67
67
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 67
favorite 0
quote 0
likely a direct appeal to the so-called originalist not on the state supreme court of colorado beforem he was arguing, but on the supreme court of the united states who tend to take the view or at least say they take the view that the constitution should be interpreted only as it was understood at the time of their founding, original public meaning. that's their sort of watch word. notably, many of those same originalists on the supreme court are happy to, it seems, ignore the truly radical intentions of the 14th amendment, how it relates explicitly to both legacy and slavery and the treasonist insurrection that started the civil war, which may be why it is notable the newest member of that court, judge browne, refuses to let them forget it. >> i understood that we looked at the history and traditions of the constitution at what the framers and the founders thought about. and when i drilled down to that level of analysis, it became clear to me that the framers themselves adopted the equal protection clause, the 14th amendment, the 15th amendment in a race conscious way. the entire poi
likely a direct appeal to the so-called originalist not on the state supreme court of colorado beforem he was arguing, but on the supreme court of the united states who tend to take the view or at least say they take the view that the constitution should be interpreted only as it was understood at the time of their founding, original public meaning. that's their sort of watch word. notably, many of those same originalists on the supreme court are happy to, it seems, ignore the truly radical...
266
266
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 266
favorite 0
quote 0
i want you to listen to something that justice alito said. >> the consequences of what the colorado supreme courtid, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say, using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral estoppel, that there's non-mutual collateral estoppel against former president trump, so the decision of the colorado supreme court could effectively decide this question for many other states, perhaps all over states? >> carl, what did you make of that argument? >> i really agree with justice alito, but i find myself in complete agreement with tonight. the pandora's box that would have been opened up i think would be devastating for the country. i'm not a constitutional expert, but most of a practical lawyer, but this was a practically strong decision coming, and i agree. it will be 8-1, 9-0, 7-2, in favorite of trump. i also agree that all eyes should not -- wait for the d.c. decision that the supreme court will have to make in a few days. the question is whether the united states supreme court will issue a stay
i want you to listen to something that justice alito said. >> the consequences of what the colorado supreme courtid, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say, using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral estoppel, that there's non-mutual collateral estoppel against former president trump, so the decision of the colorado supreme court could effectively decide this question for many other states, perhaps all...
20
20
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 20
favorite 0
quote 0
begin. the first court in new york on 34 of these charges , today, by the way, the supreme court is considering the possibility, so this case, that the supreme court of the state of colorado disqualified him from the election, the supreme court of the united states is considering trump's appeal today, well, i think that it is unlikely that the supreme court will uphold the decision of the supreme court of the state of colorado, but regarding criminal cases , the first trial will be on march 25, so let's see. what will happen next, let's hope, thank you, igor eisenberg, professor of new york university, there was espresso, and we talked about the difficult situation that is currently happening around the support package for ukraine, and actually today they will try to vote again on this decision, we will inform you, but roman and i are already saying goodbye to you for today, these few hours it flew by very quickly for us, we are passing the baton on to our colleagues, and we will see you tomorrow in this studio. take care and be safe until we meet, greetings viewers of espress. the news team will talk about the most relevant events of the moment, and this one i start the
begin. the first court in new york on 34 of these charges , today, by the way, the supreme court is considering the possibility, so this case, that the supreme court of the state of colorado disqualified him from the election, the supreme court of the united states is considering trump's appeal today, well, i think that it is unlikely that the supreme court will uphold the decision of the supreme court of the state of colorado, but regarding criminal cases , the first trial will be on march 25,...
22
22
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 22
favorite 0
quote 0
us supreme court held a preliminary discussion, the so-called oral hearings, of probably the most pressing issue of the election campaign, are you entitled... this is what the supreme court of coloradothe main court will side with trump, decide not to participate in elections is fraught with too unclear consequences, both legal and political. there is no national voting in the usa; it takes place in each state separately. the rules are different everywhere. in theory judges are nonpartisan, but one can imagine that in a given state a judge with very strong views in favor of democrats would decide to remove trump from the ballot. if this happens, it is only possible in the blue states, which always vote for democrats anyway, that is , they will still go to biden, but this will only inflame trump’s base; in the rest he will get more. by the way, you can always write in a candidate if he doesn’t exist. a positive supreme court verdict for trump would be a major victory for him, but there would be problems won't solve it. the ex-president is accused of criminal cases. according to rumors, he and his team are admitting that, in the midst of the campaign, trump will be found guilty in the
us supreme court held a preliminary discussion, the so-called oral hearings, of probably the most pressing issue of the election campaign, are you entitled... this is what the supreme court of coloradothe main court will side with trump, decide not to participate in elections is fraught with too unclear consequences, both legal and political. there is no national voting in the usa; it takes place in each state separately. the rules are different everywhere. in theory judges are nonpartisan, but...
12
12
tv
eye 12
favorite 0
quote 0
on the eve of the presidential elections, congressional elections, i think, that... the supreme court of coloradobout disqualifying trump from the election because he allegedly took part in insurrection against the republic, and this is done on the basis of the so -called fourteenth amendment of the constitution, so let's see what this the amendment says: no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or an elector of president or vice president, or hold... any office in the civil or military service of the united states, or in the service of any state, unless he, having previously accepted oath as a member of congress or as an officer of the united states or as a member of the legislature of any state, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the constitution of the united states, then took participated in rebellion or rebellion against the united states, or provided aid or support to enemies of the united states. here two questions arise, one is very fundamental, and trump took part in the insurrection, he says that he did not take part in the insurrection, n
on the eve of the presidential elections, congressional elections, i think, that... the supreme court of coloradobout disqualifying trump from the election because he allegedly took part in insurrection against the republic, and this is done on the basis of the so -called fourteenth amendment of the constitution, so let's see what this the amendment says: no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or an elector of president or vice president, or hold... any office in the civil...
96
96
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 96
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court is less than 24 hours away from hearing one of the most consequential cases tied to a presidential election since bush v. gore. it's donald trump's supreme court appeal of a colorado decision to take him off the state's republican primary ballot for his involvement in the violent attack on the capitol on january 6th, an attack that took place just steps away from the high court. the major question here should a former commander in chief be disqualified from seeking the presidency again if he engaged in insurrection. nbc's laura jarrett gives us a closer look at what to expect. >> krista kafer is a conservative columnist who voted for donald trump in 2020, but says she won't do it again. >> former president trump tried to disenfranchise 80 million americans, and how did he do that? he tried to joefr turn an election. he fomented violence to stop the peaceful transfer of power. >> reporter: kafer and five other voters in colorado successfully managed to get the republican front runner kicked off the state's primary ballot in 2024 for what happened on january 6th, 2021. >> through his actions and his actions alone, donald trump has disqualified himself from ever hold
the supreme court is less than 24 hours away from hearing one of the most consequential cases tied to a presidential election since bush v. gore. it's donald trump's supreme court appeal of a colorado decision to take him off the state's republican primary ballot for his involvement in the violent attack on the capitol on january 6th, an attack that took place just steps away from the high court. the major question here should a former commander in chief be disqualified from seeking the...
