constitutional right and legal deontology in general, during this time i have been teaching from the supreme personional in his field. he is always interesting to come on couples with him. it is always interesting to talk with him. i love my job for the opportunity to communicate with students because in fact they teach us more than we teach them. before the war, i did not think of changing my profession on february 24, we started with a phone call from a relative who informed us that the war had started. they got together with their wife and went to the supermarket. they left the supermarket right at the exit. we heard an explosion a few minutes later. seconds, we saw a huge column of smoke rise in the area of ​​the ukrainian airport in the first days of the day, we did not understand how events would develop and we still made the decision that they had to leave home, we went to the hungarian border when he respected us and he cried and we cried and this they were crying on the roads. you see, you imagine that situation. tears are coming to my eyes because it was very difficult. to be honest , the

the government and the president personally, the supreme council of housing, the ministry of roads and the minister himself are among the governors who have entered with the same amount of seriousness and we hold weekly meetings. we are the inspection team of the provinces. being and i said development the reason for the implementation of the laws is that we are now facing land restrictions. there is no problem with the presence of the provincial officials, but it is good for the jihadi work for two to three months . the land and people are being handed over in the resolution ladies, in the next two months, the situation will be much better . the province of yazd province has already given 2000 to cancer there were four children, mashhad, only the name of the province, khorasan, razavi, 1120, bushehr, 1000, within about a week, this big figure means that in this province , the governor general director of roads and urban development is concerned, but hamedan province, so far, i have, for example , only 9 provinces, we have 64 we also have 97 provincial governors, for example, hormozgan

supreme court about what's going on in the west bank. and the prime minister, who has tried his own political personal interests to delegitimize the supremeh more than just majority rules. it's about values. it's about quality, and they're not willing to accept it. therefore, they want to -- of the gatekeepers, watch dogs in the government, supreme court, and so on. >> this is very personal for the prime minister, as you know. he's facing corruption charges. practically speaking, tzipi, how do you think this would play out? >> for six months, since they put this plan, what they called the judicial reforms on the table, we democrat 12r5i9ors have been in the streets, and they need to change this plan, and we succeeded in postponing for now part of this plan that is built on different things, not just one. he decided to push for the one, the parliament is going to -- i think now we forget continuing moving on with these reforms, but no way. the demonstrators on the streets -- on my way back from jerusalem, and later on my way back, really wonderful young people fighting for democracy, for values. so the good news might be that netanyahu, it

it would reinvent the litigation strategies that go into handling cases before the supreme court. if a personan trigger a review panel of lower court judges whose rulings it's the supreme court's job to review and in many instances reverse, it won't be long for this becomes law before it can be considered malpractice for attorneys practicing before the supreme court to fail to try to trigger through these aggressive mechanisms a recusal and cast even more doubt on the credibility and institutional representation of the supreme court of the united states. this really will change the game because in some of those the circumstances this would have become law they succeed. when lawyers go to trial, they go through the process of jury selection in many parts of the country only in texas they call it more dire i don't really understand the difference in pronunciation. each side gets their own opportunity to object. there are two kinds of challenges to a would be member of the jury panel. the prosecution, defense or as some type of conflict in either side to challenge that but the other kind of chal

supreme court. justice marshall recused himself because he was married to a person who was born in hawaii. that is a relational perceived conflict. thank you, mister chairman. >> senator blumenthal. >> thank you, mister chairman. now you know, whenever these issues of ethics are discussed, i can't help but think back to my days as a lock work for justice harry blackmon. he refused to have dinner with people who might conceivably, at some point in the future, have a case before the supreme court. even if he was going to pay for dinner. he refused to sit down with someone privately who might have a case before the supreme court. and we made fun of him a little, bit i have to admit, as law courts do, behind the back sometimes of the justices. but if he were somewhat more lax, i think the standards overall have been reduced for the conduct of supreme court justices. at the time, justice, douglass he was regarded as an outlier. because he wrote books. he wrote books. supreme court court justices don't write books. of course, every supreme court justice now writes books. so i think that we are d

