and only now, when the judge did not appear for the interview for the third time, the supreme court of appeals. the supreme council of justice should release her. the higher qualification commission of judges continues to assess ukrainian judges for their suitability for the positions they hold. not everyone passes the test, but especially the resourceful servants of themis, while the qualification commission decides whether they can perform legal proceedings at all, they apply for a competition to another court in parallel, and suddenly it works. this is pavlo gorbasenko, head of the economic court of the kyiv region. he is one of the most scandalous judges and one of newer people of kyiv region. currently, gorbasenko is waiting for a decision from the supreme court of appeals, will he continue to sit in the judge's chair? last year in december, the commission postponed the final decision on gorbasenko and expected additional explanations from him. and documents, the adopted decision is announced, in fact, the decision about the meeting, because there are several points, several points in con

court of appeal overturned the decisions made by gorbasenko, so the shareholders believe that the judge's actions have signs of raiding and illegal interference in economic activity, and have reported this to the supreme court of appeal of judges, which must decide whether the judge will continue his career. instead , gorbasenko decided that the appeal of the shareholders to vkks was nothing more than interference in his activities from pavlo gorbasenko's report on interference in the judge's activities. i consider it necessary to report the interference in my activity as a judge, regarding the administration of justice, as well as the manifestation of contempt of court. in fact, spamming higher authorities, the prosecutor's office and courts with complaints and lawsuits is a common practice for gorbasenko. in the odious district administrative court of kyiv, he challenged the negative conclusion of the public integrity council, then tried in the supreme court. to appeal the decision of the vkks itself. experts regard these actions as a simple effort evade qualification assessment. i have knowingly provided true or false information in assessment procedures and attempted to evade qualification assessm

court of the kyiv region. he is one of the most scandalous judges and one of the most influential people in the kyiv region. currently , gorbasenko is waiting for a decision from the supreme court of appealsr he will continue to sit in the judge's chair. last year in december, the commission postponed the final decision on gorbasenko and expected additional explanations and documents from him. the decision is announced. the decision to adjourn the meeting because of several points. while the higher quorum commission is waiting for additional information from pavlo gorbasenko, he decided not to waste time and submitted documents for participation in the competition for the position of a judge in the northern commercial court of appeal. in this way, you can get a promotion and reset some facts of your personal and professional biography at your previous place of work. and gorbasenko spams the prosecutor general and the supreme council. the judge complains and complains about the alleged interference in his work, in reality he tries to justify himself in a banal way, because to the highest quality of the commission appeals were received about his alleged non-compliance with the qualification

court. such a decision was made today by the higher qualification commission of judges regarding its attitude to gorbasenko's candidacy near the building of the supreme court of appealserned citizens. what did the rally participants demand? let's see in the plot. there is a shortage of judges in ukraine. more than half a thousand vacant positions in appeals courts should be filled by honest candidates this year. the competition was started by the higher qualification commission of judges. at the regular meeting, the members decided which of the candidates would be allowed to participate in the selection. the commission checked the documents of the participants and determined whether they were properly executed. one question about the admission of candidates to pass the qualification assessment and participate in the competition for vacant positions of judges appeals among those who want to sit in the new chair of the judge of the northern appeal economic court, the scandalously known head of the economic court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko, appeared. in this way, he seeks not only to get a promotion, but also to erase the corrupt past, fictitious divorces, pro

on may 31st, the supreme court agreed to take the case, bypassing the court of appeals entirely. e 24th, the supreme court issued a unanimous decision against dixon, telling him to surrender the taped to the special prosecutor. the amount of time between when the supreme court agreed to take the case and when it issued its decision on the nixon tapes, was, in total, 54 days. but with trump's immunity claim, we have to wait another 51 days just for the case to be heard. not to be decided. the high court us moved on an expedited basis in the past, especially in matters of great urgency. in 2000, it resolved the bush v. gore case, and effectively decided that year's presidential race, just 35 days after election day. make no mistake, this delay was a choice. back in december, the special prosecutor jack smith asked the supreme court to bypass the court of appeals, in order to make, quote, intermediate definitive decision on the question of presidential immunity. as we saw with the nixon tapes, that's not an unprecedented nor and request. especially on a matter of most national import

