ok, so we have a motion from commissioner swigg to adopt the august 19th minutes and on that motion -- (role call) item four is the revision of the minutes and discussion of possibly revision to make a correction to the statement made by zach carnazes. the proposal is to remove the last sentence wherein he says, he stated that he would only be able to present his item if it was first on the agenda. and so the proposal is to remove that sentence from the minutes. >> is there a motion to adopt the revised minutes? >> adopt. >> any public comment on that motion? if so, please raise your hand. commissioner tanner. before we go to public comment, commissioner tanner, did you have a question? >> no, there was a public comment and i just wanted to abstain from voting because i wasn't at that meeting. >> we've had advice previously from the city attorney's office that you need to participate in the vote. >> ok. and i've been in that same situation, commissioner tanner, so you do need to vote. >> we do have mr. carnazez would like to provide public comment. >> speaker: the statement i just mad