23
23
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 23
favorite 0
quote 0
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which they are reviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed and should be rejected. host: explain hypertechnical arguments. guest: there is a whole bunch of ways that trump's counsel is trying to win this case, all of which are for the most part highly counterintuitive and hypertechnical. they are the kind of things that make people dislike lawyers which doesn't by itself means they are wrong but it should make us suspicious of those kind of argument. they have the argument which was mentioned that the person who holds the highest office in the federal government is somehow not an officer of the united states, the kind of argument that only a hypertechnical
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which they are reviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed...
128
128
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 128
favorite 0
quote 0
to that issue on thursday. >> the trial court judge in colorado found that it did not apply to the presidency, to the office of the presidency. it was the supremeourt of colorado that said, no, it does. so the supreme court could use that as an off ramp. >> also, march 4th was to be the start of the trial. the judge on the federal election interference case, that's now been postponed based on the d.c. appeals court ruling. what's the time line on that? >> i mean, everybody who has guessed when the d.c. circuit is going to rule on presidential immunity, i think, has been wrong. everyone thought it was going to have happened already. and, so, it could happen any time. and then after that, there are still a few more appeals that could happen to continue to delay it. for example, donald trump could ask that the entire d.c. circuit rule on the case because this was only before a three-judge panel. he could also ask the united states supreme court to hear the case. so a few things -- >> it will be dragged on for quite some time. >> it could. it also also get mandated back to the trial court. but there is -- there is still a lot in play. and, so, i th
to that issue on thursday. >> the trial court judge in colorado found that it did not apply to the presidency, to the office of the presidency. it was the supremeourt of colorado that said, no, it does. so the supreme court could use that as an off ramp. >> also, march 4th was to be the start of the trial. the judge on the federal election interference case, that's now been postponed based on the d.c. appeals court ruling. what's the time line on that? >> i mean, everybody who...
108
108
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 108
favorite 0
quote 0
worse say this really shouldn't be up to colorado. >> seems to me that the votes are clearly on the side of overturning the discussion of the colorado supreme courtf the colorado supreme court. >> i listened today, and i thought arguments were very, very strong. and and can you take the person that's leading everywhere and say is, hey, we're not going to let you run. you know, i think that's pretty tough to do. howard: first time i've listened to two hours of supreme court oral argument as. robby, any question in your with mind that the supreme court was extremely skeptical of donald trump being kicked off the a ballot and is going to knock that down? >> not at all. they asked all the right questions, they gave every indication that they think it would be too much of a blow to democracy. the thing democrats are running on -- howard: right. yeah. >> but you can't have the other candidate on the ballot, we can't even give people the option to vote for him even though he's not been convicted of insurrection? there's a question whether what happened is insurrection, these are all questions that have not been litigated yet. so to proactively strip don
worse say this really shouldn't be up to colorado. >> seems to me that the votes are clearly on the side of overturning the discussion of the colorado supreme courtf the colorado supreme court. >> i listened today, and i thought arguments were very, very strong. and and can you take the person that's leading everywhere and say is, hey, we're not going to let you run. you know, i think that's pretty tough to do. howard: first time i've listened to two hours of supreme court oral...
121
121
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 121
favorite 0
quote 0
of the united states. the american people, not courts or election officials, should choose the next president of the united states. they're saying in the supreme court, stay out of this. now colorado's secretary of state's an piped up before the supreme court and said colorado can do this within the law. they can decide donald trump is ineligible, but all of this is going to come to a head on thursday. we're not going to get a ruling at that time, but it is one of first times we'll be able to see the supreme court pepper trump's team with questions. the last time there was an argument like this, service when people were pursuing donald trump's tax returns several years ago. legal teams from both sides are preparing. donald trump's legal team as well as others representing the people who want to keep him off the ballot. they're all getting ready for the oral arguments where the justices will be asking questions, and at the same time so much is hanging over donald trump in court right now, include the possibility of a ruling any day about whether he can sit for trial related to january 6th as a criminal defendant, a totally different issue that has a lot to do with whether he will go
of the united states. the american people, not courts or election officials, should choose the next president of the united states. they're saying in the supreme court, stay out of this. now colorado's secretary of state's an piped up before the supreme court and said colorado can do this within the law. they can decide donald trump is ineligible, but all of this is going to come to a head on thursday. we're not going to get a ruling at that time, but it is one of first times we'll be able to...
128
128
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 128
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of colorado made this happen. these are not voters.one's name off a ballot, deleting a choice. you better love america enough to want to defend democracy by allowing the people to choose what happens in november, not these little handful of bureaucrats or judges. >> harris: and it brings to the point, why people distrust this process, you look at that map and think, the united states is not united when we vote? real quick question for you. when do we reach the point too close to the election? like is that being talked about, do you think in the white house? calculus being, if we could speed this up a little bit. >> kayleigh: it is being talked about openly. i heard an anchor say everyday counts, like toward what? speeding up a process in election interference? people are openly saying that. jamie raskin talking about the supreme court, we should be engaged and aroused because of supreme court. what does that mean? really, nancy pelosi? way to disturb faith in institution. yes, he used those words, check it out. illinois and the decisio
supreme court of colorado made this happen. these are not voters.one's name off a ballot, deleting a choice. you better love america enough to want to defend democracy by allowing the people to choose what happens in november, not these little handful of bureaucrats or judges. >> harris: and it brings to the point, why people distrust this process, you look at that map and think, the united states is not united when we vote? real quick question for you. when do we reach the point too...
75
75
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 75
favorite 0
quote 0
the state supreme court of colorado ruled this does apply to the former president, and most legal experts in yesterday's arguments before the u.s. supreme court, they seemed reluctant to rule in favor of colorado. >> whether the concern of justices or the liberal justices are really worried that one state here, colorado, could start excluding somebody from a ballot, and that will lead other states to do so as well. and as they pointed out, tens of millions of votes might not count if that happens. the u.s. supreme court is expected to issue a ruling before the colorado primary, which is set for march the fifth. >> our time now. 658. all plastic shopping bags could be banned at california grocery stores under a newly proposed legislation. the concern is that people are not reusing the thicker plastic bags, but instead they're just throwing them away like they used to do with the older, thinner bags. a new study by the state finds we're actually creating more plastic waste from grocery bags. since the original ban took effect ten years ago. now, if it's signed into law, those thicker plasti
the state supreme court of colorado ruled this does apply to the former president, and most legal experts in yesterday's arguments before the u.s. supreme court, they seemed reluctant to rule in favor of colorado. >> whether the concern of justices or the liberal justices are really worried that one state here, colorado, could start excluding somebody from a ballot, and that will lead other states to do so as well. and as they pointed out, tens of millions of votes might not count if that...
