supranational competence of the eurasian economic union, the commission, but the decision of the eurasian economic union, and expressed in the decisions of the board of the supreme councilng on the country. if this decision is there, if this recommendation is advisory in nature, that is, each level, each governing body has its own types of decisions, and accordingly, if the decision is mandatory character. andrey viktorovich, what about the distinction between national and national bodies. the main distinction is, as alesya nikolaevna noted, this is, of course, an agreement on the union , the competence is clearly stated there, where this decision is made within the eu, and what is determined at the national level, and accordingly, the main positions are the agreement, in terms of customs - this is the customs code, which spells out the decision, the competence of the commission, where the competence of national legislation is, for example, here is the decision of the eurasian economic court union, they are mandatory for execution by residents of belarus; see, if this is a decision, a court decision, it is binding , that is, any business entity can go to court to protec