returning to god, one reason why there was a historical dispute, and the divine nature of the supreme powerthis is because and what is required here, if you want the ability to integrate knowledge, the correct approach to the world, that is, god, and if you want the will to win and wisdom, and i’m absolutely not up to it from experts not because they are bad stupid, but it’s just their responsibilities. it's not their job. and it seems to me that this is our task. give the recommendations we able to defend our points of view, but if you want to have a healthy modesty in assessing the actions of the supreme power, especially when we do not have ready-made recipes, how to do it better? how to do it faster and how to achieve those results. and, if you want with the necessary level of security, alexander is your short answer. i believe that a person who really thinks, he is responsible for the results and product of his thinking to everyone , or it is something completely different, therefore, i think that this is the responsibility of the thinker subject for the consequences of his statements

let's resist and not let the united ranks of the muslims of the world become one the supreme power ofully is able to separate, the supreme leader said, if they deal with us , we will deal with them with more severity, and the enemy is serious in his enmity and in his planning, and in confronting the enemy. "we are very serious," zainab soleimani, the head of justice of fars province, said that less than 40 days after the order of the head of the judiciary, the problem of issuing ownership documents in the residential areas of abadeh tashk, the center of bakhtegan city , was solved after 40 years, and the people received 5,000 ownership documents. mr. mousavi said that people's properties were received the mistake of the national lands was registered and the provincial judiciary, after dealing with this case, issued an order for the issuance of ownership documents . the last stage of ownership documents in abadeh tashk city, bakhtegan city was handed over to the applicants. it has been completed and handed over to the owners, when the people became much more comfortable, and in the pas

but the new little cubs, the supreme court power as to why the town government decisions based on reasonableness. now the issue is coming to a head of game as the supreme court is to make a ruling on its own site. the outcome was that ruling could have found reaching effect. so the country has never faced such a slide to learn risk, such that divides within the general population. but if the quote would strike down below the reaction from the right wing a, you know, electorate and general public, the would be, i think, very, very strong, very angry. and we would see, i mean, even greater on a, you know, societal on rest and be seen until now the government and it's supposed to remain on the 2 thousands came out to these pro wrestling protest in front of the quote last week. this is main job, the liberty demonstration. these people have come out to show that simple told and you did to reform at the press the government to continue with the plan. they say the supreme court has bought too much power at all too often act as a hand break against the wishes of a democratically elected government to us

excesses further did not take place on january 28, 1919, simon petliura, but the forces of the supreme powero to obey, there were extremely few, these troops were needed at the front, but after petlyura got the opportunity to tame this otamany, to tame this otamany , to tame these otaman individual field commanders who did not obey central state power , he did it without hesitation, and the same chieftains physically, including the same chieftain semesenko , were physically removed by order of petlyura, this fact is proven with this the name of mykola chebotaryov, the head of the petlyur counter-intelligence army, that is, one of the already large armies of the ukrainian people's republic, is associated with the name of mykola chebotaryov, there was a jewish assault camp, assault squads , what kind of pogroms can we talk about that were lost or somehow supported by the ukrainian state to hand over to the ministry of jewish affairs for immediate preliminary assistance to the jewish population of the city of zhytomyr affected by the pogroms, the sum of 2 million rubles and to the jewish popula

council will create a completely new, supreme body of legislative power in russia. sounds in generally not bad. even to some extent reasonable on the surface, there was a small problem , president yeltsin did not have the authority to call such elections, president yeltsin did not have the authority to change the entire system of power, and if he had any doubts about this, then in general -they should have disappeared after literally immediately after... this decree, decree 1400, the constitutional court of russia spoke, its chairman was valery zorkin, who is still the chairman now, and the constitutional court stated that the decree had no legal force, after which the supreme council announced the impeachment of yeltsin, and brought him to power as interim president, when you saw yeltsin announcing this decree, was it some kind of surprise, shock for you, or was it you did you expect everything? this means that before these events, about a month ago, it was august, they brought me approval of draft presidential decrees, three decrees, i categorically...