77
77
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court justicesappeared skeptical of colorado supreme court decision barring former president trump from the republican primary pl ballot on grounds he engaged in insurrection in trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating on the january 6 capital attack >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power >> reporter: the trump legal team argues he did not participate in the storming of the capitol and that it did not qualify as an attempt to overthrow the government >> this was a riot it was not an insurrection the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those thing, but it did not qualify as insurrection >> reporter: the justices questioned whether congress should enact a national standard before states can invoke a version of the 14th amendment which was enacted after the civil war to prevent people who engaged in insurrection from holding office, and whether that provision even includes the president. both conservative and liberal justices voiced concerns abou
supreme court justicesappeared skeptical of colorado supreme court decision barring former president trump from the republican primary pl ballot on grounds he engaged in insurrection in trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating on the january 6 capital attack >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power >> reporter: the trump legal team argues he did not participate...
174
174
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 174
favorite 0
quote 0
regardless of my personal thoughts, a court was going to decide did his actions reach the level of disqualification under section 3 of the 14th amendment? and a court has. the colorado supremert looked at all the district court findings, special a specialized amount of time and determined he did engage in insurrection. and that on top of that the constitution applies to the president. there is no get out of jail free card for insurrection for donald trump. and honestly, erin, i think they got it right. and i'm making this clear statement in protection of colorado law because i think that's how the constitution should work. section 3 of the 14th amendment is there to protect the country from insurrectionists like donald trump, and i hope that the united states supreme court looks at all the facts, all the case law and the clear words of the united states constitution in making their determination. >> does the fact that there appear to be delays for the special counsel's case, i mean there was supposed to start on march 4th. that is not going to start now. it's been postponed indefinitely. ryan goodman was pointing out a judge there could give another date, a provisional date
regardless of my personal thoughts, a court was going to decide did his actions reach the level of disqualification under section 3 of the 14th amendment? and a court has. the colorado supremert looked at all the district court findings, special a specialized amount of time and determined he did engage in insurrection. and that on top of that the constitution applies to the president. there is no get out of jail free card for insurrection for donald trump. and honestly, erin, i think they got...
183
183
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 183
favorite 0
quote 0
think the court was very mindful in their questioning that while this decision affected the supreme court of colorado and their decision to reject trump from being on the ballot, that we're speaking to everyone else in the country and in doing that it seemed that the justices were pretty uniform in answering that question, a at least it did to me, that they would reject the colorado decision and therefore allow him to be on the ballot. why? there were questions from a liberal justice, ms. jackson, listen, does it even apply to the president? in doing that they assess the intent, the intention of when the 14th amendment section 3 was passed, with a it is really designed for the president and if it was why did it not say so? you looked at things from conservatives like kavanaugh which would suggest we may be disenfranchising too many voters. roberts and his discussions should we really be giving states this power and authority. insurrection while it wasn't really addressed, kavanaugh said there is a statute, regarding insurrection, if you are convicted of that, right, then you can't be on the ballot an
think the court was very mindful in their questioning that while this decision affected the supreme court of colorado and their decision to reject trump from being on the ballot, that we're speaking to everyone else in the country and in doing that it seemed that the justices were pretty uniform in answering that question, a at least it did to me, that they would reject the colorado decision and therefore allow him to be on the ballot. why? there were questions from a liberal justice, ms....
72
72
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 72
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court with details. >> reporter: tasked with resolving a monumental political dispute, u.s. supreme court justices today appeared skeptical of a colorado supreme court decision, barring former president donald trump from the republican primary ballot. this is on grounds that he engaged in insurrection, trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating in the january 6th capitol attack. >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states, to disrupt the presidential power. >> reporter: he did not participate in the storming of the capitol, and that he did not qualify as an attempt to overthrow the government. >> it was a right, not an insurrection. >> reporter: the justices, deciding whether congress should enact a national standard, or they can provoke the constitution's 14th amendment. it was adopted after the civil war, to prevent people who had engaged from holding office, and whether that provision includes the president. both conservative and liberal justices voiced concerns about allowing individual states to decide who is an insurrectionist. >> a good number of states will say who
supreme court with details. >> reporter: tasked with resolving a monumental political dispute, u.s. supreme court justices today appeared skeptical of a colorado supreme court decision, barring former president donald trump from the republican primary ballot. this is on grounds that he engaged in insurrection, trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating in the january 6th capitol attack. >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the...
134
134
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 134
favorite 0
quote 0
eastern for special coverage, live coverage of the supreme court's complete oral arguments on whether or not donald trump can remain on the ballot in coloradotions of course, for other states. >>> and we have breaking news from california, terrible news, there's a search underway for five u.s. marines flying from creech air force base. the marine corps is coordinating the first along with first responders. no sign if the helicopter has been found. that does it for this edition of "andrea mitchell reports." follow us on social media @mitchellreports. you can rewatch the best parts of our show on youtube. and "chris jansing reports" starts right now. light work! ♪♪ next victims. ♪♪ you ready for this? ♪pump up the jam pump it up♪ [♪♪] looking for a moisturizer that does more than just moisturize? try olay regenerist for 10 benefits in every jar. olay visibly firms, lifts, and smooths wrinkles, by penetrating the skin, to boost regeneration at the surface cellular level. try olay. there's nothing better than a subway series footlong. except when you add on an all new footlong sidekick. we're talking a $2 footlong churro. $3 footlong pretzel an
eastern for special coverage, live coverage of the supreme court's complete oral arguments on whether or not donald trump can remain on the ballot in coloradotions of course, for other states. >>> and we have breaking news from california, terrible news, there's a search underway for five u.s. marines flying from creech air force base. the marine corps is coordinating the first along with first responders. no sign if the helicopter has been found. that does it for this edition of...
69
69
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 69
favorite 0
quote 0
happened today in court with donald, trump at what it means foror th future of this case as the supreme court seems to be signaling that it is unlikely to allow the state of colorado to kick him off of its ballots. there are many other legal manners at large for donald trump of course, the question of whether the supreme court except the immunity appeal, his team is expected to file their emergency appeal by monday's deadline. also, the former criminal trials that away, tim here tonight colorado secretary of state janet creswell, also back with us, ashley, alston doug, elie honig. secretary, let me start with you, because we don't know how the supreme court is going to, rule or how soon, hopefully we will find out quickly on that. but what did you make of today's arguments and what we heard from people like trump's former attorney who believe it was actually a pretty effective day for him? >> i think it is a significant day for democracy, we are at the supreme court, just absolutely from the united states capitol where congress people ran for their lives, where we saw our nation assaulted and democracy under attack, and it was so striking to me to see trump contin
happened today in court with donald, trump at what it means foror th future of this case as the supreme court seems to be signaling that it is unlikely to allow the state of colorado to kick him off of its ballots. there are many other legal manners at large for donald trump of course, the question of whether the supreme court except the immunity appeal, his team is expected to file their emergency appeal by monday's deadline. also, the former criminal trials that away, tim here tonight...
