commissioner swiney. >> okay i have an idea based upon what commissioner sag guy 88 [spelling?] said in terms of possibility because the cap actually accomplishes nothing and i think it was after the negotiations and basically there are attempts to get something that could pass through the board and this was put forward as a possibility and try to get some votes from a number of supervisors but i think the more logical way, to do it to have a time situation. not a number situation. and may be, in two years, i would say, after the package of this, is to come back to the planning commission and the board of supervisors for action and the action would be continue as is, modify or revise. and that would be my motion. the motion also would include the two things that staff asked for having it include part of 340 location part infinite planning code, i believe you asked for had a and then the minimum open space of ten square feet per unit and basically would be a 24 months report back and it's more than a report it would actually have to be an action item that the commission and the b