador, has a long criminal history. ice had lodged multiple detai

a federal judge in new york previously blocked the question - and the u-s supreme court agreed last monthreview the decision. ((2shot/front landing)) ((vicki)) president trump's homeland security chief...on the hot seat today about the border with mexico.((grant)) kirstjen nielsen is the highest-ranking administration official to testify on immigration policy so far this year.and she faced a barrage of questions including inquiries about children apprehended with and without their parents..and the president's emergency declaration.((vicki))karin caifi has the latest from washington. rep. bennie thompson/-d- mississippi: "it's been nearly a year since the secretary of homeland security testified before this committee..." homeland security secretary kirstjen nielsen grilled by house democrats on border security and immigration -- including the highly controversial family separations at the southern border --kirstjen nielsen/secretary of homeland security: "as a consequence for a parent going to jail, we in this country do not take the children to jail."rep. kathleen rice/-d- new york: "okay

s hinder legislative work and rejects supremes court rulings. responds with a football dribble will lose. its. instead of waiting for the hand of god as his friend would advise changes field in the middle of the game. of the holds a referendum on the formation of a constitutional assembly that would remove the powers of the national assembly controlled by his opponents. was it a constitutional move absolutely. the opposition had twice considered using the same procedure to remove chavez from office in two thousand and seven. in two thousand and sixteen. zero before that. was the decision ethical. point may not be qualified to say. in my country as well as an entirely the banker was appointed prime minister. and a referendum was ignored. in europe we cancelled a total of five referendums because the citizens haven't voted as the e.u. wanted them to. was those decisions constitutional maybe they were but they also ethical and democratic. in venezuela after the two thousand and fifteen crisis the part of the right wing opposition started boycotting

. >>> today, the supreme court will hear two cases involving congressional redistricting. and s from north carolin the other from maryland. some say they reconfigured the six district in 2011. the change brought more amocrats in the districts. in north carolin mocrats say a the revised map favors republicans. >>> airlines have been cancelling hundreds of flights a day since the 7am 7 b grounded. theecond crash in ethiopia, just went down. >>> we are learning details about the norwegi cruise ship that sailed in last week. authorities want to know why the viking sky set sail during a storm warning. passengers recorded this video. 500 passengers had to be rescued by helicopter. >>> communities around the globe and right here in the u.s., continue to recover from several days of devastating flooding. >> the water levels continue to ri the mississippi river. a runway in minnesota had to be shut down because of flooding melting snow and heavy rain are causing the missouri to spill over its breaks. and there won't be any spring training at this baseball field. water.nder >>> flash floo

and as we get into the 70's, supreme court said you can't bus across city lines, it has to be within the city. program which comes up during this time as well, which is a voluntary program in which african-american children in boston are bust the suburban schools. suburban schools agreed to accept a certain number of students every year. but that is a voluntary student busing plan. is fighting the committee during the late 60's, early 70's arguing that austin city schools are segregated, mattapan, in roxbury, those areas become gradually more african-american, fewer whites in those neighborhoods. whites are living in places like east boston, south boston. arguing that the boston school committee is jittering around with the neighbor and school district lines in order to keep schools majority white. they are playing around with feeder schools, what schools feed into middle schools in order to achieve as many white students and majority white schools. 1974, a federal court case, judge arthur garrity orders that the boston schools are segregated and orders bussing to desegregate schools

as we get into the 70's with milliken, the supreme court said you cannot bus across city lines, it has to be within the city. program,s the metco which is a voluntary program in which african american children in boston are bust to suburban schools. suburban schools agreed to accept a number of those students every year. it is a voluntary student busing plan. fighting thecp is boston school committee through the late 60's and early 70's, arguing boston city schools are segregated, especially in ,oxbury, parts of dorchester those areas become gradually more african-american. fewer whites live in those neighborhoods. whites are living in places like east boston, south boston, hyde park. arguing the boston school committee is jittering around with the school district schools order to keep majority white. they are seeing what elementary schools feed into middle schools in order to achieve -- keep as many white student in majority white schools. in 1974 morgan b hannigan in a federal court case, judge arthur orders that declares the boston schools are segregated and orders busing to desegre