we will vote yes on the summit. >> the supreme courtl ethics recusal transparency on which the person who leaked the draft decision and stopsd identify and publicly disclosed, i hope we can agree the leak of the majority draft opinion was unprecedented and indefensible breach of supreme court confidential. however, i amde disappointed the supreme court's own investigation by the chief justicega roberts and breach failed to uncover the source of the leak. i am especially disappointed the investigation did not include sworn interviews with justices themselves and have gone to every possible person of asking for sworn statements of the justices themselves. the situation saying justices in the statements can withhold the statements whether implicated or not resolved the source and as long as is the case, note no code of ethics. >> it makes perfect sense we would withhold this until i come forward with the information. is this something we want to know? is something the american people want to know so we should hold this bill even if it's signed into law, it would not be implemented until

, it would reinvent the litigation strategies that go into handling cases before the supreme court because if a person can just by filing a document or making an accusation trigger a review panel of lower court judges, lower court judges whose rulings it's the supreme court's job to review and in many instances reverse, it won't be long this becomes law before it will be considered malpractice for attorneys practicing before the supreme court to fail to try to trigger through these aggressive mechanisms a recusal. and cast even more doubt on the credibility and institutional reputation of the supreme court of the united states. i think it is very unfortunate. this really will change the game because in some of those circumstances of this were to become law they would succeed. especially in a politically charged case. they would figure out a way to get one of these panels of lower court judges to order the recusal of this or that justice in order to inflict their own carefully designed supreme court for that moment. when lawyers go to trial they go through the process of jury selection in most parts of

supreme court. so this is not personal to these justices.would imply to all justices whether appointed by a democratic president or a republican. as it should. it is a nonpartisan effort to establish the same basic rules of conduct for these public servants as the other federal judges face currently. i want to add one point that should be a part of this conversation. federal judges across the united states are not happy with what the supreme court is doing. the supreme court refuses to abide by the same standards of conduct as they are required to abide by. it is not making them happy at all. so i think we go forward with this for the good of the judiciary. we have the authority to do it. we have been chief justice roberts the opportunity over and over to take control of the situation. he hasn't done it. >> mr. chairman, are you confident that you have all 51 senators, the caucus of the democrats onboard for this? >> one step at a time. we are in the first round. we have laid the -- the democrats on the senate judiciary committee will suppor

judiciary committee considered legislation that would establish a code of rules for supreme court justices relating to their personal conduct outside of their official duties. watch tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span two. it is also on c-span now, our free app, or on c-span.org. >> washington journal. we involve you to discuss the latest issues and governance, politics, and public policy from washington to across the country. friday morning, we discussed the u.s. economy and biden economic policy. and the president of citizens for responsibility and ethics on former president trump facing indictment over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. washington journal. join the conversation 7:00 eastern friday morning on c-span, c-span now, or c-span.org. during his weekly news conference, house minority leader hakeem jeffries criticized republicans for giving robert f. kennedy, jr. a congressional platform during a house judiciaries subcommittee hearing. this is about 30 minutes. mr. jeffries: good morning, everyone. at the beginning of this congress, as house democrats we made clear we would extend the hand of partner

your personal labs, these conservative justices clearly will not restrain themselves from rolling out matters that really should be a matter of public policy. what about legal precedent? the supremecades of its own opinions that have held a key civil rights policy. is a person's race illegitimate factor in determining places? the court says yes. >> federal leaders are having general approval of such programs. >> tonight, the supreme court has spoken. and affirmative action is here to stay, at least for now. at least in some form. the >> court is ruled by 5 to 4 vote that diversity justifies the raising of admissions. >> the court said colleges and universities can continue to use in their admissions. >> a big boost given to college admissions, upholding the program at the university of texas of austin, formative action makes classes more diverse, and educational plus. >> i guess that doesn't matter anymore. what about the other facts. shouldn't they -- when it comes to changing the history of lgbtq plus americans? the website designer who just provided a letter as evidence that a game and had contacted her to make a gay wedding website. but, this is a big but, it turns out that l

