if we held every position up to albert sweitzer. every position is not going to be albert sweitzer.so fair how teachers get characterized that way. besides, had a heart attack and almost died as a result of what they were doing. the other thing, i do have one disagreement with you. my disagreement is that i don't think it's true that a teacher has to reflect the ethnicity of the student hears she is teaching. i really don't believe that. if we did, we would stop the start hiring teachers on their ethnicity. >> i don't think it's a requirement but i think it's more helpful. like i said anybody can learn from anybody. the proportions are out of whack if we could get closer to representation than i think that would be better. i agree, i don't think we should create rigid systems for that but we need more role models i can understand why you would want to leave it, having worked in that field from many years myself. what you did establish in the way they did except to tells me were a good teacher and you have heart and soul. >> i appreciate that, more than you can know. i hate to be so

so let me turn it over to doc sweitzer. thank you, doctor. >> thank you, jennifer.a real honor to be here and to be part of respectability. i was talking to jennifer earlier and i said i've been running in campaigned for 35 years, seven and campaigned all around the world. and i've heard about every issue, part about veterans issues and seniors issues and the young and the old and students and small business. and rarely, if ever, have i heard about the issue of people with disabilities. in fact, i choked, i said i've heard more about endangered species, the fight for endangered species in the 56 million people with disabilities in this country. so it's a real honor to be involved with respect to respectability a decrepit great session here today, a great deal. we are going to talk about reaching voters by electronic communications making it more accessible. and i'm going to introduce it to the top a little bit about campaigns and messaging of campaigns. i have a distinguished panel. no, right is sheila newman, president of the new additions, a great new company. new

. >> peter sweitzer wrote the book on the clinton foundation. also president of the government accountability institute and author of "clinton cash" the untold story of how and why foreign governments and businesses helped make bill and hillary rich. also, good of you to be here this evening. so,. >> thank you? what do you make of all the latest here as far as her blaming collin powell for things happening with her email? >> >> well, you know, it's remarkable, it fits the clinton pattern about oftentimes blaming other people or not wanting to take responsibility. it's the same thing with the clinton foundation. they have been taking, kicking and dragging over the last 18 months that it's inappropriate, was inappropriate for her as secretary of state for her to take foreign money and now are they admitting that now it doesn't hook like if he becomes president. the problem if it's not appropriate for you to do while you are president why was it appropriate for you to do while you were secretary of state. >> there are still a lot of questions surro

. >> the book by peter sweitzer "clinton cash" shows how they enriched their family at america's expense under scrutiny for its close contact with the state department while hillary clinton was secretary. >> has hillary clinton apologized for turning the state department into a pay for play operations where favors are sold to the highest bidder. >> reporter: the clinton campaign denies any pay-to-play allegations. in fact the candidate has defended the foundation's work. >> we have so much that we are proud of and i will put that up against any of the innuendo and accusation coming from donald trump, because the work that has been done has garnereding a lathe ladies and appreciation from every corner of the world because it has been so far-sided, visionary and effective. >> reporter: but republicans jumped on the new announcement. the rnc releasing a statement saying if everything was above board while hillary clinton ran the state department as the clintons have said, then why change a thing? also of note, mr. clinton, who stopped getting paid speeches said thursday night, she'd keeptat

sweitzer was more on the moderate side. donald trumps victim. -- pants is interesting. there is an attempt to try to broadeninggates by your desirability to the populace. work.mes it doesn't with interesting question hands, i think what he did with him is to guarantee that the convention itself would not be a problem. i think the vice presidential candidate is usual not terribly meaningful during the course of the campaign. mike pence will be getting headlines that would be bigger than donald trumps won't work. the thing about foreign policy interesting. if you look at kissinger's reputation, his reputation on the right with people that were be onite who would today the ted cruz side of things. where it is risen substantially since then. some of this is simply about positioning of the moment. it's about making sure that you place your opponent in a category. reagan was really at that i asnk with ford, what reagan resident would have done in 1975 is very unclear. what he did as president after 1980 is he took the framework of detente and added a much stronger military pr

then contemporary extortion by peter sweitzer, it's been around for a while but i'm going to read it again. why are the politics broken. everyone back home thinks there is a left-wing, right-wing wing, right wing war going on between the parties and the factions. i talked to bernie sanders at a white house christmas party and he shared my view that that's not the case. most of the case has to do with may be in the middle and doling out $4 trillion to the insiders and cronies up here in d.c. i think that's a stronger explanation for why the politics are broken and he explores that pretty well. money correlated with elections and committee assignments and everything appeared, voting records etc. he traces. he traces them all out with footnotes and evidence. the next one is a shameless plug, it's called american underdog by a congressman named david pratt so i am plugging my own stuff. it's wide ranging. i had a friend help me put it together but i put together lecture notes over 20 years when i taught economics and basic lee, i ran on the republican creed and since then i went a little

the next one, more contemporary extortion by peter sweitzer. i read it a few years back. i'm going to give it another look, why are the politics broken? everyone back home seems to think there's a right-wing, left-wing war going on between the parties and the factions of the right-wingers and left-wingers, talk, talk to bernie sanders at a white house christmas party. he shared my view that is not the case. most of of the case has to do with maybe the middle and dolan out $4 trillion to the insiders and cronies appear in dc. that i think is a stronger stronger explanation of to why the politics is broken. so i think schweitzer addresses that well. money correlated correlated with elections, correlated with committee assignments, correlated with everything appear, putting records, etc. he et cetera. he traces them out with footnotes and evidence. the next one is a shameless plug, it's called american underdog by congress men named david bratt. so i plug in my own stuff. it is wide-ranging. i had a friend help me put it together but i sent previous books i put together, lec