but the new law codes, the supreme court powers to either to and government decisions based on reasonableness. now the issue is coming to a head of game, as the supreme court proposed to make a ruling on its own fate. the outcome of that ruling could have found reaching effect. so the country has never faced such a slide to learn risk, such that divides within the general population. if the quote would strike down the low, the reaction from the right wing a you know, electorate and general public, the would be, uh, i think very, very strong, very angry. and uh, we would see uh any even prey to on a, you know, the sites on rest the machine until now. the government added support has remained understood. thousands came out to these probably were from protest in front of the court last week. this is main job, the liberty demonstration. these people come out to show the support full that you additional reform at the press, the government to continue with the plan. they say there's a frame, what has about too much power at all too often acts as a hand break. i gave the wishes of a democratically e

congress determines the size of the supreme court legislative balances judicial the president has veto power over the bill sent to him by congress executive checks legislative. the president can propose laws. he thinks need to be passed executive balances legislative. the supreme court has power to declare unconstitutional any law passed by congress judicial checks legislative. congress must approve many of the appointments made by the president legislative checks executive. congress appropriates money for the executive departments legislative balances executive that's the way the constitution balances all three branches to keep them working together as a team. it's an important principle of our government. by the time i got this far on my story the gang was beginning to see how important this business of teamwork is to every american citizen. and to realize how far ahead the founding fathers were looking and guaranteeing that nobody in our federal government would ever get too much power in setting it up so that the three federal branches would have to work together for the good of all the

and what the supreme court was listening to is arguments about its own power, about what the supremeourt does, and whether it should continue being able to strike down laws as it used to be able to do, until this law was passed in july. now what happened in july was that the israeli parliament, the knesset that is now controlled by benjamin netanyahu's right-wing coalition, they passed as law that strips the supreme court of its previous ability to nullify government actions that the supreme court deems unreasonable. this law was an amendment the a basic law. it's the closest israel has to a constitution is a series of basic laws. the supreme court has never before nullified or struck down a basic law. but that is what they're potentially considering doing as a result of this hearing today. the government was represented actually by private counsel. and their argument was that the supreme court should actually have no authority in reviewing basic law, and that should rest with the people and the people that they democratically elect to the israeli parliament, that the supreme court s

the last month, he has been doing exactly the opposite and wants to take away some of his powers from the supremert. by our executive power of the government, there is no one. this is a master of situational games. he is a politician who very carefully read books about tom, what should a politician be, on the one hand, a politician should be a visionary and a prophet, you know. a man who represents his nations and that bright future. where is he going and on the other hand he is a defender , that is, he promises a bright future from the other side and scares us from time to time eh, with the enemies of iran, eh, walls, eh, inside the israeli complex situation, and here it balances on hope and our fear of ignorance, this is the negativity, eh, the rest of everything , all attempts by other talented politicians to gain a foothold in the political field in israel, you want and look, eh michael watch очень входно вопрос here we know that a million people, if i'm onyshayus, i think i'm not wrong, people are going out on the streets protesting against this reform of the court, which is being carried ou

unfortunately, this is what happens when people have supreme power, they control the legislature andold him accountable. it is long overdue in texas. >> this is not a conscientious decision for a lot of people. there is a packed call defend liberty run by age jonathan stickel and who has said, quote, anyone who votes against ken paxton in this impeachment is risking their entire political career and we will make sure that is the case. of course, the wee is ten, cruz donald trump, ronny jackson who used to be the white house physician. there are people saying if you impeach ken paxton, your political career as a republican in texas is over. it's a racket. >> no, i've got one better. guess what, the same pro paxton group you're talking about all of a sudden they decided to start giving money to the lieutenant of governor texas dan patrick. in june. these people are so unbelievable. let's set a billion bucks to the lieutenant governor. so we can get him on our side. that's how unbelievable they are. let me tell you something. those threats are actually not going to matter. the bottom li

netanyahu reaffirming the historic alliance despite concerns over a proposal to curb the israeli supreme court's powers that critics say threatens democracy. >> upholding democratic values that lie at the heart of our partnership including checks and balances in our testimonies. >> reporter: president biden also meeting with the leader of brazil, another democracy at a crossroads just as ukraine's president, volodymyr zelenskyy, made an urgent plea to save democracy in his nation. >> translator: ukrainian soldiers now are doing, at the expense of their block. >> reporter: president zelenskyy scolding the u.n. security council for not doing more to punish russia as support for funding ukraine's fight begins to falter. zelenskyy is preparing to head to washington to make his appeal directly to law makeers to grant president biden's request for billions more in aid. house republicans questioning the president's priorities. >> i've watched the president do a supplemental that's concerned about ukraine and concerned about disasters, but he avoids the border. >> reporter: that is central to government fundin