to thank you for the importance of the national housing movement, the president's personal participation in the supreme housing council a prominent example was yesterday when the governors hospitalized patients in the face for the government, the housing debate and the national housing movement are of great importance , for this reason, the housing council meeting was held weekly in the province from the very beginning until the announcement for a period of four years that nearly 62 thousand units should be converted into a single unit in the semnan province. an article at the beginning of the functions of our department in kerman province, you have two general administrations, the general administration of roads and urban development of the province, the general administration of roads and urban development in the east of the province and the new city, ivanki said that the amount of land in the country was related to the field of the ministry of roads and urban development of semnan, 2837 hectares of land needed for it is big in 44 years for 62 thousand residential units in the 34 years of 2837, fortu

judiciary committee considered legislation that would accomplish a code of rules for supreme court justices relating to their personalr official duties at 8:00 eastern on c-span 2 and available on our free mobile video app or online at c-span. org. >> c-span's ""washington journal" a live forum to discuss the latest issues in government, politics and public policy, from policy to across the country. coming up friday morning, u.s. economy and the biden administration and economic policies and president of citizens for responsibility and ethics with former president trump facing indictment to overturn the 2020 election. c-span joining in the conversation live on saturday more than, c-spannow or c-span. org. >> healthy democracy doesn't just look like this, it

supreme court and seek relief. here, or it's a fake case according to the story. it never, there is no controversy. this person in any way shape or form. what i think this means is the attorney general should be going back to the united states supreme court now, it's a tragedy that they did by this information out before, but there is a procedure to seek re-here rain, and to get this decision struck in from the books. i think that's what should happen here. you know, the current chief justice and the controversy requirements. for the most important of reasons, otherwise, the u.s. supreme court can be drawn into any number of controversies that are illegal cases. you know, just imaginary fights between people. that's not what the courts about. >> a little secret, that's part of the plan. , melissa, thank you so much for being with us. you are not going anywhere. we've got more for you, coming up. we're going to be right back after this quick break, with more conversation with neil. ation with neil. with skyrizi to treat my skin and joints, i'm getting into my groove. ♪(uplifting music)♪ along with significantly

of the general policies of the system regarding elections , the opinion of the supreme monitoring board, if we limit a personcome in 2 singles, the participant in the election the parliament and election customs are compatible with the parliament and the representatives agree that different political presences in the 405 election justice helps. legal and opinions. final in the coming days and past meetings, he removed the tehran genital elections commission and said that in the future, an urgent plan for the issue was examined separately to the parliament and the commission, and with yesterday's opinion, he announced that proportional elections were removed according to article 53. it will be established in the coming days and this research will be returned to the table of the representatives of the parliament and where will it reach regarding the right choice. we are in the general election policies. parliament election in the middle of august, let's start the initial pre-registration from mr. doctor. seven years have passed in the year 1995, the general policies of the elections were announced by the supre

recently on june 9 this year , after almost 10 years, the judge of the supreme court of the netherlands committed the museum to alara personreturn the scythian gold to ukraine and here is honor and praise in the supreme court of the netherlands and the second glaring moment about which i want to say that as a result of the agreement during the visit to ukraine of the minister of culture of france rime a budmala in february 23rd of the year at the beginning of may this year luv took 16 works of art for safekeeping in order to protect them from the war. these are our exhibits. these are our partners who undertake to store in one way or another in their museums. in particular, those values, these collections of museum exhibits that were collected in ukraine were ukrainian. russian federation is trying to steal them in every possible way and act like barbarians, that is why we support this draft law, thank you, thank you, please nestor ivanovich shufrych and this is the final speech, after that we will vote dear colleagues thank you dear colleagues, this bill and accepting it is absolutely convinced that we must proceed from t

