susan: we have about 10 minutes left. you wrote about some of the private and local experiments going on. one is national, but also local, habitat for humanity. most people watching are familiar with that. another one is in brooklyn. we have a clip from a founder talking about it in a documentary from 2014. >> the situation in east brooklyn forest families and businesses to leave their neighborhoods. hope seemed lost. ♪ but church leaders were not ready to give up. they crossed denominational lines to work on a rebirth of their community. it came in the form of a housing project named for a man in the bible who resurrected jerusalem. >> some people ask why the churches were doing this. i remember saying that we are people of the resurrection of faith and therefore the best place for resurrection. susan: given the size for the need of low income and affordable housing, can these projects make an important difference? mr. husock: i think so. i should point out that churches did not build those homes alone. a builder who had

>> i hate to say it, susan. years ago we attended the new york mayor's presidential descendants luncheons that they used to have. this is is probably 20, 25 years ago. probably in the last i would say-probably last 5 years people have become more interested and i approached steward, the president of the white house historical association probably six months ago about wanting to do, create an event for the presidential descendants because it's something that just kind of not been done but hopefully going forward we will actually have more reunions. i'm in hope that is we have an annual dinner that we actually will have in different locations around the country and -- and i hope that we will because i think it's so important. we learn so much and we share experiences, you share stories about the presidential families and i just love to be around people that are a lot like me. >> if you had to say your perception of being a president or life in the white house is different than folks who don't have the sisterry bec

susan: how does he use his editorial page?erry: as they say in the delivery, he is very tenacious. he does not believe it is a seven day a week job. it is his life. if anything is happening, he will be there. his family and his newspaper will cover it. he is a very engaged writer and i think he speaks in a voice that is very northwest island. when you read it, you feel engaged and like you're in the community with him. he speaks to his community, he is part of his community and it is his life mission to honor that. >> being familiar with the politics of northwest iowa, does his editorial point of view match that of the greater community? is he often a voice of challenge and change? jerry: the latter. as he describes in storm lake, storm lake is a blue town in a purple county in a red state. i think iowa is going more and more red over the last decade. i think he challenges big business. he challenges his community to do better and be engaged. people who work for large agribusiness find that he is perhaps less than favorable fo

susan, the holidays are coming up. supply shortage, we're facing a massive shortage of rapid tests, which i still don't understand how two years into this we don't have an affordable at-home, reliable test, it's just mind boggling. do you see yourself having a normal holiday season? are you going to be doing what you normally did before the pandemic? >> i actually am. that is my plan. now, to be fair, i don't travel for the holidays, usually, so i will be here in new york. >> must be nice. >> and we typically go out as a family, so, that's what we're doing this year, so, it's not a very extravagant thing, but i do think we have to look at that testing issue. i've been to several different events where you have to be tested within 72 hours and be vaccinated and that allows people to feel more comfortable, but you're spot-on when you say, how is it that we don't have affordable, quick, reliable testing? especially when it comes to our schools, because that's where a lot of the pent up covid frustration actually is, becau

joining me at the table is susan.hington bureau chief for usa today, a veteran political reporter who has written two books. thank you for joining our thanksgiving table. i'm wondering, we will start with covid. it is science. it is a surprising thing to divide americans. none vaccinated americans are the ones dying most of the virus, being more hospitalized. why do you think we are so divided on science? the origins was former president trump. what is keeping americans divided on this issue? susan: it's one of the big surprises to me, the fact that a disease that people see in their own households and families could have such a disagreement about things like if the vaccine works. we know it does. yet you can look at whether someone is vaccinated or not and it tells you about which political party they are aligned with. we are reaching an inflection point in terms of the power of conspiracy theories, like the conspiracy series surrounding covid, and the faith in facts. we've seen that play out not only within the covi

what do you have think, susan?dvise a politician to go out and talk about their vulnerabilities and share their own personal challenge when it comes to things like image and weight and not just policies, but personal struggles? >> you hear a lot of survivors of breast cancer talk about that. there's the big softball game with congressional softball game that sponsors breast cancer awareness. and i think that the problem is is that right now we just went through it, instagram, everyone has a phone. it's very hard to let down your guard because you never know who's coming at you. so politician when is they can be authentic, i just go to that jeff flake moment when he was caught in the elevator during the kavanaugh hearing and saw a rape survivor and he asked for more time, that was an authentic moment that we knew happened. so there can be good that comes from it. >> what's your take, michael? do you think that politicians don't have the same vulnerability or have the ability to be vulnerable and share their concerns

