wrong that isn't nothing to do a presumption of innocence you understand that i understand that mr taaffe few days ago you were warning and you were trying to evade the point is that only is that if you got somebody who would be arrested let the court decide whether he's guilty or not by simply asking that you should let him go without going through a due process of the law is a stream erosion of the rule of law and you are seeing there how on your high horse and you're telling me that the bill is rooted in the rule of law and yet you are pointing to me at the same time that freedom giving freedom or letting the arrest go free is not erosion of the rule of law you holland how could you have such double standard you warned a few weeks ago a few days ago that if things got worse the chinese army might consider taking to the streets you said when there's trouble in hong kong when things turn sour there's violence in our street our fear is that if the police are not able to control what is happening here there's a remote risk the chinese army would get involved. how remote is that risk if it'