>> god bless the supreme court, david. the person look at is the idea of taking money from one person and giving it to the other is criminal. so you are going to go to a plumber and make him pay for a college education for a doctor. that does not make sense. my husband and i had to pay down his student loans, it took years. we do not want someone else getting a pass. we did not mind having to pay it but everybody should have to pay it. the supreme court may do something wrong they made it right now biden was a double down and do it again for you have to question whether he is just trying to buy votes by paying off the student loans. david: were former ambassador to the land. i want to go globally janet yellen is in china. apparently the administration wants to try to make a nice to the chinese -- mcniff kept a lot of trade restrictions put in live from janet to stop they would insurance upon them. think that is the direction biden is going and going with china? you think is good or bad? >> china is preparing themselves for war with a

how would any person like it? the supreme court is not worth it. no job is worth it. i am not here for that. i'm here for my name, my family, my life in my integrity. i think something is dreadfully wrong anyone in this this is not a kilo room there is an fbi investigation. this is not a opportunity to talk about difficult matter. in a closed environment. this circuit is a national disgrace for my perspective at the black american this is a high tech lynching. >> that was 32 years ago. i am reminded, as i get older, that not everyone has had the same experience of memory that i have. that was one of the searing memories that i've had about the supreme court confirmation hearings. i think that provides an important context for today's hearing. the truth is that, as senator kennedy said, starting, perhaps, with the board of a nation, members of the united states supreme court, when they have been nominated for the job have been subjected to relentless campaigns of harassment and intimidation. which, as justice alito recently pointed out, can lead not just to contemporar

we have a supreme court whose final decision of the year was based on a person who was made up. a person who does not exist. the republicans in the supreme court decided, as justice sonia soleimani or says in her dissent, that, quote, a particular kind of business, the open to the public, has a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. the court does so for the first time in its history, by issuing this new license to discriminate in a case brought by a company that seeks to deny same-sex couples the full and equal enjoyment of its services, the immediate, symbolic effect of the decision is to mark gays and lesbians for second class status. in this, way the decision itself inflicts a kind of stick my arm, on top of any harm caused by denials of service. the opinion of the court is, quite literally, i noticed that reads, some services may be denied to same-sex couples. it was just the day before the supreme court issued that decision, thanks to melissa grant, reporting in the republic, that the same-sex couple named in the lawsuit that reached the unit

to your personalize these conservative justices clearly will not restrain themselves from ruling on matters that should be a matter of public policy. so what about legal precedent, the supremen affirmative action in colleges, casting aside decades of its own opinions, but upheld a key civil rights era policy. >> it's a person race eligible to factor in determining chances for placement in schools. the court said yes. >> the federal leaders are interpreting the coat decision as a general approval of such program. >> tonight the supreme court has spoken. they've ruled affirmative action is here to stay. at least for now and at least in some. form >> of the courts ruled by a 5 to 4 vote that achieving student body diversity justifies the use of race in admissions. >> today the court said colleges and universities may continue to use it and they're. admissions >> the court today gave a big boost to affirmative action and college admissions. it upheld the program at the university of texas at austin. and said that affirmative action makes classes more diverse and educational -- >> so, i guess president -- doesn't matter anymore. what about the actual facts. shouldn't they matter

want to go more mendez as a judge on the nation's highest court, the federal supreme tribunal, which is investigating the person, the attack was yours is difficult to make sure. yeah. as it is some sort of quiet here as a resource for them, for all that seemed also might have been seen quench fuzzy image, really stories dancer don't. what do you know? good throwing it in the rooms for, but it was the right. it's files. weeks of unrest encouraged by both so narrow and his supporters demonstrators erected on the road blocks and set up encampments around the army base is demanded military intervention getting through there's so many times i have been doing go for just are usually one quarter shots. their present age so far more than a 1000 people have been arrested and charged in connection with the attack, including both scenarios, just this minister who is in charge of brazilian security on the day of the riot. both on i didn't want to hit, for example, i'm jasa for them across the as you don't. but as of vivian, one mail to jude him. but you want to have your papers on the little side. you don't have to mom's g

mentioned the russian, well, his words sounded and the condemnation of vladimir putin as a person who will be the supremenlisted men are running a military company poorly, tell us how the device would shout, i am turning to putin, the war must go to the destruction of ukraine, that is, to the complete destruction of the state , or i now have to stop it. it is necessary to get a foothold, we will defend it in their article in april, it was brought directly and formulated it, and this is the central theme of the coup, it is necessary to say that the weight of the question was broken, because they are what is this ? far chose a personal object, and well, the question remains and it remains , as it were, and is the most important thing of the day, if viewed from the kremlin's side. now i have a view. putin does not answer yet, we see, uh, and they see it. it seems to me now that all the experts military and political observers from different countries see, as it were, a continuation of the trend, that is, from one country , it is clear that the kremlin is strengthening its turnover, and at the same time loud

