also with respect to item no. 6 regarding a proposed medical care of those dispensary at sutter st., the parties have jointly requested this matter be who reqsumed in january. goo>> i guess what the fed is dg may have influenced that, but i would move to reschedule. >> is there any public comment on that item? seeing none, call the roll please. >> on that motion to continue appeal 11-069 on january 18, 2012. [calling votes] the vote is 4-0. the appeal is rescheduled to generate 18. >> moving to the first item, which is public comment. is there any member of the public who wishes to speak on an item that is not on the agenda? seeing nine, item two, which is commissioner comments and questions. >> i want to announce i will be and who absent for the october meeting. >> we will move to item no. 3, which is adoption of minutes. for your consideration are the meeting who menace -- meeting minutes. >> comments? i will move for adoption. any public comment on minutes amonte who will call the roll please. >> on that motion to adopt the minutes. [calling votes] lotus 4-0. those are adopted. >>

passes unanimously and brings us back to item 16a and b. 300 grand avenue also known as 272 and 290 sutter st.. request for the amendments for approval for the previously amended compliance under the 309 and 309 j. >> good evening. this is a request to the amendment of previously approved in section 309 termination of compliance in order to extend the performance. for three years. the project also requires extension of a variance from planning code sections 136d1 and 140, under the purview of the administrator. has approved by the planning commission on june 12, 2008, it would demolish to existing buildings to construct a new 10 story building to contain approximately 45 dwelling units, 16,000 square feet of ground and retail space, and up to 40 parking spaces. with the exception of building height and building ball. the zoning administrator are proved a variant for dwelling units exposure and projections of streets and alleys at the same june 2008 hearing. no modifications are proposed to the design or intensity of the project as originally approved. since project packets were submitted, tho

these poor patients, they will have no doctor to get to and i'm wondering if sutter is retaliating against physicians practicing at st. luke's and are expressing their concerns to the plan. this is the only hospital south of market besides san francisco general. many poor patients depend on this. they're going to lose their primary care physicians, i do not want to try to speculate what's going to happen. thank you. president olague: thank you. if i have called your name, you can please come up. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am speaking on behalf of nancy bell and then -- dr. nancy bohnnon. i have been practicing at st. luke's as an endocrinologist for 35 years. i am speaking to register my disappointment with cpnc and call upon the planning commission to hold to their charity care obligations and demand cpnc support the doctors treating the low-income population served by st. luke's hospital instead of driving the out. as a physician who does clinical research as well as patient care and publishes an presents medical papers on and a chronology, i've maintained my practice at st. luke's for all these years beca