39
39
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 39
favorite 0
quote 0
on december 18th of last year the colorado supreme court kicked the leading g.o.p. tial candidate off of the ballots i think the 14th amendment. colorado does not, however have the last word appear this thursday the supreme court of the united states hears oral argument in that case. a careful listener will be able to tell which way the court is leaning based on which justices ask which questions.ques regardless, it has the potential to be as ta monumental decision. so does the 14th amendment apply in theh am absence of a charge r conviction? will the high court pass the buck and say i higt is up to congress or the people at the ballot box? this case has become something of an economic boom forco constitutional lawyers hasarri dozens of groups have filed friend of the court briefs arguing either for or against kicking trump off of the pilot. just across the street from the supreme court, congresths caught the attention of doj. missouri con congressman cory cory booker but not for herself. she spent a lot of money on her own security but was it government money, campa
on december 18th of last year the colorado supreme court kicked the leading g.o.p. tial candidate off of the ballots i think the 14th amendment. colorado does not, however have the last word appear this thursday the supreme court of the united states hears oral argument in that case. a careful listener will be able to tell which way the court is leaning based on which justices ask which questions.ques regardless, it has the potential to be as ta monumental decision. so does the 14th amendment...
126
126
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 126
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. the attorneys representing him will have 40 minutes to present their case to those justices who will determine whether or not to affirm the colorado supreme court's decision. ofld trump are as high as they could be. if the supreme court were to affirm the colorado secretary of state's decision, it could have far-reaching impacts well beyond colorado. it could potentially lead to his removal in states around the country in putting not only his political future on the line, but also in the case of if he were to be convicted of federal charges, potentially his inability to self-pardon himself after november. and so for donald trump and his team, there is a lot at stake in those 40 minutes in which they will be going before the supreme court tomorrow morning. >> thanks so much, vaughn hillyard, for setting the stage for us. lisa, what do you see as the keys for this case, for either side and just how complicated could it all again? >> well, i mean, there are a number of interpretive issues constitutionally that will come up tomorrow, but there are also some more fundamental issues too. for example, whether or not former president trump engaged in an insurrection
supreme court. the attorneys representing him will have 40 minutes to present their case to those justices who will determine whether or not to affirm the colorado supreme court's decision. ofld trump are as high as they could be. if the supreme court were to affirm the colorado secretary of state's decision, it could have far-reaching impacts well beyond colorado. it could potentially lead to his removal in states around the country in putting not only his political future on the line, but...
76
76
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
of the supreme court. the supreme court deciding if colorado's high court was wrong to exclude them from the ballot. ear a lot more about that today. this is the scene outside the supreme court. this is sherry out of kansas. caller: one lady called in and talked about the insurrection. january 6 was not an insurrection. he would not have been calling it an insurrection. why did they change the law so that the vice president can no longer do that? my call came in with the guest were on but i got disconnected. the amendments and articles have been thrown around loosely. our federal government should protect us from invasion. if they are going to use the same barometer for biden as trump, our current president is guilty of insurrection because if we have riots from illegal he is guilty of that. biden is compromised by china one of your ghost was from george mason university. they are dealing with the enemy, he talked about how horrible slavery was but china has slaves and they take their organs while they are still alive. host: one of the issues you bring up is the border issue. amid everything happenin
of the supreme court. the supreme court deciding if colorado's high court was wrong to exclude them from the ballot. ear a lot more about that today. this is the scene outside the supreme court. this is sherry out of kansas. caller: one lady called in and talked about the insurrection. january 6 was not an insurrection. he would not have been calling it an insurrection. why did they change the law so that the vice president can no longer do that? my call came in with the guest were on but i got...
44
44
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 0
caller: i think the supreme court should affirm colorado supreme court decision. believe trump off of the ballot, because we have a constitution for a reason. and the constitution states insurrection, and he participated in the insurrection, for sure, and the only other time that the insurrection act has been used, the people who were presented from being in office after the civil war because of the insurrection act, or not convicted of anything either. so, trump doesn't need to be convicted to be prevented. i think you should be kept off the ballot. if people want to vote for him, they can write it in. host: so to listen closely today? sounds like you did? caller: i listened a little bit. host: ok, because of your civil war reference, that was brought up in today's case? caller: yeah, that has been talked about a lot in the last few weeks. host: thank you. joseph in pennsylvania. hi, joseph. >> you are on. go! host: [laughs] joseph, someone is prompting you. it's your turn. caller: my question is, say that he loses the ballot can he go back to colorado saying that he wasn't -- the st
caller: i think the supreme court should affirm colorado supreme court decision. believe trump off of the ballot, because we have a constitution for a reason. and the constitution states insurrection, and he participated in the insurrection, for sure, and the only other time that the insurrection act has been used, the people who were presented from being in office after the civil war because of the insurrection act, or not convicted of anything either. so, trump doesn't need to be convicted to...
88
88
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 88
favorite 0
quote 0
honorable court is adjourned until friday, the 16th of february, at 10:00. >> you have been watching live coverage of a potentially precedent setting supreme court case. at issue, whether the state of colorado can keep former president trump off the 2020 presidential ballot in that state due to his involvement in events surrounding the january 6th insurrection. back now. andrew, let me ask you first, because it seemed to us in listening to this so closely for the last two hours and 19 minutes or so that there was broad agreement across the usual political division lines that there was a lot of ambiguity in this process and that ambiguity would favor keeping the candidate, donald trump, on the ballot. >> i agree with you. my takeaway from this is counting the votes. justice o'connor famously said when she was asked what's it like to bone supreme court, it's about counting to five. here there's clearly five votes, if not nine votes, that are going to reverse this case. the point that you made about ambiguity was raised by various justices, meaning if it's not clear, shouldn't that favor having somebody being allowed to run and thus our ability to vote for that person? there was a lot of conce
honorable court is adjourned until friday, the 16th of february, at 10:00. >> you have been watching live coverage of a potentially precedent setting supreme court case. at issue, whether the state of colorado can keep former president trump off the 2020 presidential ballot in that state due to his involvement in events surrounding the january 6th insurrection. back now. andrew, let me ask you first, because it seemed to us in listening to this so closely for the last two hours and 19...
93
93
Feb 1, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 93
favorite 0
quote 0
of state colorado is making. just because the state supreme court decision by colorado very clearly was aimed at neil gorsuch and end of the conservative justice of the supreme court because they knew it was gonna get supreme court review basically like, what we're doing here is a matter of interpreting the u.s. constitution but also state law here and really, like, you guys are real into the states figuring out. it seems like jenna griswold the secretary of state is doing the same thing. >> the colorado supreme court wrote this with the conservative supreme court in mind. it relied on state rates and strict constructionism, which is statute through yourself and forcing. as a former chair of the democratic state committee, i know this all too well because the states control federal and state elections who gets on the ballot and who doesn't. so how would you enforce someone taking him off the ballot as the attorney general said if they had been twice elected president? that would be a state right decision. the state would not put them on the ballot. there's nothing really different here other than they have a fact
of state colorado is making. just because the state supreme court decision by colorado very clearly was aimed at neil gorsuch and end of the conservative justice of the supreme court because they knew it was gonna get supreme court review basically like, what we're doing here is a matter of interpreting the u.s. constitution but also state law here and really, like, you guys are real into the states figuring out. it seems like jenna griswold the secretary of state is doing the same thing....