courts to weaken jim crow's desegregation. he appointed five reasonably progressive jir injury i-s to the supreme court. most significantly earl warren to have supreme court as chief justice. eisenhower had some qualms about the decision but at no point did he ever publicly denounce the decision or seek to undermine it. he never would dream of doubting it publicly. he would sign into law the 1957 civil rights act. first one since the end of the civil war, since reconstruction. and he took a real risk when he ordered federal troops to surround central high school in little rock, arkansas, to ensure that court-ordered desegregation of through school would proceed despite the hostility of the governor of arkansas. eisenhower saw the issue as one of federal power vs. state power in which the federal government had to right to impose and enforce the law. he may have been a reluctant warrior on civil rights but he was an authority on federal law enforcement it's true that ike didn't personally take up the civil right as his own. he didn't speak on civil rights as a ash deny an issue of justice. he spoke about

in the 90's, the supreme court looked at the line-item veto in the supreme court said you cannot just hand over your powers that way in the presidency. we are likely to see a court case on this but you have people like omar alexander going to the floor, urging the president to stand down, that there are other ways to get wall money. it seems very unlikely the president is going to listen at this point, but as this court case goes on, we get a court decision before september 30, that might make things easier. --t: our guest this morning guests this morning, steven dennis with bloomberg. if you want to check out his stories. kathryn watson, we welcome for the first time. the white house reporter for cbsnews.com. our next caller is lisa. caller: i am with the lady who just called in and i was just wondering how this budget or what ever is going from $5 billion to $8 billion and where is all of this money coming from and do we really trust this president to be shifting money around wherever he wants to put it? the republicans are they areup because afraid to lose their job or whatever. ka

supreme court. chris: after donald trump 's victory in 2016, he wrote an essay in which you said, i think it was calledom flyover country. correct? he said democrats have largely and to there very much there costs, have ignore that industrial midwest.how would you take on donald trump and specifically, how do you beat him in michigan and ohio and wisconsin, that upper rust belt that he took away from the democrats.>> again, coming from a former auto manufacturing town, northern part of indiana, this is my home. and i understand why our party largely lost touch. but i don't think it's just about donald trump. as a matter fact i think in many ways he is a symptom rather than a cause. where come there are a lot of people and i think a lot of viewers a network who are under no illusions about the character of the president. but i voted this way in order to make a statement. some people i think voted to burn the house down. they produced economic and social and political results that let them down. we have to be speaking to people. chris: forgive me seems a little gauzy. how do you say to the people in thos

supreme court, watch this. >> the former ag has tried to s give out and expanding people in the ninth straight to court to get more progressives on there. where you on that? >> i think that we need to fix this in court, they have a supreme court seat. >> should we keep it at nine? >> i think i would like to sort of explore a lot of options and we should have a limit per supreme court justices. it might be one thing to get every president to choose three. people holding onto those seats in ways that i do not think is necessarily healthy. >> sean: you may want to note that spartacus was not determining term limits for his own position as a u.s. senator. where kavanaugh and neil gorsuch presided. this is part of a far left tactics. when you cannot win an election based on ideas and policy at the ballot box, they just go to rigging the i system. which is why elizabeth warren is now trying to dismantle the very way that we even elect a president. e it does not work in her favor, take a look. >> my view is that the every vote matters. and the way that we can make that happen -- [applause] is that we can have nation

up the boundaries with a lot of inputs from vote also representative david shrone s aopposed the lawsuit. the supreme court is expected to make a decision by the end of utne. liveside the supreme court, aimee cho, news4. >> thank you. >>> we also ran into a group of high school students from austin,texas, at the supreme court this morning. they developed a board game on gerrymandering. they hope will educates and open conversation about the issue. >>> tragedy now on top of tragedy.es two communirying to heal after mass shootings. they're now dealing with sever suicides. we have reaction from survivors of the florida school ooting. >>> plus bump stock ban, the device allows rifles to mimic automa lc weapons. k at how the ban willork. w >>> welcome back. it's 11:12 this mo today the first major gun restriction in the u.s. in years goes into effectto bumps are now officially outlawed. >> bump stock say device thatce can be p on to a semi-automatic rifle to enable it to fire continuously, like a machine gun. back in december, the las vegas -- the las vegas gunman back in 2017 used bump stock during his attack