on there for 37 weeks prompted by proposed judicial reforms that would curb the country's supreme court powers. back here in the bay, the prime minister will leave in about an hour to head to the east coast. later on this week he'll address the u.n. general assembly in new york and meet with president biden. >>> almost all cvs pharmacies in the bay area offering the latest covid-19 vaccine and if it's not in stock now, it's coming on a rolling basis. cvs recommends making appointments for the vaccine online, but walk-ins are welcome. they're offering the shot to everyone 18 months and older. >> it's still very prominent. covid-19 is still very prominent in the u.s., especially the strains that are going on now is what we're targeting with these new vaccines. >> according to the cdc it, is safe to get a covid and flu shot in the same visit. >>> the red and gold won 30-23 down in l.a. matt lively joins us to break it all down. >> reporter: the 49ers started the year 2-0, both dubs on the road and it has the locker room feeling pretty good. how are you doing? >> phenomenal. just won on a sunday i

, reaffirming the historic alliance, despite concerns over a proposal to curb the israeli supreme court's powers that critics say threatens democracy. >> democrating vc valc valu that the center >> reporter: also meeting with the leader of brazil, just as ukraine's president, volodymyr zelenskyy, made an urgent plea to save democracy in his nation. [ speaking in a non-english language ] >> translator: ukrainian soldiers now are doing at the expense of their blood what the u.n. security council should do by its voting. >> reporter: president zelenskyy scolding the u.n. security council for not doing more to punish russia as funding for ukraine starts to falter he is heading to washington to make his appeal directly to lawmakers, to grant president biden's request for billions more in aid. house republicans questioning the president's priorities >> i've watched the president do a supplemental, this concern about ukraine and disasters, but he avoids the border >> reporter: that tension central to the standoff over government funding, as gop members dig in over conservative policy provisions and ste

its scrawny neck and remind it of the limits of its power and to have it acknowledge instead the supreme powerf the sovereign individual. magna carta was the consequence of one of those times when an overmighty king had to be reminded that, like everyone else, he was subject to the law of the land. king john wriggled on that hook, but it was swallowed deep. parliament would prefer magna carta did not exist, but it does exist and always will. and it burns the state like holy water thrown in a demon's face. if the state could destroy magna carta, unmake it , then it surely would. unmake it, then it surely would. the state seeks to dismiss it to paper over it, to distract us and have us look the other way to persuade us. the great charter's power is gone long ago. like that of a battery run flat, but deep down, the state knows the law of the land. still thrums with power over them. the fact, the inconvenient truth is that the law of the land is older than parliament. magna carta , which only restated and carta, which only restated and reaffirmed the ancient common law law, was sealed before parli

its scrawny neck and remind it of the limits of its power and to have it acknowledge instead the supreme powerf the sovereign individual. magna carta was the consequence of one of those times when an overmighty king had to be reminded that, like everyone else, he was subject to the law of the land. king john wriggled on that hook, but it was swallowed deep. parliament would prefer magna carta did not exist, but it does exist and always will. and it burns the state like holy water thrown in a demon's face. if the state could destroy magna carta, unmake it , then it surely would. unmake it, then it surely would. the state seeks to dismiss it to paper over it, to distract us and have us look the other way to persuade us. the great charter's power is gone long ago. like that of a battery run flat, but deep down, the state knows the law of the land. still thrums with power over them. the fact, the inconvenient truth is that the law of the land is older than parliament. magna carta , which only restated and carta, which only restated and reaffirmed the ancient common law law, was sealed before parli

and what the supreme court was listening to is arguments about its open power, about what the supreme court does and whether it should continue being able to strike down laws as it used to be able to do until this law was passed in july. what happened in july, the israeli parliament now controlled by the right wing coalition, they passed a law that strips the streak of its previous ability to nullify government actions that the supreme court deems unreasonable. the law was an amendment to a basic law, closest thing that it has to a constitution. the supreme court has never before nullified or struck down a basic law. but that is what they are potentially considering doing as a result of this hearing today. the government was represented actually by private counsel and their argument was that the supreme court should actually have no authority in reviewing basic law and that should rest with the people and who in the people that they democratically elect to the israeli parliament, that the supreme court should have essentially no power to be able to change the basic laws if they are pa