well, the words already sounded in his head, and the condemnation of vladimir putin as a person who will be the supreme leader in the military enlistment poorly leads a military company, tell us, as if shouting, i am turning to putin, this war must go to the destruction of ukraine, that is, to the complete destruction as the state or i now, we need to stop everything , we need to consolidate, we will defend it in their article in april, the month was brought exactly so directly and formulated it, and this is the central the topic of the bunch must be told that the weight of the question is broken because they are what this is. let him be brought to the middle of this, he could not prove that he understood that he chose a personal object very far away, and well, the question remains, and it remains, as it were, and is the most important in the fate of the day if you look at it from the side of the kremlin, now i have to introduce putin until he answers, we see, er, and they see it. it seems to me now that all the experts, military and political observers of different countries see, er, a continuation of

course of three months . the words also sounded the condemnation of vladimir putin as a person who will be the supreme leader of the armed forces, who leads the military company badly , tell us how the woman would shout, i turn to putin, the war must go to destruction ukraine, that is, until the complete destruction of the state, or i now, it is necessary to stop it, it is necessary to gain a foothold, they will defend it, and in his article in april, he brought it exactly so directly and formulated it, and this is the central theme of the coup . let privozhn not be able to prove that in the middle of this he understood that he had chosen a personal object very far away, and the question remained, and he somehow remains and is the most important in the fate of the day, if viewed from the kremlin's side. now i have i will introduce putin until he answers . and the loud voices continue to sound, and in fact, it is dmitry medvedev with his own only to write a russian newspaper, and the professor of the higher school of economics, and one of the main russian foreign policy experts today, to roganov, who w

person. let's start with the supreme court's affirmative action decision. want to read clarence thomas' opinion. he said, quote, individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments. what matters is not the barriers that they face, but how they choose to confront them and their race is not to blame for everything good or bad that happens in their lives. and ketanji brown jackson, she said, deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life, although formal race-linked legal barriers are gone, race still matters to the lived experiences of all americans in innumerable ways and today's ruling makes things worse, not better. who do you agree with? >> well, race still does matter, and that's why this case still allows race to be used whether adjudicating whether or not a student should be able to go to college. the reality is, with or without affirmative action, we've done a terrible job of preparing our black and brown kids to be able to go to college. when you look at the number of black and brown kids that are graduati

i think the problem with the supreme court is, it is my personal feeling of the three branches of governmente supreme court is the most powerful. they can change any law they do not like. they can change laws of the state, they can change the decision of the president, they can change the decision made by the senate, they can change the decision made by congress. anything. they completely controlled the united states. i would like to say to the people who have given the supreme court an a+ strictly for the constitution, i would like them to tell me where in the constitution does it say that the supreme court can choose the president of the united states. they are all powerful. there is no recourse to the supreme court. anything they want to do, anything they want to change, any law they want to make and change, the country has to live with it. whether the country likes it or not. there are nine people who are therefore a lifetime, and to control everything anybody, the congress, the president, the senate, any state, anywhere, they can change that law. host: appreciate your call. let's go to

i think the problem with the supreme court is, it is my personal feeling of the three branches of governmentthe supreme court is the most powerful. they can change any law they do not like. they can change laws of the state, they can change the decision of the president, they can change the decision made by the senate, they can change the decision made by congress. anything. they completely controlled the united states. i would like to say to the people who have given the supreme court an a+ strictly for the constitution, i would like them to tell me where in the constitution does it say that the supreme court can choose the president of the united states. they are all powerful. there is no recourse to the supreme court. anything they want to do, anything they want to change, any law they want to make and change, the country has to live with it. whether the country likes it or not. there are nine people who are therefore a lifetime, and to control everything anybody, the congress, the president, the senate, any state, anywhere, they can change that law. host: appreciate your call. let's go t