supreme court in the early twentieth century. the major contributions came in the one nine hundred sixty s. one of the leading ones was a case involving the civil rights movement well but then you had a mass popular movement which was demanding rights. refusing to back down and in that context the supreme court did establish a pretty high standard freedom of speech or it takes a women's right to women also began identifying oppressive structures refusing to accept them or he'd go their people to join with them well that's her right to return. to non-trivial extent if also spent a lot of my life in activism some of that doesn't show up publicly but you know i should not terribly good at it and not the greatest organizer i think that we can see quite clearly a very very serious defect was an error. which are going to have to be corrected by operating out. that is commonly accepted i think we're going to have to find new ways. but the activists are people who have created the rights that we enjoy. in the arctic carrying out cosies based on information that they're receiving but also contributi

s decision to oppose brett kavanaugh's supreme court nomination... >> christine blasey ford: i believeding to rape me. >> stahl: ...based on christine blasey ford's allegation of sexual assault and kavanaugh's response. the a.c.l.u. bussed and flew in large numbers of women to capitol hill to lobby key senators and ran an ad in four states, insinuating kavanaugh's guilt by association. >> we've seen this before, denials from powerful men. >> clinton: i did not have sexual relations with that woman. >> cosby: i've never seen anything like this. >> kavanaugh: i categorically and unequivocally deny the allegation against me by dr. ford. >> america is watching. oppose the confirmation of judge kavanaugh. >> stahl: we've heard criticism that the a.c.l.u. would oppose someone on an unproven charge. you're usually defendieople when there's an unproven charge. >> cole: right. and if the question was whether brett kavanaugh should go to jail, we would have defended him. but the question was not whether he should go to jail. the question was whether he should be appointed to one of the most power

s?ne: the political consequences would be outrage ron: huge. we saw this in the supreme courthard nixon when he tried to exert executivilege, and that got many in congress to say, maybe impeachment is the right thinto do because the president is trying to hide behind executive privilege. jane: what can we expect when the report comes out? ron: after spending two years and several million dollars, robert mueller will be looking at ways to say that the trump administrati and or its closest associatesave come close to russia. we don't know the extent. it will give congress the opportunity to look further. this could put a cloudver the administration heading into the president's reelection bid. if i'm donald trump, anticipate it is not going to be good news. jane: more than people have -- jane: still to come on tonight-esque above program, it is all the news that is fit to print but sometimes stories the new york times need legal help. will talk to the man wh makes it happen. most a week after the tropical cyclone swept through southern afca, a few -- rescue l ams are stilstruggli

though trump sdruzdoes have a s and plenty of empty promises. >> if the supreme court rules obamacares out, we'll have a plan far better than obamacare. >> we are still waiting. here's what happens. 21 million people could lose coverage, spending to fight opioid addiction will be slashed, 133 million people with preexisting conditions will lose protections. 171 million would no longer have cap the entire health insurance system, the whole thing will be thrown into utter chaos this is the battleground the election will be fought. what dayou make of the reporting that they tried to convinsz the president not to do this >> it's been clear from the beginning all they wanted to do was burn down the health care system and i assume it's because it help as lot of people who are not wealthy and part of the flump aerj and so my view on this is we just got to fight him back. they have put it in front of us and we said this is part of what democrats are about. we defend health care. that's one of our principal core issues and we will fight this all the way. >> i followed your writing and speaking

at 130 p.m.,'s of supreme court associate justice samuel alito and elena kagan appeared before the house government subcommittee on the supreme court legit. watch beginning wednesday, live at 10 a eastern on c-span3, www.c-span.org or listen on the free c-span radio app. >> up next live on "washington journal," your calls and comments on later, the president of the group positions for a national health program and american enterprise institute scholar joseph antos on recently unveiled medicare for all plants and how they would change the u.s. of care system and then the editorial board member talks about climate change and how best to enact a green new deal. best to enact a green new deal. host: senate armed service chairman republican jim and half told and oh, radio station that president trump's emergency declaration is dead in the water. adding he was not sure how it would affect military. this as mitch mcconnell says there are enough public and senators who will vote for a resolution of disapproval to keep the president from gaining access to funds. committeeoday, senate looks at the

