this year, separately, on wednesday, less than 2a hours after that charge decided to sue the supreme courtjudgetrumental in deciding whether these the allegations that this lawsuit is making is that persecution of an individual who they have not named, saying that this is an contrition ofjust protections mr moraes has famously issued orders in the past where he has asked for certain social media accounts to be taken down, by local laws if they want to operate in the country. dispute with the x owner elon musk last year, leading to a temporary ban on x in brazil, clamp down on disinformation on social media in brazil. from mr moraes yet. families of the disappeared are still searching for their loved ones. an estimated 3,000 children are among those who vanished during the war. this report from damascus. all that is left for their families to remember — the faded photos of their missing children. human rights organisations in syria say hundreds disappeared under the assad regime. desperate to find them, relatives gathered so their i went to visit attia al mousa and his wife ghasieh, hiba and her

rival, luiz inacio lula da silva. and the video sharing platform, rumble, have sued a brazilian supreme courtjudgeng the account of an outspoken social media figure, who hasn't been named. presidentjair bolsonaro. on tuesday night, the top prosecutor in brazil of the 2022 election, after he lost to the now left—wing president lula da silva. well face a trial. again to be president of brazil one day. he is currently facing a ban of eight years from running for office again, although congress are currently debating whether such bans could be reduced to just two years, which may be something that would help jair bolsonaro, in the 2026 elections here in brazil. along with the social media platform rumble, alexandre de moraes, who will be one of the figures who is instrumental in deciding whether these the allegations that this lawsuit is making is that moraes has been essentially politically censoring people on social media. they accuse moraes of essentially political saying that this is in contradiction of us protections for free speech. he has continuously defended doing that, saying he doesn't want

social media platform at rumble, decided to s—= the supreme t the supreme court in sue the supreme courtjudgewhether these charges deciding whether these charges be formally now will be formally brought now bolsonaro. the against bolsonaro. the allegations that tttmtatktingtt t tt tt tt t mtaking is that de moraes has is making is that de moraes has been essentially on social censoring people on social media. they accuse of essentially political persecution of an individual who they have named, saying this is an contrition ofjust protections for free speech. mr moraes has issued moraes has famously issued orders in the past where he has for certain social media asked for certain—social media to be down, that accounts to be taken down, that have been accused of spreading political disinformation or, in politioaldisihtormation or, in words, being a of his words, being a sort of threat to democracy. he has his words, being a sort of threat to der defended e has his words, being a sort of threat to der defended doing contineoesty defended doles ——l— l——— —— l— saying contineoesty defended dneall

still, the president in the �*70s said he doesn't agree with the supreme courtjudges and ordered thater. president museveni has _ under no order. president museveni has accused - under no order. president| museveni has accused him under no order. president. museveni has accused him as using the hunger strike as a black male to secure bail. what's your response to that? is he willing to answer the case in court?— is he willing to answer the case in court? ., , case in court? two things. one is rison case in court? two things. one is prison 70 — case in court? two things. one is prison 70 is _ case in court? two things. one is prison 70 is callous - is prison 70 is callous and insensitive. that somebody should put their lives on the line because they are protesting the violation of their human rights, he should respect that. he doesn't. he does not respect human rights. my does not respect human rights. my husband has absolutely nothing within his means to protest the violation of his rights, the total disregard of the constitution and the rule of law. so he's put the body —— his body o