and appeal was filed directly to the supreme court, asking it to give the final word on the matter. on may 31st, the supreme court agreed to take that case, bypass a court ofls, entirely. and on july 24th, the supreme court issued a unanimous decision against nixon, telling him to surrender the tapes to the special prosecutor. the amount of time between whene the supreme court agreed to take the case and when issued its decision on the nixon tapes, was 54 weeks, but with trump's immunity claim, we have to wait for another 51 days just for the case to be heard, not to be decided. the high court has moved on an expedited basis ouin the past, especially in matters of great urgency. if you, 1000th resolve the bush v. gore vecase, and effectively decided that years presidential race, just 35 days after election day. but make no mistake, this was a choice. back in the summer, the special prosecutor, tech smith, asked the supreme court to bypass the court of appeals in order to make quote, an immediate definitive, decision on the question of presidential immunity. as we saw with the nixon tapes, that's not an unprecedented or unreasonable request, especially on a

of people's claims. the high court did find that it was generally safe for individuals to be relocated in rwanda, and that was not challenged by the court of appeal or the supremekes it further clear that all the obligations will be met avoiding discrimination. the constitution of rwanda includes a broad prohibition of discrimination. it does not criminalise or discriminate against aspects that have been raised. the land itself is passing new laws on asylum processing. forall passing new laws on asylum processing. for all those reasons we are confident that this policy is the right one and is deliverable within all our obligations. i have a commitment from the president that they are determined to make this work. i they are determined to make this work. ~ ., , ., ., _, work. i think that you and i could auree work. i think that you and i could aaree is work. i think that you and i could agree is that _ work. i think that you and i could agree is that the _ work. i think that you and i could agree is that the uk _ work. i think that you and i could agree is that the uk has - work. i think that you and i could agree is that the uk has some i work. i think that yo

supreme court immediately responded to the illegal actions of the sbi, declaring the inadmissibility of pressure from themis officials and the interference of law enforcement agencies in the court's activities. the supreme court appealedrector of the sbi, who is directly responsible for the actions of his employees, with a request to provide. the explanation can be entered in the register and searched by the judge, without valid grounds, and the search can be conducted without the permission of the court. i mean, you all know, the decision of the assembly, which was considered by the supreme council of justice, about interference in the judicial activity, such a challenge is serious enough, and the supreme court, and in particular the president of the supreme court could not but react to it with a corresponding letter, demanding the holding proper investigation, because it is a question of the authority of the system, and the leadership of the supreme court should be here, for me it is obviously. on the protection of judicial independence, because this is also an obvious criterion, based on the fact that there will be no independent court, there will be no rule of law. the supreme council of justice, in turn, consider

of the supreme court rule on it yesterday? >> is a number of arguments that donald trump raised in his appeal. the supreme court honed in on one ofd them which is that only congress can enforce section iii of the 14th amendment the provision that bars of former officials who engage the insurrection rebellion from ■public office. the supreme court said only congress can set up the rules for enforcing that provision against federalfederal officeho. that was the specific question. colorado supremes court is a state court it had no authority to make the determination that donald trump was ineligible for engaging in insurrection per. >> really surprise it was unanimous ruling? >> and no i was not. because of the many, many trump cases the supreme court is hearing. this would seem pretty clear the court was going to go into this ral argument and it was also the consensus of many observers of the court.llowed each state to make this kind of determination were pretty severe. the same can of the supre court majority could be qualified inat some states. not qualified in others. even based on the same rec