since the ban went into effect, 10's of thousands of bump stocks have been destroyed or hand it over to authorities. today's a supreme court decision means that ban will stay in place a federal judge in san francisco says he plans to issue a preliminary injunction requiring the alameda county sheriff's office. >>to reduce the sleep deprivation of female inmates, a civil rights lawsuit filed by santa rita jail inmates claims women are only allowed 5 hours of sleep before breakfast, which is at 04:00am some inmates claim their woken up even earlier for medication delivery at 2 30 in the morning. the judge says sheriff's officials said not given sufficient reason for this early routine and that unreasonable deprivation of sleep could be unconstitutional. inhumane treatment. the injunction is expected to be issued after both sides meet to discuss its wording was a deadline of april 11th. >>in the north bay classes were back in session it and in high school in fairfield today that's after officials close the school because of a threat earlier this week. force christina takes row has details. >>the parking lot behind me is full

aspect of the bill is an attack on the supreme court's decision, shelled -- shelby county versus holder, it limited a piece of the voting rights act from the 1960's and has become a rallying cry. hurdles for people to register to vote and go to the ballot box. conservatives oppose it and say it opens the door to people who are not properly -- should not be able to vote, makes it easier for them to vote. this is a controversial piece. if you look across partisan lines, it is not going to get much, if any republican support and mitch mcconnell is fiercely opposed to it because limiting campaign-finance restrictions has been one of the causes near and dear to his heart. the: in terms of going to ballot box, talk about the early voting and vote by mail provisions. designed to expand access to the polls in all sorts of ways. this is an aspect that would limit the role of what is known as dark money in politics and it would improve federal ethics laws as well, especially as we talked about -- where it relates to presidential tax returns. host: it would also make election day a national holiday, correct? guest: that is right. host: some of the pushback

in the 90's, the supreme court looked at the line-item veto in the supreme court said you cannot justd over your powers that way in the presidency. we are likely to see a court case on this but you have people like omar alexander going to the floor, urging the president to stand down, that there are other ways to get wall money. it seems very unlikely the president is going to listen at this point, but as this court case goes on, we get a court decision before september 30, that might make things easier. --t: our guest this morning guests this morning, steven dennis with bloomberg. if you want to check out his stories. kathryn watson, we welcome for the first time. the white house reporter for cbsnews.com. our next caller is lisa. caller: i am with the lady who just called in and i was just wondering how this budget or what ever is going from $5 billion to $8 billion and where is all of this money coming from and do we really trust this president to be shifting money around wherever he wants to put it? the republicans are they areup because afraid to lose their job or whatever. kathry

s when he retired. this is a concern to all americans that we want a fully functioning supreme court.as interested about this topic in general. scotus isn't helping, what can i do with regard to foia? two thinks. -- things. i went every circuit court in the country. creating a judicial wellness initiative would be helpful you can figure out some resources for justices that age. the ninth circuit has been doing this since 2000 but i have been pushing other circuits and half of them have judicial committees which is great. foia,her thing, i sent a to the defense health and ask themn look, you've got article one judges, military judges, air force pilots that have an age requirement, the joint chiefs of staff that have age and terminal requirements. are there comprehensive policies in the department of defense that help those individuals who are aging age gracefully or check their cognitive decline? i haven't got a response on this yet, but it is interesting the supreme court thinks it is in this blackbox and you can see in, but there are parallels government and i want to utilize those t

s. they won a critical victory when the supreme court confirmed, confirmed that the first amendment is eroded when big brother forces private organizations to publicize the people who work to support them. naacp versus alabama in the 1950's. it was true in the 1950's. it remains true today. but that erosion is exactly what house democrats want to achieve. it's what they want to achieve. and their bill even supports a constitutional amendment to take away first amendment protections. and even if their proposal does chill the exercise of the first amendment, fear not. house democrats have a plan to make sure there is still plenty of activity come election season. it's a taxpayer-funded stimulus package for campaign consultants and political candidates. they are going to take your tax money and give it to candidates you oppose. to buy commercials. buttons, balloons, bumper stickers with your tax money. democrats want to sign taxpayers up to a six-times matching subsidy for certain political contributions. it could total about $5 million in taxpayer money, $5 million in taxpayer money for every c

political dynamics, and we have not talked about the history of court packing, the historical example 1930's, who was unhappy with the supremeourt striking down parts of the new deal and proposing adding members to the supreme court. politically, that was a big loser, perhaps the biggest political mistake fdr made as president. democrats will have to overcome that hurdle, that it seems like they are trying to politically manipulate the supreme court for their advantage. host: the fact that this even became an issue is indicative for how rare it is for justice clarence thomas to speak out during oral arguments. in a case this week. involvedis discrimination in choosing a jury. trial, ther is on same prosecutor had repeatedly struck black prospective jurors from the jury. the question for the supreme court was whether the man was entitled to a new trial. host: the fact that justice thomas asked questions is because? guest: he so rarely does it. before that, he had not in three years and before that in 10 years. it only happens every few years. thomas whenrthy -- he does ask questions, it is often around issues of race, where h

