federation, since there was no direct intent to commit this crime zhukov in the actions of svetlana ivanovna zhukova to the subjective nature mistakenly perceived everything that happened on the night of march 25 with the participation of her husband, as well as employees of the traffic police, including inspector yezhovkin zhukov, was conscientiously mistaken in what was happening. in addition, there is no evidence in the case that there was a sign of knowledge in the actions of the defendants, and that the defendants, by their actions, prevented the establishment of the truth in the case, violated the normal functioning of the judicial system and the investigating authorities. what could violate the interests of justice. in your part in during operation, the vacuum cleaner makes an unpleasant noise, although during the demonstration it was explained to the court that if he changes the demonstration nozzle for a dust bag, the noise will disappear, but after the highest action, the noise not only did not disappear. it got even more nasty and now, if you look at the diagram, uh, you can very much you

zhukova svetlana ivanovna, being a witness in a criminal case, knowingly gave false testimony, accusingson of committing a cup crime, under the following circumstances, in the investigator's office during the preliminary investigation, zhukova svetlana ivanovna was interrogated as a witness in a criminal case against her husband, accused under the second part of the article 306 of the criminal code of the russian federation, namely, deliberately false denunciation, being warned in the manner prescribed by law before interrogation about a criminal responsibility for the task of deliberately false testimony, deliberately, in order to help the latter avoid criminal liability, gave deliberately false testimony, and the innocence of her husband, namely, indicated that police officer izhovkin afanasy yegorovich exceeded his official powers by using violence again from 24 to 25 march 2013 in relation to her husband accusing, thereby the victim of committing a serious crime. danilov andrey nikodimovich, being in a state of intoxication in a car that belonged to the victim kipian zaurushalovich