for more on the situation in syria we now talk to more what call for a member of the syrian social club a pro-government group supporting a reforms he joins us from london now moscow's against taking sides in the conflict while the resolution adopted in the u.n. general assembly puts the blame solely on the regime how damaging is this difference of opinion. right well we're seen yesterday in the in the security council is the general assembly taking basically one side hearing one side of the conflict for the both sides of obviously it wasn't balance had the general assembly been made aware of a little atrocities that were taking place against those people who support president assad including civilians by the way probably people who all of the states would have voted different this has to different basically two different objectives aid to send a message to people on the ground in syria to keep on fighting that the international community will come to their help basically and i believe falsely providing them with hope or false hope and second to squeeze the international powers that act

and i walk out thanks so much for your time joining us live there in london a member of the syrian social club thanks thank you very much. well the level has been talking to his cross talk guests and ask them just how far the international community can go interfering into series domestic affairs and here's a taste of what's coming up in full for you at seven thirty pm g.m.t. . the power of the security council is precisely the problem in these situations we've always had great power interventions with or without security council approval philip's idea of sovereignty is being inviolability is totally out of date and has been for at least twenty years the notion that states consider themselves to be beyond any external interference i mean we had the genocide convention in one nine hundred forty eight before a myriad international treaties since then recognizing some role for the international community in intrastate affairs and that's that's all i welcome the problem is that i. disagree with what i've been saying this idea of. sovereign impunity is purely there to protect governments so that th

embassy there for more insight on all of this we're joined by i'm arwa cough a member of the syrian social club in london so first of all as a syrian what's your view of russia's diplomatic efforts to settle the conflict in your country. well basically the diplomatic efforts you know are you know put into two segments a the segment who wants to be proactive who wants to find a solution to the segment who is interested only in regime change now what we have called for from the very beginning is that you know the regime or the syrian government is strong by the way president assad still commands a comfortable majority in syria according to a recent opinion poll by a conducted by hugo fifty five percent of syria said they did not want him to go now faced with that fact you cannot force the whole country like syria to change its president so the only you know constructive way is used to be proactive about this we have factions and let's see how we can mediate a let's see how we can guarantee that no more bloodshed all little block is going to be allowed so i think the russian approach is the basica

and a member of the syrian social club told me a little earlier that he believes there's a very big difference between what the people of syria see and what the international community sees. we've noticed since the very start of this problem in syria the west in general did not welcome and ridiculed actually every single reformists to the syrian government promised to do or actually took all these steps were either not mentioned at all by the international media or pretty kewl somehow as being either too little too late or not sufficient or you know their credibility are not ok this is i believe to try to undermine the syrian government's commitment towards reform what the international community needs to understand is what syrians view on the ground is very different apparently from what everybody here is in the in the international media or the mainstream media and in that sense people i wouldn't say totally united behind the current government but they view it as their best option so as not for the country not to collapse because everybody is afraid of what to come next should the central g

has admitted al qaeda is working alongside syria's armed opposition a marble call from the syrian social club a pro-government group believes washington's realized it's actually fighting alongside a terrorist group. i never thought that the americans would want to publicly admit that our is actually operating in syria what we know for sure is that. clear involvement had started with dignity by amazon while hearing the head of al qaeda back in july calling for jihad in syria and nobody actually took notice that when the first suicide bombings in damascus took place there less than twenty four hours before that huge explosions. in iraq they carried the same fingerprint now the american position is very interesting it just says that her hang on a minute this is a an enemy that we want to fight and suddenly they're operating in the same theater that we're trying to overthrow this government and perhaps it may signify the americans are trying to understand what the syrian president had said previously that there might be tens of landslides in the in the region if they keep pressuring the syrian go