82
82
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 82
favorite 0
quote 0
of the supreme court. there are protestors there. not sure which side this is. no, this is not a witch hunt. gotcha. they're in favor of the colorado plaintiffs. >> dana: there is four of them. not too robust. >> bill: a grand total inside the cage outside the steps of the u.s. supreme court. stand by. a big morning coming up in moments. let's get to this story now. >> what do you say to americans who feel like you are calling them ex tramists because of what where they like to shop and read. nothing to say to the american people? >> dana: treasury secretary janet yellen not providing information about a very controversial issue on when her plate. she is back on capitol hill before a senate panel today. senator tim scott giving his opening statement. her appearance comes after she repeatedly failed to directly answer lawmakers' questions whether her department instructed financial institutions to spy on certain americans. the surveillance campaign targeting conservatives. we're monitoring to see if she is more forthcoming this town. -- this time. >> do you mind if i talk to you real quick? >> about what? >> they're saying you aren'
of the supreme court. there are protestors there. not sure which side this is. no, this is not a witch hunt. gotcha. they're in favor of the colorado plaintiffs. >> dana: there is four of them. not too robust. >> bill: a grand total inside the cage outside the steps of the u.s. supreme court. stand by. a big morning coming up in moments. let's get to this story now. >> what do you say to americans who feel like you are calling them ex tramists because of what where they like...
27
27
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
of politics. >>december the colorado supreme court ruled donaldrump ineligible to appear on the state's presidential ballot for violation of the constn's insurrection clause. the u.s. supreme court hears oral argument of donald trump's appeal of the decisiowe will ha, c-span now, and online at c-span.org. now president bided speaking with union members after a recent endorsement for his reelection for the united auto workers. this comes at the after donald trump met with the teamsters union who has yet to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential minute -- presidential race. this is about 15 minutes. pres. biden: thank you. supporting you is the easiest thing i have done. i was raised on gm. my dad managed a dealership. in delaware we used to have the highest percentage of autoworkers in any state because we are a small state. we had the largest gm facility and the largest chrysler facility outsidethat is how we h school, that is how we all made it. i am going to be brief because i know you have been doing a lot of work. thank you. the expression growing up in delaware was you are the ones who br
of politics. >>december the colorado supreme court ruled donaldrump ineligible to appear on the state's presidential ballot for violation of the constn's insurrection clause. the u.s. supreme court hears oral argument of donald trump's appeal of the decisiowe will ha, c-span now, and online at c-span.org. now president bided speaking with union members after a recent endorsement for his reelection for the united auto workers. this comes at the after donald trump met with the teamsters...
83
83
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 83
favorite 0
quote 0
steal the presidency. >> last question, a group of republican secretaries of state urge the supreme court to rule against the coloradoreme court to say that if the secretaries of state and partisan individuals obtuse the section 3, there are obvious safeguards, and i have to admit that i am sympathetic to the argument, because i have seen in washington that any time a norm is shattered or, or something new like this happens, it goes on to be abused, whether it is the filibuster or whatever. what do you say to that argument that, i mean, we have heard governor ron desantis saying that joe biden should be kept off of the ballot because of what is going on at the bord ser a rebellion or insurrection? >> i don't think that saying that one party is going to act poorly is a reason to uphold the law or the constitution, and we do have safeguards, and it is the legal system. in colorado, i did not make the decision, and this was brought by unaffiliated voters who did not want a disqualified candidate and the ballot. he has had two trials to this point, two trials in the colorado district and supreme court, and now indicating
steal the presidency. >> last question, a group of republican secretaries of state urge the supreme court to rule against the coloradoreme court to say that if the secretaries of state and partisan individuals obtuse the section 3, there are obvious safeguards, and i have to admit that i am sympathetic to the argument, because i have seen in washington that any time a norm is shattered or, or something new like this happens, it goes on to be abused, whether it is the filibuster or...
91
91
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 91
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court is going to hear from attorneys for six coloradans who brought this case led by a 91-year-old former republican member of the legislature. the supreme court will also hear from lawyers for the coloradosecretary of state, and then of course from mr. trump's attorneys who argue that any move to keep him off the ballot would disenfranchise millions of voters and they also say it could cause bedlam in the united states, which the opponents seized on in their briefs and said that is a veiled threat. we've seen the kind of bedlam in the words of the proponents of keeping mr. trump off the ballot. we saw that on january 6th, and it shouldn't be allowed to continue and that's why they say mr. trump should be excluded from the ballot. >> we want to bring in ken yoshino, let's go over the questions at the center of this case, the supreme court may be getting ready in just minutes to take this case up. the first one is is the president an officer of the united states? >> yes, absolutely. it's a pleasure to be hear on this momentous day. one of the lead arguments trump's lawyers are making in a counterintuitive way the presidents is not an officer of the united states. section 3 of the 14th ame
supreme court is going to hear from attorneys for six coloradans who brought this case led by a 91-year-old former republican member of the legislature. the supreme court will also hear from lawyers for the coloradosecretary of state, and then of course from mr. trump's attorneys who argue that any move to keep him off the ballot would disenfranchise millions of voters and they also say it could cause bedlam in the united states, which the opponents seized on in their briefs and said that is a...
24
24
Feb 21, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 24
favorite 0
quote 0
if the supreme court decides we will not take this case and supreme court watchers think of the supreme court decides that from can stay on the ballot in colorado for instance, he might get an unfavorable ruling on the immunity thing and they might refuse to hear the case. when the supreme court in effect decides whether to hear the case or not. if they decide not to take the case in the immunity question, jurisdiction go straight back to the district court and the judge can restart the clock and say you have three months from today to prepare for trial and i will set up ryle -- a trial date in may. if the supreme court waits late into the summer, it could be in july we get a decision postconvention, then we will not have a trial before the election. host: the georgia case and what we saw last week in georgia, what does that mean for the timing on when or if that case comes to trial? guest: that is the one case we don't have a tentative trial date set. it has already been scrambled little bit because the situation there in essence, the district attorney, had a romantic relationship with one of the deputies. the defendants in the rico case basic
if the supreme court decides we will not take this case and supreme court watchers think of the supreme court decides that from can stay on the ballot in colorado for instance, he might get an unfavorable ruling on the immunity thing and they might refuse to hear the case. when the supreme court in effect decides whether to hear the case or not. if they decide not to take the case in the immunity question, jurisdiction go straight back to the district court and the judge can restart the clock...