we have susan b. anthony wearing very masculine-looking clothing, her skirt is too short, her boots even have fur on them. in the background we have a women's political rally. this is from 1873, so women were not yet having these kinds of political protests and rallies yet. we also have a woman who is a police officer and two men who are doing domestic tasks including holding a baby and grocery shopping. so very similar to the other images we're looking at, but slightly updated in that we can tell immediately that it's susan b. anthony. and the as was so intent on particularly taking anthony down that the artists actually replicated the eye issue that she had. if you look closely here, you can see that one of her eyes is slightly out of focus. and this was one of the reasons why she often posed in profile, we often think of her in profile, that the artist perhaps knew this and decided to replicate that in this front page illustration for "the daily graphic." suffragists still wanted to appear like the

susan mcconnell: i was, like, super frustrated. chris: susan mcconnell wrote in from stanford. an airline canceled her flight then ignored her refund request for a year. susan: no response to email. no response to the phone call. just dead silence on there and-- chris: two weeks after susan submitted her complaint, the dot pinged her carrier. susan: the next day the airline said, "we're bumping you up in the queue for a refund." chris: in the end, susan got ten grand back in full. to file a dot airline complaint, pick up your smartphone, snap this qr code right here. that's the easy part. be prepared to explain what happened and when. uncle sam will also want to see your documentation, which i'm sure you have. all right, we're gonna stay on the topic of travel and focus on vacation rentals. your host might be watching you or listening in or both. so we decided to look at how to look for spying eyes and ears. chris: if you think cameras are totally forbidden from vacation rentals, i'm afraid you're wrong. your host might be able to have a camera outside the house and inside some

susan: what about you, evan bernick?van: i was actually persuaded by randy's view of the privileged immunities clause. i took an overwhelming amount of evidence that natural rights are protected by the privileges or immunities clause, only to the extent that they are specified in the positive law of the states and protected by the positive law of the states. i learned, having followed randy along that earlier line. the other thing i was surprised to discover involved the equal protection of the laws clause. there were two things i was surprised by. first, the degree to which equal protection has a history within abolitionism, within radical abolitionism. one of the central points that we make over the course of our book is the 14th amendment is a radical amendment not only in the sense that its promises are in the annals of political history more generally unusual, but if the central ideas, the constitutional theory that underpins section one, section five, was developed by beleaguered radical movements toward the beginn

susan: it is a great and provocative question. one important question is could baker have pushed more. it was a process asked to show up and participate in the process as opposed to do something. what he anticipated and what didn't happen was a second term which is an ironclad rule which is take what you can get when you can get it because you might not have the future opportunity. i think this is a classic case not perhaps of failing to use leverage, failing to understand that the movement was potentially going to go away. interestingly the thing i didn't mention that's important is the context of u.s. politics and the partnership with israel. that was also a very different situation than what we have now. stu alluded to this, they were much more willing than their successors to pressure israel and both baker and bush were seen as an older tradition of the republican party closer and more willing to publicly criticize israel. both baker and bush did so very controversially and criticized israeli settlements and showed they were w

and this is why i disagree with susan. better, but because yes, more is coming. yes, bridges and broadband are critical for communities to function. but they are not the same as eliminating the cost of child care, prek, reducing medical prescription costs. things that will be helpful to the inflationary impact we're seeing. next week, it's a drum the democrats should be hitting from the white house, as well as president biden deploys his cabinet. mayors and governors to sell it. monday when he signs the bipartisan infrastructure, i expect him to feam size that more is coming, more cost cutting measures to put money where they need it. i think the other factor here for the president is continuing to contextualize it in a global pandemic that no one planned for, as we know the gop is gearing up their attacks on inflation and blaming it on biden, and a lot is the pandemic and global supply chains as a result. >> i know the audience thanks me in tanks juanita tolliver, and susan del percio. we will do it again. the editor of a

