to whom the decision relates without the presence of a lawyer that that is what we see at svyatoslav lytynsky'sey come home in large numbers and begin to search why this is done. this is exactly how this question is actually open , because it is the norm of the criminal process, they they provide for a softer order, they provide for voluntariness, why is this done quickly and as sharply as possible, uh, i can't explain, but hmm, what is also very noticeable in such cases, uh, there is a decision on the person on the basis of which the search is carried out, uh, the decision clearly has a defined list of materials, things, documents, which should be and for which the court gives permission to seize e.e., in the case of stanislav, i think that this is no longer a secret in the case of svyatoslav litenskyi, and during the search of him , money was seized, well, quite insignificant of quantities yes, but the resolution gave permission for the seizure, including with computer equipment, we sat next to each other in the computer equipment, we printed out the protocol of the search on svyatoslav's pri