because the courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court were part of a single system of unions ; the last judicial station was the supreme court of the ussr union and all judicial practice was formed there and that’s all, the legislation is connected with the arrangement or special production of the republic of belarus, too, in general, was regulated based on non- conscious legislation, therefore, if to compare these two periods, they are very important historical ones, it seems to me that after all , this is a thirty-year period of recent history. it would be on the more difficult the most difficult. for some reason , i remember it more than the period when we were reforms within the soviet union - this is not some kind of radical break. these are some traditions. foundations. it was one of those serious concepts, we worked on several types of concepts. judicial reform , and especially with the belarusian model, was that we really could not breaking the foundations of the judiciary there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from the fact that the most, perhaps the easiest to do and no more needed to be done. we got o

because the courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court were part of a single system of unions and the last judicial station was the supreme court of the ussrnd all judicial practice was formed there, all legislation related to the arrangement or special proceedings of the republic of belarus, also in general something, the basis of non- union legislation was regulated. therefore, if i compare these two periods, they are very important historical ones, it seems to me that after all this unfolding period of recent history, it would be more difficult than the most difficult. for some reason, i remember it more than the period when we were, uh, within the reform of the soviet union. it's not some kind of fundamental breakdown. these are some traditions. foundations. it was one of those big concepts, we were working on several kinds of concept, everything is right and special. from the belarusian model, it was that we really couldn’t break the foundations of the judiciary, there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from what is most may be easier to do and no more needs to be done. we got out of those problems that we neede

because he courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court were part of a single the system of unions at the last judicial station was the supreme court of the ussr union and all judicial practice was formed there and all legislation related to shipbuilding or special proceedings of the republic of belarus was also generally regulated by the union legislation, therefore, if i compare these two periods, they are very important historical, it seems to me that after all, this resettlement period is the latest history, it would be more difficult and more difficult. for some reason i remember him more than that's the period when we were under the reform of the soviet union. it's not some kind of fundamental breakdown. these are some traditions. foundations. it was one of those big concepts, we were working on several kinds of concept, everything is right and special. from the belarusian model , it was that we really couldn’t break the foundations of the judiciary, there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from the fact that it might be easier to do and more needed to be done. we left because of the problems that we needed now rig

because he courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court were part of a single union system; the last judicial station was the supreme court. union of the ussr was formed there and all the legislation related to devices or special production of the republic of belarus, too, in general, the basis of non-union legislation was regulated. therefore, if i compare these two periods, they are very important historical ones, then it seems to me that after all , this is a thirty-year period of recent history. it would have been more complicated than the most difficult for me, so for some reason i remember it to a greater extent than that period when we were, uh, within the framework of the soviet union reform - this is not some kind of radical break. this some traditions. foundations. it was one of those serious concepts, we worked on several types of concepts. judicial reform, and especially with the belarusian model , was that we really couldn’t break the foundations of the judiciary, there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from the fact that it is most, perhaps easier to do and most necessary to do. we got out of those prob

of the belarusian judicial system. with weapons in hand. defended the homeland not many people know that the heroes of the soviet union maria osipova was an employee of the supreme court of the ussr the pages of our heroic history admire the courage of the belarusian people in memory of the heroes of those years, a real front-line song will sound fire beats in a cramped stove on tar logs, like a tear and sings to me in a dugout, an accordion your smile and eyes whispered about you to me in the snow-white fields near moscow i want to hear you somehow taste my voice. today i want you to hear how my voice of animals yearns. before it's not easy for me to find you. where it's warm in the cold dugout from your demoi love i'm warm in the cold dugout, from your unwelcome love. to me in the cold land of unquenchable love to me cold strawberries. the victory in the great patriotic war is of great importance for the fate of our motherland . the victory saved the peoples of the country and all of humanity from the threat of fascist enslavement. it was great. the contribution of the people of this generation to the right of belarusians to live in a free and peaceful country. never one home f

leonid alexandrovich voskresensky on april 9 , 1962, the soviet union in the soviet union by decree of the presidium of the supreme court of the ussrstablished the day of cosmonautics. it received international status at the conference of the international aviation federation in 1968, by the way, since 2011. it has another name international day of human flight. in space, about which on april 7, 11, at the initiative of russia , at a special state of the general assembly, he adopted an official resolution on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the first step. in the matter of space exploration , co-sponsors - this resolution has become more than 60 states of the russian federation is the successor of the soviet union, takes a principled position in the development of space programs. our country is working on the adoption of joint statements with other countries. refusal of placement in outer space is the first weapon, uh, and in this way we are trying, but to make space free of weapons, uh, and the space of the world of cooperation to concentrate on the development of peaceful technologies to most clearly formulate russia's mod