susan: at least -- neil: as many as you have. susan: right.sales, sounds like neil cavuto money because his strike price was 6.24. six bucks, 24 cents. he sold out at $1000. he made about five billion. neil: that is no-brainer. you were in the camp, i'm in the camp too, susan, he doesn't just say wacky things. there is a method to that madness. susan: obviously. of course. he is a very smart man. he is worth $200 billion for a reason. maybe he wanted to get ahead of the possible increase in the capital-gains tax. there is not guarranty that will happen. if the democrats get their way, currently the capital gains tax is 23% and change. the democrats want 8% surtax for people as wealthy as elon musk. i have to exercise the options any way. might as well sell the stock, cap the gains pay 8% less in taxes this year before 2021. neil: there is more to come. he is committed to 20 billion he wants to sell. susan: right. neil: is that the wave of options we're talking about? susan: move them or lose them, from a 2012 compensation package. there will b

susan mickie, thank — what we have at the moment?usan mickie, thank you _ what we have at the moment? susan mickie, thank you very _ what we have at the moment? susan mickie, thank you very much - what we have at the moment? susan mickie, thank you very much indeed. you have been watching a bbc news special. returning travellers must take a pcr test, rules on masks will be tightened in england, and anybody coming in contact with a case of omicron must be isolated. this will slow down the _ omicron must be isolated. this will slow down the spread _ omicron must be isolated. this will slow down the spread of _ omicron must be isolated. this will slow down the spread of the - omicron must be isolated. this will slow down the spread of the new i slow down the spread of the new variant and maximise our defences. to the new rules will be reviewed in three weeks. also on the programme, three weeks. also on the programme, three people die as storm arwen hits the uk with winds of up to 100 mph. and the family and friends of one of those who d

c is still with us juanita tolliver and susan del percio. so susan, think of these challenges, massive social spending bill. a big roadblock in the name of a guy who, despite the motor yacht in the maserati, isn't it for the little guy in west virginia. and then you've got the government funding deadline coming up, and on top of all of it, if you ask people. the number one issue in american homes these days, the price of bacon, what we're paying for gas, and the fear that these prices are going north for a good long while. >> that's right, and brian that should be the target of this administration. let me say this way, the first, second, and third thing that should come out of the president's mouth and everyone around him is, i am going to repair this bridge. i'm going to get broadband to this community. the specific, say what you are delivering, because the president needs, politically, in order to get the other things done, he needs to get his approval numbers up. they are in anywhere from the low 40s to some even in the high 30s. he has t

still with us, don calloway, and susan del percio.don, given what we heard from the house minority leader today, howard argued that republicans will in fact, not just take the house in 2020, two but will exact retribution from democrats? >> will there's a very good chance they will take the house, as unfortunate as that prospect may seem. but not only will they take the house, but as we, saw kevin mccarthy plans to reward plans to elevate members of congress who have done the most absurd things as possible. including, at big kit [inaudible] -- february six was not in this calendar year. it's a next year application of the responsibility of leadership, so, you know, i am worried that they will have the house sooner than i have been around d.c. a long time. this thing lives in [inaudible] . it comes and goes. but i am extraordinarily worried about the worst -- battling predict. not only in the republican party but with people outside who listen to these people. who still consider -- and what behaviors might -- by watching republican lea

is so elizabeth cady stanton and susan b. anthony see the success of distributing a portrait like sojourner truth, they see the interest in them, the ways they can challenge these dominant ideas about women's rights leaders, and they decide to do their own portrait in 1870. you can see that they are more interested in showing a little bit more about their fashion. they've got these lacy kind of shawl and this lacy color, and you can see more jewelry with hem. so they're clearly wealthier than sojourner truth is. but they're really emphasizing that they are leaders of a movement, that you better not cross them and that they are going to be pushing forward together. and this doesn't change anti-women's rights cartoons too much, but it does in one really significant way. and that is the previous illustrations you're looking at often really emphasize nameless, generic women. but once women's individual portraits like susan b. anthony become more familiar, the cartoonists actually identify which suffragists they're making fun of.

