why don't we sever out the t.d.m. branding matter at $154,200, and is there -- can we sever that out. and by commissioner yee. and seconded by commissioner breed. we will do that without objection. on the balance of item six, is there a motion to move that forward? made by commissioner breed. seconded by commissioner yee. we can take that same house, same call. and now on the balance of item six, $154,000 -- i'm sorry? mr. taylor, the action was that we just approved the allocation of $2.53 million. we just approved the signal modifications at $1.218 million. the signal upgrades at $175,000 t business relocation, t.d.m. at $383,000 and the signal upgrades at $65 # 5,000 and did not yet consider the transportation demand management program. and which we will now consider is there a motion one way or the other on the main $154,200 of the prop k request. >> i will make a motion to disapprove it. >> motion made to disapprove the $154,200. seconded by commissioner sheehy, and on that item, a roll call please. >> on item 6

that was the number one project that came out of the initial t.d.m.trategy and was also one of the top early ideas for the t.d.m. plan. in terms of the cost, it is staff time to manage the contract, to and to engage multi-city agency effort. we have a lot of agencies that touch and offer t.d.m. that a lot of coordination that goes there. and this is about $60,000 who and to increase the power of our outreach. >>