government has passed, pops with all the holes that will limit the supreme court's powers. because he's been imposed in the rocky city of critical culture, one protested was killed and several others injured. security forces dispersed arrival demonstrations by coalition. our residents of the kind of the strong democratic parties return to the political davita law without the why this following developments from the capital in baghdad, violence include cook, the multi ethnic cities, residents took the discrete sad today. good, one side rips and if need to come in on the other good cook about 265 kilometers north of baghdad has long been at the heart of dispute between the rocks. assembled between them is code this region, and the authorities in the capital. to start above that handed control of the city secuity hits quarters to the code this political party at up and to commend residents closed through linking could cool to the could this region of capital b u a 100 kilometers to the north. good discount to approach is followed, and by evening, attend scuse, was in place the

so that will limit the supreme court's powers. a curfew has been imposed in the rocky city of kit a cool capital, one protested was killed and several others injured. security forces disposed rival, demonstrate his demonstrations rather by kurdish and our residents of the code. as don democratic parties return to the political davina lock went up and was following developments from the capital of baghdad. violence include cook, the multi ethnic cities residents due to discrete saturday goods, one side rips, and if need to come in on the other good cook about 265 kilometers north of baghdad has long been at the heart of dispute between the rocks assembly between them is code this region, no thought is in the capital of thought about that handed control of the city secuity hits quarters to the code this political party at up and to commend residents closed a route linking could cook to the could this region of capital b, u a 100 kilometers to the north. a good discount to protest this followed and by evening attend scuse, was in ple

unlike every other federal official, supreme court justices are not bound by a code of ethical conduct. they are the most powerful judges in america, and yet, they are not required to follow the most basic ethical standards. what we are considering will change that. it would require the supreme court to adopt an enforceable code of conduct. it would also add new recruit results and transparency requirements to federal law. and this, way it would bring all nine justices of the supreme court and lined with every other federal judge in america. required a code of conduct for supreme court justices should not be controversial. historians and legal scholars from across the political spectrum agree that legislation, and closing a code of conduct of the supreme court, is necessary and well within congress's congressional authority. members of this committee on both sides of the aisle have a long lead efforts to make the supreme court more accountable and transparent. in 2021, our colleague, senator cohen, along with our colleagues, editor cohen's, introduced the courthouse ethics and transparency act. this would require

the power to separate, the supreme leader said, if they deal with us, the famous promise we will deal with them with more severity, giving in to the unjust demands of everyone, and the enemy is serious in his enmity and in his own plans, and we are also very serious in confronting the enemy . development of management and resources of the ministry of health said that we have reached an understanding with the national employment organization and the planning and budget organization for the recruitment of 75,000 medical personnel. we did and this project is in the licensing phase of 25 thousand people simplified in various fields, both in the field of health , in the field of treatment and in the field of medical emergency. 25 thousand people, the exam booklet will be published on the same day , god willing, the exam will be held in october and the recruitment ceremony will be held from the beginning of november. and the selection of this 25,000 will be finalized in accordance with the opening of the project, god willing, afghan 1402 will be 25,000 to the second , and the recruitment ad

power to bring non- judges to disciplinary responsibility two years ago, this session hall voted that contrary to the constitution, and this is my deep conviction , contrary to the constitution, the supremeouncil of justice de facto de facto took away this authority by creating some institute of disciplinary inspectors, which is not provided for by the constitution, and this institute of disciplinary inspectors was given certain powers to decide on consideration of disciplinary proceedings against judges, that is, in fact, instead of the constitutional body of the supreme council of justice, some people tell me that this is not the case, but look, and then once the vrp also considers this issue. in the final case, i gave this very simple and clear example to the honorable chairman of the committee several times. if , god forbid, the chairman wants to get married, then i will choose his wife, and let him get married, and then it will mean that he is married. they offer us approximately the same model for the work of the supreme council of justice, taking away constitutional powers from the constitutional body, so they will then consider the conclusions of the disciplinary inspectors, and

so saying, basically the courts in israel and especially the supreme court, has too much power. they always sold, it's too liberal and too left and they want to see the, the courts powers here, um diminished. tanya, is this hearing likely to change and, and do we have any idea of when the supreme court is going to reach a decision? well, this could take some time. i talk to some expert, they're saying, you know, to take some weeks, but they're hoping to get some idea of what the judge is. i mean, see the 15 dresses sitting there, what they would be thinking over the course of the hearing. this would be broad cost by so to get some kind of hint where they're going as a, as i said, until now the high court of justice has never on another side to basic. so an amendment to it. we're also going to get into a period of the 2 is high holidays and also the connected with only start by mid october. so it could take some time. now what that will decide, we have to see it all depends also a lot of experts saying, how's the government will then respond to it? whether this comfortable go int