this is going to go back to the supreme court whatever the fifth court of appeals does it will go to constitutional authority to defend his day because the federal government refuses to do so and they made great strides. i will tell you we wet from several thousand to ten the lieutenant governor said in the cartels have moved the flow over to arizona and california so you don't have to be perfect you just have to be serious. maria: look at the numbers that we are showing. border patrol agents have arrested more than 32000 migrants with criminal records during the fiscal year 2023. that's a 340% in the past three years, you were a homeland security, you've seen this happen personal. >> you gotta be concerned, here's the supreme court saying the state can have a role in this and yet the biden administration saying if you do this texas and ask these policies and starts arresting folks you're going to make texans less safe but your experience that does not work at all when you think about it, you're going to arizona as opposed to being in texas that is really a problem, the white house i

supreme court and try to overturn the law under the tennessee constitu tution. plus, we want to appeal it eventually to the united states supreme court and maybe really expand freedom of speech and maybe even get a freedom of religion. question in here. and so now we've got our appeal. so the rest of the trial, what darrow was trying to do with a national audience look looking on is make his points about the battle between religious religion and science. and in part, he wants to humiliate the leader of the anti-evolution movement, william jennings bryan. all right. and there's all kinds of moments in this trial where people but the trial just stops as people make these long speech. is darrow bryan other members of the to defense the prosecution teams and some of the things that are said if evolution wins christianity goes and of course bryan is arguing the people who pay for schools have a right to determine what's taught in the school scopes is an employee. he can say whatever he wants on his own time. and darrow is going to argue back. the state has a right to say what's taught in schools within reason. and he says evolution has been taught in tennessee for years. a

court of appeals out of new orleans has stood behind texas. that will almost certainly be appealed and head to the supreme court. when that is filed, a briefing schedule set. find out whether or not scotus will move quickly and pick it up but it is stayed, the court of appeals has stayed it for seven days. if by weekend the supreme court is not moving it or stay it, it will indeed go into effect and we could see texas dps law enforcement officers arresting everyone that crosses into the state of texas. a part of governor abbott's efforts to try to bring it under control. i want to show you some other video, apprehensions continuing to happen here in eagle pass. there were two large groups of about 50 or 60 that crossed here midday and late yesterday. there was another group today. we are working to get you video of that. but just an indication that it still continues to happen in texas. although we just got a little while ago the latest numbers and we are learning there were more than 21,000 crossings across the entire southwest border in the last 72 hours, most of them, the largest numbers out west, in arizona,

courts and such a short order. of course, united states like many countries, has many layers of courts. you have district court, you have appeals courts, then of course, you have the supreme court and the united states being a federal system. you have state level courts and federal level courts depending on whether a law is a state issue or a federalist. or in this case in the federal issue because immigration law is federal law, the federal government has the legal right and responsibility to patrol borders and securing the borders. and texas is essentially so goes, the accusation is violating or undermining federal law, which is inherently unconstitutional. because in the united states, the federal government has supremacy is called the supremacy doctrine of supremacy law that no state lock in its supercede federal law. they have the final say when it comes to matters affecting the entire country. so that's what this is really about, is a constitutional issue. it's not really, although you know, the, a, c, l, u, migration groups. these kinds of people are, are arguing the human rights side, the humanitarian side. really, this is a legal issue about the constitutionality

of interest and that is sufficient. i'm going to be candid with the courts. there was a supreme court1996 ae two court of appealisions after that that deal in some dicta that suggests an actual conflict as required by the supreme court georgia since those decisions came down has made clear that the appearance of a conflict still stands. in order to preserve the defendant's rights under that provision, you have got to consider the appearance of a conflict. and the rthe appearance of a conflict is so pressing and here is because if this court allows this kind of behavior to go on and da's across the state by its order to engage in these kinds of activities, the entireconfide shot. and the integrity of the system will be undermined. and so, with and constitutional principles, i want to return to the law in georgia on disqualification. and i'm gointo give you the law and then talk about the facts and how they apply to the lot the end. if you want to talk about the facts earlier jump right in. i'm sure your horwell-prepared s all the law that i was sight to you but to give the skeleton outline. the original seminal