jonathan: this is another supreme court decision that hits me personally. affirmative action, i would not be sitting in this seat, i would not be with david brooks, i would not have gotten the great education i got. the thing i found most offensive about this decision is the foundation of this so-called colorbnd constitution, that affirmative action flew in the face of the framers's colorblind constitution, which is a fallacy. which i think justice jackson did a superb job, i'm sure the justices know the history, but showing to the american people, outlining to them in a great synopsis of our tortured american history when it comes to race, why something as modest as affirmative action was necessary. once again, you have a supreme court which i think, between the two decisions we are talking about right now and the next one, student loan forgiveness, the american people -- they will start looking at the supreme court not as judges sitting on high and being the referee, but as political actors who don't have the interests of the majority of the american peop

supreme court. it has the final say on how to read below and personally, it's the last line of defense for democracy. when all else fails. in the year 2000, then republican candidate, george w bush, the democrats. i'll go only off to the supreme court for you to stop the florida recount or say, effectively hunting verse the prisoner's team together a winning goal issue here tonight, there was accepted by al gore immediately. while i strongly disagree with the court's decision, i accepted you can't imagine donald trump doing something like that. nobody can, with the front runner for the republican presidential candidacy, who can't be trusted to accept the election results. public confidence in the supreme court is more crucial than ever with that is waning. the latest poem shows a soft dropped from 60 percent of americans who said they had a large degree of trust in the supreme court a year ago to just 39 percent. now, at the moment of ever depot, a political divisions because it is experiencing a decline in public trust that trust is particularly important. now, as many fee that the 2024 presidentia

in the eyes of the monarchists, a menshevik means a person who shares the socialist view, of course. this discredited sergeev in their eyes. supremeer of russia on march 3, 1919, the city of omsk , i hereby command all places and persons to fulfill the unquestioning and exactly all legal requirements of the judicial investigator for especially important cases, nikolai sokolov, and to assist him in the fulfillment of the tasks assigned to him, at my will responsibility for the production of preliminary investigations on the murder of the emperor of his family and the grand dukes admiral kolchak as the supreme ruler of russia, the head of the provisional russian government, admiral kolchak, understood that this case should be taken out of the city of yekaterinburg to give them an all-russian scale, and therefore, probably, this was one of the reasons. why did a conscientious professional investigator transfer sergei’s cases to kololov for conducting investigative proceedings nikolai alekseevich sokolov graduated from the penza the second male gymnasium, then the faculty of law of kharkov university in 1911 was appointed as a researc

oppression, poverty and discrimination, he was a member of the supreme council of the cultural revolution, and further added that if a person looks at the council with an emotional and emotional approach, he sees it as full of emotional realities that these two approaches are combined in ashura muharram and hosseini movement exist, but another emotional aspect is needed it is needless to say, step by step, moment by moment, what do you see from the enemy's side of cruelty and cruelty, and what do you see from this side of oppression and suffering, in the same great secretary, dignity and resistance in bearing this and all these two intellectual and emotional dimensions are also purple. fast hair under the umbrella of insult. how many more times did the president of russia say that we are trying to make the african continent play an essential role in the new and multi-polar world order ? this agreement was implemented because of western sanctions against russia's grain and fertilizer exports during the implementation of the agreement russian president also said that we are ready to support poor countries. in the next three m

and so we who care about the supreme court, whether professionally person or both, should be paying more attention. what happens in these in able, often inaccessible rulings. so i was curious after reading the book about the will bode coining of this term, and i went back and read the paper that he wrote in, he coined the term and he explained what he talked about and what i was clearer on as a result was that we're really talking about two things. we're talking about. on the one hand, orders and vote says that one of the problems with these orders, which as you say, are banal, many of the times but they lack transparency. right. we've come to expect. the court they at least tell us this is the thinking, see signed opinions, all that these orders not visible to us lack transparency. but then there were these reversals right summary reversals become part of the practice of of the court and that's more complicated. can you talk about those please. sure. i mean, so i guess the shortest way of describing it is even though we spend most of our talking about the merits docket, the merits docke