the supreme court lifted restrictions on state authorized the sports betting. and it is being considered in a 23 states including california. >>>'s ticking up bedding. while fans are excited for the new royal baby. summer placing bets on the newest member of the family. the couple says that they don't know the gender, but 70% are on a little girl for the duke and duchess of sussex. >> reporter: at 10 to 1 red-hot favorite. have a look at arthur. that is the best bet for the boys names. >> other popular names of victoria, alice, james, and edward. as with royal tradition, the world will not learn the real name until the birth announcement from kensington palace. >>> a special reunion for a father and son in tennessee. little look at was that his martial arts class and was a blindfolded. he took off his gloves and blindfold.'s dad has been gone since 2018. which feels like forever. >> i don't know if i could wait to get that reaction. have a greater rest of your afternoon. the next newscast is at 4 pm. dr. oz: love your chips and dip? we have a guac shock. how do companies get away with selling guacamole that doesn't have real avoc

by the country supremes court this is the moment here arrived in caracas has been touring latin america to rouse the poor and his return now opens the possibility the venezuelan all forty s will try to arrest him later he addressed his supporters urging them to continue their protests all of venezuela will return to the streets determined to mobilize in search of freedom we will risk one second one to freedom is achieved the man who says he's the interim president of venezuela is back in the country by the red sea and i arrest warrants against him behind me addressing the faithful enough mother says that this started out those suburbs small gathering number in the hundreds but now there's houses of people's ears you know so far to go a month off motherhood was not impeded by the presence of white or here why don't house arrest warrants against him i'm a little just at a rate the rate that should be arrested inside and yet here he is in the us most is address in their millions of the opposition deferred behind the boy in. the russian ambassador to venezuela claims the threat of a u.s. intervention in the country remains according to him washington on a satellite have been

s are the liberals. depending on what happens to any 9 and president trump gets another appointee, the court could move further to the right. nation and for the for the supremeourt of will becomes president in 2020 because of these ages. brian: how many years have you covered the court? since 1989.ime, when i started at the washington post as a supreme court reporter it was 1992. brian: your first appearance on this network. 1990. we are going to show a little bit of it right now. joan: this is my punishment for coming on. brian: no punishment. joan: all right. [video clip] >> the headline with justice scalia. what is he like? joan: very argumentative. very engaging. he will go after with -- a lawyer with real vigor. seems to be one of the more vocal ones. sometimes certain hypotheticals just to see. [end of video clip] brian: that was 29 years ago. my question to you is -- joan: the hair. brian: you are a lawyer. changed in your mind about the court in 29 years? joan: it has become so much more political. our times have become so much more obviously political. it is not just our current president, donald trump, who likes to talk about the as he can own his

most notably, 26 states went to the supreme court and asked for relief from the clean power plan, citing e.p.a.'s lack of authority to issue that rule. in an unprecedented move the court granted the states' request and stayed the rule. the trump administration and the new e.p.a. administrator, andrew wheeler, have recognized the need to reconsider controversial rules that have gone way beyond their original intended authority. this administration is committed to listening to the concerns of the states. our expert witnesses today are state air officials who can bring an on-the-ground perspective as to how the decrease in federal litigation tying up state resources has affected their important work. north dakota, in an example that we'll hear about today, has saved half a million dollars in litigation annually and can instead redirect that money toward environmental protection. my regulatory philosophy is that government works best at the local level, i believe that in my entire life, i think there's regulation needed. it's best implemented when your closest to the people. where those being govern

the supreme court ovturned that ruling that effectively outlawed sports betting in almost every ate. >>> here's a look at the final numbers on wall street. the dow fell 141 points, nasdaq rose 5, s&p 500 down 8. that will do it for "nightly business report" tonight. i'm sue herera. thanks for joining us. >> i'm bill griffeth. have a great evening. we'le ♪ >> this is "bbc world news america." funding of this presentation is made possible by the freeman foundation, and kovler foundation, pursuing ssolutions for america' neglected needs. >> possibilities. your day is filled with them. anpbs helps everyone discover theirs.