111
111
tv
eye 111
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado court argued trump violated the 14th amendment, which prevents people who engaged in insurrection from holding office. but during three hours of arguments yesterday, the supreme court justices were highly skeptical of colorado's decision. >> i think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> this doesn't seem like a state call. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot. and others, uh, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election that trump's team argues the terme officer of the united states in the 14th amendment applies to an appointed official, not the president. >> a ruling from the supreme court is expected within weeks. lionel ike, thank you for that update. >> a major shakeup in the war in ukraine. president zelenskyy has fired his top military commander. he has replaced the officer who led ukrainian forces since russia's invasion nearly two years ago. zelensky's office says
the colorado court argued trump violated the 14th amendment, which prevents people who engaged in insurrection from holding office. but during three hours of arguments yesterday, the supreme court justices were highly skeptical of colorado's decision. >> i think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> this doesn't seem like a state call. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number...
144
144
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 144
favorite 0
quote 0
were to rule in favor of colorado, the rest of those dominos, jonathan, would probably fall. so, based upon that, how do you think the supreme court is going to rule? >> well, first of all what's interesting about this case is that colorado was the outlier. all the other cases either suspended consideration or rejected this on different grounds. there were three basic questions and many of them decided on three different grounds. so it's interesting going to the court to see which of these areas they can find being unanimous. i think john roberts was listening to jackson. many of us thought jackson would be the toughest sell for roberts. it appears maybe sotomayor will be the tougher sell. you could not help but feel some sympathy for murray, it's like "west side story," you show up and find out none of your sharks are there. everyone is a jet. and he did the best he could, you know, but he was looking very lonely at points and i thought he did a very good job. i thought mitchell did an outstanding job and you know, i think that overall, the argument was really solid. i think at this point if he was -- if you were to take a bet yo
were to rule in favor of colorado, the rest of those dominos, jonathan, would probably fall. so, based upon that, how do you think the supreme court is going to rule? >> well, first of all what's interesting about this case is that colorado was the outlier. all the other cases either suspended consideration or rejected this on different grounds. there were three basic questions and many of them decided on three different grounds. so it's interesting going to the court to see which of...
98
98
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 98
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. we have this issue pending before the supreme court and the justices were skeptical of the colorado supreme court's ability to unilaterally remove somebody from the ballot in a self-executing way. i'm not sure why illinois decided to do this, i don't think ultimately they will be able to keep him off the ballot given legal framework argued of the constitution. >> carley: politics rules the day, trump campaign spokesperson says. this is a ruling we will quickly appeal. thank you for waking up with us. breaking now, fire crews working day and night to control the out of control wildfire in texas and oklahoma which are being blamed for at least one death. more than one million acres have burned and fires are only 3% contained. >> todd: next guest is a texas pilot using his own money and helicopter to help crews along the fire line. he will join us to tell us what he is seeing right now. i got the power of 3. i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. i'm under 7. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular
supreme court. we have this issue pending before the supreme court and the justices were skeptical of the colorado supreme court's ability to unilaterally remove somebody from the ballot in a self-executing way. i'm not sure why illinois decided to do this, i don't think ultimately they will be able to keep him off the ballot given legal framework argued of the constitution. >> carley: politics rules the day, trump campaign spokesperson says. this is a ruling we will quickly appeal. thank...
89
89
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit -- would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral, that there is non-mute rail coll collateral estoppel against president trump and the colorado supreme court could decide this for all other states. could it not lead to that consequence? >> i don't think so. i believe the effect of the decision would be determined by colorado law rather than the law of another state. i think your question gives rise to an even greater concern because if this decision does not have precluesive effect in other lawsuits it opens the possibility a different factual record could be developed in some of the litigation that occurs in other states and different factual findings could be entered by state trial judges. they may conclude president trump didn't have any intent or make a finding differs from what this trial judge court found. >> exactly. in this decision the trial court in colorado thought it was pro
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit -- would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral, that there is non-mute rail coll collateral estoppel against president trump and the colorado supreme court could decide this for all other states. could it not lead to that consequence? >> i don't think so. i believe the effect of the...
93
93
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 93
favorite 0
quote 0
delegates, if not all of those delegates, and that also gives him more strength, at least in the delegate math. >> right, absolutely, and if, in fact, the supreme court rejects the coloradoeme court's decision, of course donald trump will continue to appear on the ballots across the country. after today, still only 3.78% of the delegates nationally will have been allocated after these first three voting states. i think it's important what we heard from donald trump down in mar-a-lago after the supreme court's oral arguments today. it goes beyond just the actual question of whether he can appear on the ballot or not, but it also hits at the heart of what a future donald trump presidency in the white house come 2025 could look like. what you heard from his remarks there at mar-a-lago was one. talked about the insurrection, he placed the blame on nancy pelosi. there's no evidence she had any involvement in any of the security measures taken on the day of the january 6th attack, but for donald trump it is about a justification of his actions leading up to that day and on that day. there has been no acknowledgment of any wrongdoing. instead he has justified his responses in t
delegates, if not all of those delegates, and that also gives him more strength, at least in the delegate math. >> right, absolutely, and if, in fact, the supreme court rejects the coloradoeme court's decision, of course donald trump will continue to appear on the ballots across the country. after today, still only 3.78% of the delegates nationally will have been allocated after these first three voting states. i think it's important what we heard from donald trump down in mar-a-lago...
81
81
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
let's see, "the washington post," supreme court seems poised to allow trump to remain on the colorado ballot. "wall street journal," supreme court appears skeptical of challenges to trump's ballot eligibility and the paper of record, "the new york times." supreme court appears skeptical. what are the big take aways that you're hearing. >> i noticed that trend, too, chris, the word skeptical being the operative word here after the more than two hours of arguments before the supreme court. the justices did seem to have some very pointed questions about the colorado case here about whether the former president would be under the 14th amendment at all about the consequences of potentially leaving someone like him off the ballot here in the real world. and even on questions about whether or not what we saw on january 6th was an insurrection or not, a point of some contention from the attorneys arguing before the justices today. take a listen to a little bit of that slice of the discussion in court today. >> we are here because for the first time since the war of 1812, our nations capitol came under violent assault. for the first time in history, the atta
let's see, "the washington post," supreme court seems poised to allow trump to remain on the colorado ballot. "wall street journal," supreme court appears skeptical of challenges to trump's ballot eligibility and the paper of record, "the new york times." supreme court appears skeptical. what are the big take aways that you're hearing. >> i noticed that trend, too, chris, the word skeptical being the operative word here after the more than two hours of...