the supreme court declared that they do not agree with lviv's reinstatement and appealed to the court of and literally the day before the sixth court of appeals began consideration of the case on the reinstatement of bohdan lviv as a judge of the supreme court, but no decision was made, the meeting was postponed to april 25. the representative of the security service of ukraine noted that... at the court, it is impossible to officially confirm lviv 's citizenship of the russian federation, but actually, how to understand it and what it means, we will now sort it out, georgy shabaev, a journalist of the scheme program, joins our broadcast the author of the investigation about bohdan lviv, giorgia, hello, hello, yesterday i followed, yesterday you followed how this meeting was held court, i followed that, your reaction, and you wrote that you had been searching for words for a long time to describe what was happening in the court, where it was decided whether to reinstate a citizen of the russian federation in office or not, and you stated , that you did not find such words, now tell in de

supreme court rule on yesterday? guest: there were a number of arguments donald trump raised in his appeal. the supreme court honed in on one of them, which is only congress can enforce section 3 of the 14th amendment which bars former officials who engage in insurrection or rebellion from public office. the supreme court said only congress can set out the rules for enforcing the provision against a federal candidate and officeholders. that was the question. colorado's supreme court is a state court and had no authority to make that determination that donald trump was ineligible for engaging in insurrection. host: were you surprised it was unanimous? es no, because of the many trump cases the supreme court is hearing. this one seemed pretty clear the courwa this direction. it was clear at the oral argument and the consensus view of many observers of the court, because the applications of 11 each state to make this kind of determination were pretty severe. the same candidate could be qualified in some states and not qualified and others. even based on the same conduct or record. this was not

of profit. apple appealed the supreme court ruling. in the summer of the same year, the judge ruled in favor of the government. and in fact amazon. apple was sentenced to pay $845 million in damages, because the company had violated anti-trust laws according to the government. in fact, the government believed that amazon operated completely based on the free market and competition rules. however, at the end of the day, amazon monopolized the audiobook market. after this decision, many people talked about besus's secret relationship with american judges and of course the government. exactly 3 weeks after winning the court case against apple, barack obama visited an amazon warehouse in the chattanuga area where workers were paid average of $11 an hour. he praised the creation of decent employment by. amazon, it's great to be here at amazon, everything was coordinated to benefit bases the most. last year, during the busiest day of the christmas rush, customers around the world ordered more than 300 items from amazon every second. reducing

a big day of the supreme court's members of the organization. rejection candidates have made an appeal to the supreme court to cancel the election to restart the electrical process altogether. and i suspect many of the people here with funds, so there are 10 such as the election that's about all we're going to get, i think from the cock in the car. as we're saying, obviously there's a lot of people, as you can see, using mobile phones, they are who are capturing the moment that's going to crime up a lot of space and the, and the wi fi and the internet services. so that's going to break up some of the communication that was made, caught bringing yourself today with the situation and the doc out there. okay, a powerful gang lead on hate is born politicians against participating in a propos transition council. as far as broke through the city escape. people have been stranded in their homes for days because of the violent and said because they're running out of basic needs. i'm is that i only stuck in puerto rico as promised to resign ones, so transitional counselors for them to select an

of interest and that is sufficient. there is -- i'm going to be candid with the court. there is a supreme court decision from 1996 and then there are two court of appealsisions after that that deal frankly in some data that suggest that actual conflict is required. the supreme court of georgia since those decisions came down has made quite clear that the appearance of conflict standard still applies and the reason that is important is i think other the sixth amendment which is where we are at, in order to preserve the defendant's rights under that provision and another quarterly provisions of georgia law. you have got to consider the appearance of a conflict. and the reason why the appearance of the conflict is so transient here is because if this court allows this kind of behavior to go on and allows the ace across the state by its order to engage in these kinds of activities, the entire public counsel -- confidence in the system will be shot and the integrity of the system will be undermined and so with those sort of public policy and constitutional principles, i wanted to return to the law in georgia on disqualification and your honor, i'm going to

