and the t.a. board decide to do this, the funds are available. if not, the category does not incur financing costs. but there's steps that need to be taken before the decisions are made and m.t.a. will be back to the c.a.c. and the board to present on this cost benefit analysis of doing this. and i wanted to note that even with the accelerated schedule there's a funding gap. and the funding gap is from $17 million as an accelerated schedule to about $56 million at a standard schedule. and so a bit of a hole to plug. but just wanted to highlight that we're -- we're, you know, hoping to get these vehicles on the street as fast as possible. next category is to support these vehicles literally and figuratively to advance some of the facility projects that would support the new and expanded fleet as you can see here. and there's a project that is a potential project that is a very large project and so we'll see that project advance through both the facilities muni category and the discretionary category and there's discretionary funds that would be av

back as 20 -- 2004 in the san francisco transportation plan, this board, in his other role as a t.a. board, adopted a plan that recommended removing parking minimums and setting maximums instead. so following through on this will be a way of completing this recommendations that were set 14 years ago. thank you for your time. >> good afternoon. i am speaking on behalf of the neighbors for density which is a urban group. i will not repeat all the other comments that folks have made but one thing i wanted to emphasize, we are not locking anything in stone. we are allowing for flexibility in future projects as possible. we understand and are aware of the fears about parking and congestion that exist in a lot of the city. it does not change the rules on any of those projects. it just means we can continue to have conversations. it reduces the amount of congestion within a neighborhood and not add to it. will be able to talk to community members around the city and explain this is something that will make straits -- make streets less congested. we look forward to trying to continue to spread tha

board. you should realize that. >> chairman peskin: thank you for those comments. seeing no other public comment, public comment is closed, and the t.a. is adjourned, but please stick around, because we're going to reconvene as timma for one item. >> clerk: timma board meeting will start in five minutes. [ five-minute break ] >>> good afternoon, colleagues, and welcome to the most exciting part of our day today, the board meeting of the treasure island mobility management agency. please contain your excitement. our clerk today is alberto quintanilla, and i'd like to take a moment to thank felix and charles at sfgov tv for broadcasting our meeting and ensuring it is available online. mr. clerk, do we need to take roll? >> clerk: yes. [ roll call ] >> chairwoman kim: can you call items two, three, and four together? >> clerk: items two, items three, item four, approve the minutes of the june 26, 2018 meeting. this is an action item. >> chairwoman kim: thank you, colleagues, this meeting is somewhat apropos after our deep dive and discussion into congestion management and mobility management in our sfcta committee meeting, and this is r

eight years that i've been on the board have felt not heard, and it does fly in the face and feels like disrespect. but i also have positive work experiences with the t.a. staff, and i know that maria lombardo, it's not personal. i'm not making excuses for everyone, i just want to acknowledge that i was uncomfortable with the exchange, and affirm that i can connect and be empathetic to supervisor fewer's frustration, and also just want to acknowledge, maria, i think to your staff and tilly do do a good job and are thoughtful, and i'm hopeful, mr. chair, that perhaps with your leadership, will be able to reconcile this incident. when we move forward, it does respect everyone's perspective. i hope that you've heard supervisor fewer and received it. like supervisor fewer, she said it's not personal, but she's coming from a very raw place and that is what we are experiencing and hearing. thank you. >> chair peskin: thank you for those comments. commissioner ronen? >> supervisor ronen: yes. i also wanted to chime in here because as a supervisor that is constantly advocating for the east side of the city that deals with so much development and homelessness a