personal gain. but the same, sadly, is not true for the nine justices across the street. unlike every other federal official, supreme court justices are not bound by a code of ethical conduct. let me repeat that. unlike every other federal official, the nine supreme court justices are not bound by a code of ethical conduct. they are the most powerful judges in the entire nation and yet they are not required to follow even the most basic ethical standards. it's time for that to change. the highest court in the land should not have the lowest ethical standards. tomorrow the senate judiciary committee which i chair will consider legislation i have joined senator whitehouse in introducing. known as the supreme court ethics and recusal transparency act. our legislation would require the supreme court to adopt an enforceable code of conduct. it would also add new recusal and transparency requirements to federal law. and these requirements would apply to every justice no matter which president of which political party appointed them or their ideological views notwithstanding. i wish this legislation were unnecessary. the f

in the navy, the president and the supreme commander-in-chief will personally receive the parade, the signal for its start will be given in one gulp salute division from the peter and paul fortress, which is now on your screens at exactly 11:00 moscow time on the neva , will be the first to begin moving against the sabotage boat. they will carry the flags of the russian ministry of defense and the naval flag, and now the admiralteyskaya embankment, where the central grandstand is located , my colleague alexei petrov alexei good morning. happy holidays, i'm sure. impression you already have a lot share with us. yes tatyana good morning, of course, happy holidays, great impressions in a special rhythm lives today from st. petersburg. the inhabitants of the city also gather here. actually, it's a holiday. of course it will be. quite rightly noted not only for sailors, but for everyone who now feels this absolutely incredible rhythm. let's see what 's going on in our water area. not we, not you, not you at all. i myself will say right today with a needle and special and lucky with the wea

person watching this? >> i >> well, i think yes. i and i also that it's important what the supreme court did today on top of some other decision nothey made, whether it's epa case last year with the major questions doctrine, what you'rully is e sg now, thankfully, is a narrowing of what these unilateral executive actions, what the impact it can have or the broader administrative statr e. our founders created a country that you spread out authority. you had separation of powers. wt these kinds of decisions are supposed to be decided . the people's branch, the article one branch congress. because guess what? you caannd then them there. you can send them home. you can send them back. these unelectendsed bureaucrats, you know, are exercising immense authority and nobody ever voted for them. and so you've got that piece of it, and then you've got this unilateral executive action. look, tammy, i think it's important. remember now the the playbook was set with covid, declare an emergency, you know, aggregate power and control. they did it with covid. they to do it now with climate issues.

all, i don't think that's going to work in this instance because women -- this feels personal to women. the supremetaken away a right that women have counted on for 50 years. women do not want the government telling them what to do with their own bodies and in their relationships with their families, with their own faith. the government doesn't have a primary role in that instance, and women aren't going to forget this. i remember being on "meet the press" after the dobbs decision, and i remember the republican panelists touted a poll that said everyone is talking about this abortion decision and peoply really aren't paying attention to it, it won't matter in the mid-terms. and i we looked at each going he's wrong. he doesn't understand women care about this. they understand it. and women understand many times you don't even know you're pregnant at six weeks. it is just the same as missouri law which makes it illegal to have abortion in all instances from the moment of conception. >> i think it's notable that donald trump who's so far sort of the only person who's raised a red flag around the abort

person. let's start with the supreme court's decision.um of their unique experiences, challenges and accomplishments. what matters is not the barrieris that face and how they choose to confront them and their race is not to blame for anything good or bad that happens in their life and ketanji brown jackson said deeming race irrell vent in law does not make it so in life. race-linked barriers are gone, race still matters to the lived experiences of americans in inupperable ways and it makes it matter. >> race still does matter and that allows rice to be used whether or not a student should be able to go to college. with or without affirmative action, we've done a terrible job of preparing our black and brown kids to be able to go to college. when you look at the number of black and brown kids that are graduating high school and not going to college, those numbers are terrible and we've been failing them in making sure they have the skill sets and the schools they need to be successful when they're there. also many of these universities why