wade and maybe that the supreme court has too much power. nd a slight decline this year, but the fact is that we are at double where we were just four years ago, and so americans are overall not that hot on the united states supreme court. >> the slide that you showed me, this is a two to three-year trend and not 50 years, but 2019 here, and it is basically has doubled in people thinking that they have too much power and the same with favorability, and the same with three years ago. >> it has happened very, very fast, and americans' minds have changed rapidly. >> thank you. >> rahel? >> and coco gauff made quite a turn around in flushing turning around to get a win against caroline wozniacki, and the milestones that places her in the likes of serena williams. we will be back. i can see from youour expressin that you find that shocking. ...aaaaaaaand, you don't have ears. book an examam today at americasbest.com. - [mo] if you're thinking about going back to school, this is for you. ♪ - i ended up spending less money my entire time asnhu than

world's superpowers and not let the united ranks of the world's muslims be separated by a 10-power superpower, the supreme, if they are with us. as the famous saying goes, we deal with them more severely. we should not give in to the unjust demands of anyone, and the enemy is serious in his enmity and in his own plans, and we are also extremely serious in confronting the enemy. the american said for the first time that iran has air superiority destroying the united states in the world of the virus. now these days, it says significantly the capabilities and capacity of its ballistic missiles . they have thousands of cruise missiles for ground attack. these enable iran to achieve something that we have achieved. superior compared to its neighbors, iran has achieved their superiority in the world with the power of its cruise missiles, such as the abu mehdi cruise missile with a range of 1,000 kilometers. 11 months ago, a large number of them were delivered to the main armed forces of the missile compared to other cruise missiles manufactured by the islamic republic of iran. shirin experts said that missile r

and my response, that is actually the most important textual check on the supreme in the constitution is congress's express power to impeach supreme court justices. like maybe we don't all agree that that the the stories that the revelations and the propublica reporting gives rise to an impeachable offense. but the notion that congress lacks the authority to decide that question right and to actually investigate whether individual justices have engaged in impeach liable conduct if is both like horrifying to me as a separation of powers person. but such like perfect of the moment we're in and as a civics textbook person, i think texas civics textbook, no, just civics textbooks. it's going to make a generic the part that is striking to me is that in the case congress has made the decision to begin articles of impeachment. there was a mechanism on the other side of that, regardless of how that came out, called an election in which the person in question be held accountable. if these are lifetime appointees, there is no mechanism for all of us to to in at election time on a clarence and this and this and goes back t

there is a single check on the power of the governing coalition, and this is the supreme court. majority in the israeli parliament out of 120 knesset members, if you have 61 knesset members who vote, for instance, to take away voting rights from arab citizens or to ban women from public spaces, the only entity that can intervene and says, "no, you can't do that, "this is anti—democratic," is the supreme court. now the government tries to neutralise the supreme court. in your view, without getting into too much detail about netanyahu's judicial reforms, what he is doing is saying that for far too long, thejudiciary has become something of a closed shop, a self perpetuating elite. "what we are doing," he and his far—right ministers in the most far—right government israel's ever seen, they are changing the system, so the knesset, the parliament, has ultimately much more control, more power over the supreme court. they're not doing away with the supreme court, they're just changing the way judges would be elected. it's very simple. if i would sit here with netanyahu, i would ask him

minister benjamin netanyahu, altering the legal system proposed legislation would limit the powers of supreme court judges to reverse the government decisions. tens of thousands of cubes support as it needs to accompany outside of military base in the capital. make such a day that demanding the departure for about 1500 french soldiers. few imposing the certificate could find ranks of prime minister has been lifted. at least 4 people were killed and several injured off to violence broke out between curtis are open. epic tuchman communities during rivals demonstrations. the 1st tropical storm to direct me hit taiwan and for years has made land full 5 feet high. okay. as far as nearly 3000 people to leave the homes, the national weather departments is expecting heavy rains, strong winds, and high tides, domestic flights being canceled. and businesses have been shut down. so we're, i'm staying with headlines as always, so website out there a dot com. that's the latest on all top stories. and a select is coming, right. i'll see you later. bye. if in september now is india hose, the g 20 summit, wh