of interest, and that is sufficient. there is -- i'm going to be candid with the court. there is a supreme court decision from 1996, and then there are two court of appealisions after that that deal, frankly, in some dicta that suggest that an actual conflict is required, but the supreme court of georgia since those decisions came down has made quite clear that the appearance of a conflict standard still applies, and the reason that's important is i think under the sixth amendment, which is where we're at, in order to preserve the defendant's rights under that -- under that provision, and under corollary provisions of georgia law, you've got to consider the appearance of a conflict. and the reason why the appearance of a conflict is so prescient here is because if this court allows this kind of behavior to go on and allows d.a.s across the state by its order to engage in these kinds of activities, the entire public confidence in the system will be shot. and the integrity of the system will be undermined, and so with those sort of public policy and constitutional principles, i wanted to turn to the law in georgia on disqualification. and you know, i'm go

court of appeals. judges decided to hear the court case this morning after the supreme court temporarily allowed sb-4 tot. questions focus squarely on the merits of the law. texas' solicitor general seemed to struggle to defend the law's merit. >> so someone enters in let's say from mexico and arizona, moves there for five years and then moves to texas are, they covered? >> i don't know the answer. i think that -- i'm reading the text, maybe. >> reporter: spencer ander with the aclu says sb-4 is unconstitutional. >> federal law is clear that states have no business regulating who can come into the country and who has to leave. that is just the core of federal immigration power. >> reporter: while the court decides sb-4's fate, texas governor greg abbott remains steadfast. >> even without sb-4, texas has the legal authority to arrest people coming across the razor wire barriers on our border. >> reporter: abbott's action of bussing migrants to democrat-run cities also suffered a minor setback in new york where after being sued by the city, at least one bus company has agreed to stop bussing migrants from

transfer of the costal complaint to the court of the appellate instance takes about another six months, where , of course, the defendants are not going to appeal to the supremetion, but in principle there is another 2 months allocated for consideration somewhere. another recent high-profile case was in february , the arbitration court of the sverdlovsk region approved the transfer of the chelyabinsk electrometallurgical plant plants into state ownership. privatization in the nineties was declared illegal. assets belonged businessman yuri antipov. the illegal enrichment of the businessman was initially appreciated almost. 26 billion rubles, and then the amount increased to 105 billion. in addition, demands were made against the former business partner and antipov’s family. in consideration of the penalty, the prosecutor general's office asks to seize the benefit of the state, including the ivanovo foundry, an enterprise of the oriand agricultural holding , the largest wine producer in the country , kuban wine. in february, the moskovsky district court of st. petersburg satisfied the claim of transferring to the state income all shares of the largest car deale

of the country safer and you are right. we have to sit tight until the courts decide what to do. the fifth court of appeals will appeal to the supremeybody, this is about a simple number and the number is 270, the number of electoral votes it takes to win a presidential election. the biden administration will do everything they can, abdicate their duty, let texas be invaded. stuart: i want to say to our viewers, what biden says about your texas law which has been blocked. the texas law, an example of politicizing the border and blocking real solutions. i put to you you have a real solution. you've cut the flow. people are trying to get through arizona and california. you had a real solution. how come the president is trying to say republicans don't have a solution and the mess is their fault? >> is an outright liar, his five minute trip to the border a few weeks ago for a photo up, he has no idea what's happening here. it is his policies that are being the drive to bring people here. when trump was president we had barely a trickle across the border. within 12 hours, biden is signing executive orders to make sure illegal migrants ar