96
96
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 96
favorite 0
quote 0
>> the big headline at the supreme court are that the majority of supreme court justices sounded skeptical of colorado'smer president trump could be kicked off the republican primary ballot. we had both justices who are considered liberal and conservative questioning whether colorado as one state can make the case that they can take him off of the ballot. we also heard robust arguments from both sides. on the trump side, the lawyer for him arguing that all of this, the section 3 of the 14th amendment does not apply to him for a number of reasons. chief among them, he's not an insurrectionist. we heard from lawyers for the state of colorado arguing that trump was trying to disenfranchise millions of americans and did, in fact, partake in an insurrection. afterwards, we heard from plaintiffs, take a listen to one of them now. >> as a republican, i believe in rule of law. i believe in our constitution. i believe in its plain words that said you cannot take an oath of office and then subvert that oath and foment violence and insurrection. >> colorado's secretary of state told nbc news after the oral argumen
>> the big headline at the supreme court are that the majority of supreme court justices sounded skeptical of colorado'smer president trump could be kicked off the republican primary ballot. we had both justices who are considered liberal and conservative questioning whether colorado as one state can make the case that they can take him off of the ballot. we also heard robust arguments from both sides. on the trump side, the lawyer for him arguing that all of this, the section 3 of the...
132
132
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 132
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court is going to deal with colorado law. i do think the supreme court's more likely to go head on into section three itself. so there are a number of questions. what is an insurrection? and was january 6th an insurrection? i think that's a strong case for colorado, frankly, that january 6th was an insurrection. but that's never been defined. if it's an insurrection, did donald trump engage in it? his lawyers are arguing that sort of engaging behind the scenes doesn't qualify. number three, uh, the constitution lists the people that can be, um, sort of implicated in section three. and the argument is the president isn't specifically named. i don't think that's the strongest argument, but that's one that the court could take up. then the court could take up. the question is it a requirement that congress step in and give us that bridge between a getting before a court and the constitution itself? there are people who who in arguing the viability of this, say, listen, this whole thing hasn't even been looked at since 150 years have passed. i mean, don't they have a point? the constitution is old. it's terse, and we have judges, justic
supreme court is going to deal with colorado law. i do think the supreme court's more likely to go head on into section three itself. so there are a number of questions. what is an insurrection? and was january 6th an insurrection? i think that's a strong case for colorado, frankly, that january 6th was an insurrection. but that's never been defined. if it's an insurrection, did donald trump engage in it? his lawyers are arguing that sort of engaging behind the scenes doesn't qualify. number...
130
130
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 130
favorite 0
quote 0
march 5th, so it is a safe bet that we will get a rolling before that because the supreme court recognizes the voters of coloradolsewhere have to recognize whether candidates will or will not be cut fat -- >> joining us now, jamie raskin of maryland, he attended today's supreme court hearing as a former member of the january 6th house select committee. congressman, good to see you. what was it like in the room for the oral arguments, what was your take away? do you agree with our assessment that court seems to be looking for an off ramp? >> i agree with the last point. the conservative majority is looking for a way not to have to uphold the obvious, which is that donald trump participated in what was obviously an insurrection. the legal arguments abstracted away from that, the core of the argument being made by donald trump's pretty able lawyer was that you need, you cannot disqualify trump now, even if everybody agreed he was an insurrectionist. you cannot move the disqualification between the points of the election and his taking of office. that is a nice splitting hairs point about the electoral college. unfo
march 5th, so it is a safe bet that we will get a rolling before that because the supreme court recognizes the voters of coloradolsewhere have to recognize whether candidates will or will not be cut fat -- >> joining us now, jamie raskin of maryland, he attended today's supreme court hearing as a former member of the january 6th house select committee. congressman, good to see you. what was it like in the room for the oral arguments, what was your take away? do you agree with our...
130
130
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 130
favorite 0
quote 0
what happened today in court for donald trump and what it maeps for the future of this case as the supreme court seemed to be signaling it is unlikely to allow the state of colorado to kick him off of its ballot. there are many other legal matters for donald trump of course. the question of whether the supreme court takes up the immunity appeal, his team is expected to file their emergency appeal by monday's deadline. also the four criminal trials that await him. here tonight colorado's secretary of state jena griswold, also back with us ashley, doug, elie. secretary, we don't know how the supreme court is going to rule or how soon. hopefully, we will find out quickly on that. what did you make of today's arguments and what we heard from people like trump's former attorney who believed it was a effective day for him? >> well, i think it's a significant day for democracy. we are at the supreme court just steps away from the united states capitol where congress people ran for their lives, where we saw our nation assaulted and our democracy under attack. it was so strike to go me to see trump continue to lie, to lie about his role in the ipos, to continue to argue h
what happened today in court for donald trump and what it maeps for the future of this case as the supreme court seemed to be signaling it is unlikely to allow the state of colorado to kick him off of its ballot. there are many other legal matters for donald trump of course. the question of whether the supreme court takes up the immunity appeal, his team is expected to file their emergency appeal by monday's deadline. also the four criminal trials that await him. here tonight colorado's...
26
26
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 26
favorite 0
quote 0
of the c-span now video app or online at c-span.org. >> on thursday, the u.s. supreme court will hear oral arguments in the case of former president donald trump's eligibility to be on the 2024 colorado ballot. the colorado supreme court ruled that former president trump was ineligible for running from office because he violated the 14th amendment to the u.s. constitution and supported an insurrection on january 6. watch live coverage beginning at 7:00 a.m. eastern on washington journal, with expert analysis previewing the case. at 10:00 a.m. eastern it's live coverage of the u.s. supreme court oral argument. at 8:00 p.m. eastern we recap the day's events and take your calls. watch live coverage of the u.s. supreme court oral argument benning thursday at 7:00 a.m. eastern on washington journal, on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile video app, or online at c-span.org. click c-span is your unfiltered view of government. funded by these television companies and more, including cox. >> this syndrome is extremely rare. but friends don't have to be. when you're connected, you are not alone. >> c supports c-span as a public service, along with these other television providers, giving you a
of the c-span now video app or online at c-span.org. >> on thursday, the u.s. supreme court will hear oral arguments in the case of former president donald trump's eligibility to be on the 2024 colorado ballot. the colorado supreme court ruled that former president trump was ineligible for running from office because he violated the 14th amendment to the u.s. constitution and supported an insurrection on january 6. watch live coverage beginning at 7:00 a.m. eastern on washington journal,...
61
61
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 61
favorite 0
quote 0
courts have looked at that issue. it feels decided. the colorado district court and the colorado supreme court, of course. not yet been litigated on the federal level, which i think something people have raised. and i'm in justinterested in your viewyou the on ton, jenyour show for the very first time. and with your introduction, i grew up in a cabin with a house outside on -- so thini states constitution. rovision, it has toto be what dhapphere. you arprioand c ould have accepted donald trump's grip is on the republican party, and how mainstream maga extrnow imagint are of don e, and ahonjustchaos are yoyourn personal safety? i hdeatthworkeof state. iton the line. if a political partis trywith t democrprior host saibe intimbeintidonald trumpsa would be bedlchaos to the united states supreme court, depending on their decision, just reek grave threat his ou, your brave and coach. lot of lwayou had e as welme this evening. n thuthank yothink you has fall we've beeninto one authoritaria impulse of donald trump is real quick break. ♪♪uick break. my safetnce 20 whenhreat arted tol three of it ing file death t.
courts have looked at that issue. it feels decided. the colorado district court and the colorado supreme court, of course. not yet been litigated on the federal level, which i think something people have raised. and i'm in justinterested in your viewyou the on ton, jenyour show for the very first time. and with your introduction, i grew up in a cabin with a house outside on -- so thini states constitution. rovision, it has toto be what dhapphere. you arprioand c ould have accepted donald...
