t.e. lawrence, and the sense in the kind of romantic consecutivism of the last century. the 19th century and the 20th century in which the arab was incredibly idealized in a way, and the jew if you think about the trollops way we live now, is the modernity, so there's a slightly golf club, patronizing snobbery about the jew. pound had it and again, very much a european style. but there's no doubt you're right there is a degree of something unhinged, hostility towards israel government policy. i'm not a great admirer of current israeli poll simple i'm sort of peace now, but i'm a zionist. i believe in the jewish state and the palestineish state. i'm a two-state solution person. but has it shadowed into without daring to call itself that, a kind of anti-semitism? the answer is, yes, in my view. and it's something actually which friends of mine who are jewish public intellectuals -- a phrase which slighma

t.e. lawrence to david kilcullen, leads me to believe that we need a larger security forces. >> larger than the current and- strength? >> yes, sir. >> general, do you also believe -- in your judgment, will the afghan army need to get a significantly higher end-of strength than 134,000? >> yes, that is my belief right now. >> in terms of the pakistan situation -- and here, general, he made reference to this -- would you agree that assistance to pakistan would only be affected if the pakistani government is considered by the people of pakistan as taking the fight to the insurgents because of their own needs as a nation, not because of u.s. pressure? >> yes, sir, i do. >> admiral, do you want to give a quick comment on that? >> yes, sir, i do. >> the general mcchrystal, are you familiar with the national solidarity program in afghanistan? >> yes, sir. >> do you have an opinion of its success? >> i want to learn more when i get on the ground, but from what i've seen here, it is very successful and very positive. >> relative to the question of detainees, and you make brief reference to it, gener