court of appeals blocked the sweeping law. this was just hours after the supremeaid it could go into effect. of the texas law gives local and state police the power to arrest and detain migrants who cross the border illegally. immigration enforcement has for decades been the sole responsibility of federal authorities, and as you heard, republican texas governor greg abbott has said the state has the right to defend itself against what he is calling an invasion. now, president biden opposes the texas law, and he actually landed in the state today for fundraisers. this challenge comes as a texas bus company has put the brakes on transporting migrants to new york city after a lawsuit was filed by new york city. the mayor they are, eric adams, urged other bus companies to stop their trips, too. so there's a lot to talk about in cbs's omar villafranca will start us off tonight with all the latest from dallas. >> reporter: tonight, one of texas governor greg abbott's toughest border restriction policies is under scrutiny by the fifth circuit court of appeals. judges dec

the lviv court of appeal overturned the previous decision and deprived the mother of her rights to the child. however, the grandmother did not have time to formalize guardianship, as the supreme court annulled the decision of the court of appeal. the case was considered only on the basis of written evidence. resolution of the court of cassation. the sanction entered into force on february 7, 2024, is final and is not subject to appeal, that is, the mother is currently the legal representative of her minor son. we tried to contact oleksandr's mother, but the woman did not answered messages and calls. meanwhile, young oleksandr is received by his grandmother for her small pension. the family is looking for dedicated human rights defenders or activists who can help in this fight. catherine volodymyr studenny, espresso tv channel. and the collection of the espresso tv channel continues. repair of a car for the 65th separate mechanized brigade of the armed forces of ukraine, which destroys, is urgently needed. the enemy in the southern direction. a faulty car at the front can cost health or even life. thanks to you, we have already paid for some parts and collection continues join

court of appeals. judges decided to hear the case this morning after the supreme court temporarily allowed sb 4 to go into questions focus squarely on the merits of the law. texas' solicitor general seemed to struggle to defend the law's merit. >> so what if someone enters in, let's say, from mexico into arizona and lives there for five years, then moves to texas. are they covered? >> i don't know the answer. i could, i mean, i think that, you know, i'm reading the text, you know, maybe. >> reporter: spencer amdur with the aclu says sb 4 is unconstitutional. >> federal law has been clear that states have no business regulating who can come into the country and who has to leave it. that is just the core of federal immigration power. >> reporter: while the court decides sb 4's fate, texas governor greg abbott remains steadfast. >> even without sb 4, texas has the legal authority to arrest people coming across the razor-wire barriers on our border. >> reporter: abbott's action of busing by migrants to democrat-run cities also suffered a minor setback in new york. where, after being sued by the city, at least

i can't find a single case that's been published by the court of appeals or the supreme court. that is based on these facts. there of course, number of different appellate court cases that deal with conflict related issues. and more importantly, appearance of conflict related issues and some of those are based in state law, some of them are based on the ethical rules that govern lawyers. some of them are based upon the sixth amendment right to due process. that's implicit in all of what we're doing here today. i want to remind the court that we're here today on this motion to disqualify da willis and her office because of her judgment. frankly, xi is supposed to be disinterested under the sixth amendment and she's anything but that the fact that these proceedings have taken this long convoluted, looted way we've made it here today explain that. >> so >> as i present my arguments, i want the court to understand that this court represents the guardrails for the sixth amendment in this context. and ms willis has already been disqualified. wants so i would encourage the court to rem

the lviv court of appeal overturned the previous decision and deprived the mother of her rights to the child. however, grandmother. did not have time to formalize guardianship when the supreme court annulled the decision of the court of appeal. the case was considered only on the basis of written evidence. the ruling of the court of cassation entered into force on february 7, 2024, is final and cannot be appealed. that is, the mother is currently the legal representative his minor son. we tried to contact oleksandr's mother, but the woman did not respond to messages and calls. meanwhile, young oleksandr is received by his grandmother for her small pension. the family is looking for dedicated human rights defenders or activists who can help in this fight. kateryna oliynyk, volodymyr studenny, espresso tv channel. there are discounts on parafast, 10% in psyllium pam and oschad pharmacies. there are discounts on spasmal tablets of 15% in pharmacies of travel bams. and saving exclusively on the air of our channel. greetings friends. on air politclub on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week. russia's war against ukraine. war in the middle east. the crisis