susan, that is just one issue out there in the road.other on twitter today, as families gathered for thanksgiving, it will not be talking about new roads and bridges, they will be talking about high gas prices and the cost of thanksgiving dinner. this will only keep president biden's approval ratings in the low 40s. susan, i would add to that, only the point i made to, ashley, the guessing game as to which christmas gifts will be and contain arise chipping off the coast of long beach california. leicester things have killed presidencies then things like inflation. >> that is true. when you start looking at biden's numbers, not just his low approval numbers, but the numbers when you start looking at right direction wrong direction, those wrong direction numbers are in the 60s, and one poll even had hitting 70% wrong direction. right now, and our political system, when those numbers start settling in, it is hard to come out of it. i know a lot of democrats, and a lot of republicans are at home in the congressional districts, and they are

susan: in their prom.with evan standing there writing the words down and crossing work on changing it. that actually happened. susan: i have not watched it but i recommended it to you. i said you should get disney+ to watch this documentary. i was reading the notes how applicable this is to the business world. wilson who is the most famous in new york put a note today i get back in d said it's applicable because it highlights teamwork and how the geniuses get together in different expertise in specialties. stuart: you can see the way that they created the conflicts that they had as they were creating the brilliant music. that is fascinating. that is the end of disney+. susan: isn't that amazing. stuart: i was at the house with my good friend rick and he turned me onto it. i am moving on. the former dow. susan: goldman sachs. stuart: not bad. s&p winners. >> marathon petroleum, they dropped 10% on friday. stuart: nasdaq winners, or any of the big tech. susan: over and over again chipmakers. i went to see in

first martin, stuart, and then susan. mine: delighted to be back at the institute and to be on this panel. i would jump right in. why was -- why did kissinger devote so much time and energy? he was almost entirely devoted to that challenge. it was not his original intention. when he came into government, he knew very little about the least. he traveled six times to israel before that had never traveled there. he did not care to know about it. he thought that there was a stable order in the middle east, in which israeli deterrence -- they basically maintained. nixon was pressing him to do something to stabilize it further. she decided before the war broke out that he would launch an initiative after the elections. he did not believe. therefore, before the war took place, he was never really that interested in making peace. he knew nothing about it and the details. the war changed everything. it came as a surprise to israel and to him. nevertheless, he recognized very quickly that it created an opportunity to do something t

i had susan at the time. i was able to organize where the general said command and ask questions about what was going on. and i think it was that the sort of allowed to stand each other up and going to challenge the way things would be done it is so, yes, i learned from them. she was great and tough and smart but i think we all kind of stood each other up. and this is not just for us. no like you have a baby girl. [laughter] i so determined to change this world for her. >> to think it was for you and have a separate space in the capitol pretty. >> other was really important. it was nice to just have those areas when you had a headache or you wanted to do something or maybe when you wanted to speak out and have a public discussion about a decision you had made. anyone with that sacred space. i think it is helpful pretty. >> were there other places that you would go to be people some of them informally pretty. >> every once in a while but have groups, probably very much bipartisan but we would go out to dinner

so, there is some that totally understandable, but as susan says, this is not universal.re are places where legislators have the last word on what the constitutions mean. other countries think about this very differently. so it's not a novel they think that you have brought up, but it's sort of, unique to the united states that we have this notion of judicial supremacy where the court is the last word and that's of course until the people amend the constitution to say what the last word is to be. >> or until the supreme court changes its mind. >> right. so, that very much gets to jamal's point how the court should see the evil of its ways and part of the story that wilfred is telling we need the court to be countermajortarian. they get life tenure and they can stand up to popular will when popular will is, i think maybe we'll introduce the footnote four idea and we teach in constitutional law in the 1930's that was a case with the famous footnote four where the idea of footnote four is that the court has a special role it has to play a countermajor tarian role if the righ

still with us, don callaway and susan del percio.heard from the house minority leader today, how worried are you that republicans will, in fact, not just take the house in 2022, but but will exact retribution from democrats? >> there's a very good chance they'll take the house, as fortunate as that prospect may seem. not only will they take the house, but as we saw, kevin mccarthy plans to reward, plans to elevate members of congress who have done the most absurdist things possible, including advocating for the killing of -- january 6th was not on this calendar year. it's a next-level abdication of the dismantling of leadership. you know, i'm worried that they'll get the house, but i've been around d.c. a long time. this thing lives and combs and goes. but i'm worried about worried the worst elements being validated with people outside who listen to these people, who still consider them -- what behaviors might they emulate having affiliated these worst behaviors. >> would it be naive to think distrust and reaction can't get any worse