administration, well, in his guts, there was also a condemnation of vladimir putin as a person who will still be in the supremeive committee, and he leads a military company poorly, say i am turning to putin, the war must go to the destruction of ukraine, that is, to the complete destruction of the state, or i now, we need to stop it , we need to consolidate, we will defend this and in his article in april he brought it exactly so directly and formulated it, and this is the central theme of the coup , it is necessary to say that the weight of the question was broken because they what is it? object and well, the question remains and it remains, as it were, and is the most important thing in a lucky day, if you look at it from the kremlin's side. now i have to introduce putin until he answers, we see er and they see it. it seems to me now that all the experts , observers, military and political are different country sees, as it were, the continuation of both trends, that is, from one country, it is clearly visible that the kremlin is strengthening the turnover and at the same time they are sounding and continuin

supreme court. period. by the, way the person who interviewed alito for that piece was david b. attorney who, i kid you not, is about to appear before him in a case at the supreme court. it is the biggest possible middle finger that he could send to congress, and to any american that believes supreme court justices should not vote with impunity above the law. joining us now to discuss, this is mark joseph stern, a senior writer on the court for slate. thank you for joining me. what do you think justice alito is trying to do here with this wall street journal interview? as he got a strategy here? is he just trying to provoke debate for the democrats to subpoena or impeach him? was it a show of strength, you can't touch me? >> i think justice alito genuinely enjoys trolling liberals. clearly a consumer of twitter type news and information. he clearly sees the reaction on the left whenever he makes a statement like this. he seems to love it. what he said in the interview goes so far beyond the pale of any known standard of ethics. it's hard to know where to start. you have a justice

newest history of russia, he passed for the seventh time, he accepted it and personally congratulated the crews. vladimir putin supremein-chief noted that already this year the russian fleet will be replenished with 30 ships of various classes, so our country , as the president said, is confidently implementing the large-scale tasks of the national maritime policy and consistently increasing the power of its fleet, this power was shown today at the main parade. it involved 33 warships and boats, four submarines of the baltic north pacific fleet and the caspian flotilla, as well as eight sailing ships. among them, including the largest sailing ship in the world bark sedov and a sailboat the world they were placed on the great kronstadt roadstead, and on the niva, the patrol ship , not intimidating, became the flagship from which they controlled the passage of the parade. the richest and glorious history of the russian fleet began 327 years ago with the decree of peter the great to have sea vessels, and this year three more times. the jubilee 240th anniversary of the black sea fleet, 320th baltic fleet and 290th norther

supreme court. it has the final say on how to read below and personally, it's the last line of defense for democracy. when all else fails. in the year 2000, then republican candidate source w bush be the democrats. i'll go only off to the supreme court for you to stop the florida recount or say, effectively hunting verse the presidency together, a winning coefficient here tonight. it was accepted by al gore immediately. while i strongly disagree with the court's decision, i accepted you can't imagine donald trump doing something like that. nobody can, with the fund thrown out for the republican presidential candidacy, who can't be trusted to accept the election results. public confidence in the supreme court is more crucial than ever with that is waning. the latest poem shows a soft dropped from 60 percent of americans who said they had a large degree of trust in the supreme court a year ago to just 39 percent. now, at the moment of ever depot political divisions, the course is experiencing a decline in public trust that trust is particularly important. now, as many is that the 2020 for presidential

day, americans are again arguing about racism, after the supreme court declared illegal the benefits for black university applicants to admit a person to study only because of the color of his skin, this is racism, the american judges considered, but, however, the participants movements for the rights of blacks until recently, who opposed any discrimination. now they say in the issue of benefits skin color should matter in shades of american racism aleksey veselovsky understood this story began back in 2014, when several applicants, and by origin sued harvard university, teenagers passed the exams perfectly. however, they were all hacked to death, the admissions committee raised the history of admissions, and it turned out that at harvard, in fact , there were quotas for admission on a racial basis , blacks were preferred for 9 years. this case walked through the american courts and now the u.s. supreme court has ruled that skin color should no longer be a factor in college admissions. many people mistakenly believe that affirmative action policies allow unqualified students to have an advantage over others. this is not how college