the lviv court of appeal overturned the previous decision and deprived the mother of her rights to the child. however, the grandmother has not yet... made it to issue a guardianship, as the supreme court annulled the decision of the court of appeal. the case was considered only on the basis of written evidence. the ruling of the court of cassation entered into force on february 7, 2024, is final and cannot be appealed. that is, the mother is currently the legal representative of her minor son. we tried to contact oleksandr's mother, but the woman did not respond to messages and calls. meanwhile. young oleksandr is received by his grandmother for her small pension. the family is looking for caring human rights defenders or activists who will be able to help in this fight. kateryna oliynyk, volodymyr studenny, espresso tv channel. the space of life. a new center was opened in the capital, which will help people overcome gaming addiction. this is the first center in ukraine that works according to the standard of social and psychological rehabilitation. psychological and legal will be provided in the space. and medical care. the organizers emphasize that consultations are anonymous

don't think so. >> lawrence: not buying it. >> steve: unless suddenly out of nowhere the new york state supreme court or court of appeals rules, he's going to be on the hook for it on monday. >> brian: five days. >> steve: we keep you posted. carley joins us at 7:18 with some news. >> carley: i certainly do. we have brand new body camera footage that came in last time seen missing riley strain seen alive. he vanished 11 days ago after leaving luke bryan's nashville bar. former nypd detective mark fuhrman joined us earlier. >> ironically, people that are sometimes quite drunk, sober up very quickly when a uniformed officer is talking. so he could have presented suspecting that the officer made a judgment that i don't need to arrest or take this person into custody. he'll get to his location. i think this investigation is at the point of recovery, not location. >> carley: two women discovered strain's debit card near the cumberland river on sunday not far from where he was last seen. senator chuck schumer's criticism of israel's prime minister and calls for new election getting pushback from republican lawmakers. but some

however, we are pleasantly surprised that the supreme court and the court of appeals has held this particularold pending a final resolution and a ruling which we believe will find this bill is unconstitutional. caitriona: is it impacting anyone's decision as to whether to come to the u.s. at this time? domingo: i think there's a lot of fear and panic amongst some families in texas. we have a lot of families that are mixed. grandma and grandpa might be undocumented, but their children and grandchildren are u.s. citizens and they are afraid. grandma takes kids to school, she gets stopped for a traffic ticket, and she gets detained. the father is arrested and the children are alone and child protective services takes over the children because there's no adult. those are real fears that can happen if the law takes effect. right now, we are happy to say it has not taken effect. we expect it will not but we are planning. caitriona: are you giving any particular advice to people at this time who might find themselves in that situation you outlined? domingo: we started an education program using span

effectively blamed rachel for the outcome, and when it went to the supreme court and they found in favor of the israeli state and then they appealed it, the parents appealed it, and again the supreme court found in favor of the israeli state, so we've never had a full investigation, we've never been able to identify exactly what happened, and it's... led to people being suggest, offering suggestions as to what took place from both sides, which never have happened, because there should have been as a clear investigation that found out exactly who was responsible and why? david - this character bench piro's position at the the david horrowittz freedom center was funded by a director of the charity that funds the israeli military, just say a word to will you about this - organization, the so-called friends of the idf. well, let's remember that the david horivit center is one of the key islamophobic thing tanks in the us, part of the what's been called the islamophobic network, of course, largely funded by zionists and unsurprisingly, they these the people who fund this organization are also fund the friends of the israel defense forc