susan: i think john is too pessimistic. of the meeting was to get communications between the two biggest economies in the world back on track and having a normal dialogue where we can actually talk about things and try to resolve problems. i don't think that there is anything inevitable about u.s.-china tensions leading to a conflict. i think president biden does not think so. i don't think any president think so. i think we can certainly foster these kinds of communications. joe biden said they will have follow-on discussions about managing tensions in the security area, follow-on discussions about signaling on taiwan to make sure we get clear communication, and i think in the era of nuclear weapons among major powers, we certainly have to believe, and i believe very strongly, that our governments, leaders, and peoples have agency to keep the two countries from having a conflict, and that is what this meeting was about. i think it was a start. it did not produce a dramatic list of outcomes, but i think it sets the town bac

but as susan said this is not universal. there are places where legislators have the last word on what the constitution's main. other countries think about this very differently. it is not a novel thing you brought up but it is sort of unique to the united states we have the issue of judicial supremacy where the court is the last word and that is of course until the people amend the constitution to say it with the last word is to be picked. >> or the supreme court changes its mind. >> that very much against her jamaal's point how the court should see the evil of its ways. but the counter majoritarian part of what were telling here is we need them to be counter because the judges are insulated they drop the answer to politics federal judges including supreme court justices get life tenure therefore they can stand up to popular will i think maybe he will introduce the footnote idea we also teach in constitutional law but in the 1930s there is with a very famous footnote, footnote four the idea footnote four is the court has a

so hopefully susan you're shouting loud to some of your fellow republican party women. so thanks so much to susan, fernand and erin haynes for breaking down crazy stuff that happened last night. >>> up next on "the reidout" the supreme court is ready to expand the rights of gun owners. i don't understand. >>> and joy's interview with huma abedin and her husband anthony weiner. >> every instance, joy, i really tried to make the best decision for my son and myself to a point where i just couldn't do it anymore. >> you don't want to miss that interview. it could be a major turning point in the pandemic as children begin getting vaccinated. the "reidout" continues after this. the "reidout" coinntues after this wealth is breaking ground on your biggest project yet. worth is giving the people who build it a solid foundation. wealth is shutting down the office for mike's retirement party. worth is giving the employee who spent half his life with you, the party of a lifetime. wealth is watching your business grow. worth is watching your employees grow with it. principal. for al

joining me now, juanita toliver and susan del percio.y, susan, let's read this just-in statement from house gop leader kevin mccarthy. "i talked to congresswoman lauren boebert today. she has apologized for what she said and has reached out to congresswoman omar to meet next week. i spoke with leader hoyer today to help facilitate that meeting so that congress can get back to talking to each other and working on the challenges facing the american people." it feels as if he wrote this statement up, him and his team, and then he went back to what he was doing because nowhere in this team does he say what she said was wrong, what she said was abhorrent, what she said was racist or islamaphobic. what she said inspires hateful speech. none of it. none of it. should we expect more? >> we should expect more from leadership, but kevin mccarthy has shown no leadership so i don't expect more from him because he's incompetent and is just bound to whatever he thinks, and that's the key. whatever he thinks will make donald trump happy. so, that's his

in contrast we have elizabethicaty stanton and susan b. anthony who are far less interested or concerned with appearing domestic or motherly. in fact the expressions on their faces are very different. they look more aggressive, defiant. they have a little bit less to prove. it's not only challenging the anti-womens right cartoons we're looking at, she's also challenging the racist stereo types that are so popular at the time as well. they see the success of distributing a portrait like sojourner truth, the interest in them and the way it can challenge these dominant ideas and decide to do their own portrait. you can see they're more interested in showing a little bit more about their fashion. they've got these lacy kind of shawl and this lacy color and you can see more jewelry with them, so they're clearly wealthier than sojourner truth is, so they're really emphasizing they're leaders of a movement, that you better not cross them and that they are going to be pushing forward together. and this doesn't change anti-womens rights cartoons to

susan banks. >> demon susan: huh.l, i will admit it might not be hard to resist susan-- >> evil kristen: but what about your old flame, kristen? [tense music] ♪ ♪ >> john: i'm seeing things. >> evil kristen: still here. >> john: kristen? >> evil kristen: of course it's me, baby. who else could lead you right into temptation? >> male announcer: like sands through the hourglass, so are the "days of our lives." [soft orchestration] ♪ ♪ >> john: no, you're just another one of lucifer's tricks. >> evil kristen: ouch. that kind of hurts my feelings. >> john: he conjured up my son's dead mother the last time he did this to marlena. >> evil kristen: hmm. right, but i'm not dead. i'm right here, standing in front of you. you can see me. you can hear me. you can even touch me. >> marlena: john. >> john: i'm right here, doc. >> evil kristen: well, hello there, sleepy head. >> marlena: you! >> nicole: you know, you really shouldn't have gone to all the trouble, 'cause i already had dinner. >> ej: not dining fashionably late anymo

