suzanne maloney: i think it is hard to say.he iranians have done a good job of avoiding the blame for the delays in the process up till this point, and it really has been washington that has invested the most to try to bridge gaps where they have appeared. i think a real danger in not getting a deal over the course of the next 48 to 72 hours is what we saw after the last round, the sides came together in late march, negotiated round-the-clock for some days, and actually came to this legal framework in switzerland that was hailed as a big step forward, and then went away, and by the time they came back to the negotiating table, there was a lot of work to be done in terms of solidifying the positions they both achieved in that critical framework, so they effectively had to renegotiate some of what they had already agreed upon, and i think one of the dangers, and one of the incentives keeping everyone at the table right now is that we are this close. we know it will take work to get back to this point if we all disappear for a wee

suzanne maloney: it is still a minority danger. i think the administration has done a good job of effectively co-opting congress. they want to be out in public with their views on this, but in the end, i think it will be very difficult for republicans and other opponents of the deal to pull together a coalition of 66 or 67 senators who are prepared to override a presidential veto, a vote of disapproval, of any kind of agreement with iran. there is a danger that the 60-day period provides for more public antics on the part of congress, as well as some sense of dissatisfaction on the iranian side that the agreement they may have committed to one of take that much longer to see a fresh phase of implementation. ian: do you accept that, gary? that is interesting. a majority of americans say they want to deal with this point. gary samore: i think the outcome of the congressional review has to deal with the substance. the substance of the agreement. if the agreement includes strong provisions for inspection and monitoring strong limits ,

suzanne maloney of the brookings institution and gary samore of harvard's kennedy school. >> bad behavior's never been a direct function of the resources available to it. some of the worst abuses at home and around the region by the islamic republic occurred in the '80s at time of tremendous constrain due to the war of iraq and other issues. so i'm not concerned reflux as a result of sanctions release will alter what we know to be a problematic foreign policy. >> bremmer: we look at china's stock market crash we're joined by former prime minister of australia, kevin rudd. >> let's just understand this is a significant correction in the market. you've got chinese assets which have been overprized, even against a basic analysis with their standard price ratios. but to draw too much implication from this in terms of, number one, the overall performance of the market in recent times to what it means to the economy in general and, three the direction of reform, i think we need to take a calmer perspective. >> bremmer: finally, a look back at charlie's 2004 interview with former saudi former mini

ian: i asked that question to suzanne maloney, who is a strong expert on iran.'t you think the iranians are going to misbehave and she said there's no reason to believe that. the president charlie: alluded to that himself. we are not -- charlie: we are not naive. ian: i think it is a good deal for the u.s. but i have to recognize, i'm not just in the tank for this deal. i think there are problems with it. i don't think the iranians are gagging to have a nuclear weapon tomorrow. they were getting closer to it and it gave them more leverage. but the existence of this interim deal was not bad for the u.s. and we signed this deal too quickly. the iranian government understood that the best deal they were ever going to get signed and implemented was under obama and carry. they knew anyone else likely to become president and 2017 they were likely to have a much more significant challenge. charlie: including hillary clinton. she would be much tougher on iranians. ian: i believe so. implementation, including congress, was going to take eight months. that meant as we got