she was appointed a judge of the united states court of appeals trump dominated her as an associate justice of the supreme court and she took her seat on october 27, 2020. [applause] i want to begin, justices, with just recognizing this time that we are in, both civic learning week itself, and the centrality of those themes, but also the time we are in in the country. we are approaching the 250th anfounding in a couple of years, and unlike the bicentennial nearly half a century ago, there are a lot of debates about who we are as a country and where we are headed. one of the things true across the board, left and right, is there has been a declining level of confidence and faith in institutions. before we get to that importance of civic learning, i wanted to get to the question of confidence in public institutions and why, from your vantage point, sitting at the highest court of the land, why this world that seems abstract, we talk about trust and confidence. . we know it when it disappears. we don't think about it much when it is there. i am curious for each of you, why you feel like confidence in institu

special counsel jack smith asked the supreme court to weigh in on the immunity claim in head of appeals ruling, -- they refused. the appeals court than ruled, unanimously rejecting trump's claim of immunity. last, week the supreme court said, you know what? we do want to weigh in after all. they scheduled a hearing for the week of april 22nd. that's seven weeks from now. that's four months after jack smith first asked them to take the case, four months to get a hearing on the immunity claim justice compared to over six days to get to today's ruling which keeps trump on the ballot. joining me now is conservative attorney george conway. he's a contributor to the atlantic and co-host of the podcast george conway explains it all. i want to dig into all of that. a lot of us can't figure that out, the timing of the supreme court. we were just talking about the ruling today. you tweeted today, it doesn't even profess to be interpreting the text. >> it doesn't! you know, professor eiffel said that there was a lot of overreach in the majority opinion. i think the problem here is that all nine ju

she lost at the court of appeals and the arizona supreme court. then she filed another lawsuit. i was hoping she would get a new job, but she kept talk about it and made it the centerpiece of all of her fund raising appeals and her political prominence and even a book deal so i figured she is not getting a new job. i am the job and defaming my good name to her millions of followers was her profession at that point. this is the first time and last time i sued anybody in my individual capacity. but i talked to the team at protect democracy and we have a strong case. >> let me ask you legally the significance of today. the filing that she is basically not going to contest the defamation. she wants to fight on the grounds of damages. but that means you caught me. >> that is exactly right. this is an unequivocal admission by ms. lake she has no evidence whatsoever so support her claims that mr. richer engaged in misconduct in the 2022 election. of course, we all knew that she had no evidence all along. but ms. lake has been saying she looks forward to showing receipts and yesterday, s

also in december, jack smith asked the supreme court to leapfrog over the d.c. court of appealsimmunity issue immediately. the court said, no. we will wait for the d.c. court of appeals to decide for the court did not need to do that. it had a brilliant 57 page opinion from the judge. it had a 40 page opinion from the court of appeals. both making the obvious legal point that the president is not immune from prosecution for things that he does while he is in office that are obviously illegal. nonetheless, the court waited and waited and this week is that oral argument, literally on the last day. >> it is extraordinary. some people are interpreting things one way. i know you are leaving as it is been paul butler, thank you so much. >>> the clock is ticking towards a tiktok bandwidth new information from capitol hill, next. and more on-time deliveries. the united states postal service built for how you business. bladder leak underwear has one job. i just want to feel protected! especially for those sudden gush moments. always discreet protects like no other. with a rapid dry core

supreme court. it was already heard by the u.s. court of appealshich smacked it down so hard it needed a concussion protocol. [ laughter ] but the supreme court was like, "wipe the blood out of your ears and get back in the game!" the question the supreme court decided they need to rule on is, can a president do literally anything while in office and be immune from prosecution? and if you think that's an exaggeration, or an oversimplification, trump's lawyers were asked, if this is true, would a president be allowed to send s.e.a.l. team 6 in to kill one of his political opponents, and he didn't say no. trump's argument is that he could literally shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue and get away with it. and i'll be honest, i'm worried the person he would shoot might be me. [ laughter ] i'm staying away from fifth avenue. and so now we may have to wait until next year to find out if trump did the things we all saw and heard him do on television. [ laughter ] this is what happens when we let an extra from "home alone 2" pick three supreme cou