77
77
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
pretty much most of the cases in the supreme court is 9-0. >> steve: talking about the person who argued on behalf of colorado? >> lawrence: correct. evidence seemed ill prepared for any of the questions. and gorsuch continued to say, look, you are dodging the question that i'm asking you right now. ketanji brown jackson said the same thing. when you have both the conservative and liberal judges agreeing on the issue of can you just give me the law here? can you give me precedence for this. >> ainsley: i learned a lot about the law listening to. this they were talking about how the con distribution, the 1st amendment should keep the president off the ballot in colorado. the supreme court justice said if you read the constitution. it says it is to keep officers off the ballot. the president is not an officer. >> steve: he is not listed that's the important part. >> ainsley: this dates back to the 1800s when they were trying to get officers, former confederates off the ballot. legally, that was written in not a way to say that a president couldn't be on the ballot. >> brian: between that and the first case bein
pretty much most of the cases in the supreme court is 9-0. >> steve: talking about the person who argued on behalf of colorado? >> lawrence: correct. evidence seemed ill prepared for any of the questions. and gorsuch continued to say, look, you are dodging the question that i'm asking you right now. ketanji brown jackson said the same thing. when you have both the conservative and liberal judges agreeing on the issue of can you just give me the law here? can you give me precedence...
117
117
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 117
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. u.s. supreme court. there wasn't any real defense of their decision. and it is really too bad because the coloradort, i think got it right. it was the right legal answer to these questions, and it begins and ends with the idea that someone who is and adjudicated insurrectionist, as donald trump was, has no business serving in our governments. particularly at the highest levels. unfortunately, i do not think that came out at all and so i suspect that the court is looking for an off ramp, and probably the easiest run is the idea that congress hasn't passed a law to implement the 14th amendment. section three. that's a little novel because congress hasn't passed a law to implement other parts of the 14th amendment. like say, the equal protection clause, but there is some technical ways to try to distinguish the other parts of the 14th amendment, and that might provide an attractive off- ramp because, right now the only thing that the court heard was how dangerous, as justice kagan said in the interchange you just played, how dangerous it would be for colorado to kick someone off the ballot. we never
supreme court. u.s. supreme court. there wasn't any real defense of their decision. and it is really too bad because the coloradort, i think got it right. it was the right legal answer to these questions, and it begins and ends with the idea that someone who is and adjudicated insurrectionist, as donald trump was, has no business serving in our governments. particularly at the highest levels. unfortunately, i do not think that came out at all and so i suspect that the court is looking for an...
51
51
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
of colorado deciding, and it's true. >> joining me is colorado secretary of state jena griswold. she was represented today by colorado's solicitor general, shannon stevenson, who argued before the supreme court. thank you for being here. i'm going to let you answer that question, because it did seem some of the justs had it. why should colorado get to decide who can be president of the united states for all states? >> well, first off, i don't think that that necessarily would play out like that. but if it did, ultimately, it's up to states how they choose to appoint the electors. so the electoral college. and it's also up to states, as far as we know, as of now, to be able to have ineligible people kept off their ballots. you know, one of the things that really was striking to me about the court's argument is that if they are so focused on political outcomes, if they're so focused on one state having the ability to swing a presidential election, why don't they look towards georgia and their voter suppression laws? why don't they look at the states that are trying to swing elections by suppressing the vote? so ultimately, i think that line of argument is not founded in the constitution. but w
of colorado deciding, and it's true. >> joining me is colorado secretary of state jena griswold. she was represented today by colorado's solicitor general, shannon stevenson, who argued before the supreme court. thank you for being here. i'm going to let you answer that question, because it did seem some of the justs had it. why should colorado get to decide who can be president of the united states for all states? >> well, first off, i don't think that that necessarily would play...
75
75
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 75
favorite 0
quote 0
to see what happens again, what happens in colorado could be a model for the rest of the country in many ways, including both this decision from the supreme courtive attempt to regulate a.i. in our elections. colorado secretary of state jena griswold, always a pleasure. thank you for coming back on the show. it is great to see. >> thank you. >> >>> we have breaking news from capitol hill. the senate releasing its long awaited text of its bill to send aid to both israel and ukraine, as well as funding for our southern border. the president just called on house republicans to act. and the question now is, what will speaker johnson do? speak? okay everyone, our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition for strength and energy. yay - woo hoo! ensure, with 27 vitamins and minerals, nutrients for immune health. and ensure complete with 30 grams of protein. (♪♪) new herbal essences sulfate free. packed with pure aloe and camellia flower oil your hair will love. and none of the things it won't. hair that feels deeply nourished, soft and lightweight. new herbal essences. with the majority of my patients with sensitivity i see irritated gums and
to see what happens again, what happens in colorado could be a model for the rest of the country in many ways, including both this decision from the supreme courtive attempt to regulate a.i. in our elections. colorado secretary of state jena griswold, always a pleasure. thank you for coming back on the show. it is great to see. >> thank you. >> >>> we have breaking news from capitol hill. the senate releasing its long awaited text of its bill to send aid to both israel and...
71
71
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
and i think the supreme court is seeing that, you know, the state of colorado with a completely democraticurt following suit here was really just -- you know, arguments that don't make any sense under the 14th amendment. i was heartened to hear all of the supreme court justices, the liberal ones and the conservative ones, really question the soundness of the state of colorado's argument that somehow the state would have supremacy over a federal candidate and the ability to disqualify them. you know, chief justice roberts pointed out very quickly that, look, if we we ruled in your favor, things are going to turn just the opposite where where red states are going to knock liberal candidates off of the ballot, and we'll have all chaos. but i think the most important thing was all of the liberal justices like ketanji brown and kagan and even sotomayor pushed back on this idea, you know, where the 14th amendment, everyone knows that the history of the 14th amendment, maria, was to take power away from the states, and yet here's the state of colorado saying it actually gave them more power, powe
and i think the supreme court is seeing that, you know, the state of colorado with a completely democraticurt following suit here was really just -- you know, arguments that don't make any sense under the 14th amendment. i was heartened to hear all of the supreme court justices, the liberal ones and the conservative ones, really question the soundness of the state of colorado's argument that somehow the state would have supremacy over a federal candidate and the ability to disqualify them. you...