joining susan, katherine rivera. so katherine, to what susan was just reporting, this notion that the customer's resilience might be very savvy. trying to buy things now that he or she knows are only going to go up in price later. what do you think is going up? >> that's what's going on. that is correct. the -- it's been front loaded. holiday shopping is happening now because everyone knows that you have to get the dog before it's sold out or before somebody takes it. the fact is there's a lot of shortages and lead team because of the supplies and the supply chain disruptions. i would say that retail sales won'ts remain this strong. the 30-year high. nestle just said costs higher than 5% or increasing at prices higher than 5%, people start to change their methods of purchasing. so certainly if inflation continues, you should expect consumer sentiment to continue to drop. as cost goes higher, you should expect the consumer expect to feel the pain. >> neil: what is interesting when you pick apart walmart numbers. it's

also his wife susan.y lavish lifestyles and it could challenge the existence of one of the most powerful lobbying groups in washington. what led to this unraveling? >> well, it's really interesting because wayne lapierre is an unknown character until this book. right? so the book starts out with this scene at wayne lapierre's wedding to susan in the late '90s and he doesn't show up. his best man is outside with him in the car and says, hey, i don't think you should be getting married today either. puts $100 bill on the dash board. but ultimately wayne lapierre does it hooraying into going through with the wedding. this is very awkward ceremony where he can't even make eye contact with his bride. there's a reason i tell that anecdote and why it's in "misfire." the reason is that wayne lapierre's character is really behind a lot of the financial and legal problems at the nra is in today. that wayne lapierre is a pushover and powerful people inside the nra have realized over time that if you yell at wayne la

susan: that's a big deal.here for 30 years, he told fellow executives the open to leaving the company and he can't fix the problems, this is reported, really harsh criticism internally of sexual misconduct including rape which is very severe, also harassment, federal investigation on and customers like xbox say that they may not be able to work with activision blizzard because of the obligations in 70% of activision. stuart: that is trouble for the company spieth entries before this is a huge game maker, games are bigger than entertainment. stuart: a major upset in a major gaming company. read the end i believe they are down, it is down 7%, that is a drop, what happened to their plans to develop with ford. >> i wanted to ask if you were surprised, they are going their separate ways are not going to collaborate on electric cars together and they struck a deal in 2019 to make an electric car model one day. ford got a very good deal, they got 12% of the company for $500 million in 2019, do you know how much a $50

thank you susan. you're a great mentor and colleague. thank you for being on this panel. the book is called the people's constitution and the genesis for the idea g was in 2016 when we d the ielectoral college failure that gave us donald trump as president. this was the second time that this happened in two decades. fifth time it'sne happened in history. it prompted a question that my co-author and i were asking. why do we accept it? why can't we get rid of it? we knew that americans haed a ad -- had a distaste for the electoral college. itit gave us two presidents we felt were not properly equipped to handle the nation's affairs in the highest office. it still begs this question why aren't we doing anything about it? which led to another question, how did people in history, americans of past generations do something about the flaws they saw in the constitution in the past? you know, that gave a few answers but it really did spark this deep dive into history. one of those answers is people think it's impossible. up with of those answer s people think it's unwise to tamper

susan, what is it, and i mean this sincerely, will they ever learn messaging?see no proof that that will happen, as of this point in time. and it's hard, because republicans boil things down into inflation. you're facing inflation. where is democrats want to give you an economic 1:01 lesson into why you may see inflation, but it's really not that, bad and it's gonna come down, and don't worry about, plus we have this legislation that is going to help, we've got your back. i'm telling you, trust us. it doesn't work like that, brian, people go to the grocery store, they see higher prices. they fill up their gas tank, it costs more. and they are not feeling the impacts, the actual good economic news. and that's what i think the issue is with democrats messaging, is that they talk at the voters, instead of talking with them. instead of, i feel your pain, they say i know what your pain is and i'm here to fix it. that's a problem. >> i got one for you susan, democrats should continue this free advice from an ad man, this is donny deutsch earlier on this network talki