and i guess i'm saying that could mean subject to the sutro bierman. or is that not clear when that. >> at your suggestion is that the epa could rely on this procedure act. >> whatever procedural acquirements and strained the epa wanted to prove this, those were the same procedural ironman that constrained the epa in this way. and we are just asking. both have to be subject to the same procedural requirements in the epa can act differently as long as they are acting within that same set of rules. >> we don't think that is a construction of this. they offer this to make corrections and it says specifically that the corrections must be made in the same manner as the decision being corrected and it went through a notice on, they have to go through notice and comment as well. if the decision went through formal adjudication, then it must also go through formal adjudication and they don't try to make that about what this means. they're just trying to say that the good exception to notice this will make them carried over here. >> i think that they are trying